Intentional, tacit, contingent: knowledge recontextualization in the official History curriculum - a Critical Discourse Analysis

References

• Alexander, C., & Weekes-Bernard, D. (2017). History lessons: Inequality, diversity and the national curriculum. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(4), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1294571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvunger, D. (2018). Teachers’ curriculum agency in teaching a standards‐based curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 29(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1486721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., Billig, M., Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2002). Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1). Sheffield Hallam University.https://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/open/2002/002/antaki2002002-paper.html
   Google Scholar
• AQA. (2018). AS and A-level History; AS (7041); A-level (7042). specifications: For teaching from September 2015 onwards; for AS exams in May/June 2016 onwards; for A-level exams in May/June 2017 onwards. version 1.2 18 September 2018. AQA Education. https://filestore.aqa.org.uk/resources/history/specifications/AQA-7041-7042-SP-2015.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, H., Bardgett, S., Budd, A., Finn, M., Kissane, C., Qureshi, S., Saha, J., Siblon, J., & Sivasundaram, S. (2018). Race, ethnicity & equality in UK history: A report and resource for change. Royal Historical Society. https://5hm1h4aktue2uejbs1hsqt31-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/RHS_race_report_EMBARGO_0001_18Oct.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, J., & Lee‐Kelley, L. (2009). The dearth of managerialism in implementation of national examinations policy. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802382938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1998). Big policies/small world: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy. Comparative Education, 34(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050069828225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2007). Education Plc: Understanding private sector participation in public sector education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964200
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2010). The Necessity and Violence of Theory. In P. Thomson & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge Doctoral Student’s Companion: Getting to Grips with Research in Education and the Social Sciences (first edition, pp. 68–74). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852248
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2015). What is policy? 21 years later: Reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(3), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1015279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203153185
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. B. (1990). Class, codes, and control, volume IV: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203011263
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (revised edition ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bladh, G., Stolare, M., & Kristiansson, M. (2018). Curriculum principles, didactic practice and social issues: Thinking through teachers’ knowledge practices in collaborative work. London Review of Education, 16(3), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.3.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29(1), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
   Google Scholar
• Braddick, M. J. (2015). Civil war and revolution in England, Scotland, and Ireland. In M. J. Braddick (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the English revolution. pp. 3–20. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695898.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Brady, N. (2015). ‘Epistemic chaos’: The recontextualisation of undergraduate curriculum design and pedagogic practice in a new university business school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(8), 1236–1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.897216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadwallader, S., & Tremain, K. (2013). How policy formation and implementation interacts with risks to high stakes qualifications [Research Paper]. AQA Centre for Education Research and Practice (CERP). https://cerp.aqa.org.uk/research-library/how-policy-formation-and-implementation-interacts-risks-high-stakes-qualifications
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, E. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum contexts. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannadine, D., Keating, J., & Sheldon, N. (2011). The right kind of history: Teaching the past in twentieth-century England. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. (2011). The History curriculum 16-19. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in History Teaching (first edition, pp. 46–59). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Child, S., Darlington, E., & Gill, T. (2014). An analysis of the unit and topic choices made in an OCR A level History course. Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment Publication, 18(1), 2–9. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/465802-an-analysis-of-the-unit-and-topic-choices-made-in-an-ocr-a-level-history-course.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Child, S., Darlington, E., & Gill, T. (2015). A level History: Which factors motivate teachers’ unit and topic choices? Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment Publication, 19(1), 2–6. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/465775-a-level-history-which-factors-motivate-teachers-unit-and-topic-choices-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CIE. (2017). Syllabus. Cambridge International Level 3 Pre-U Certificate in History (principal) 9769. for examination in 2019, 2020 and 2021. Cambridge International Examinations (CIE). http://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/329576-2019-2021-syllabus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Corson, D. (1991). Bhaskar’s Critical Realism and Educational Knowledge. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 12(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569910120206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counsell, C. (2011). Disciplinary knowledge for all, the secondary history curriculum and history teachers’ achievement. The Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2011.574951
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Pugsley, L. (2010). The concept smacks of magic: Fighting familiarity today. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015a). Content, Joseph Schwab and German didaktik. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 773–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1090628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015b). Michael Young, knowledge and curriculum: An international dialogue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1101492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2018). Contemporary curriculum theorizing: Crisis and resolution. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1537376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfE. (2014). GCE AS and A level subject content for History. Department for Education (DfE). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/gce-as-and-a-level-for-history
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K., Darlington, E., & Benton, T. (2016). Revisiting the topics taught as part of an OCR A level History qualification. Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment Publication, 22(1), 2–8. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/374589-revisiting-the-topics-taught-as-part-of-an-ocr-history-qualification.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., & Murphy, P. (2015). Assessment systems as cultural scripts: A sociocultural theoretical lens on assessment practice and products. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1021568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). The discourse of New Labour: Critical Discourse Analysis. In S. Yates, S. Taylor, & M. Wetherell (Eds). Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis (pp. 229–266). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language (second edition). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fordham, M. (2017). Tradition, authority and disciplinary practice in history education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(6), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1135777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, S. (2013). Teaching about the Holocaust in English schools: Challenges and possibilities. Intercultural Education, 24(1–02), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2013.772323
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (third edition). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., Hudson, B., Olin-Scheller, C., & Stolare, M. (2018). Powerful knowledge, transformations and the need for empirical studies across school subjects. London Review of Education, 16(3), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.3.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrard, J., & Farrell, L. (2013). ‘Peopling’ curriculum policy production: Researching educational governance through institutional ethnography and bourdieuian field analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 28(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.664288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, T. (2016). Uptake of Level 3 qualifications in English schools 2015 (Statistics Report No. 105; Statistics Report Series). Cambridge Assessment. http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/307015-uptake-of-level-3-qualifications-in-english-schools-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gove, M. (2010, March 2). We will end the political control of A levels [Speech]. On SayIt. My Society. https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/601516
   Google Scholar
• Grever, M., & Stuurman, S. (2007). Introduction. In M. Grever & S. Stuurman (Eds.), Beyond the canon: History for the twenty-first century (pp. 1–16). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Graham, S. (2019). Engaging with curriculum reform: Insights from English history teachers’ willingness to support curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1513570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Haydn, T (2012). What happens to a subject in a ‘free market’ curriculum? A study of secondary school history in the UK. Research Papers in Education, 27(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520903513217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Reynolds, R. (2014). The history curriculum and its personal connection to students from minority ethnic backgrounds. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(4), 464–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.881925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Reynolds, R. (2018). Exploring teachers’ curriculum decision making: Insights from history education. Oxford Review of Education, 44(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1352498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (2012). The concept of semiotic mediation. In H. Daniels (Ed.), Vygotsky and Sociology (pp. 80–92). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haydn, T. (2012). ‘Longing for the past’: Politicians and the History curriculum in English schools, 1988-2010. Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society, 4(1) https://doi.org/10.3167/jemms.2012.040102
   Google Scholar
• Helsby, G., & McCulloch, G. (Eds.). (1997). Teachers and the National Curriculum. Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Higham, J., & Yeomans, D. (2011). Thirty years of 14–19 education and training in England: Reflections on policy, curriculum and organisation. London Review of Education, 9(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2011.585883
   Google Scholar
• Hizli Alkan, S., & Priestley, M. (2019). Teacher mediation of curriculum making: The role of reflexivity. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(5), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1637943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoadley, U., Sehgal-Cuthbert, A., Barrett, B., & Morgan, J. (2019). After the knowledge turn? Politics and pedagogy. The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1601844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBO. (2015) . History Guide. First examinations 2017. IB Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jordanova, L. J. (2006). History in Practice (second edition). Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. V. (2009). The Curriculum: Theory and practice (sixth edition). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kontovourki, S., Philippou, S., & Theodorou, E. (2018). Curriculum making as professionalism‐in‐context: The cases of two elementary school teachers amidst curriculum change in Cyprus. The Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1447308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. (2018). Teaching as a research-engaged profession: Uncovering a blind spot and revealing new possibilities. London Review of Education, 16(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.3.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2011). History education and historical literacy. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (first edition ed., pp. 63–72). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P., & Howson, J. (2009). ‘Two Out of Five Did Not Know That Henry VIII Had Six Wives:’ Historical Education, Historical Literacy, and Historical Consciousness. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp. 211–263). Information Age Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2014). Critical thinking and the anti-liberal state: The politics of pedagogic recontextualization in Singapore. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(5), 692–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.927173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2017a). Delocating and relocating knowledge: The dynamics of curriculum change in Singapore. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives (pp. 134–146). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2017b). Regulating the unthinkable: Bernstein’s pedagogic device and the paradox of control. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 26(4), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2017.1317605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, K., Hayward, L., Higgins, S., & Wyse, D. (2015). Multiple influences on curriculum decisions in a supercomplex world. The Curriculum Journal, 26(4), 515–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1095015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, F., & Weiss, L. (2018). Can didactic transposition and popularization explain transformations of genetic knowledge from research to classroom? Science & Education, 27(5–6), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9977-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1989). The Lyotard Reader (A. Benjamin, Ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Madaus, G., & Russell, M. (2010). Paradoxes of high-stakes testing. Journal of Education, 190(1–2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057410190001-205
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, P. (2013, July 7). History, national life and the new curriculum. 25th National Schools History Project Conference. Schools History Project Conference, Leeds, UK. Schools History Project. http://www.schoolshistoryproject.org.uk/ResourceBase/downloads/MandlerKeynote2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McPhail, G. J. (2013). The canon or the kids: Teachers and the recontextualisation of classical and popular music in the secondary school curriculum. Research Studies in Music Education, 35(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X13483083
   Google Scholar
• McPhail, G. J. (2016). Music on the move: Methodological applications of Bernstein’s concepts in a secondary school music context. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(8), 1147–1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1044069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, J., & Young, M. (2019). Knowledge, power and powerful knowledge re‐visited. The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1570292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mahoney, J., & Vincent, S. (2014). Critical realism as an empirical project: A beginner’s guide. In P. K. Edwards, J. O’Mahoney, & S. Vincent (Eds.), Studying organizations using critical realism: A practical guide (first edition, pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665525.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• OCR. (2018). History A A-level specification, H505, for first assessment in 2017. Version 1.2 (August 2018). OCR. https://www.ocr.org.uk/Images/170128-specification-accredited-a-level-gce-history-a-h505.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ofqual. ( n.d.). Who we are. Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofqual/about
   Google Scholar
• Ofqual. (2014a). GCE subject level conditions and requirements for History. Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/371202/2014-04-09-gce-subject-level-conditions-and-requirements-for-history.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ofqual. (2014b). GCE subject level guidance for History. Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/371214/2014-05-23-gce-subject-level-guidance-for-history-may.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ofqual. (2018). Annual qualifications market report 2016 to 2017 academic year (England), and accompanying data tables. Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/685145/Annual_Qualifications_Market_Report_2016_17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ormond, B. (2014). Powerful knowledge in History: Disciplinary strength or weakened episteme? In E. Rata & B. Barrett (Eds.), Knowledge and the Future of the Curriculum: International Studies in Social Realism (pp. 153–166). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137429261
   Google Scholar
• Ormond, B. (2017b). Conceptions of knowledge in History teaching. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity. Social realist perspectives (pp. 102–116). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315111360 doi:10.4324/9781315111360
   Google Scholar
• Ormond, B. M. (2017a). Curriculum decisions – the challenges of teacher autonomy over knowledge selection for History. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(5), 599-619. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1149225
   Google Scholar
• Pandraud, N. (2011). The recontextualization of scientific knowledge and learning activities: Translating the French language curriculum into the writing of a tale in a classe de 6e. In D. Frandji & P. Vitale (Eds.), Knowledge, pedagogy and society: International perspectives on Basil Bernstein’s sociology of education(first ed., pp. 175–190). Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843932
   Google Scholar
• Pearson. (2017). A-level History. Specification, Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in History (9HI0). First teaching from September 2015. First certification from 2017. 3. Pearson Education Limited. https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/A%20Level/History/2015/Specification%20and%20sample%20assessments/9781446914366_GCE_2015_A_HIST.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., & Humes, W. (2010). The development of Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence: Amnesia and déjà vu. Oxford Review of Education, 36(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980903518951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., & Philippou, S. (2018). Curriculum making as social practice: Complex webs of enactment. The Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1451096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, L. (2009). Using documents in social research (reprinted). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. L. (2012). Placing teachers in global governance agendas. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 584–607. https://doi.org/10.1086/667414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Schaenen, I., Schott, C., O’Brien, K., Trigos-Carrillo, L., Starkey, K., & Chasteen, C. C. (2016). Critical Discourse Analysis in education: A review of the literature 2004-2012. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1192–1226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rublack, U. (Ed.). (2012). A concise companion to History (first paperback edition). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, I. (2007). The teacher’s grasp of subject matter. In R. R. Curren (Ed.), Philosophy of education: An anthology (pp. 347–350). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1964). The structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 6–30). Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. (2000). Reading educational research and policy. RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487525
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Recontextualization of Science from lab to school: Implications for science literacy. Science & Education, 18(9), 1253–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9112-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K., & Westbury, I. (2016). State-based curriculum-making, part I. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(6), 744–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1186737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2016). What remains of history? Historical epistemology and historical understanding in Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence. The Curriculum Journal, 27(4), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2016.1197138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2019). Curriculum coherence and teachers’ decision-making in Scottish high school History syllabi. The Curriculum Journal, 30(4), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1647861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202799183205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns, P. N., Seixas, P. C., & Wineburg, S. S. (Eds.). (2000). Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinke, I. (2004). Quality criteria in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. Von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 184–190). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930502
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2017). Blaming the victim: Assessment, examinations, and the responsibilisation of students and teachers in neo-liberal governance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1104854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosh, J. (2006). The pursuit of history: Aims, methods and new directions in the study of modern history (fourth edition). Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Tronsmo, E. (2020). Changing conditions for teachers’ knowledge work: New actor constellations and responsibilities. The Curriculum Journal, 31(4), 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse and Knowledge. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 587–603). Routledge. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi:10.4324/9780203809068.ch41
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I., Aspfors, J., Fries, A.-V., Hansén, S.-E., Ohlhaver, F., Rosenmund, M., & Sivesind, K. (2016). Organizing curriculum change: An introduction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(6), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1186736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbury, I., & Sivesind, K. (2016). State-based curriculum-making, Part 2, the tool-kit for the state’s curriculum-making. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(6), 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1186738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2012). Centrifugal schooling: Third sector policy networks and the reassembling of curriculum policy in England. Journal of Education Policy, 27(6), 775–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.653405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R., & Froehlich, H. (2012). Basil Bernstein’s theory of the Pedagogic Device and formal music schooling: Putting the theory into practice. Theory Into Practice, 51(3), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.690307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., Brown, C., Oliver, S., & Poblete, X. (2018). The BERA close-to-practice research project research report. The British Educational Research Association (BERA). https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/bera-statement-on-close-to-practice-research
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., Brown, C., Oliver, S., & Poblete, X. (2021). Education research and educational practice: The qualities of a close relationship. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3626
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. F. D. (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. Collier-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. F. D. (2011). The return to subjects: A sociological perspective on the UK coalition government’s approach to the 14–19 curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2011.574994
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. F. D. (2015). Curriculum theory and the question of knowledge: A response to the six papers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 820–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1101493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar