543
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Manifestations, Drivers, and Frictions of Mobile Phone Use in Low- and Middle-Income Settings: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Rural India and China

ORCID Icon
Pages 1834-1858 | Received 04 Jun 2017, Accepted 04 Mar 2018, Published online: 27 Mar 2018

References

  • Aker, J. C., & Fafchamps, M. (2015). Mobile phone coverage and producer markets: Evidence from West Africa. The World Bank Economic Review, 29, 262–292.
  • Aker, J. C., Ksoll, C., & Lybbert, T. J. (2012). Can mobile phones improve learning? Evidence from a field experiment in Niger. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(4), 94–120.
  • Anstey Watkins, J. O. T., Goudge, J., Gómez-Olivé, F. X., & Griffiths, F. (2018). Mobile phone use among patients and health workers to enhance primary healthcare: A qualitative study in rural South Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 198, 139–147.
  • Archambault, J. S. (2012). ‘Travelling while sitting down’: Mobile phones, mobility and the communication landscape in Inhambane, Mozambique. Africa, 82, 393–412.
  • Arksey, H., & Knight, P. T. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists. London: Sage.
  • Bailard, C. S. (2009). Mobile phone diffusion and corruption in Africa. Political Communication, 26, 333–353.
  • Barbour, R. S. (2007). Doing focus groups. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Basu, K., & Foster, J. E. (1998). On measuring literacy. The Economic Journal, 108, 1733–1749.
  • Basu, K., Narayan, A., & Ravallion, M. (2001). Is literacy shared within households? Theory and evidence for Bangladesh. Labour Economics, 8, 649–665.
  • Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47, 1287–1294.
  • Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Gwebu, K. L. (2010). A critical analysis of current indexes for digital divide measurement. The Information Society, 27, 16–28.
  • Chavula, H. K. (2013). Telecommunications development and economic growth in Africa. Information Technology for Development, 19, 5–23.
  • China Marketing Research. (2014). China data online. Retrieved November 19, 2014, from http://chinadataonline.org
  • Chipchase, J. (2008). Reducing illiteracy as a barrier to mobile communication. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 79–89). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1983). Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika, 70, 1–10.
  • D’Souza, D. A. (2010). The exercise of personal agency by mobile phone use: A mixed methods study among young people in Mumbai, India (Unpublished PhD thesis). Dublin City University, Dublin.
  • Datanet India. (2014). Indiastat. Retrieved November 19, 2014, from www.indiastat.com
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.
  • De Silva, H., Ratnadiwakara, D., & Zainudeen, A. (2011). Social influence in mobile phone adoption: Evidence from the bottom of the pyramid in emerging Asia. Information Technologies and International Development, 7(3), 1–18.
  • Dey, B., Newman, D., & Prendergast, R. (2011). Analysing appropriation and usability in social and occupational lives: An investigation of Bangladeshi farmers’ use of mobile telephony. Information Technology & People, 24, 46–63.
  • Dodson, L. L., Sterling, S. R., & Bennett, J. K. (2013). Minding the gaps: Cultural, technical and gender-based barriers to mobile use in oral-language Berber communities in Morocco. In G. Marsden, J. May, J. Donner, & T. Parikh (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers - Volume 1 (pp. 79–88). Cape Town: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Donner, J. (2007). The use of mobile phones by microentrepreneurs in Kigali, Rwanda: Changes to social and business networks. Information Technologies & International Development, 3(2), 3–19.
  • Donner, J. (2009). Blurring livelihoods and lives: The social uses of mobile phones and socioeconomic development. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 4(1), 91–101.
  • Donner, J., Rangaswamy, N., Steenson, M. W., & Wei, C. (2008). “Express yourself” and “stay together”: The middle-class Indian family. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 325–337). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Donner, J., & Tellez, C. A. (2008). Mobile banking and economic development: Linking adoption, impact, and use. Asian Journal of Communication, 18, 318–332.
  • Doron, A. (2012). Mobile persons: Cell phones, gender and the self in North India. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 13, 414–433.
  • Duncombe, R. (2011). Researching impact of mobile phones for development: Concepts, methods and lessons for practice. Information Technology for Development, 17, 268–288.
  • Emerging Markets, I. S. I. (2012). ICT Sector India. New York, NY: ISI Emerging Markets.
  • Emerging Markets, I. S. I. (2013). ICT Sector China. New York, NY: ISI Emerging Markets.
  • Farhadi, M., Ismail, R., & Fooladi, M. (2012). Information and communication technology use and economic growth. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e48903.
  • Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33, 255–298.
  • Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2012). Exploring the use of mobile communications in a sample of older people: preliminary results of a case study in Los Angeles IN3 Working Paper. Barcelona: Internet Interdisciplinary Institute.
  • Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2014). Mobile phones, restrictions and discontinuities. In I. N. C. Scharff & C. Wamala (Eds.), Proceedings of 4th International Conference on M4D Mobile Communication for Development (pp. 119–130). Karlstad: Karlstad University.
  • Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2010). Microeconomics of technology adoption. Annual Review of Economics, 2, 395–424.
  • Gagliardone, I. (2016). ‘Can you hear me?’ Mobile-radio interactions and governance in Africa. New Media & Society, 18, 2080–2095.
  • Google Inc. (2016). Google. Retrieved 23 May 2016, from https://www.google.com
  • Government of India. (2011). Census of India 2011: Rajasthan: Provisional population totals. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner.
  • Graham, C., & Nikolova, M. (2013). Does access to information technology make people happier? Insights from well-being surveys from around the world. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 44, 126–139.
  • GSMA. (2016a). GSMA mAgri deployment tracker. Retrieved 25 March 2016, from http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/m4d-tracker/magri-deployment-tracker/
  • GSMA. (2016b). GSMA mHealth tracker. Retrieved 25 March 2016, from http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/programmes/mhealth/mhealth-deployment-tracker
  • GSMA. (2016c). GSMA mobile money deployment tracker. Retrieved 25 March 2016, from http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/m4d-tracker/mobile-money-deployment-tracker/
  • Haenssgen, M. J. (2015a). Exploring the mismatch between mobile phone adoption and use through survey data from rural India and China. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) (pp. 1–15). doi:10.1109/ISTAS.2015.7439402
  • Haenssgen, M. J. (2015b). Satellite-aided survey sampling and implementation in low- and middle-income contexts: A low-cost/low-tech alternative. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 12(1). doi:10.1186/s12982-015-0041-8
  • Haenssgen, M. J. (2018). The struggle for digital inclusion: Phones, healthcare, and marginalisation in rural India. World Development, 104, 358–374.
  • Haenssgen, M. J., & Ariana, P. (2017). The social implications of technology diffusion: Uncovering the unintended consequences of people’s health-related mobile phone use in rural India and China. World Development, 94, 286–304.
  • Heeringa, S., West, B. T., & Berglund, P. A. (2010). Applied survey data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Horst, H. A. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: Cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks, 6, 143–159.
  • Hübler, M., & Hartje, R. (2016). Are smartphones smart for economic development? Economics Letters, 141, 130–133.
  • IMF. (2015). World economic outlook database April 2015. Retrieved June 22, 2013, from International Monetary Fund Web site: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/index.aspx
  • ITU. (2015). ICT facts & figures. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.
  • Iversen, V., & Palmer-Jones, R. (2008). Literacy sharing, assortative mating, or what? Labour market advantages and proximate illiteracy revisited. The Journal of Development Studies, 44, 797–838.
  • Jeffrey, R., & Doron, A. (2013). The great Indian phone book: How the cheap cell phone changes business, politics, and daily life. London: Hurst.
  • Jensen, R. (2007). The digital provide: Information (technology), market performance, and welfare in the South Indian fisheries sector. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 879–924.
  • Kaba, B., N’Da, K., Meso, P., & Mbarika, V. W. A. (2009). Micro factors influencing the attitudes toward and the use of a mobile technology: A model of cell-phone use in Guinea. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52, 272–290.
  • Karnowski, V., von Pape, T., & Wirth, W. (2011). Overcoming the binary logic of adoption. In A. Vishwanath & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), The diffusion of innovations: A communication science perspective (pp. 57–76). New York: Peter Lang.
  • Katz, R., Koutroumpis, P., & Callorda, F. M. (2014). Using a digitization index to measure the economic and social impact of digital agendas. Info, 16(1), 32–44.
  • Kavetsos, G., & Koutroumpis, P. (2011). Technological affluence and subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 742–753.
  • Kohler Riessman, C. (2006). Narrative analysis. In V. Jupp (Ed.), The SAGE dictionary of social research methods (pp. 187–190). London: Sage.
  • Kurniawan, S. (2008). Older people and mobile phones: A multi-method investigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 889–901.
  • Kwon, H. S., & Chidambaram, L. (2000, January 4–7). A test of the technology acceptance model: The case of cellular telephone adoption. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ielx5/6709/20043/00926607.pdf?tp=&arnumber=926607&isnumber=20043
  • Lapadat, J. C. (2010). Thematic analysis. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 926–928). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lee, K. H., & Bellemare, M. F. (2013). Look who’s talking: The impacts of the intrahousehold allocation of mobile phones on agricultural prices. Journal of Development Studies, 49, 624–640.
  • Lee, S. K., von Pape, T., & Karnowski, V. (2012, May 24-28). Towards more valid and reliable instruments for media appropriation research: An English translation and test of the mobile phone appropriation model and its scales. Paper presented at the “Mobile Pre-Conference Workshop” of the annual convention of the International Communication Association (ICA), Phoenix, AZ.
  • Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ling, R., & Xiao, J. (2012). mhealth in China: Designing a winning business model. New York, NY: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
  • Lloyd-Evans, S. (2006). Focus groups. In V. Desai & R. B. Potter (Eds.), Doing development research (pp. 153–161). London: Sage.
  • Maddox, B., & Esposito, L. (2013). Literacy inequalities, mediation and the public good: A case study of physical proximity and social distance in Nepal. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34, 243–261.
  • Martin, B. L., & Abbott, E. (2011). Mobile phones and rural livelihoods: Diffusion, uses, and perceived impacts among farmers in rural Uganda. Information Technologies and International Development, 7(4), 17–34.
  • May, J., & Diga, K. (2015). Progress towards resolving the measurement link between ICT and poverty reduction. In A. Chib, J. May, & R. Barrantes (Eds.), Impact of information society research in the global south (pp. 83–104). Springer: Singapore.
  • Medhi, I., Cutrell, E., & Toyama, K. (2010, March 20-24). It’s not just illiteracy. Paper presented at the India HCI 2010/ Interaction Design & International Development 2010 conference, Mumbai.
  • Miritello, G., Moro, E., Lara, R., Martínez-López, R., Belchamber, J., Roberts, S. G. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). Time as a limited resource: Communication strategy in mobile phone networks. Social Networks, 35, 89–95.
  • Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Mishra, S. (2005). Secluded and proximate illiteracy: Comparing situations. Social Indicators Research, 70, 231–240.
  • Morgan, D. L. (2008). Snowball sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • NBS. (2013). China statistical database. Retrieved July 23, 2013, from National Bureau of Statistics of China Web site: http://219.235.129.58/welcome.do
  • Ndiaye, M. A., & Zouinar, M. (2014). The usage of mobile phones by low-literate users in Senegal: An ethnographic study. In I. N. C. Scharff & C. Wamala (Eds.), Proceedings of 4th International Conference on M4D Mobile Communication for Development (pp. 272–280). Karlstad: Karlstad University.
  • Oreglia, E., & Kaye, J. (2012, February 11-15). A gift from the city: Mobile phones in rural China. Paper presented at the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA. Retrieved from http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/2150000/2145228/p137-oreglia.pdf?ip=129.67.116.17&id=2145228&acc=ACTIVE%20SERVICE&key=C2716FEBFA981EF1FFE496A39B822B3BD58A7F987B06222E&CFID=234201184&CFTOKEN=70925838&__acm__=1374089094_a5b4af572dc07f3e30d963ae80ea606b
  • Palackal, A., Nyaga Mbatia, P., Dzorgbo, D.-B., Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M. A., & Shrum, W. M. (2011). Are mobile phones changing social networks? A longitudinal study of core networks in Kerala. New Media & Society, 13, 391–410.
  • Porter, G., Hampshire, K., Abane, A., Munthali, A., Robson, E., Mashiri, M., & Tanle, A. (2012). Youth, mobility and mobile phones in Africa: Findings from a three-country study. Information Technology for Development, 18, 145–162.
  • Qiang, C. Z., Yamamichi, M., Hausman, V., Miller, R., & Altman, D. (2012). Mobile applications for the health sector. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • QSR International. (2014). Nvivo 10. Doncaster: Author.
  • Reisdorf, B. C. (2011). Non-adoption of the Internet in Great Britain and Sweden. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 400–420.
  • Reisdorf, B. C., Axelsson, A.-S., & Söderholm, H. M. (2012, October 18-21). Living offline: A qualitative study of Internet non-use in Great Britain and Sweden. Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers Conference, Salford, UK.
  • research2guidance. (2013). Whitepaper: The smartphone app market 2013. Berlin: Author.
  • Rice, R. E., & Pearce, K. E. (2015). Divide and diffuse: Comparing digital divide and diffusion of innovations perspectives on mobile phone adoption. Mobile Media & Communication, 3, 401–424.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  • Saramaki, J., Leicht, E. A., Lopez, E., Roberts, S. G. B., Reed-Tsochas, F., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). Persistence of social signatures in human communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 942–947.
  • Souter, D., Scott, N., Garforth, C., Jain, R., Mascarenhas, O., & McKemey, K. (2005). The economic impact of telecommunications on rural livelihoods and poverty reduction: A study of rural communities in India (Gujarat), Mozambique and Tanzania. London: UK Department for International Development.
  • StataCorp. (2013). Stata statistical software: Release 13. College Station, TX: Author.
  • Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice (2nd ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Stump, R. L., Gong, W., & Zhan, L. (2008). Exploring the digital divide in mobile-phone adoption levels across countries: Do population socioeconomic traits operate in the same manner as their individual-level demographic counterparts? Journal of Macromarketing, 28, 397–412.
  • Subramanian, S. (2004). Measuring literacy: Some extensions of the Basu-Foster framework. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 453–463.
  • Subramanian, S. (2008). Externality and literacy: A note. The Journal of Development Studies, 44, 839–848.
  • Tenhunen, S. (2008). Mobile technology in the village: ICTs, culture, and social logistics in India. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14, 515–534.
  • Thornham, H., & Gómez Cruz, E. (2017). [Im]mobility in the age of [im]mobile phones: Young NEETs and digital practices. New Media & Society, 19, 1794–1809.
  • Torrance, H. (2012). Triangulation, respondent validation, and democratic participation in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6, 111–123.
  • Tossell, C. C., Kortum, P., Shepard, C., Rahmati, A., & Zhong, L. (2012). An empirical analysis of smartphone personalisation: Measurement and user variability. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31, 995–1010.
  • Ureta, S. (2008). Mobilising poverty? Mobile phone use and everyday spatial mobility among low-income families in Santiago, Chile. The Information Society, 24, 83–92.
  • Walsham, G. (2010). ICTs for the broader development of India: An analysis of the literature. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 41(1), 1–20.
  • Wei, L., & Zhang, M. (2008). The adoption and use of mobile phone in rural China: A case study of Hubei, China. Telematics and Informatics, 25, 169–186.
  • Wesolowski, A., Eagle, N., Noor, A. M., Snow, R. W., & Buckee, C. O. (2012). Heterogeneous mobile phone ownership and usage patterns in Kenya. PLoS ONE, 7(4), e35319.
  • Wesolowski, A., Eagle, N., Noor, A. M., Snow, R. W., & Buckee, C. O. (2013). The impact of biases in mobile phone ownership on estimates of human mobility. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(81). doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0986
  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.
  • Wicander, G. (2010). M4D overview 1.0: The 2009 introduction to mobile for development. Karlstad: Karlstad University.
  • Wirth, W., Von Pape, T., & Karnowski, V. (2008). An integrative model of mobile phone appropriation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 593–617.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Zanello, G. (2012). Mobile phones and radios: Effects on transactions costs and market participation for households in Northern Ghana. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63, 694–714.
  • Zanello, G., Srinivasan, C. S., & Shankar, B. (2014). Transaction costs, information technologies, and the choice of marketplace among farmers in Northern Ghana. The Journal of Development Studies, 50, 1226–1239.
  • Ziefle, M., & Bay, S. (2005). How older adults meet complexity: Aging effects on the usability of different mobile phones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(5), 375–389.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.