Fairness and Efficiency in Smallholder Farming: The Relation with Intrahousehold Decision-Making

References

• Agarwal, B. (1997). “Bargaining” and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51. doi:10.1080/135457097338799
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. (2015). Gender, group behavior and community forestry in South Asia. In R. L. Bryant (Ed.), The international handbook of political ecology (pp. 201–217). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Alderman, H., Hoddinott, J., Haddad, L., & Udry, C. R. (2003). Gender differentials in farm productivity: Implications for household efficiency and agricultural policy. In A. R. Quisumbing (Ed.), Household decisions, gender, and development: A synthesis of recent research (pp. 61–66). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf, N. (2009). Spousal control and intrahousehold decision making: An experimental study in the Philippines. American Economic Review, 99, 1245–1277. doi:10.1257/aer.99.4.1245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalew, A. D., Bowen, F. H., Deininger, K. W., & Duponchel, M. F. (2015). Investigating the gender gap in agricultural productivity: Evidence from Uganda (Policy Research working paper WPS 7262). Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Baland, J. M., & Platteau, J. P. (1998). Wealth inequality and efficiency in the commons, Part II: The regulated case. Oxford Economic Papers, 50, 1–22. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a028631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc, E. (2012). The impact of climate change on crop yields in Sub-Saharan Africa. American Journal of Climate Change, 1, 1–13. doi:10.4236/ajcc.2012.11001
   Google Scholar
• Blattman, C. (2010, October 27). The cardinal sin of matching [Blog]. Retrieved September 18, 2017,  from https://chrisblattman.com/2010/10/27/the-cardinal-sin-of-matching/
   Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, J. C. (2011). Social norms and behavior in the local commons as seen through the lens of field experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, 451–485. doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9452-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, J. C., & Carpenter, J. (2008). Behavioural development economics: Lessons from field labs in the developing world. The Journal of Development Studies, 44, 311–338. doi:10.1080/00220380701848327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, M. S., Boston, R., Farrar, J. T., & Strom, B. L. (2003). Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158, 280–287. doi:10.1093/aje/kwg115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiputwa, B., & Qaim, M. (2016). Sustainability standards, gender, and nutrition among smallholder farmers in Uganda. The Journal of Development Studies, 52, 1241–1257. doi:10.1080/00220388.2016.1156090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaver, F. (2002). Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. The European Journal of Development Research, 14(2), 11–30. doi:10.1080/714000425
   Google Scholar
• Cochard, F., Couprie, H., & Hopfensitz, A. (2016). Do spouses cooperate? An experimental investigation. Review of Economics of the Household, 14, 1–26. doi:10.1007/s11150-014-9276-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doss, C. (2013). Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 28, 52–78. doi:10.1093/wbro/lkt001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doss, C., Deere, C. D., Oduro, A., & Suchitra, J. Y. (2012). The rural gender asset and wealth gaps: Evidence from Ghana, Ecuador, Uganda and Karnataka, India. Bangalore: Indian Institute of Management Bangalore.
   Google Scholar
• Doss, C., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2015). Collective action within the household: Insights from natural resource management. World Development, 74, 171–183. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., & Leibbrandt, A. (2011). A field study on cooperativeness and impatience in the Tragedy of the Commons. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1144–1155. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiala, N., & He, X. (2017). Unitary or noncooperative intrahousehold model? Evidence from couples in Uganda. The World Bank Economic Review, 30(Suppl. 1), S77–S85.
   Google Scholar
• Gelcich, S., Guzman, R., Rodríguez-Sickert, C., Castilla, J. C., & Cárdenas, J. C. (2013). Exploring external validity of common pool resource experiments: Insights from artisanal benthic fisheries in Chile. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 2. doi:10.5751/ES-05598-180302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, A. N., & Quinn, K. M. (2010). An introduction to the augmented inverse propensity weighted estimator. Political Analysis, 18, 36–56. doi:10.1093/pan/mpp036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, A. H. X. (2012). A literature review of the gender-differentiated impacts of climate change on women’s and men’s assets and well-being in developing countries (CAPRi Working Paper,106). Washington, DC: CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi), International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hoel, J. (2015). Heterogeneous households: A within-subject test of asymmetric information between spouses in Kenya. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118, 123–135. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, V., Jackson, C., Kebede, B., Munro, A., & Verschoor, A. (2011). Do spouses realise cooperative gains? Experimental evidence from rural Uganda. World Development, 39, 569–578. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. (2013). Cooperative conflicts and gender relations: Experimental evidence from Southeast Uganda. Feminist Economics, 19(4), 25–47. doi:10.1080/13545701.2013.827797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., & Kes, A. (2015). The ambiguity of joint asset ownership: Cautionary Tales from Uganda and South Africa. Feminist Economics, 21(3), 23–55. doi:10.1080/13545701.2014.926559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30, 435–464. doi:10.1111/dech.1999.30.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebede, B., Tarazona, M., Munro, A., & Verschoor, A. (2014). Intrahousehold efficiency: An experimental study from Ethiopia. Journal of African Economies, 23, 105–150. doi:10.1093/jae/ejt019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecoutere, E., D’Exelle, B., & Van Campenhout, B. (2015). Sharing common resources in patriarchal and status-based societies: Evidence from Tanzania. Feminist Economics, 21(3), 142–167. doi:10.1080/13545701.2015.1024274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenjiso, B. M., Smits, J., & Ruben, R. (2016). Transforming gender relations through the market: Smallholder milk market participation and women`s intrahousehold bargaining power in Ethiopia. The Journal of Development Studies, 52, 1002–1018. doi:10.1080/00220388.2016.1139693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Landrum, M. B. (2013). Propensity score weighting with multilevel data. Statistics in Medicine, 32, 3373–3387. doi:10.1002/sim.5786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, M. C., Munro, A., & Tarazona-Gomez, M. (2015). Us and Them: Experimental evidence on what creates efficiency in choices made by married couples (GRIPS Discussion Papers, Vol. 15-10). Tokyo: National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mani, A. (2008). Mine, yours or ours: The efficiency of household investment decisions - an experimental approach (Working Paper). Warwick: University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D. F., Griffin, B. A., Almirall, D., Slaughter, M. E., Ramchand, R., & Burgette, L. F. (2013). A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models. Statistics in Medicine, 32, 3388–3414. doi:10.1002/sim.5753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, A., Kebede, B., Tarazona-Gomez, M., & Verschoor, A. (2010). The lion’s share: An experimental analysis of polygamy in northern Nigeria (GRIPS Discussion Paper, Vol. 10-27). Tokyo: National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, A., Kebede, B., Tarazona-Gomez, M., & Verschoor, A. (2014). Autonomy and efficiency. An experiment on household decisions in two regions of India. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 33, 114–133. doi:10.1016/j.jjie.2013.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, D. (2015, May 7). Development blind spots: rethinking gender inequality. Kapuscinski development lectures [Streaming]. Retrieved May 7, 2015 from http://kapuscinskilectures.eu/lectures/rethinking-gender-inequality/
   Google Scholar
• Njuki, J., Kaaria, S., Chamunorwa, A., & Chiuri, W. (2011). Linking smallholder farmers to markets, gender and intrahousehold dynamics: Does the choice of commodity matter? The European Journal of Development Research, 23, 426–443. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2011.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pirracchio, R., Resche-Rigon, M., & Chevret, S. (2012). Evaluation of the propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample size. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(70), 12–17. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quisumbing, A. R., & Maluccio, J. A. (2000). Intrahousehold allocation and gender relations: New empirical evidence from four developing countries. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Reuben, E., & Riedl, A. (2013). Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations. Games and Economic Behavior, 77(1), 122–137. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustagi, D., Engel, S., & Kosfeld, M. (2010). Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science, 330, 961–965. doi:10.1126/science.1193649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tittonell, P., & Giller, K. E. (2013). When yield gaps are poverty traps: The paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Research, 143, 76–90. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bold, M., Dillon, A., Olney, D., Ouedraogo, M., Pedehombga, A., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2015). Can integrated agriculture-nutrition programmes change gender norms on land and asset ownership? Evidence from Burkina Faso. The Journal of Development Studies, 51, 1155–1174. doi:10.1080/00220388.2015.1036036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, N., Jassogne, L., van Asten, P. J. A., Mukasa, D., Wanyama, I., Kagezi, G., & Giller, K. E. (2015). Evaluating coffee yield gaps and important biotic, abiotic, and management factors limiting coffee production in Uganda. European Journal of Agronomy, 63, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2012). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar