1,408
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Technological Catch-up to the National and Regional Frontier: Firm-level Evidence for India

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1303-1320 | Received 15 Jan 2020, Accepted 08 Jan 2021, Published online: 22 Feb 2021

References

  • Aiello, F., & Scoppa, V. (2008). Convergence and regional productivity divide in Italy: Evidence from panel data (Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) Paper 17343). Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17343/1/MPRA_paper_17343.pdf
  • Baldwin, R. (2009). The great trade collapse: What caused it and what does it mean? The great trade collapse: Causes, consequences and prospects. Centre for Economic Policy Research, 100(105), 1.
  • Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). Technological diffusion, convergence, and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 1–26.
  • Bartelsman, E. J., Haskel, J., & Märtin, R.-P. (2008). Distance to which frontier? Evidence on productivity convergence from international firm-level data (Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Discussion Papers, 7032). Retrieved from https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=7032#
  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.
  • Bernard, A. B., & Jones, C. I. (1996). Comparing apples to oranges: Productivity convergence and measurement across industries and countries. American Economic Review, 86(5), 1216–1238.
  • Bond, S. R. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 141–162.
  • Cameron, G., Proudman, J., & Redding, S. (2005). Technological convergence, R&D, trade and productivity growth. European Economic Review, 49(3), 775–807.
  • Chevalier, P.-A., Lecat, R., & Oulton, N. (2012). Convergence of firm-level productivity, globalisation and information technology: Evidence from France. Economics Letters, 116(2), 244–246.
  • Chhibber, P., & Nooruddin, I. (2004). Do party systems count? The number of parties and government performance in the Indian states. Comparative Political Studies, 37(2), 152–187.
  • Dash, B., & Raja, A. (2009). Institutions and the quality of governance: An empirical study on interstate differences in economic development in India. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 16(1), 1–26.
  • Demir, F., & Duan, Y. (2018). Bilateral FDI flows, productivity growth, and convergence: The north vs. the south. World Development, 101, 235–249.
  • Dheer, R. J. S., Lenartowicz, T., & Peterson, M. F. (2015). Mapping India’s regional subcultures: Implications for international management. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(4), 443–467.
  • Dougherty, S., Frisancho, V., & Krishna, K. (2014). State-level labour reform and firm-level productivity in India. India Policy Forum, 10(1), 1–56.
  • Esteban, J. (2000). Regional convergence in Europe and the industry mix: A Shift-Share analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(3), 353–364.
  • Fariñas, J. C., & Ruano, S. (2005). Firm productivity, heterogeneity, sunk costs and market selection. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(7), 505–534.
  • Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., McGowan, D., Sanz, I., & Sanz‐Sanz, J. F. (2018). Corporate taxation and productivity catch‐up: Evidence from European firms. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 120(2), 372–399.
  • Ghani, E., Kerr, W. R., & O’Connell, S. (2014). Spatial determinants of entrepreneurship in India. Regional Studies, 48(6), 1071–1089.
  • Girma, S., & Kneller, R. (2005). Convergence in the UK service sector: Firm level evidence, 1988–1998. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52(5), 736–746.
  • Girma, S., & Vencappa, D. (2015). Financing sources and firm level productivity growth: Evidence from Indian manufacturing. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 44(3), 283–292.
  • Greenaway, D., Guariglia, A., & Kneller, R. (2007). Financial factors and exporting decisions. Journal of International Economics, 73(2), 377–395.
  • Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Simpson, H. (2009). Technological catch-up and geographic proximity. Journal of Regional Science, 49(4), 689–720.
  • Harrison, A. E., Martin, L. A., & Nataraj, S. (2012). Learning versus stealing: How important are market-share reallocations to India’s productivity growth? World Bank Economic Review, 27(2), 202–228.
  • Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.
  • Howitt, P. (2000). Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences. American Economic Review, 90(4), 829–846.
  • Iacovone, L., & Crespi, G. A. (2010). Catching up with the technological frontier: Micro-level evidence on growth and convergence. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 2073–2096.
  • Kumar, G., & Borbora, S. (2017). Institutional environment differences across the Indian states for entrepreneurial development. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6, 50–69.
  • Kumar, S., & Managi, S. (2012). Productivity and convergence in India: A state-level analysis. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(5), 548–559.
  • Lancheros, S. (2012). Innovation and technological convergence: The role of technology investments and international activities. In Essays on firm level responses to trade and foreign direct investment liberalization in India(PhD Thesis). Retrieved from http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12657/1/Thesis_Lancheros.pdf 
  • Lee, J. (2009). Trade, FDI and productivity convergence: A dynamic panel data approach in 25 countries. Japan and the World Economy, 21(3), 226–238.
  • Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341.
  • Mukim, M., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2012). The location choices of foreign investors: A district-level analysis in India. The World Economy, 35(7), 886–918.
  • Nishimura, K. G., Nakajima, T., & Kiyota, K. (2005). Productivity convergence at the firm level (Discussion Paper No. 39). University of Tokyo MMRC. Retrieved from http://merc.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/mmrc/dp/pdf/MMRC39_2005.pdf
  • Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.
  • Shingal, A. (2014). The services sector in India’s states: A tale of growth, convergence and trade. The World Economy, 37(12), 1773–1793.
  • Sridhar, K. S., & Wan, G. (2010). Firm location choice in cities: Evidence from China, India, and Brazil. China Economic Review, 21(1), 113–122.
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development [UNCTAD]. (2015). Handbook of statistics. New York: United Nations.
  • Villaverde, J., & Maza, A. (2008). Productivity convergence in the European regions, 1980–2003: A sectoral and spatial approach. Applied Economics, 40(10), 1299–1313.
  • Wang, J., Liu, X., Wei, Y., & Wang, C. (2014). Cultural proximity and local firms’ catch up with multinational enterprises. World Development, 60, 1–13.
  • Zheng, G. (2016). Geographic proximity and productivity convergence across New Zealand firms (Working paper 2016/04). New Zealand Productivity Commission. Retrieved from https://www.productivity.govt.nz/assets/Documents/explaining-ethnic-disparities-2/6cca996bb0/Geographic-proximity-and-productivity-convergence.pdf