34
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Academic drift and curriculum debris: Analysis of high school course‐taking patterns and its implications for local policy makers

, &
Pages 341-360 | Published online: 09 Jul 2006

References

  • Boyer , E. L. 1983 . High School: A Report on Secondary Education in America , New York : Harper and Row .
  • Husen , T. 1983 . Are standards in US schools really lagging behind those in other countries? . Phi Delta Kappan , 64 : 455 – 467 .
  • Cuban , L. 1984 . Transforming the frog into a prince: Effective schools research, policy, and practice at the district level . Harvard Educational Review , 54 : 129 – 151 . Levin, H. (1984) Time for reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,6, pp. 151‐164; Rosenholtz, S. J. (1985) Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence. American Journal of Education,93, pp. 281‐312.
  • Alexander , K. A. and Pallas , A. M. 1983 . Curriculum Reform and School Performance: An Evaluation of the ‘New Basics’ Center for Social Organization of Schools , ERIC ED 242046 Baltimore, MD : Johns Hopkins University . Boyer (1983) (see note 1); California State Department of Education (1984a) California High School Curriculum Study: Paths through High School(Sacremento, CA); Goodlad, J. I. (1984) A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future(McGraw‐Hill, New York); National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) A Nation at Risk: The Imperative of Educational Reform(us Government Printing Office, Washington, DC); Pallas, A. M. and Alexander, K. A. (1983) Sex differences in quantitative sat performance: New evidence on the differential coursework hypothesis. American Educational Research Journal,20, pp. 165‐182; Resnick, D. P. and Resnick, L. B. (1985) Standards, curriculum, and performances: A historical and comparative perspective. Educational Researcher,14, pp. 5‐20; Sebring, P. A. (1984) Course taking and achievement: Findings and implications for curricular policy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Murphy , J. and Hallinger , P . 1984 . Policy analysis at the local level: A framework for expanded investigation . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 6 : 5 – 13 . Murphy, J. and Hallinger, P. (1986 a) Educational equity and differential access to knowledge: An analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Finance Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Boyer , E. L. and (see note 1); Murphy, J., Hallinger P., . 1983 . (1986 b) Transcript analysis: A tool for improving quality and equity in high school programs . High School Journal , 69 : 132 – 138 . Hull, T. R., Walker, A., and Murphy, J. (in press) Transcript analysis: Implications for high school principals. NASSP Bulletin.
  • Congressional Report of us Representative John N. Erlenborn (Winter 1983).
  • Sebring, (1984) (see note 4)
  • Ibid. ,
  • Brophy , J. and Good , T. L. 1986 . “ Teacher behavior and student achievement ” . In Handbook of Research on Teaching: , 3rd Edition , Edited by: Wittrock , M. C. 328 – 375 . New York : Macmillan . Cooley, W. W. and Leinhardt, G. (1980) The instructional dimensions study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,2, pp. 7‐25; Hanson, R. A. and Schutz, R. E. (1978) A new look at schooling effects from programmatic research and development. In Mann, D. (ed.) Making Change Happen? (TeachersCollege Press, New York), pp. 120‐149; Walberg, H. J. and Shanahan, T. (1983) High school effects on individual students. Educational Researcher,12, pp. 4‐9; Keith, T. and Page, E. (1985) Homework works at school: New evidence for policy changes. School Psychology Review,14, pp. 351‐359.
  • Purkey , S. C. and Smith , M. S. 1983 . Effective schools: A review . Elementary School Journal , 83 : 427 – 452 . Rosenshine, B. (1983) Teaching functions in instructional programs. Elementary School Journal,83, pp. 335‐351.
  • Boyer, (1983) (see note 1)
  • National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) (see note 4)
  • Sebring (1984) (see note 4)
  • Sizer , T. R. 1984 . Horace's Compromise: The Dilemma of the American High School , Boston, MA : Houghton Mifflin .
  • Powell , A. G. , Farrar , E. and Cohen , D. K. 1985 . The Shopping Mall High School: Winners and Losers in the Educational Marketplace , Boston, MA : Houghton Mifflin .
  • Resnick and Resnick (1985) (see note 4).
  • Sizer (1984) (see note 15).
  • California (1984a) (see note 4); National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) (see note 4).
  • Grossman , P. 1985 . Curricular Change in California Comprehensive High Schools: 1982‐83 to 1984‐85 , Stanford, CA : Policy Analysis for California Education . Kirst; M. W. (1982) Policy Implications of Individual Differences and the Common Curriculum(Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance, Stanford University, Stanford, CA); Murphy, J., Hallinger, P. and Mesa, R. P. (1985) School effectiveness: Checking progress and assumptions and developing a role for state and federal government. Teachers College Record,86, pp. 615‐641; Sebring (1984) (see note 4).
  • Murphy and Hallinger (1984) (see note 5)
  • Boyer (1983) (see note 1) and Coleman , P. 1985 . Towards more effective schools: Improving elementary school climate . Administrator's Notebook , 31 : 1 – 4 . Finn, C. E. (1983) Strategic Independence: Policy Considerations for Enhancing School Effectiveness(National Institute of Education, Washington, DC); Goodlad (1984) (see note 4); Purkey and Smith (1983) (see note 11); Sizer (1984) (see note 15).
  • Berman , P. 1984 . Improving School Improvement: A Policy Evaluation of the California School Improvement Program: Volume 1: Executive Summary and Recommendations , Berkeley, ca : Berman, Weiler Associates . Clark, D. S., Lotto, L. S., and Astuto, T. A. (1984) Effective schools and school improvement: A comparative analysis of two lines on inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly,20, pp. 41‐68; Fullan, M. (1982) Implementing educational change: Progress at last. Paper prepared for a Conference on the Implications of Research on Teaching, Warrenton, VA.
  • Murphy and Hallinger (1986 a) (see note 5)
  • Campbell , R. F. 1975 . The Organization and Control of American Schools , 3rd edn , Columbus, OH : Charles E Merrill .
  • Murphy and Hallinger (1986 b) (see note 6)
  • Brookover , W. 1982 . Creating Effective Schools: An Inservice Program for Enhancing School Learning Climate and Achievement , Holmes Beach, FL : Learning Publications Inc. . Edmonds, R. R. (1979) Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership,37, pp. 15‐24; Hersh, R. H. (1981) What makes some schools and teachers more effective? Unpublished manuscript (University of Oregon at Eugene, or); Lezotte, L. W. et al.(1980) School Learning Climate and Student Achievement: A Social Systems Approach to Increased Student Learning(Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University, East Lancing, mi); Murphy, J. et al.(1985) School effectiveness: A conceptual framework. Educational Forum,49, pp. 361‐374; Phi Delta Kappa (1980) Why Do Some Urban Schools Succeed?(Phi Delta Kappa, Bloomington, in); Purkey and Smith (1983) (see note 11); Wynne, E. A. (1980) Looking at Schools: Good, Bad and Indifferent(D. C. Heath, Lexington, MA).
  • Murphy , J. and Hallinger , P . 1985 . Effective high schools: What are the common characteristics? . NASSP Bulletin , 69 : 18 – 22 . Russell, J. S. et al.(1985) Linking the Behavior and Activities of Secondary School Principals to School Effectiveness: A Focus on Effective and Ineffective Behaviors(Center for Educational Policy and Management, University of Oregon at Eugene, OR), ERIC ED 258 934; Rutter, M. et al.(1979) Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and their Effects on Children(Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
  • Hanson , E. M. 1981 . “ Organizational control in educational systems: A case study of governance in schools ” . In Organizational Behavior in Schools and School Districts , Edited by: Bacharach , S. B. 245 – 276 . New York : Praeger . Little, J. W. and Bird, T. D. (1984) Is there instructional leadership in high schools? First findings from a study of secondary school administrators and their influence on teachers’ professional norms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, la; Martin, W. J. and Willower, D. J. (1981) The managerial behavior of high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly,17, pp. 69‐90; Morris, V. C. et al.(1984) Principals in Action: The Reality of Managing Schools(Charles E. Merrill, Colombus, OH).
  • DeBevoise , W. 1984 . Synthesis of research on the principal as instructional leader . Educational Leadership , 41 : 14 – 20 . Leithwood, K. A. and Montgomery, R. J. (1982) The role of the elementary school principal in program improvement. Review of Educational Research,52, pp. 309‐339; Murphy, J. et al.(1983) Instructional leadership: A conceptual framework. Planning and Changing,14, pp. 137‐149; Rutherford, W. L. (1985) School principals as effective leaders. Phi Delta Kappan,67, pp. 31‐34.
  • Goodlad , Murphy , J. , Mesa , R. P. and Hallinger , P . 1984 . A stronger state role in school reform . Educational Leadership , 42 : 20 – 26 . (1984) (see note 4); Murphy and Hallinger (1986 a) ((see note 5)
  • Edmonds , (see note 27) and Lezotte , L. 1979 . School effectiveness , San Diego, CA : Speech delivered at the San Diego County Office of Education . Murphy, J., Hallinger, P. and Peterson, K. D. (1985) The administrative control of principals in effective school districts: The supervision and evaluation functions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL).
  • Adler , M. 1983 . Paideia: Problems and Possibilities , New York : Macmillan . Boyer (1983) (see note 1); Goodlad (1984) (see note 4).
  • Pallas and Alexander (1983) (see note 4)
  • Murphy and Hallinger (1986b) (see note 6)
  • Cicourel , A. V. and Kituse , J. I. 1963 . “ California (1984 a) (see note 4) ” . In The Educational Decision Makers , Indianapolis, IN : Bobbs‐Merrill . Heyns, B. (1974) Social selection and stratification within schools. American Journal of Sociology,79, pp. 1434‐1451; Page, R. (1984) Lower‐track classes at a college‐preparatory high school: A caricature of educational encounters. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Boyer (1983) (see note 1); California (1984 a) (see note 4); Goodlad (1984) (see note 4); Page (1984) (see note 36); Powell et al.(198S) (see note 16).
  • Evertson , C. M. 1982 . Differences in instructional activities in higher‐ and lower‐achieving junior high English and math classes . Elementary School Journal , 82 : 329 – 350 . Good, T. L. and Marshall, S. (1984) Do students learn more in heterogeneous or homogeneous groups? In Peterson, P. L. et al.(eds.) The Social Context of Instruction: Group Organization and Group Processes(Academic Press, Orlando, FL), pp. 15‐38; Page (1984) (see note 36); Powell et al.(1985) (see note 16); Rosenbaum, J. E. (1976) Making Inequality: The Hidden Curriculum of High School Tracking(Wiley, New York).
  • Murphy and Hallinger (1985) (see note 28)
  • See, for example, Adler (1983) (see note 33); Boyer (1983) (see note 1); and Sizer (1984) (see note 15).
  • Murphy and Hallinger (1986 b) (see note 6)
  • Cuban , L. 1982 . Persistent instruction: The high school classroom, 1900‐1980 . Phi Delta Kappan. , 64 : 113 – 118 . Sizer (1984) (see note 15); Tyack, D. and Hansot, E. (1982) Managers of Virtue: Public School Leadership in America, 1820‐1980(Basic Books, New York).
  • See especially California (1984a) (see note 4)
  • Alexander , K. A. and McDill , E. L. 1976 . Selection and allocation within schools: Some causes and consequences of curriculum placement . American Sociological Review , 41 : 963 – 980 . and Murphy and Hallinger (1986 a) (see note 5)
  • California (1984 a) (see note 4) , Murphy , J. , Hallinger , P. and Mesa , R. P. 1986 . Assessing high academic expectations at the high school level . Effective School Report , 3 : 6 Powell et al.(1985) (see note 16); Resnick and Resnick (1985) (see note 4).
  • Brophy , J. 1982 . Successful teaching strategies for the inner‐city child . Phi Delta Kappan , 63 : 527 – 530 . Brophy and Good (1986) (see note 10); Rosenshine (1983) (see note 11).
  • Carlberg , C. 1981 . Tests/texts: Report cards for schools . Noteworthy , : 43 – 48 . Cooley and Leinhardt (1980) (see note 10); Freeman, D. J. et al.(1983) Do textbooks and tests define a national curriculum in elementary school mathematics? Elementary School Journal,83, pp. 501‐513; Levine, D. U. (1982) Successful approaches for improving academic achievement in inner‐city elementary schools. Phi Delta Kappan,63, pp. 523‐526; Levine, D. U. and Stark, J. (1982) Instructional and organizational arrangements that improve achievement in inner‐city schools. Educational Leadership,40, pp. 41‐46.
  • 1984b . “ California State Department of Education ” . In Time and Learning in California Public Schools , CA : Sacramento . Cotton, K. and Savard, W. G. (1980) Time factors in student learning. Paper prepared for the Alaska Department of Education (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Portland, OR); Denham, C. and Lieberman, A. (1980) Time to Learn(United States Department of Education/National Institute of Education, Washington, DC); Fisher, C. W. and Berliner, D. C. (eds.) (1985) Perspectives on Instructional Time(Longman, New York); Schneider, B. Further evidence on school effects. Journal of Educational Research,78, pp. 32‐37.
  • Alexander and Pallas (1983) (see note 4); Cooley and Leinhardt (1980) (see note 10); Hanson and Schutz (1978) (see note 10); Walberg and Shanahan (1983) (see note 10).
  • Alexander and Pallas (1983) (see note 4)
  • Powell et al.(1985) (see note 16); Sebring (1984) (see note 4).
  • California (1984 a) (see note 4); Resnick and Resnick (1985) (see note 4)
  • Grossman et al.(1985) (see note 20).
  • Boyer (1983) (see note 1); California (1984a) (see note 4); Goodlad (1984) (see note 4); Powell et al.(1985) (see note 16).
  • California (1984a) (see note 4); Resnick and Resnick (1985) (see note 4)
  • Alexander and Pallas (1983) (see note 4)
  • Sizer (1984) (see note 15)
  • National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) (see note 4)
  • Powell et al.(1985) (see note 16).
  • Boyer (1983) (see note 1); Powell et al.(1985) (see note 16).
  • Alexander , McDill , Alexander , K. A. , Cook , M. and McDill , E. L. 1978 . Curriculum tracking and educational stratification: Some further evidence . American Sociological Review , 43 : 47 – 66 . (1976) (see note 44);
  • Powell et al.(1985) (see note 16); Sizer (1984) (see note 15).
  • California (1984 a) (see note 4); Powell et al.(1985) (see note 16); Resnick and Resnick (1985) (see note 4).
  • Murphy et al.(1986) (see note 45).
  • Powell et al.(1985) (see note 16); Sizer (1984) (see note 15).
  • Murphy et al.(1986) (see note 45).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.