A pedagogic compact: retrieving ‘powerful’ educational knowledge from Didaktik and curriculum studies

References

• Alexander, R. (2004). Still no pedagogy? Principle, pragmatism and compliance in primary education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764042000183106
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, B., Hoadley, U., & Morgan, J. (Eds.) (2018). Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, B., & Rata, E. (Eds.). (2014). Knowledge and the future of the curriculum: International studies in social realism. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beard, P., & Morrow, W. (Eds.). (1981). Problems of pedagogics: Pedagogics and the study of education in South Africa. Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (2nd ed.). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.582255
   Google Scholar
• Bladh, G., Stolare, M., & Kristiansson, M. (2018). Curriculum principles, didactic practice and social issues: Thinking through teachers’ knowledge practices in collaborative work. London Review of Education, 16(3), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.3.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böttcher, W. (2014). Curriculum, evaluation and control in Germany. In W. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (2nd ed., pp. 201–207). Routledge/AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, L. (1996). A singular history? The development of German perspectives on the social analysis of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569960170205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (1994). On the neglect of pedagogy in educational studies and its consequences. British Journal of In-Service Education, 20(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305763940200103
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015a). Michael Young, knowledge and curriculum: An international dialogue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1101492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015b). Bringing curriculum theory and didactics together: A Deweyan perspective. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 24(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1083465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2018). Rethinking teaching and teachers: Bringing content back into the conversation. London Review of Education, 16(3), 371–383. https://doi/10.18546/LRE.16.3.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (2017). The didaktik/curriculum dialogue; what did we learn? In M. Uljens & R. Ylimaki (Eds.), Bridging education leadership, curriculum theory and Didaktik (pp. 219–227). SpringerOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1961/2002). Moral Education: A study of the theory and application of the sociology of education. trans. E. Wilson and H. Schnurer. Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Enslin, P. (1984). The role of fundamental pedagogics in the formulation of educational policy in South Africa. In P. Kallaway (Ed.), Apartheid and education (pp. 139–147). Ravan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, A. (Ed.). (1889). Sonnenschein’s cyclopaedia of education: A handbook of reference on all subjects connected with education (it’s history, theory and practice comprising articles by eminent educational specialists. S. Sonnenschein and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gallison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of micro-physics. The Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, J. (2014). Sequencing rules as a condition of knowledge structure. In B. Barrett & E. Rata (Eds.), Knowledge and the future of the curriculum: International studies in social realism (pp. 169–180). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, E. (1973/2003). Selected philosophical themes, vol. 1: Cause and meaning in the social sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., Hudson, B., Olin-Scheller, C., & Stolare, M. (2018). Powerful knowledge, transformations and the need for empirical studies across school subjects. London Review of Education, 16(3), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.3.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundem, B., & Hopmann, S. (Eds.). (1998). Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue. Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. (1999). The pedagogic paradox (or why no didactics in England). Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 7(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681369900200048
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D., & Gudmundsdottir, S. (1994). Didaktik and/or curriculum? Curriculum Studies, 2(3), 245–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965975940020305
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Burn, C. (2015). English history teachers’ views on what substantive content young people should be taught. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(4), 518–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1122091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (1974). Knowledge and the curriculum. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, U. (2010). Tribes and territory: Contestation around curriculum in South Africa. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies in South Africa: Intellectual histories and present circumstances (pp. 125–176). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.109
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (2015). ‘Didaktik meets curriculum’ re-visited: Historical encounters, systematic experience, empirical limits. NordSTEP, Nordic Journal of Studies in Education Policy, 1(2), 14–21. https://doi.org/103402/nstep.v1.27007
   Google Scholar
• Hordern, J. (2017). Bernstein’s sociology of knowledge and education(al) studies. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 191–210). Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hordern, J. (2018). Is powerful educational knowledge possible? Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1427218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlacher, R. (2017). The educated subject and the German concept of ‘Bildung’: A comparative cultural history. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2018). Powerful knowledge and epistemic quality in school mathematics. London Review of Education, 16(3), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.3.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (1995). Didactic analysis as the core of preparation of instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027950270103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger, R. (2008). The significance of the concepts ‘elemental’ and ‘fundamental’ in didactic theory and practice (G. Yonge, trans). Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(2), 215–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270701332267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landman, W., Van der Stoep, F., Van Zyl, P., & Van Niekerk, P. (1979). Simposium oor die eenheid van die pedagogiek (Symposium on the unity of pedagogy)(G. Yonge trans). South African Journal of Pedagogy,13(1), 159–196. http://www.landmanwa.co.za/landman_occlect.htm
   Google Scholar
• Langeveld, M. (1960). Educational responsibility. Symposium: A Journal for Education in Southern Africa, 1, 43–44.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grange, L. (2008). The didactics tradition in South Africa: A reply to Richard Krüger. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270701832498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Grange, L. (2010). South African curriculum studies: A historical perspective and autobiographical account. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies in South Africa: Intellectual histories and present circumstances (pp. 177–200). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grange, L. (2014). Curriculum studies in South Africa. In W. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (2nd ed., pp. 466–475). Routledge/AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliedahl, J. (2015). The recontextualization of knowledge: Towards a social realist approach to curriculum and didactics. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 15(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27008
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R., Arnot, M., Beck, J., & Daniels, H. (Eds.). (2006). Knowledge, power and educational reform: Applying the sociology of Basil Bernstein. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R., & Muller, J. (2002). The growth of knowledge and the discursive gap. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 627–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569022000038477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais, A., Neves, I., Davies, B., & Daniels, H. (Eds.). (2001). Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, W. (Ed.). (1980). The proceedings of the Kenton conference 1980. University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, R. (Ed.). (1983). The proceedings of the Kenton education conference 1982. University of Natal.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J. (1980). A dialogue on higher degrees in education for the eighties in South Africa. In W. Morrow (Ed.), The Proceedings of the Kenton Conference 1980 (pp. 45–59). University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J., Davies, B., & Morais, A. (Eds.). (2004). Reading Bernstein, researching Bernstein. RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J., & Hoadley, U. (2010). Pedagogy and moral order. In P. Singh, A. Sadovnik, & S. Semel (Eds.), Toolkits, translation devices and conceptual accounts: Essays on Basil Bernstein’s sociology of knowledge (pp. 161–176). New York.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J., & Hoadley, U. (2018). Pedagogic modality and structure in the recontextualizing field of curriculum studies: The South African case. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives (pp. 80–101). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J., & Young. (2019). Knowledge, power, and powerful knowledge re-visited. The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1570292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2007). Intellectual advancement through disciplinarity: Advancing a scholarly and professional agenda. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2010). On the internationalization of curriculum studies. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies in South Africa: Intellectual histories and present circumstances (pp. 221–242). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2011). The character of curriculum studies: Bildung, currere and the recurrent problem of the subject. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reagan, T. (1990). Philosophy of education in the service of apartheid: The role of ‘fundamental pedagogics’ in South African education. Educational Foundations, 4(2), 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rée, J. (2019). Witcraft: The invention of philosophy in England. Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Röhner, C. (2014). Competence-oriented curriculum reform in the Federal Republic of Germany. In W. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (2nd ed., pp. 208–216). Routledge/AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, S. (1973). The relationships: Philosophical anthropology, fundamental pedagogics, pedagogy., Trans. of chapter 1. In W. Landman & S. Roos (Eds.), Fundamentele Pedagogiek en die Opvoedingswerklikheid (pp. 1–96). Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Ruzgar, M. (2018). On matters that matter in curriculum studies: An interview with Ian Westbury. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1537374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriewer, J. (2017). Between the philosophy of self-cultivation and empirical research: Educational studies in Germany. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 75–99). Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B. (1977, September). Educational research: Which way? Presidential address, annual BERA Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B. (1981). Why no pedagogy in England? In B. Simon & W. Taylor (Eds.), Education in the eighties (pp. 125–145). Batsford.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B. (1995). Why no pedagogy in England? In B. Moon & A. Mayes (Eds.), Teaching and learning in the secondary school (pp. 10–22). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suransky-Dekker, C. (1998). ‘A liberating breeze of Western civilisation’? A political history of fundamental pedagogics as an expression of Dutch-Afrikaner relationships [Unpublished D.Ed dissertation]. University of Durban-Westville.
   Google Scholar
• Tahirsilaj, A., Kai, N., & Duschl, R. (2015). Curriculum and Didaktik in 21st century; Still divergent or converging? European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2(2), 262–281.
   Google Scholar
• Tröhler, D. (2014). International curriculum research; Why and how? In W. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (2nd ed., pp. 60–66). Routledge/AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M., & Ylimaki, R. (Eds.). (2017). Bridging education leadership, curriculum theory and Didaktik: Non-affirmative theory of education. SpringerOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer, H. (2014). Fachdidaktik and the development of a generalized subject didactics in Germany. Éducation et Didactique, 8(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.1861
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (1992). Curriculum studies in the United States: Reflections on a conversation with Ulf Lundgren. In D. Broady (Ed.), Education in the late twentieth century: Essays presented to Ulf P. Lundgren on the occasion of his fiftieth birthday (pp. 117–140). Stockholm Institute University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (2012). Critical perspectives on the framework for the national curriculum (report by the Expert Panel for the National Curriculum Review) Part 1. Retrieved June 3, 2020, from https://www.newvisionsforeducation.org.uk/2012/04/05/an-unstable-framework/
   Google Scholar
• Willbergh, I. (2016). Bringing teaching back in: Norwegian NOU, the school of the future in light of the Allgemeine Didaktik theory of Wolfgang Klafki. Nordic Journal of Pedagogy and Critique, 2, 111–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.17585/ntpk.v2.268
   Google Scholar
• Yonge, G. (2008). Ideological alchemy: The transmutation of South African didactics (and Fundamental Pedagogics) into ‘apartheid education’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270701832043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (Ed.). (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions in the sociology of education. Collier-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2012). The curriculum – ‘an entitlement to powerful knowledge’: A response to John White. Retrieved June 3, 2020, from https://www.newvisionsforeducation.org.uk/about-the-group/home/2012/05/03/the-curriculum-‘an-entitlement-to-powerful-knowledge’-a-response-to-john-white/
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.764505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M., Lambert, D., Roberts, C., & Roberts, M. (2014). Knowledge and the future school: Curriculum and social justice. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Yonge, G. (1990). Fundamental Pedagogics is a philosophy of education in the service of the foundations of education: A response to T. Reagan. South African Journal of Education, 10(5/6), 530–535.
   Google Scholar