School principals as translators – examining Swedish school principals’ translations of the standards-based curriculum

References

• Adhikary, R. W., & Lingard, B. (2018). A critical policy analysis of ‘Teach for Bangladesh’: A travelling policy touches down. Comparative Education, 54(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1360567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be?. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, V. E., March, J. G., & Saetren, H. (1986). Implementation and ambiguity. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 2(3–4), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0281-7527(86)90016-2
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203153185
   Google Scholar
• Beaton, E. E., DeJordy, R., & Foster, P. (2021). The lived experience of managerialisation: understanding values conflict in non‐profits through a pragmatic institutionalism. Journal of Management Studies, 58(6), 1471–1506. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benders, J., & Van Veen, K. (2001). What’s in a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions. Organisation, 8(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840181003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, A., & Wahlström, N. (2018). Conflicting goals of educational action: A study of teacher agency from a transactional realism perspective. The Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1400449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., & Burbules, N. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research (Philosophy, theory and educational research). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterji, M. (2002). Models and methods for examining standards-based reforms and accountability initiatives: Have the tools of inquiry answered pressing questions on improving schools? Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 345–386. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In I. B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating organisational change (pp. 13–48). Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
   Google Scholar
• Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education interaction and practice (Introducing qualitative methods). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209670
   Google Scholar
• Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2019). School principals’ sensemaking of their leadership role during reform implementation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1450996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, J. (1994). Realism, Deweyan pragmatism and educational research. Educational Researcher, 23(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023001005
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. (2008). Clear Goals and Knowledge Requirements, New Curricula for Schools. A Summary. [Tydliga mål och kunskapskrav i grundskolan. Förslag till nytt mål- och uppföljningssystem]. Swedish Government Official Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M. (2011). Leadership and the reform of education. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., Møller, J., Schratz, M., & Serpieri, R. (2017). From welfarism to neo-liberalism: Conceptualising the diversity in leadership models in Europe. In D. Waite & I. Bogotch (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of educational leadership (pp. 311–334). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Yuan, K. (2012). Standards-based accountability in the United States: Lessons learned and future directions. Education Inquiry, 3(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v3i2.22025
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008016
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J. (2017). Leading education beyond what works. European Educational Research Journal EERJ, 16(4), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117705487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAE. (2021). The Swedish National Agency for Education. Statistics of grades. Retrieved July 20, 2021, https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/statistik
   Google Scholar
• NAE (Swedish National Agency for Education). (2011) . Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preschool Class and the Leisure-time Centre. Lgr 11. Swedish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. The Elementary School Journal, 84(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1086/461348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2019). Skandinavisk translationsforskning ad nye veje: Om de-kontekstualisering af organisatorisk praksis. Samfundslederskab i Skandinavien, 34(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.22439/sis.v34i1.5669
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D. (2018). Exploring curriculum change using discursive institutionalism – a conceptual framework. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 820–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1482961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øygarden, O., & Mikkelsen, A. (2020). Readiness for change and good translations. Journal of Change Management, 20(3), 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2020.1720775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., & Jones, R. (2006). Travelling and embedded policy: The case of knowledge transfer. Journal of Education Policy, 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500391462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalising education policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867396
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (2008). Managementsamhället. Trender och idéer på 2000-talet. [The management society - Trends and ideas in the 21st century]. Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (2016). Knowledge transfer as translation: review and elements of an instrumental theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A., & Pettersen, H. M. (2014). Masterideer. In I. K. A. Røvik, T. V. Eilertsen, & E. M. Furu (Eds.), Reformideer i norsk skole: Spredning, oversettelse og implementering (pp. 54–86). Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success: the construction of organisational fields. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organisational change (pp. 69–92). Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. D. S. (2002, August). The Processes of Globalisation. Eurozine, 1–48. https://www.eurozine.com/the-processes-of-globalisation/
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourses seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Speaking of change: Why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2011.576520
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2015). Discursive institutionalism: Understanding policy in context. In F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, & M. Orsini (Eds.), Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 171–189). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• SFS 2010:800. Skollag [Swedish Education Act].
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P., Thomas, S., & Harris, J. (2013). Recontextualising policy discourses: A Bernsteinian perspective on policy interpretation, translation, enactment. Journal of Education Policy, 28(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.770554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K., & Wahlström, N. (2017). Curriculum and leadership in transnational reform policy: A discursive-institutionalist approach. In M. Uljens & R. M. Ylimaki (Eds.), Bridging educational leadership, curriculum theory and didaktik: Non-affirmative theory of education (pp. 439–462). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhlkrantz, K. (2022). Principal agency: Educational leadership at the intersection between past experiences and present environments. In N. Wahlström (Ed.), Equity, teaching practice and the curriculum: Exploring differences in access to knowledge (pp. 90–104). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, D. (2018). Curriculum standardisation. In N. Wahlström & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational curriculum standards and classroom practices (pp. 116–132). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2012). Standards-based curricula in a denationalised conception of education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.342
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2018). From transnational curriculum standards to classroom practices: The new meaning of teaching. In N. Wahlström & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational Curriculum Standards and Classroom Practices (pp. 133–150). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., & Weinbaum, E. H. (Eds.). (2008). The implementation gap: Understanding reform in high schools. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good Research Practice. https://www.vr.se/download/18.5639980c162791bbfe697882/1555334908942/Good-Research-Practice_VR_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M., & Ylimaki, R. (2015 3). Towards a discursive and non-affirmative framework for curriculum studies, Didaktik and educational leadership. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(3), 30177. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.30177
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N. (2022). Equity in education: Equal opportunities for what? In N. Wahlström (Ed.), Equity, teaching practice and the curriculum. Exploring differences in access to knowledge (pp. 30–59). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (2018a). Discursive institutionalism: Towards a framework for analysing the relation between policy and curriculum. Journal of Education Policy, 33(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1344879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (2018b). Transnational curriculum standards, curriculum reforms and classrooms practices – an introduction. In N. Wahlström & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational curriculum standards and Classroom Practices (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waldow, F. (2015). From Taylor to Tyler to no child left behind: Legitimating educational standards. Prospects, 45(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9334-x
   Google Scholar