On the Colonial Origins of Agricultural Development in India: A Re-examination of Banerjee and Iyer, ‘History, Institutions and Economic Performance’

References

• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2002). ‘Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1231–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., Burgess, R., Redding, S.J., Zilibotti, F. (2008). The unequal effects of liberalization: Evidence from dismantling the license Raj in India. The American Economic Review, 98, pp. 1397–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baden-Powell, B. H. (1892). The land systems of British India, Vol. I–III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baden-Powell, B. H. (1894). A short account of the land revenue and its administration in British India: With a sketch of the tenures. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press. Retrieved from http://archive.org/details/shortaccountofla00bade
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., & Iyer, L. (2001). The imperial legacy: Colonial land tenure systems and independent India. Mimeo. (no longer available on the internet: copy available from authors on request).
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., & Iyer, L. (2002). History, institutions and economic performance: The legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India (Working Paper 02-27). Cambridge, MA: MIT, Department of Economics,
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., & Iyer, L. (2005). History, institutions and economic performance: The legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India. American Economic Review, 95, 1190–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., Iyer, L. & Somanathan, R. (2005). History, social divisions and public goods in rural India. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3, 639–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P. K. (2005). Scarcity, conflicts, and cooperation: Essays in the political and institutional economics of development. Google eBook (p. 306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-J. (2007). Institutional change and economic development. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, B. (1983). Agrarian relations: Eastern India. In D. Kumar (Ed.), The Cambridge economic history of India, Vol. II (pp. 86–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, B. B. (1984). Rural power structure and agricultural productivity in eastern India, 1757–1947. In M. Desai, S. H. Rudolph, & A. Rudra (Eds.), Agrarian power and agrarian productivity in South Asia (pp. 100–170). New Delhi: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. (1991). The meaning of replication and the science of economics. History of Political Economy, 23, 123–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, P. (1932). District administration in the United Provinces, Central Provinces, and the Panjab, 1858–1918. In The Cambridge history of the British Empire, Vol. 5 (pp. 276–293). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, J. (1870). Report on the Land Revenue Settlement of British Nimar; a District of the Central Provinces. Effected by Captain J. Forsyth 1868–69. [With a Map.]. Chief Commissioner’s Office Press, Nagpur.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, J. B. (1922). Introduction to the land revenue and settlement systems of the Central Provinces. Reprint. Nagpur: Government Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, M., Mahoney, J., & Hau, M. vom (2006). Colonialism and development: A comparative analysis of Spanish and British colonies. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1412–1462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1133–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez, de Silanes F., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15, 222–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkandawire, T. (2010). On tax effort and colonial heritage in Africa. Journal of Development Studies, 46, 1647–1669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (Ed.). (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from HD 800 NOR.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavan, T. C. A. (1985). Malguzars and peasants: The Narmada Valley, 1860–1920. Studies in History, 1, 169–200.
   Google Scholar
• Reserve Bank of India. (1985). Agricultural productivity in Eastern India: Report of the Committee on Agricultural Productivity in Eastern India. Bombay: Reserve Bank of India.
   Google Scholar
• Robb, P. G. (1988). Law and agrarian society in India. The case of Bihar and the nineteenth-century tenancy debate. Modern Asian Studies, 22: 319–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb, P. G. (1997). Ancient rights and future comfort: Bihar, the Bengal Tenancy Act of 1885, and British rule in India. London: Curzon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, T. (2011). Geography or politics? Regional inequality in colonial India. Mimeo, Department of Economic History, London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. H. (2011). From reflection to refraction: State administration in British India, circa 1770–1855. The American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1437–1477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar