Constructing ‘powerful’ curriculum theory

References

• Benner, D. (1991). Allgemeine Pädagogik [General education].. Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence‐based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.582255
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2015). On the two cultures of educational research, and how we might move ahead: Reconsidering the ontology, axiology and praxeology of education. European Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904114565162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., & Priestley, M. (2013). Capacities and the curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 35–49). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2009). The formation of a school subject and the nature of curriculum content: An analysis of liberal studies in Hong Kong. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(5), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270902767311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2013). The “why” and “what” of curriculum inquiry: Schwab’s the practical revisited. Education Journal, 41(1), 85–105. https://www.hkier.cuhk.edu.hk/en/journal_abstract.asp?pageid=8356
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2018). Contemporary curriculum theorizing: Crisis and resolution. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1537376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2020). Knowledge, content, curriculum theory and Didaktik: Beyond social realism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education, 52(4), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1219535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (2017). The Didaktik/Curriculum dialogue: What did we learn? In M. Uljens & R. M. Ylimaki (Eds.), Bridging educational leadership, curriculum theory and Didaktik (pp. 219–227). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dyk, C. V. (2006). Exemplary teaching: Some possibilities for renovating and stimulating didactic practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500122653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenstermacher, G. D. (1980). The nature of science and its uses for education: Remarks on the philosophical import of Schwab’s work. Curriculum Inquiry, 10(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1980.11075215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, N. (2020). ‘Education as a Geisteswissenschaft:’an introduction to human science pedagogy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1705917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong, J., & Whitty, G. (2017). Knowledge traditions in the study of education. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 13–57). Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gundem, B. B. (2000). Understanding European didactics. In B. Moon, M. Ben- Peretz, & S. Brown (Eds.), Routledge international companion to education (pp. 235–262). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. (1999). The pedagogic paradox (or why no didactics in England?). Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 7(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681369900200048
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common cores of. Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.109
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (2000). Starting a dialogue: A beginning conversation between Didaktik and curriculum traditions. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 3-11) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4), 417–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270801989818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hordern, J. (2016). Regions and their relations: Sustaining authoritative professional knowledge. Journal of Education and Work, 29(4), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2014.958653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hordern, J. (2018). Is powerful educational knowledge possible? Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(6), 787–802. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2018.1427218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humboldt, W. V. (2000). Theory of bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 57–61). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jank, W. (2014). Didactics, education, content: On the writings of Frede V. Nielsen. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 22(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.2979/philmusieducrevi.22.2.113
   Google Scholar
• Kansanen, P. (1999). The Deutsche Didaktik and the American research on teaching. Didaktik/Fachdidaktik as Science (-s) of the Teaching Profession, 2(1), 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kansanen, P. (2017). Pedagogical thinking and instructional design: The Didaktik perspective. In J. Chi-Kin Lee & K.J. Kennedy (Eds.), Theorizing teaching and learning in Asia and Europe. A conversation between Chinese curriculum and European didactics (pp. 248-260). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kenklies, K. (2012). Educational theory as topological rhetoric: The concepts of pedagogy of Johann Friedrich Herbart and Friedrich Schleiermacher. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9287-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (1998). Characteristics of critical constructive Didaktik. In B. B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue (pp. 307–330). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (2000a). Didaktik analysis as the core of preparation. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 139–159). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (2000b). The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of allgemeinbildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 85–107). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, R. A. (2008). The significance of the concepts “elemental” and “fundamental” in didactic theory and practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(2), 215–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270701332267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Künzli, R. (1998). The Common Frame and the Places of Didaktik. In B. B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue (pp. 29–45). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Künzli, R. (2013). Memorizing a memory: Schwab’s the practical in a German context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.798837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labaree, D. F. (2014). Let’s measure what no one teaches: PISA, NCLB, and the shrinking aims of education. Teachers College Record, 116(9), 1–14. https://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=17533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labaree, F. (2017). Futures of the field of education. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 277–283). Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. (2014). Curriculum thinking,’capabilities’ and the place of geographical knowledge in schools (special contribution). Journal of Japanese Educatinal Research Associaon for the Social Studies, 81, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, D. N. (2006). Powers of the mind: The reinvention of liberal learning in America. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lüth, C. (2000). On Wilhelm von Humboldt’s theory of Bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 63–84). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (2014). New teachers need access to powerful educational knowledge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2014.957151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maton, K. (2014). Building powerful knowledge: The significance of semantic waves. In B. B. Barrett & E. Rata (Eds.), Knowledge and the future of the curriculum (pp. 181–197). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, G. (2017). Education: An applied multidisciplinary field? The english experience. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 211–229). Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, R. (1937). Education and the disciplines. International Journal of Ethics, 47(3), 370–381. https://doi.org/10.1086/intejethi.47.3.2989393
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, R. (1949). The nature and teaching of the humanities. The Journal of General Education, 3, 290–303.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (Eds.). (1993). The quality of life. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, W. A. (1980). Democracy, perfectability, and the battle of the books: Thoughts on the conception of liberal education in the writings of Schwab. Curriculum Inquiry, 10(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1980.11075222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, W. A. (1984). Curriculum, community, and liberal education: A response to the practical 4. Curriculum Inquiry, 14(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1984.11075910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, H. (2000). The art of lesson preparation. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 127–138). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ruzgar, M. E. (2018). On matters that matter in the curriculum studies: An interview with Ian Westbury. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1537374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriewer, J. (2017). Between the philosophy of self-cultivation and empirical research: Educational studies in Germany. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 75–99). Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1969). College curriculum and student protest. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1971). The practical 2: Arts of eclectic. School Review, 79(4), 493–542. https://doi.org/10.1086/442998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 81(4), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/443100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1978). What do scientists do? In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selective essays (pp. 181–228). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (2013). The practical: A language for curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45 (5), 591–621. (Reprinted from The practical: a language for curriculum by J. J. Schwab, 1970, Washington, D.C: National Education Association). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.809152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirley, D. (2009). American perspectives on German educational theory and research: A closer look at both the American educational context and the German Didaktik tradition. Allgemeine Didaktik und Lehr-Lernforschung: Kontroversen und Entwicklungsperspektiven einer Wissenschaft von Unterricht, 10(9), 195–209.
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M. (2002). The idea of a universal theory of education _An impossible but necessary project? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uljens, M., & Ylimaki, R. (2015). Towards a discursive and non-affirmative framework for curriculum studies, Didaktik and educational leadership. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(3), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.30177
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M., & Ylimaki, R. M. (2017). Bridging educational leadership, curriculum theory and didaktik. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Stoep, F. (2020).A study in fundamental didactical theory construction (G. D. Yonge, trans.) (original work published 1972). http://georgeyonge.net/translations/didactic-pedagogics/didaskein-study-fundamental-didactical-theory-construction
   Google Scholar
• Van der Stoep, F., & Louw, W. J. (2005). Introduction to Didactic Pedagogics (ch. 2)(G. D. Yonge, trans.)(Original work published 1974).http://georgeyonge.net/sites/georgeyonge.net/files/Stoep_Louw_Ch2%28b%29pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez-Levy, D. (2002). Bildung-centred Didaktik: A framework for examining the educational potential of subject matter. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270110056581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weniger, E. (2000). Didaktik as a theory of education. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 111–125). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might Didaktik teach curriculum. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 15–39). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2005). Reconsidering Schwab’s “Practicals”: A response to Peter Hlebowitsh’s “Generational ideas in curriculum: A historical triangulation”. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2005.00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbury, I., & Wilkof, N. J. (1978). Introduction. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selective essays (pp. 1–40). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willbergh, I. (2016). Bringing teaching back in: The Norwegian NOU the school of the future in light of the allgemeine Didaktik theory of Wolfgang Klafki. Nordic Journal of Pedagogy & Critique, 2(3), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.17585/ntpk.v2.268
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2009). What are schools for? In H. Daniels, H. Lauder, & J. Porter (Eds.), Knowledge, values and educational policy. (pp. 10–18). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3017
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (Eds.). (2014). Knowledge, expertise and the professions. Routledge.
   Google Scholar