15,361
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Importance of Reliability and Construct Validity in Multidimensional Poverty Measurement: An Illustration Using the Multidimensional Poverty Index for Latin America (MPI-LA)

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1763-1783 | Received 07 Feb 2018, Accepted 01 Mar 2019, Published online: 26 Sep 2019

References

  • Abdu, M., & Delamonica, E. (2018). Multidimensional child poverty: From complex weighting to simple representation. Social Indicators Research, 136(3), 881-905.
  • Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 476–487.
  • Alkire, S., Roche, J. M., Ballon, P., Foster, J., Santos, M. E., & Seth, S. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Alkire, S., & Santos, M. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries (OPHI Working Paper No. 38). Oxford: University of Oxford.
  • Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2001). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
  • Altimir, O. (1979). La dimensión de la pobreza en América Latina. Santiago de Chile, Chile: CEPAL.
  • Bank, W. (2017). Monitoring global poverty: Report of the commission on global poverty (The Atkinson Commission). Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Bartholomew, D. J. (1987). Latent variables models and factor analysis. ( D. J. Bartholomew, Ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Battiston, D., Cruces, G., Lopez-Calva, L. F., Lugo, M. A., & Santos, M. E. (2013). Income and beyond: Multidimensional poverty in six Latin American Countries. Social Indicators Research, 112(2), 291–314.
  • Beccaria, L., & Minujín, A. (1985). Métodos alternativos para medir la evolución del tamaño de la pobreza (Documento de Trabajo N. 6). Buenos Aires: INDEC.
  • Boltvinik, J. (1992). El método de medición integrada de la pobreza. Una propuesta para su desarrollo. Comercio Exterior, 42(4), 354–365.
  • Boltvinik, J. (1998). A panorama of poverty measurement methods. New York, NY: UNDP.
  • Boltvinik, J. (2014). América Latina, de la vanguardia al rezago en Medición multidimensional de la pobreza. La experiencia contrastante de México. Una guía para la región. In J. Boltviniki (Ed.), La multidimensionalidad como un desafío para los métdos y técnicas de la Medición de la pobreza (pp. 23–73). Buenos Aires: CLACSO-CROP.
  • Brennan, R. L. (2006). Educational measurement. ACE/Praeger series on higher education. USA: ERIC.
  • Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. ( T. Brown, Ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Buchanan, R. D., & Finch, S. J. (2005). History of psychometrics. In B. Everitt and D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science (Vol. 2, pp. 875–878). West Sussex: John Wiley.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
  • Cudeck, R., & MacCallum, R. C. (2012). Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions. New Jersey: Routledge.
  • de Graaf-Zijl, M., & Nolan, B. (2011). Household joblessness and its impact on poverty and deprivation in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 413–431.
  • Dean, H. (2010). Understanding human need. ( H. Dean, Ed.). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press, University of Bristol.
  • Decancq, K., & Lugo, M. A. (2013). Weights in multidimensional indices of wellbeing: An overview. Econometric Reviews, 32(1), 7–34.
  • Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (Eds.). (1991). A theory of human need. London, UK: The Macmillan press LTD.
  • Gibbons, R. D., Immekus, J. C., Bock, R. D., & Gibbons, R. D. (2007). The added value of multidimensional IRT models. In Multidimensional and hierarchical modeling monograph (pp. 1–92). Chicago, IL: Center for Health Statistics, University of Illinois.
  • Gordon, D. (2000). The scientific measurement of poverty: Recent theoretical advances. In J. Bradshaw (Ed.), Researching poverty (pp. 37–58). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Gordon, D. (2006). The Concept and measurement of poverty. In C. Pantazis, D. Gordon, & R. Levitas (Eds.), Poverty and social exclusion in Birtain: The milenium survey (pp. 29–69). Bristol: Bristol Policy Press.
  • Guio, A., Gordon, D., & Marlier, E. (2012). Measuring material deprivation in the EU: Indicators for the whole population and child-specific indicators. Luxembourg: EUROSTAT.
  • Guio, A.-C., Gordon, D., Najera, H., & Pomati, M. (2017). Revising the EU material deprivation variables ( techreport). Luxembourg: EUROSTAT.
  • Guio, A.-C., Marlier, E., Gordon, D., Fahmy, E., Nandy, S., & Pomati, M. (2016). Improving the measurement of material deprivation at the European Union level. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(3), 219–333.
  • Hambleton, R., & Jodoin, M. (2003). Item response theory: Models and features. In Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (pp. 510–515). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi:10.4135/9780857025753.n110
  • Harris, D. (1989). Comparison of 1-, 2-, and 3-parameter IRT models. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8(1), 35–41.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
  • INDEC. (1984). La Pobreza en la Argentina: Indicadores de necesidades básicas insatisfechas a partir de los datos del Censo nacional de población y vivienda, 1980. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos.
  • Kast, M., & Molina, S. (1975). Mapa extrema pobreza (en Chile). Santiago de Chile, Chile: ODEPLAN/IEUC.
  • Katzman, R. (2000). Notas sobre la medición de la vulnerabilidad social. Santiago de Chile, Chile: CEPAL.
  • Kvalheim, O. M. (2012). History, philosophy and mathematical basis of the latent variable approach: From a peculiarity in psychology to a general method for analysis of multivariate data. Journal of Chemometrics, 26(6), 210–217.
  • Lai, K., & Green, S. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 220–239.
  • Lohmann, H., & Marx, I. (2018). Handbook on in-work poverty. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Mack, J., & Lansley, S. (Eds.). (1985). Poor Britain. London: George Allen & Unwin.
  • Moisio, P. (2004). A latent class application to the multidimensional measurement of poverty. Quality and Quantity, 38(6), 703–717.
  • Muthén, B. (2013). IRT in Mplus. Mplus. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/MplusIRT2.pdf
  • Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (Eds.). (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed). California, USA: Mplus.
  • Nájera, H. E. (2018). Reliability, population classification and weighting in multidimensional poverty measurement: A Monte Carlo study. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-018-1950-z
  • Nandy, S., & Pomati, M. (2015). Applying the consensual method of estimating poverty in a low income African setting. Social Indicators Research, 124(3), 693–726.
  • Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2011). The EU 2020 poverty target. UCD Geary Institute Discussion Paper Series. Dublin: Geary Institute.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from http://books.google.co.in/books?id=WE59AAAAMAAJ
  • Pasha, A. (2017). Regional perspectives on the multidimensional poverty index. World Development, 94, 268–285.
  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. (Eds.). (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Revelle, W. (1979). Hierarchical cluster analysis and the internal structure of tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(1), 57–74.
  • Revelle, W. (2018). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Version = 1.8.12.
  • Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154.
  • Santos, M. E., & Villatoro, P. (2016). A multidimensional poverty index for Latin America. Review of Income and Wealth, n/a–n/a. doi:10.1111/roiw.12275
  • Sen, A. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44(2), 219–231.
  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. ( A. Sen, Ed.). Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
  • Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. Américan Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72–101.
  • Spicker, P., Alvarez, S., & Gordon, D. (2006). Poverty and international glossary. In P. Spicker, Alvarez S., & D. Gordon, (Eds.), International studies in poverty research, International social science council. London, UK: Zen Books.
  • Stewart, Q. T. (2006). Reinvigorating relative deprivation: A new measure for a classic concept. Social Science Research, 35(3), 779–802.
  • Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Thorndike, R., & Hagen, E. (1969). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Townsend, P. (Ed.). (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A survey of household resources and standards of living. England, UK: Penguin Books Ltd.
  • Townsend, P. (2010). The meaning of poverty. The British Journal of Sociology, 61, 85–102.
  • Vollmer, F., & Alkire, S. (2018). Towards a global assets indicator: Re-assessing the assets: Indicator in the global multidimensional poverty index Oxford, UK: OPHI RESEARCH IN PROGRESS SERIES 53a.
  • Whelan, C., & Maitre, B. (2006). Comparing poverty and deprivation dynamics: Issues of reliability and validity. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 4(3), 303–323.
  • Zinbarg, R., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ω: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133.