“The king will be corrupt too!” Teaching thinking in bible studies

References

• Amit, Y. (2010). Rise and fall of the Bible’s empire in Israeli education: The 2003 syllabus: Retrospect and prospect. Reches Educational Projects.
   Google Scholar
• Baumfield, V., & Cush, D. Religious education at the crossroads (again): The search for a subject identity?. (2013). British Journal of Religious Education, 35(3), 231–235. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2013.818191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (2003). Classroom discourse: Courtney b. cazden and sarah w. beck. In Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 170–202). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., Nokes, J. D., & Drits, D. (2014). Cognitive strategy instruction. In Israel, Susan E (ed) Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 371–396). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frenkel, M. (2007). Teaching the Bible: The philosophy of Nechama Leibowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, C., Hipkins, R., & Zohar, A. (2012). Positioning thinking within national curriculum and assessment systems: Perspectives from Israel, New Zealand and Northern Ireland. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(2), 134–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenfeld, Z. R. (2017). Teaching sacred texts in the classroom: The pedagogy of transmission and the pedagogy of interpretive facilitation. Journal of Jewish Education, 83(4), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2018.1378562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenfeld, Z. R. (2018). Putting students front and center in the Hebrew bible classroom: Inquiry-oriented pedagogy in the Orthodox and liberal classroom. Journal of Jewish Education, 84(1), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2018.1418104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, S. R., & McKenzie, S. L. (1999). To each its own meaning: An introduction to biblical criticisms and their application. Westminster John Knox Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtz, B. W. (2016). 2. A Map of Orientations to the Teaching of Bible. In Turn it and Turn it Again (pp. 26–51). Academic Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huth, K. (2021). Using the pedagogy of thinking skills in Christian studies lessons in primary school years 4–6: The teacher’s perspective. Journal of Religious Education, 69(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-020-00130-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israeli Ministry of Education. (2019) . Tanakh curriculum for Mamlchti Education System. Israeli Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. (2016). A retrospective introduction to religious education: An interpretive approach. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2016-0011
   Google Scholar
• Katzin, O. (2015). Teaching approaches of beginning teachers for Jewish studies in Israeli mamlachti schools: A case study of a Jewish education teachers’ training program for outstanding students. Journal of Jewish Education, 81(3), 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2015.1065633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, G., & Katzin, O. (2020). Engaged in the Bible – Disengaged from the lesson: Perceptions of Generation Z pupils in Israeli non-religious state middle and high schools. Education and Context, 42, 47–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, A. Y., Marom, M. S., & Keep, B. (2019). What we talk about when we talk about research in Jewish education: How references produce a field. Journal of Jewish Education, 85(3), 240–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2019.1639115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, O. (2006). Interactive text study: A case of hevruta learning. Journal of Jewish Education, 72(3), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244110600990155
   Google Scholar
• Kisler, R. (2020). A three-thousand-year-old soldier: History and the Hebrew Bible in Jewish-Israeli public education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 43(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1832963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamm, Z. (2000). The Idealogical Foundations of Jewish Studies in Israeli Education. In Pressure and resistance in education: Articles and conversation. Sifriyat Hapoaalim.
   Google Scholar
• Leibowitz, N. (1963). Teaching Bible in high school classes. Maayanot.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S., & Horton, W. (2015). Helping high school students read like experts: Affective evaluation, salience, and literary interpretation. Cognition and Instruction, 33(2), 125–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2015.1029609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, A. (2005). Religious education in Israel. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, 83, 679.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. (1997). Dialogic instruction: When recitation becomes conversation. Nystrand, I. M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R. & Prendergast(Red), C. ( 1997). Dialogic instruction: When recitation becomes conversation. Opening dialogue. understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001016
   Google Scholar
• Peskin, J. (1998). Constructing meaning when reading poetry: An expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 16(3), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1603_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2012a). The ‘document-based lesson’: Bringing disciplinary inquiry into high school history classrooms with adolescent struggling readers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(2), 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.591436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2012b). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., & Goulden, M. (1987). Education and learning to think. New Directions for Higher Education, 1987(59), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.36919875911
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (1984). Biblical narrative. Back to the Sources: Reading the Classic Jewish Texts, 31–81.
   Google Scholar
• Saada, N., & Magadlah, H. (2021). The meanings and possible implications of critical Islamic religious education. British Journal of Religious Education, 43(2), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2020.1785844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweid, E. (2000). Jewish humanistic education in Israel, ways and contents. Hakibbutz Hameuchad.
   Google Scholar
• Segall, A., & Burke, K. (2013). Reading the Bible as a pedagogical text: Testing, testament, and some postmodern considerations about religion/the Bible in contemporary education. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(3), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2012). The big six historical thinking concepts.
   Google Scholar
• Shalom Hartman Institute (Director). (n.d.). How to compose a facilitating question? https://heb.hartman.org.il/%D7%9B%D7%99%D7%A6%D7%93-%D7%9C%D7%97%D7%91%D7%A8-%D7%A9%D7%90%D7%9C%D7%AA-%D7%93%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9B%D7%94/
   Google Scholar
• Shapira, A. (2004). The bible and Israeli identity. AJS Review, 28(1), 11–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0364009404000030
   Google Scholar
• Shkedi, A. (2009). From curriculum guide to classroom practice: Teachers’ narratives of curriculum application. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(6), 833–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270902927030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shkedi, A. (2016). They remained in the classroom: ‏narratives of outstanding teaching students. Mofet Institiute.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2008). Pedagogies of interpretation, argumentation, and formation: From understanding to identity in Jewish education. Journal of Jewish Education, 74(s1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244110802493289
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, T., Hall, A. H., Goldman, S. R., & Lee, C. D. (2016). Developing symbolic interpretation through literary argumentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(1), 93–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1124040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Education Law. (1953). State Education Law, 1953, HH, 242, § 2. https://fs.knesset.gov.il//2/law/2_lsr_208355.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Stern, J. (2021). We’re still teaching, we’re still learning. British Journal of Religious Education, 43(2), 137–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2021.1880108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz, R. J., Costa, A. L., Beyer, B. K., Reagan, R., & Kallick, B. (2010). Thinking-based learning: Promoting quality student achievement in the 21st century. ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Tamarin, G. R. (1972). The Israeli dilemma: Essays on a warfare state (Vol. 2).
   Google Scholar
• Tishman, S., Perkins, D. N., & Jay, E. S. (1995). The thinking classroom: Learning and teaching in a culture of thinking. Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tsemach, E., & Zohar, A. (2019). Teaching Thinking in Bible Studies. Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
   Google Scholar
• TTBSI (Director). (2022a). Asking questions—the Teaching about Thinking in Bible Studies Project. Asking questions - the Teaching about Thinking in Bible Studies Project.
   Google Scholar
• TTBSI (Director). (2022b). Promoting argumentation in Bible studies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFpoIDTyQj0
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V., Hout-Wolters, V., Bernadette, H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
   Google Scholar
• Vermeer, P. (2012). Meta-concepts, thinking skills and religious education. British Journal of Religious Education, 34(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2012.663748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., James, L. L., & Kaufman, C. (2015). Introduction. In The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaniv, I. (2010). From alienation to dialogue: Teaching Bible in non-religious Jewish Israeli secondary education [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tel-Aviv University.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. (2020). Connecting Islands to Form a Continent: Improving Education by Deep Learning across the School System.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2015). Metacognition and teaching higher order thinking (HOT) in science education: Students’ learning, teachers’ knowledge and instructional practices. In The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking (pp. 253–266). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Cohen, A. (2016). Large scale implementation of higher order thinking (HOT) in civic education: The interplay of policy, politics, pedagogical leadership and detailed pedagogical planning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar