Tracing teachers’ change of pedagogical design capacity through professional development

References

• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology,3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Edelson, D. C. (2003). Teaching as design: Can we better understand how teachers use materials so we can better design materials to support their changes in practice? LeTUS Report Series. http://inquirium.info/people/matt/teaching_as_design-Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhauser, M. A., & Lesaux, N. K. (2017). Exercising a bounded autonomy: Novice and experienced teachers’ adaptations to curriculum materials in an age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1088065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canbolat, Y. (2020). Professional autonomy of high school teachers in Turkey: A retrospective and prospective policy analysis. Education and Science, 45(202), 141–171. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.7833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, I. (2016). Pedagogical design capacity and underlying knowledge base of curriculum materials use of a Hong Kong English teacher. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p85
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenders, F., & Terlouw, C. (2015). A model for in-service teacher learning in the context of an innovation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(5), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9432-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., Beyer, C., Forbes, C. T., & Stevens, S. (2011). Understanding pedagogical design capacity through teachers’ narratives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, C., & Remillard, J. T. (2019). Seeing teacher-designer-curriculum research through an ergonomic lens: Commentary. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics reform education. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00351.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst, C. J., Bruder, M. B., & Hamby, D. W. (2015). Meta-synthesis of in-service professional development research: Features associated with positive educator and student outcomes. Educational Research & Reviews, 10(12), 1731–1744. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2306
   Google Scholar
• Eroglu, M., & Donmus Kaya, V. (2021). Professional development barriers of teachers: A qualitative research. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2), 1896–1922.
   Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487101052001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T. (2011). Preservice elementary teachers’ adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry-based elementary science. Science Education, 95(5), 927–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2010). Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers’ mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 820–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümüş, E., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2023). The relationship between the types of professional development activities teachers participate in and their self-efficacy: A multi-country analysis. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1892639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartnett, J. E. (2011). Professional Growth Through Working Together: A Study of Reciprocal Benefits for Teacher and Education Advisor Through Classroom-Based Professional Development [Unpublished dissertation], Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, H. (1999). Teacher Professional growth: A study of primary teachers Involved in mathematics professional development. [ Unpublished thesis]. Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Jukić Matić, L. (2019). The pedagogical design capacity of a lower secondary mathematics teacher and her interaction with curriculum resources. REDIMAT–Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 8(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2019.2396
   Google Scholar
• Justi, R., & Van Driel, J. H. (2006). The use of the IMTPG as a framework for understanding the development of science teachers’ knowledge of models and modelling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(4), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen, H., Bethell, G., Fordham, E., Henderson, K., & Ruochen Li, R. (2019). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Student assessment in Turkey. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5edc0abe-en
   Google Scholar
• Knight-Bardsley, A., & McNeill, K. L. (2016). Teachers’ pedagogical design capacity for scientific argumentation. Science Education, 100(4), 645–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshota, M., & Adler, J. (2018). Disaggregating a mathematics teacher’s pedagogical design capacity. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: Advances and issues (pp. 89–117). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73253-4_5
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., & Harfitt, G. J. (2017). An examination of language teachers’ enactment of curriculum materials in the context of a centralised curriculum. Pedagogy Culture & Society, 25(3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1270987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (1st ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, L. (2018). Proposed structural refinements to the interconnected model of teacher professional growth. In J. Hunter, P. Perger, & L. Darragh (Eds.), Making waves, opening spaces Proceedings of the 41st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Auckland (pp. 495–502). MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthey, S. J., & Woodard, R. (2017). Faithfully following, adapting, or rejecting mandated curriculum. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 13(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2017.1376672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDuffie, A. R., & Mather, M. (2009). Middle school mathematics teachers’ use of curricular reasoning in a collaborative professional development project. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 302–320). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2011). The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Nalbantoğlu, Ü. Y., & Bümen, N. T. (2024). Changes in the curriculum adaptation skills of teachers as a result of professional development support: A Turkish case study. Teaching & Teacher Education, 137, 104386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017). Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osman, D. J., & Warner, J. R. (2020). Measuring teacher motivation: The missing link between professional development and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 103064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2009). Comparing three approaches to preparing teachers to teach for deep understanding in Earth science: Short-term impacts on teachers and teaching practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(4), 461–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903191904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepin, B., Artigue, M., Gitirana, V., Miyakawa, T., Ruthven, K., & Xu, B. (2019). Mathematics teachers as curriculum designers: An international perspective to develop a deeper understanding of the concept. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet, & B. Pepin (Eds.), The ‘resource’ approach to mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_6
   Google Scholar
• Petrou, M., & Goulding, M. (2010). Conceptualising teachers’ mathematical knowledge in teaching. In T. Rowland, & K. Ruthven (Eds.). Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 9–25). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Prenger, R., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2021). Professional learning networks: From teacher learning to school improvement? Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 13–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09383-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2018). Examining teachers’ interactions with curriculum resource to uncover pedagogical design capacity. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources. ICME-13 monographs. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73253-4
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(5), 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
   Google Scholar
• Sims, S., & Fletcher-Wood, H. (2021). Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: A critical review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1772841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis. Available from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/2515/15341, Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tokgöz, Ö. (2013). Transformation of centralized curriculum into teaching and learning Processes: Teachers’ journey of thought curriculum into enacted one. [ Unpublished thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Tokgoz, M., & Bümen, N. T. (2021). Turkish teachers’ autonomy in using and adapting curriculum: A mixed methods study. Issues in Educational Research, 31(4), 1270–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. Ascd.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, D., & O’Connor, B. R. (2023). Teacher curriculum competence: How teachers act in curriculum making. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2271541
   Google Scholar
• Troyer, M. (2017). Teachers’ adaptations to and orientations towards an adolescent literacy curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 202–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1407458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyer, M. (2019). “And then my creativity took over”: Productivity of teacher adaptations to an adolescent literacy curriculum. The Elementary School Journal, 119(3), 351–385. https://doi.org/10.1086/701719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood Taylor, M. (2013). Replacing the ‘teacher-proof’ curriculum with the ‘curriculum-proof’ teacher: Toward more effective interactions with mathematics textbooks. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(3), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.710253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witterholt, M., Goedhart, M., Suhre, C., & van Streun, A. (2012). The interconnected model of professional growth as a means to assess the development of a mathematics teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 661–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongsopawiro, D. S., Zwart, R. C., & Van Driel, J. H. (2017). Identifying pathways of teachers’ PCK development. Teachers & Teaching, 23(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1204286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazicilar, U., & Bumen, N. T. (2019). Crossing over the brick wall: Adapting the curriculum as a way out. Issues in Educational Research, 29(2), 583–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yun‐peng, M., Chi‐chung, L., & Ngai‐ying, W. (2006). Chinese primary school mathematics teachers working in a centralised curriculum system: a case study of two primary schools in North‐East China. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 36(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920600741206
   Google Scholar
• Zepeda, S. J. (2017). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625874
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Stephens, M. (2013). Utilising a construct of teacher capacity to examine national curriculum reform in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0072-9
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T. C. M., & Bolhuis, S. (2007). Experienced teacher learning within the context of reciprocal peer coaching. Teachers & Teaching, 13(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600601152520
   Google Scholar