517
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Households’ Willingness to Pay for Health Microinsurance and its Impact on Actual Take-up: Results from a Field Experiment in Senegal

, &
Pages 1445-1462 | Accepted 21 Apr 2014, Published online: 01 Oct 2014

References

  • Acharya, A., Vellakkal, S., Taylor, F., Masset, E., Satija, A., Burke, M., & Ebrahim, S. (2013). The impact of health insurance schemes for the informal sector in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review (Policy Research Working Paper 6324). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Alberini, A., Kanninen, B., & Carson, R. (1997). Modeling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data. Land Economics, 73(3), 309–324.
  • ANSD. (2006). Troisième Recensement Général de la Population et de l’Habitat – RGPH – 2002 Senegal.
  • ANSD. (2008). Situation Economique et Sociale de la Région de Thies. Retrieved from http://www.ansd.sn/publications_SES_ region.html.
  • Ashraf, N., Berry, J., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). Can higher prices stimulate product use? Evidence from a field experiment in Zambia. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2383–2413.
  • Bateman, I. J., Landford, I. H., Jones, A. P., & Kerr, G. N. (2001). Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Resource and Energy Economics, 23(3), 191–213.
  • Bhatia, M., & Fox-Rushby, J. (2003). Validity of willingness to pay: hypothetical versus actual payment. Applied Economics Letters, 10(12), 737–740.
  • Blumenschein, K., Blomquist, G. C., Johannesson, M., Horn, N., & Freeman, P. (2008). Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: Evidence from a field experiment. Economic Journal, 118, 14–137.
  • Blumenschein, K., Johannesson, M., Blomquist, G. C., Liljas, B., & O’Conor, R. M. (1998). Experimental results on expressed certainty and hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Southern Economic Journal, 65(1), 169–177.
  • Blumenschein, K., Johannesson, M., Yokoyama, K. K., & Freeman, P. R. (2002). Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: Results from a field experiment. Journal of Health Economics, 20(3), 441–457.
  • Bonan, J., Dagnelie, O., LeMay-Boucher, P., & Tenikue, M. (2012). Is it all about money? A randomised evaluation of the impact of insurance literacy and marketing treatments on the demand for health microinsurance in Senegal (Working Papers 216). Milan: University of Milano-Bicocca.
  • Carson, R., & Groves, T. (2007). Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental & Resource Economics, 37, 181–210.
  • Cummings, R. G., Harrison, G. W., & Rutstrom, E. E. (1995). Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: Is the dichotomous choice approach incentive-compatible? American Economic Review, 85(1), 260–266.
  • Dercon, S. (2002). Income risk, coping strategies, and safety nets. World Bank Research Observer, 17(2), 141–166.
  • DeShazo, J. R. (2002). Designing transactions without framing effects in iterative question formats. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43(3), 360–385.
  • Diop, F., Sulzbach, S., & Chankova, S. (2006). The impact of mutual health organizations on social inclusion, access to health care, and household income protection: Evidence from Ghana, Senegal, and Mali. Bethesda, Abt Associates.
  • Donaldson, C., Jones, A. M., Mapp, T. J., & Olson J. A. (1998). Limited dependent variables in willingness to pay studies: Applications in health care. Applied Economics, 30(5), 667–677.
  • Donfouet, H. P., Makaudze, E., Mahieu, P. A., & Malin, E. (2011). The determinants of the willingness-to-pay for community-based prepayment scheme in rural Cameroon. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 11(3), 209–220.
  • Dong, H., Kouyate, B., Cairns, J., Mugisha, F., & Sauerborn, R. (2003). Willingness to pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso. Health Economics, 12(10), 849–862.
  • Dong, H., Kouyate, B., Cairns, J., & Sauerborn, R. (2003). A comparison of the reliability of the take-it-or-leave-it and the bidding game approaches to estimating willingness-to-pay in a rural population in West Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 56(10), 2181–2189.
  • Dong, H., Kouyate, B., Cairns, J., & Sauerborn, R. (2005). Inequality in willingness to pay for community based health insurance. Health Policy, 72(2), 149–156.
  • Dror, D., Radermacher, R., & Koren, R. (2006). Willingness to pay for health insurance among rural and poor persons: Field evidence from seven micro health insurance units in India. Health policy, 82(1), 12–27.
  • Ekman, B. (2004) Community-based health insurance in low-income countries: A systematic review of the evidence. Health Policy Plan, 19(5), 249–270.
  • Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure – or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38(1), 115–132.
  • Haab, T. C., & McConnell, K. E. (2002). Valuing environmental and natural resources: The econometrics of non-market valuation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Hanemann, M., Loomis J., & Kanninen, B. (1991). Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 1255–1263.
  • Harrison, G. W., & Rutström, E. (2008). Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods. In Charles R. Plott & Vernon L Smith (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics results (vol. 1) (pp. 752–767). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Herriges, J. A., & Shogren, J. F. (1996). Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(1), 112–131.
  • ILO. (2008). Social health protection. An ILO strategy towards universal access to health care (Social security policy briefings, Paper 1). Geneva: ILO.
  • Johannesson, M., Liljas, B., & Johansson, P. O. (1998). An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions. Applied Economics, 30(5), 643–647.
  • Johannesson, M., Blomquist, G. C., Blumenschein, K., Johansson, P. O., Liljas, B., & O’Conor, R. M. (1999). Calibrating hypothetical willingness to pay responses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 21–32.
  • Jutting, J. (2003). Do community-based health insurance schemes improve poor people’s access to health care? Evidence from rural Senegal. World Development, 32(2), 273–288.
  • Kanninen, B. (1995). Bias in discrete response contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(1), 114–125.
  • McCollum, D. W., & Boyle, K. J. (2005). The effect of respondent experience/knowledge in the elicitation of contingent values: An investigation of convergent validity, procedural invariance and reliability. Environmental and Resource Economics, 30, 23–33.
  • McNamee, P., Ternent, L., Gbangou, A., & Newlands, D. (2010). A game of two halves? Incentive incompatibility, starting point bias and the bidding game contingent valuation method. Health Economics, 19(1), 75–87.
  • Mitchell, R., & Carson, R. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  • Morduch, J. (1995). Income smoothing and consumption smoothing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(3), 103–114.
  • Morduch, J. (1999) Between the state and the market: Can informal insurance patch the safety net? World Bank Research Observer, 14(2), 187–207.
  • Onwujekwe, O., Hanson K., & Fox-Rushby, J. (2005). Do divergences between stated and actual willingness to pay signify the existence of bias in contingent valuation surveys? Social Science & Medicine, 60(3), 525–536.
  • Onwujekwe, O., & Nwagbo, D. (2002). Investigating starting-point bias: A survey of willingness to pay for insecticide-treated nets. Social Science and Medecine, 55(12), 2121–2130.
  • Onwujekwe, O., Okereke, E., Onoka, C., Uzochukwu, B., Kirigia, J., & Petu, A. (2010). Willingness to pay for community-based health insurance in Nigeria: Do economic status and place of residence matter? Health Policy Plan, 25(2), 155–161.
  • Prabhu, V. S. (2010). Tests of intrahousehold resource allocation using a CV framework: A comparison of husbands’ and wives’ separate and joint WTP in the slums of Navi-Mumbai, India. World Development, 38(4), 606–619.
  • Rutstein, S., & Johnson, K. (2004). The DHS wealth index (Comparative Reports No. 6). Calverton, MD: DHS.
  • Ryan, M., Sutthi, J., & Cairns, J. (2007). Testing the external validity of contingent valuation: A field experiment comparing hypothetical and real payments. iHEA 2007 6th World Congress: Explorations in Health Economics Paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=993412
  • Voors, M. J., Nillesen, E. E. M., Verwimp. P., Bulte, E. H., Lensink, B. W., & van Soest, D. P. (2012). Violent conflict and behavior: A field experiment in Burundi. American Economic Review, 102(2), 941–964.
  • Wagstaff, A. (2007). The economic consequences of health shocks: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Health Economics, 26(1), 82–100.
  • Wagstaff, A., & van Doorslaer, E. (2003). Catastrophe and impoverishment in paying for health care: With applications to Vietnam 1993–98. Health Economics, 12(11), 921–934.
  • Wang, H., Yip, W., Zhang, L., & Hsiao, W. (2009). The impact of rural mutual health care on health status: Evaluation of a social experiment in rural China. Health Economics, 18(2), 65–82.
  • Watson, V., & Ryan, M. (2007). Exploring anomalies in double bounded contingent valuation. Journal of Health Economics, 26(3), 463–482.
  • Whitehead, J. C. (2002) Incentive incompatibility and starting-point bias in iterative valuation questions. Land Economics, 78(2), 285–297.
  • WHO. (2010). The world health report. Health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. Geneva: WHO.
  • WHO. (2011). World health statistics. Geneva: WHO.
  • World Bank. (2013) World development indicators 2013. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.