The politics of pupil self-evaluation: A case of Finnish assessment policy discourse

References

• Act. (101/1921). Oppivelvollisuuslaki. 15.2.2012. [Compulsory Education Act].
   Google Scholar
• Act. (467/1968). Laki koulujärjestelmän perusteista. 24.5.1968. [Act on the Principles for the School System].
   Google Scholar
• Act. (476/1983). Peruskoululaki. 27.5.1983. [Comprehensive Education Act].
   Google Scholar
• Act. (628/1998). Perusopetuslaki. 21.8.1998. [Basic Education Act] https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1998/19980628?search%5Btype%5D=pika&search%5Bpika%5D=perusopetuslaki
   Google Scholar
• Act. (477/2003). Perusopetuslaki §22 muutos 13.6.2003. Amendment to the Basic Education Act §22 in 13.6.2003.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers of Education, 87(4), 1–13 doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., & Cizek, G. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of formative assessment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: Research-based principles to guide classroom practice.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10–17. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0159630930130203
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2013). Foucault, power, and education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2015). What is policy? 21 years later: Reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(3), 306–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1015279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Perryman, J., & Hoskins, K. (2012). Assessment technologies in schools: ‘Deliverology’ and the ‘play of dominations’. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.550012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.740678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, T. A. C. (2007). Foucault, truth-telling and technologies of the self: Confessional practices of the self and schools In M. A. Peters, and T. A. C. Besley (Eds.), Why Foucault? New directions in educational research. Counterpoints. (Vol. 292, pp. 55–69). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bialik, M., Martin, J., Mayo, M., & Triling, B. (2016). Evolving Assessments for a 21st century education. Assessment research consortium. A Division of the Center for Curriculum Redesign.
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M., DeLuca, C., Earl, L., Heritage, M., Klenowski, V., Looney, A., Smith, K., Timberley, H., Volante, L., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2015). International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210314566733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, W., & William, P. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, 80(2), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleakley, A. (2000). Adrift without a life belt: Reflective self-assessment in a post-modern age. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(4), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/713699179
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, T., Lidstone, J., & Ryan, M. (2015). Schooling teachers: Professionalism or disciplinary power? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.839374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. J., & Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: Reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 2(1), 22–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i1.24
   Google Scholar
• Choo, S. S. (2018). Approaching twenty-first century education from a cosmopolitan perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1313316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cizek, G. J. (2009). An introduction to formative assessment. History, characteristics, and challenges. In H. L. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 3–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 2(24), 205–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
   Google Scholar
• Council of State. (2001). Valtioneuvoston asetus N:o 1435 perusopetuslaissa tarkoitetun opetuksen valtakunnallisista tavoitteista ja perusopetuksen tuntijaosta. 20.12.2001. (Government Decree on the National Objectives for Education Referred to in the Basic Education Act and in the Distribution of Lesson Hours). Finnish Government https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2001/20011435
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P. (2011). The Evaluation Society. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Decree. (190/1931). Asetus kansakoulun järjestysmuodosta. 4.6.1931. [Degree on Elementary School].
   Google Scholar
• Decree. (321/1958). Kansakouluasetus 23.7.1958. [Decree on Elementary School].
   Google Scholar
• Decree. (443/1970). Peruskouluasetus. 26.6.1970. [Decree establishing comprehensive education].
   Google Scholar
• Decree. (718/1984). Peruskouluasetus 12.10.1984. [Decree on Comprehensive Education. 12.10.1984.].
   Google Scholar
• Decree. (852/1998). Perusopetusasetus. 20.11.1998. [Basic Education Decree]. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1998/19980852?search%5Btype%5D=pika&search%5Bpika%5D=perusopetusasetus).
   Google Scholar
• Fejes, A. (2011). Confession, in-service training and reflective practices. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 797–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.500371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fejes, A., & Dahlstedt, M. (2012). The confessing society: Foucault, confession and practices of lifelong learning. Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fejes, A., & Nicoll, K. (2015). Foucault and a politics of confession in education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fendler, L. (2003). Teacher reflection in a hall of mirrors: Historical influences and political reverberations. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032003016
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1969/2013). Archaeology of knowledge. Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975/1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1976/2010). Seksuaalisuuden historia: Tiedontahto, nautintojen käyttö ja huoli itsestä (Histoire de la sexualité) (transl. K. G. Sivenius) Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 139–164). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self., In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), A seminar with Michel Foucault. Technologies of the Self. (pp. 16–49). The University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1997). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Ethics, subjectivity and truth: The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984 (Vol. 1, pp. 281–301). Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2000). Governmentality. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984. (pp. 201–222). The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2005). The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the college de France 1981–1982. F. Gros, F. Ewald, A. Fontana, and A. I. Davidson (Eds.), English series. Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). M. Senelart, F. Ewald, and A. Fontana. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1978–79. Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, E. (2019). An archaeology of educational evaluation: Epistemological spaces and political paradoxes. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, E., & Ball, S. J. (2021). The blended learner: Digitalisation and regulated freedom - neoliberalism in the classroom. Journal of Education Policy, 36(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1704066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, S., Silvonen, H., & Simola, H. (1999). Technologies of truth. Peeling Foucault’s triangular onion. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20(1), 141–157.
   Google Scholar
• Heinonen, V. (1961). Koulusaavutustestit [Student Achievement Tests]. Gummerus.
   Google Scholar
• Heinonen, V., & Viljanen, E. (1980). Evaluaatio koulussa [Evaluation at School]. Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Hilt, L. T., Riese, H., & Søreide, G. E. (2019). Narrow identity resources for future students: The 21st century skills movement encounters the Norwegian education policy context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(3), 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1502356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2019). Risky teachers: Mitigating risk through high-stakes teacher evaluation in the USA. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(3), 399–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1322938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., & Brass, J. (2018). Making accountable teachers: The terrors and pleasures of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1372636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., & Troman, G. (2011). The construction of performative identities. European Educational Research Journal, 10(4), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2011.10.4.484
   Google Scholar
• Jóhannesson, I. A. (2001). Ideas in historical web. A genealogy of educational ideas and reforms in Iceland. In T. S. Popkewitz, B. M. Franklin, & M. A. Pereyra (Eds.), Cultural history and education: Critical essays on knowledge and schooling (pp. 243–262). Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Kauko, J., Pitkänen, H., & Varjo, J. (forthcoming) Quality in Finnish comprehensive schools: Entrenching enhancement-led evaluation. In de La Porte, Caroline, Guðný, Björk Eydal, Kauko, Jaakko, Nohrstedt, Daniel, ‘t Hart, Paul, and Tranøy, Bent Sofus (Eds.), Successful Public Policy in the Nordic Countries. Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kauko, J., Rinne, R., & Takala, T. (Eds.). (2018). Politics of quality in education. A comparative study of Brazil, China, and Russia. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kauko, J., Varjo, J., & Pitkänen, H. (2020). Quality and evaluation in Finnish schools. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1451.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnari, H. (2020). Elinikäinen oppiminen ihmistä määrittämässä: Genealoginen analyysi EU:n, OECD:n ja Unescon politiikasta. [Lifelong learning defining the conception of human. Genealogical analysis of the policies of EU, OECD, and UNESCO]. Research in Educational Sciences 81. Finnish Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• KM (1925). Maalaiskansakoulun opetussuunnitelmakomitean mietintö. [Committee Report on the Curriculum for the Rural Primary School]. Valtioneuvoston kirjapaino.
   Google Scholar
• KM (1946). Kansakoulun opetussuunnitelmakomitean mietintö 1946:2. [Report of the Committee for the Primary School Curriculum]. Valtioneuvoston kirjapaino.
   Google Scholar
• KM (1952). Kansakoulun opetussuunnitelmakomitean mietintö II. Varsinaisen kansakoulun opetussuunnitelma 1952:3. [Report ofthe Committee for the Primary School Curriculum II]. Valtioneuvoston kirjapaino.
   Google Scholar
• KM (1970a). Peruskoulun opetussuunnitelmatoimikunnan mietintö I. Opetussuunnitelman perusteet. [Report of the Committee for the Comprehensive School Curriculum I]. Valtion painatuskeskus.
   Google Scholar
• KM (1970b). Peruskoulun opetussuunnitelmatoimikunnan mietintö II. [Report of the committee for the comprehensive school curriculum II]. Valtion painatuskeskus.
   Google Scholar
• Konttinen, R. (1995). Arvostelusta näyttöön. Koulutuksen arvioinnin kehityspiirteitä Suomessa. [From assessment to Proof. Developments in the assessment of education in Finland]. Kasvatus, 26(1), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Looney, J. (2011). Integrating formative and summative assessment: Progress toward a seamless system? OECD Education Working Papers No. 58. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C. (2003). The formation of an assessment culture. Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy Discourse, 2003(3), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C. (2006). Viljan att veta vad andra vet. Kunskapsbedömning i tidigmodern, modern och senmodern skola. Uppsala Universitet Arbetslivsinstituttet.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C., Hultén, M., & Tveit, S. (2017). The power of teacher-assigned grades in outcome-based education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1317229
   Google Scholar
• NBE. (1994). Peruskoulun opetussuunnitelman perusteet [Framework Curriculum for Comprehensive School 1994]. National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• NBE. (2004). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet. [National core curriculum for basic education 2004]. National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• NBE. (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet. [National core curriculum for basic education 2014]. Finnish National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• NBE. (2020a). Oppilaan oppimisen ja osaamisen arviointi perusopetuksessa. Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteiden 2014 muutokset. 10.2.2020. [Assessment of Pupils’ learning and skills in basic education. Adjustments to the National Core Curriculum 2014 in 10.2.2020]. Finnish National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• NBE. (2020b). Perusopetuksen päättöarvioinnin kriteerit. Opetushallituksen määräys 5042/2020. [Criteria for final assessment in basic education. In Order of the National Board of Education 5042/2020]. Finnish National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• NBGE. (1943). Kouluhallituksen kiertokirje 18.6.1943 kansakoulujen tarkastajille, johtokunnille ja opettajille. [Order by National Board of General Education 18.6.1943 for elementary school inspectors, school boards and teachers]. National Board of General Education.
   Google Scholar
• NBGE. (1973). Kouluhallituksen ryhmäkirje 18.5.1973/3812 [Administrative letter by National Board of General Education]. National Board of General Education.
   Google Scholar
• NBGE. (1985). Peruskoulun opetussuunnitelman perusteet. [Framework Curriculum for Comprehensive School]. National Board of General Education.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, A.-M. (2015). The New Zealand experiment: Assessment-driven curriculum – managing standards, competition and performance to strengthen governmentality. Journal of Education Policy, 30(6), 831–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1033766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, A.-M. (2016). Assessment-based curriculum: Globalising and enterprising culture, human capital and teacher–technicians in Aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 598–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1150520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2008). Assessment for learning formative assessment. OECD/CERI international conference “learning in the 21st century: Research, innovation and policy”. OECD https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiR6em05YH2AhWsRPEDHTS4C4cQFnoECAQQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oecd.org%2Fsite%2Feduceri21st%2F40600533.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0qwe_uXPo_uYDt1GsPKFL3
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning. An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. OECD Learning Compass 2030.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). Education policy outlook: Finland. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., Dahler-Larsen, P., Segerholm, C., & Simola, H. (Eds.) (2011). Fabricating quality in education. Data and governance in Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., Ball, S. J., Braun, A., & Maguire, M. (2017). Translating policy: Governmentality and the reflective teacher. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6), 745–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1309072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkänen, H. (2019). Arviointi, tieto ja hallinta. Peruskoulun paikallisen arvioinnin genealogia. [Evaluation, knowledge and power: Genealogy of local quality evaluation in comprehensive education]. Helsinki Studies in Education 50. University of Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-5238-1
   Google Scholar
• Pitkänen, H. (forthcoming). Finnish quality evaluation discourse: Swimming against global tide. In M. Thrupp, P. Seppänen, J. Kauko, and S. Kosunen (Eds.), Finland’s famous education system - Unvarnished insights into Finnish schooling. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S. (1997). The production of reason and power: Curriculum history and intellectual traditions. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(2), 131–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202797184107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S. (2018). Reform and making human kinds: The double gestures of inclusion and exclusion in the practice of schooling. In E. Hultqvist, S. Lindblad, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Critical analyses of educational reforms in an era of transnational governance (pp. 133–150). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1989/1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999/2009). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought (2nd ed.). The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, A. (2013). Tilastollinen järkeily ja oppilasarviointi suomalaisen kasvatustieteen historiassa Ian Hackingin tieteenfilosofian näkökulmasta. [Statistical reasoning and pupil assessment in Finnish history of educational sciences from the perspective of Ian Hacking’s philosophy of science]. Kasvatus ja Aika, 7(3), 5–23. https://journal.fi/kasvatusjaaika/article/view/68627
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on schooling. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp. 128–144). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Salmela, A. (1948). Kansakoulun oppilasarvostelu [Pupil Assessment in Primary School]. Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Siarova, H., Sternadel, D., & Mašidlauskaitė, R. (2017). Assessment practices for 21st century learning: Review of evidence. NESET II report. Publications Office of the European Union. European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Simola, H. (2002). From exclusion to self-selection: Examination of behaviour in Finnish primary and comprehensive schooling from the 1960s to the 1990s. History of Education, 21(3), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00467600210122595
   Google Scholar
• Simola, H. (2015). The Finnish education mystery: Historical and sociological essays on schooling in Finland. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skovholt, K., Nordenstrom, E., & Stokoe, E. (2019). Evaluative conduct in teacher-student supervision: When students assess their own performance. Linguistics and Education, 50, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohrer, K., Stahl, G., & Bowers-Brown, T. (2018). Constituting neoliberal subjects? ‘Aspiration’ as technology of government in UK policy discourse. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1336573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K. H. K. (2004). Does student self‐assessment empower or discipline students? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000227209
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, M., & Prieto, H. P. (2014). In between self-knowledge and school demands: Policy enacted in the Swedish middle-year classroom. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(4), 554–569 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.871232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahervuo, T. (1958). Arvosanojen antaminen. [Giving grades] Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Varjo, J., Kalalahti, M., & Hooley, T. (2021). Actantial construction of career guidance in parliament of Finland’s education policy debates 1967–2020. Journal of Education Policy, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2021.1971772
   Google Scholar
• Varjo, J., Simola, H., & Rinne, R. (2016). Arvioida ja hallita: Perään katsomisesta informaatio-ohjaukseen suomalaisessa koulupolitiikassa. [To evaluate and govern: From looking after to steering by information in Finnish education policy]. Research in Educational Sciences 70. Finnish Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Verger, A., Parcerisa, L., & Fontdevila, C. (2019). The growth and spread of large-scale assessments and test-based accountabilities: A political sociology of global education reforms. Educational Review, 71(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1522045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith, C., & Adie, L. (2021). The development of students’ evaluative expertise: Enabling conditions for integrating criteria into pedagogic practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(4), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1624831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar