756
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

The racism of Maria Montessori

ORCID Icon
Pages 619-631 | Received 19 Jan 2023, Accepted 14 Aug 2023, Published online: 20 Aug 2023

References

  • Anonymous. (1913). Review of Pedagogical Anthropology. The North American Review, 198(696), 733–734.
  • Anonymous. (1914). Review: Montessori ‘system’: Pedagogical Anthropology by Maria Montessori and Frederic Taber. British Medical Journal, 1(2766), 32.
  • Baldwin, J. M. (1895). Mental development in the race and the child. Macmillan.
  • Boas, F. (1901). The mind of primitive man. The Journal of American Folklore, 14(52), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/533099
  • Boas, F. (1909). Race problems in America. Science, 29(752), 839–849. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.29.752.839
  • Broca, P. (1864). On the phenomena of hybridity in the genus homo. Longman, Green, Longman, & Roberts. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.33744
  • Burkholder, Z. (2011). Color in the classroom: How American schools taught race 1900-1954. Oxford University Press.
  • De Stefano, C. (2020). The child is the teacher: The life of Maria Montessori. Other Press.
  • Dewey, J., & Dewey, E. (1915). Schools of to-morrow. E.P. Dutton & Co.
  • Fallace, T. (2015). Educators confront the ‘science’ of racism, 1898-1925. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(2), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1088067
  • Foschi, R. (2008). Science and culture around the Montessori’s first children’s houses in Rome (1907-1915). Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 44(3), 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20313
  • Frierson, P. (1918). Maria Montessori’s metaphysics of life. European Journal of Philosophy, 26, 991–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12326
  • Goddard, H. H. (1912). The Kallikak family: A study in the heredity of feeblemindedness. MacMillan Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/10949-000
  • Goddard, H. H. (1920). Keeble-mindedness: Its causes and consequences. Macmillan.
  • Goodchild, L. F. (2012). G. Stanley Hall and an American social Darwinist pedagogy: His progressive educational ideas on gender and race. History of Education Quarterly, 52(1), 62–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5959.2011.00373.x
  • Gossett, T. E. (1965). Race: The history of an idea in America. Schocken Books.
  • Gould, S. J. (1981). Mis-measure of man. Norton.
  • Grant, M. (1916). The passing of the great race. Charles Scribner’s sons.
  • Hall, G. S. (1905). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relation to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion, and education. D. Appleton Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10616-000
  • Hines, M., & Fallace, T. (2022). Pedagogical Progressivism and black education: A historiographical Review, 1880–1957. Review of Educational Research, 93(3), 454–486. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221105549
  • James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. Henry Holt and Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000
  • Jordan, D. S. (1910). The blood of the nation: The study of the decay of races through the survival of the unfit. American Unitarian Association. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.18642
  • Kendi, I. X. (2016). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of the racist ideas in America. Nation Books.
  • Kilpatrick, W. H. (1914). The Montessori system examined. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Kloppenberg, J. T. (1986). Uncertain victory: Social democracy and progressivism in European and American thought, 1870-1920. Oxford University Press.
  • Kramer, R. (1988). Maria Montessori: A biography. Diversion Books.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. University of Chicago Press.
  • Levenson, J. R. (1968). Confucian China and its modern fate. University of California Press.
  • Margonis, F. (2009). John Dewey’s racialized visions of the student and classroom community. Educational Theory, 59(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00305.x
  • Menand, L. (2001). The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America. Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
  • Montessori, C. (Ed.). (2015). Maria Montessori writes to her father: Letters from California, 1915. Montessori-Pearson Publishing Company).
  • Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method (Anne E. George, Trans.). Frederick Stokes Company.
  • Montessori, M. (1913). Pedagogical anthropology (Frederic Taber, Trans.). Frederick Stokes Company.
  • Moretti, E. (2021). The best weapon for peace: Maria Montessori, education, and children’s rights. University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Reach for Montessori. (2022, March 7). Montessori and race: Questions and answers. https://reachformontessori.com/montessori-and-race-questions-and-answers/
  • Robson, D., & Franco, A. (2023). Montessori: The world’s most influential school? BBC Future. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230131-does-the-montessori-method-actually-work#:~:text=And%20according%20to%20some%20estimates,world%20using%20the%20Montessori%20method
  • Romano, A. (2020). Maria Montessori: A complex and multifaceted historiographical subject. History of Psychology, 23(2), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000150
  • Selden, S. (1999). Inheriting shame: The story of eugenics and racism in America. Teachers College Press.
  • Skiba, R. (2012). ‘As nature has formed them’: The history and current status of racial difference research. Teachers College Record, 114(5), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211400501
  • Smith, T. L. (1912). The Montessori system in theory and practice. Harper & Brothers.
  • Standing, E. M. (1957). Maria Montessori: Her life and work. Hollis & Carter.
  • Stocking, G. (1968). Race, culture and evolution: Essays in the history of anthropology. University of Chicago Press.
  • Sussman, R. W. (2016). The myth of race: the troubling persistence of an unscientific idea. Harvard University Press.
  • Thayer-Bacon, B. (2012). Maria Montessori, John Dewey, and William H. Kilpatrick. Education and Culture, 28(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1353/eac.2012.0001
  • Thomas, W. I. (1909). Source book on human origins: Ethnological materials, psychological standpoint, classified and annotated bibliographies for the interpretation of savage society. Gorham Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.