Under What Conditions Can Local Government Nurture Indigenous People’s Democratic Practice? A Case Study of Two Ho Village Assemblies in Jharkhand

References

• Alkire, S. (2006). Structural injustice and democratic practice: The trajectory in Sen’s writings. In S. Deneulin, Nebel, M., & Sagovsky, N. (Eds.), Transforming unjust structures: The capability approach. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Areeparampil, M. (1988). Forests and tribals: Victims of exploitation. Chaibasa: TRTC.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners. 35(4), 216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00109-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, T., Nathan, I., & Lund, D. (2012). The national park process in Denmark: A network governance approach to democratize nature policy-making?. In K. Hogl, E. Kvarda, R. Nordbeck, & M. Pregernig (Eds.), Environmental governance: The challenge of legitimacy and effectiveness (pp. 89–109). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 307–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colfer, C., & Capistrano, D. (2005). The politics of decentralization: Forests, people and power. London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). The case for participation as tyranny (pp. 1-15). Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S. (2002). The continuing struggle for India’s Jharkhand: Democracy, decentralisation and the politics of names and numbers. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 40(3), 55–71. doi:10.1080/713999595
   Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S., & Jewitt, S. (1997). From forest struggles to forest citizens? Joint Forest Management in the unquiet woods of India’s Jharkhand. Environment and Planning A, 29(12), 2145–2164. doi:10.1068/a292145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S., Jewitt, S., & Kumar, S. (2004). Jharkhand: Environment, development, ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S., & Kumar, S. (2002). Community, corruption, landscape: Tales from the tree trade. Political Geography, 21(6), 765–788. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00029-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damodaran, V. (2006). The politics of marginality and the construction of indigeneity in Chotanagpur. Postcolonial Studies: Culture, Politics, Economy, 9(2), 179–196. doi:10.1080/13688790600657843
   Google Scholar
• Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2002). Democratic practice and social inequality in India. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 37(2), 6–37. doi:10.1177/002190960203700202
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (2004). Development as institutional change: The pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 30–52. doi:10.1007/BF02686327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, W. (2013). Tribal or indigenous? The Indian Dilemma. The Round Table, 102(4), 381–389. doi:10.1080/00358533.2013.795012
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, T., & Sikor, T. (2013). Forests, development and the globalisation of justice. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 114–121. doi:10.1111/geoj.2013.179.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. (2002). Exploring citizenship, participation and accountability. IDS Bulletin, 33(2), 1–14. doi:10.1111/idsb.2002.33.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of India. (1992). The Constitution (73^rd Amendment) Act, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. (1996). Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. (2001). Census atlas of India, 2001. New Delhi: Office of Registrar General and Census Commissioner.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. (2007). Scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. (2010). The Jharkhand Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Bill, 2010. New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. (2011). Census atlas of India, 2011. New Delhi: Office of Registrar General and Census Commissioner.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss, J., Stokke, K., & Törnquist, O. (Eds.). (2004). Politicizing democracy: The new local politics of democratization (pp. 1–28). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hebbar, R. (2005). Homecoming: Ho women, work, and land rights in Jharkhand. Sociological Bulletin, 54, 18–39. doi:10.1177/0038022920050102
   Google Scholar
• Herriott, R., & Firestone, W. (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability. Educational Researcher, 12(2), 14–19. doi:10.3102/0013189X012002014
   Google Scholar
• IFAD. (2012). Republic of India: Jharkhand tribal empowerment and livelihoods project main report. Rome: Author.
   Google Scholar
• IFAD. (2015). Republic of India: Impact evaluation of the Jharkhand-Chhattisgarh tribal development programme. Rome: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, S. (2000). Mothering earth? Gender and environmental protection in the Jharkhand, India. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 27(2), 94–131. doi:10.1080/03066150008438733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, S. (2008). Political ecology of Jharkhand conflicts. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 49(1), 68–82. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8373.2008.00361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., Deshingkar, P., & Start, D. (2005). Grounding the state: Devolution and development in India’s panchayats. Journal of Development Studies, 41(6), 937–970. doi:10.1080/00220380500155197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadlec, A., & Friedman, W. (2007). Deliberative democracy and the problem of power. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. (2014). Interrogating ‘Integration’ in Adivasi discourse: Customary vs. Democratic Institutions in West Singhbhum, Jharkhand. Journal of Adivasi and Indigenous Studies, 1(1), 62–75.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, A., & Ribot, J. (2004). Democratic decentralisation through a natural resource lens: An introduction. The European Journal of Development Research, 16(1), 1–25. doi:10.1080/09578810410001688707
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., Mearns, R., & Scoones, I. (1999). Environmental entitlements: Dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Development, 27(2), 225–247. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00141-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manor, J. (2011). Perspectives on decentralization. ICLD Working Paper 3. Visby: ICLD.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. (2012). Capacity assessment and capacity development strategy report for strengthening Panchayati Raj Institutions in Jharkhand. New Delhi: Ministry of Panchayati Raj .
   Google Scholar
• Nambiar, M. (2001). Making the gram sabha work. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(33) 3114–3117.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, I., Lund, J., Gausset, Q., & Andersen, S. (2007). On the promises of devolution: Overcoming the constraints of natural resource management in a village in Tanzania. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 6(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Neergaard, H., & Ulhøi, J. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of qualitative research methods in entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner India. (2011) Census of india 2011. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Participatory Research in Asia. (2004). Tribal self-rule law: Implications of Panchayat laws in Scheduled Areas of Jharkhand. New Delhi: Participatory Research in Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Poteete, A., & Ribot, J. (2011). Repertoires of domination: Decentralization as process in Botswana and Senegal. World Development, 39(3), 439–449. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhu, P. (2004). PESA and the illusions of tribal self-governance. Combat Law, 2, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Rath, G. C. (2006). The struggle for self-governance: the gram sabha movement for implementation of the pesa act in Jharkhand. Man in India. 86(1–2), 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. (2004). Waiting for democracy: The politics of choice in natural resource decentralization. WRI report, World Resources Institute, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J., Agrawal, A., & Larson, A. (2006). Recentralizing while decentralizing: How national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Development, 34(11), 1864–1886. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft, D. J., & Dasgupta, S. (Eds.). (2011). The politics of belonging in india: becoming adivasi. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Saito-Jensen, M., & Nathan, I. (2011). Exploring the potentials of community-based natural resource management for benefiting local communities: Policies and practice in four communities in Andhra Pradesh, India. Society & Natural Resources, 24(11), 1142–1156. doi:10.1080/08941920.2010.516062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sareen, S. (2016). Seeing development as security: Constructing top-down authority and inequitable access in Jharkhand. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 13. DOI : 10.4000/samaj.4146
   Google Scholar
• Sarin, M. (1996). From conflict to collaboration: Institutional issues in community management. In M. Poffenberger & B. McGean (Eds.), Village voices, forest choices: Joint forest management in India (pp. 165–209) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, A. (2010). In the shadows of the state: Indigenous politics, environmentalism, and insurgency in Jharkhand, India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, G. (2010). Democracy and democratization. In K. Leicht& & J. Jenkins (Eds.), Handbook of politics (pp. 441–458). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stuligross, D. (2008). Resources, representation, and authority in Jharkhand, India. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 49(1), 83–97. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8373.2008.00362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, N. (2001). Is devolution democratization? World Development, 29(12), 2007–2023. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00085-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, N. (2005). ‘Custom’ and ‘Democracy’ in Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(41), 4430–4434.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, N. (2009). Legal grounds: Natural resources, identity and the law in Jharkhand. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tillin, L. (2011). Questioning borders: Social movements, political parties and the creation of new states in India. Pacific Affairs, 84(1), 67–87. doi:10.5509/201184167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2007). United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. Washington: Author.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (1998). The UNECE convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Verardo, B. (2003). Rebels and devotees of Jharkhand: Social, religious and political transformation among the Adivasis of Northern India ( Unpublished dissertation). London: University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, California.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. (1976). Decisions and analogy: Political structure and discourse among the Hotribals of India ( Unpublished dissertation). London: University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar