A Decolonial Approach to Innovation? Building Paths Towards Buen Vivir

References

• Albó, X. (2011). Suma qamaña = convivir bien. ¿Cómo medirlo? In I. Farah & L. Vasapollo (Eds.), Vivir Bien: ¿paradigma no capitalista? Roma: CIDES-UMSA: Sapienza, Università di Roma: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• ANDES. (2015). Biocultural Heritage innovations in the Potato Park - SIFOR qualitative baseline study, Peru (Issue March). Retrieved from https://pubs.iied.org/g03917
   Google Scholar
• Anthias, P. (2018). Limits to decolonization: Indigeneity, territory, and hydrocarbon politics in the bolivian chaco. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argumedo, A. (2013). Collective trademarks and Biocultural heritage: Towards new indications of distinction for Indigenous peoples in the Potato Park, Peru. London: International Institute for Environment and Development All.
   Google Scholar
• Argumedo, A., & Pimbert, M. (2010). Bypassing globalization: Barter markets as a new indigenous economy in Peru. Development, 53(3), 343–349.
   Google Scholar
• Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2000). Looking At National Systems of Innovation from the South. Industry & Innovation, 7(1), 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Aubert, J. E. (2004). Promoting innovation in developing countries: A conceptual framework. In Innovation (Issue July). Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Fitz, C. C., Alizaga, N. M., & Zucker, A. N. (2015). Tracking Homo oeconomicus: Development of the neoliberal beliefs inventory. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bélair, C., Ichikawa, K., Wong, B. Y., & Mulongoy, J. (2010). Sustainable use of biological diversity in socio-ecological production landscapes: Background to the ‘Satoyama Initiative for the benefit of biodiversity and human well-being’. Technical Series no. 52 (p. 184). Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., & Davidson-Hunt, I. J. (2010). Innovating through commons use community-based enterprises. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Billet, B.L. (1993). Modernization theory and economic development: Discontent in the developing world. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, J. (2010). Food security, food sovereignty, and local challenges for transnational agrarian movements: The Honduras case. Journal of Peasant Studies. 37(2), 319–351. doi:10.1080/03066151003594997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, R., & Fischer-Mackey, J. (2017). From extractivism towards Buen Vivir: Mining policy as an indicator of a new development paradigm prioritising the environment. Third World Quarterly, 38(6), 1327–1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderón Farfán, J. C., Dussán Chaux, J. D., & Arias Torres, D. (2021). Food autonomy: decolonial perspectives for indigenous health and Buen Vivir. Global Health Promotion, 28(3), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, S., & Pachon, A. M. (2013). The social and solidarity economy in ecuador: Opportunities and challenges (issue July). Ecuador: MINCA.
   Google Scholar
• Canessa, A. (2014). Conflict, claim and contradiction in the new ‘indigenous’ state of Bolivia. Critique of Anthropology, 34(2), 153–173. doi:10.1177/0308275X13519275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caria, S., & Domínguez, R. (2016). Ecuador’s Buen vivir. Latin American Perspectives, 43(1), 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappero-Martinetti, E., Houghton Budd, C., & Ziegler, R. (2017). Social innovation and the capability approach—introduction to the special issue. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(2), 141–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C., Ojomo, E., & Dillon, K. (2019). The prosperity paradox: How innovation can lift nations out of poverty (first). New York, NY: Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, C. C. (2021). Decolonizing philosophy of technology: Learning from bottom-up and top-down approaches to decolonial technical design. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 0123456789.
   Google Scholar
• Davila, Tony, Marc Epstein, and Robert Shelton. 2013. Making innovation work: How to manage it, measure it, and profit from it. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Saille, S., & Medvecky, F. (2016). Innovation for a steady state: A case for responsible stagnation. Economy and Society, 45(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, D. (2019). A toxic development: Pollution and change in an Amazonian oil frontier. In S. Joseph (Ed.), Commodity frontiers and global capitalist expansion. Palgrave Studies in Economic History (pp. 255–277). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15322-9_9
   Google Scholar
• Druijff, A., & Kaika, M. (2021). Upscaling without innovation: taking the edge off grassroot initiatives with scaling-up in Amsterdam’s Anthropocene forest. European Planning Studies, 29(12), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2016). Thinking-feeling with the earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the south. AIBR Revista de Antropologia Iberoamericana, 11(1), 11–32. doi:10.11156/aibr.110102e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: Rationales, lessons and challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(2), 497–512. doi:10.1111/joes.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities, and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417–1435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1995). The “National System of Innovation” in historical perspective Introduction: The National System of Friedrich List. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannini, M. (2012). Social enterprises for development as buen vivir. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 6(3), 284–299. doi:10.1108/17506201211258432
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, T. (2015). An Indigenous autonomous community-based model for knowledge production in the Peruvian Andes. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 10(1), 107–133. doi:10.1080/17442222.2015.1034433
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, G. J. (2019). Environmental personhood. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 43(1), 49.
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, R. (2000). Developmentalism, modernity, and dependency theory in Latin America. Nepantla: Views from the South, 1(2), 347–374.
   Google Scholar
• Guardiola, J., & García-Quero, F. (2014). Buen Vivir (living well) in Ecuador: Community and environmental satisfaction without household material prosperity? Ecological Economics, 107, 177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen Vivir: Today’s tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441–447. doi:10.1057/dev.2011.86
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo-capitán, A. L., Cubillo-guevara, A. P., Medina-carranco, N. (2019). Los Objetivos del Buen Vivir Una propuesta alternativa a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible Good Living Goals An alternative proposal to the Sustainable Development Goals Los Objetivos del Buen Vivir Una propuesta alternativa a los Objetivos de Desarr. Ibe-Roamerican Journal of Development Studies, 8(1), 6–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizawa, J. (2006). Cosmovisions and environmental governance. Bridging Scales and Knowledge Systems: Concepts and Applications in Ecosystem Assessment, 4, 207–224.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. (2017). Prosperity without growth. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, A., & Roberts, T. (2019). Decolonising neo-liberal innovation: Using the andean philosophy of ‘Buen Vivir’ to reimagine innovation hubs. In: P. Nielsen, & H. Kimaro (Eds.), Information and communication technologies for development. strengthening southern-driven cooperation as a catalyst for ICT4D. ICT4D 2019. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (vol. 552). Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_15
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, A., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Tech hubs, innovation, and development. Information Technology for Development, 1102(January), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplinsky, R. (2011). Schumacher meets Schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar. Research Policy, 40(2), 193–203. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, U. (2005). A radical history of development studies: Individuals, institutions and ideologies, Kothari. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer-Mbula, E., Wamae, W., International Development Research Centre (Canada), & Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Innovation and the development agenda. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, U. (2013). Innovation: The new Big Push or the Post-Development alternative? Development, 56(2), 223–226. doi:10.1057/dev.2013.29
   Google Scholar
• Ley marco de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica N° 28303. (2004). Retrieved from https://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con4_uibd.nsf/6A4A8870DD76CFEF05257A76005953CB/$FILE/1_LEY_28303_LEY_MARCO_CIENCIA_TEGNOLOG%C3%8DA_INNOVACI%C3%93N_TECNOL%C3%93GICA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, D., & Macnaghten, P. (2020). Traditional ecological knowledge in innovation governance: A framework for responsible and just innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(1), 26–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. a. (2007). National innovation systems—analytical concept and development tool. Industry & Innovation, 14(1), 95–119.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Torres, M. E., & Rosset, P. M. (2010). La ví a campesina: The birth and evolution of a transnational social movement. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1), 149–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino, R. (2016). An alternative to ‘alternative development’? Buen vivir and human development in Andean countries. Oxford Development Studies, 44(3), 271–286. doi:10.1080/13600818.2016.1144733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino, R., & Gustafsson, M. T. (2021). Localizing the indigenous environmental steward norm: The making of conservation and territorial rights in Peru. Environmental Science and Policy, 124(July), 627–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W., & Walsh, C. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mun, N. K. (2015). La problemática transición boliviana hacia la época postneoliberal: el caso de la economía comunitaria. Revista Estudios Sociales, 54(2014), 22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: studying practises by switching thCeoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418. doi:10.1177/0170840609349875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojalehto mays, B., Seligman, R., & Medin, D. L. (2020). Cognition beyond the human: Cognitive psychology and the new animism. Ethos, 48(1), 50–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, M. (2013). Frugality, grassroots and inclusiveness: New challenges for mainstream innovation theories. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation & Development, 5(6), 469–478.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., Arthur, K. N. A., Jimenez, A., & Pandey, P. (2020). The Plurality of Technology and Innovation in the Global South. In S. De Saille, F. Medvecky, M. Van Oudheusden, K. Albertson, E. Amanatidou, T. Birabi, et al. (Eds.), Responsibility beyond growth: A case for responsible stagnation (pp. 91–110). Bristol University Press. doi:10.46692/9781529208351.011
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., & Owen, R. (2018). Framing inclusive innovation within the discourse of development: Insights from case studies in India Research Policy, 47(1), 23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou, T. (2014). How inclusive can innovation and development be in the twenty-first century? Innovation and Development, 4(2), 187–202. doi:10.1080/2157930X.2014.921355
   Google Scholar
• Perry, K. (2020). Innovation, institutions, and development: A critical review and grounded heterodox economic analysis of late-industrialising contexts. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44(2), 391–415. doi:10.1093/cje/bez049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 168–178. doi:10.1080/09502380601164353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. A. (2018). Tackling complex inequalities and Ecuador’s Buen Vivir: Leaving no-one behind and equality in diversity. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 37(4), 417–433. doi:10.1111/blar.12706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Cendrero, J. García, S. Santillán, A. (2017). Sumak kawsay in Ecuador: The role of communitarian economy and the experience of the rural communities in Sarayaku (Ecuadorian Amazonia), Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 111–121. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.018
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, A. (2012). The Quechua, the guardians of the Potato. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 36(1), 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, R., Saltelli, A., Giampietro, M., Rommetveit, K., & Funtowicz, S. (2018). New narratives for innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1849–1853. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, S. (2005). Potato capital of the world offers up new recipe. IPS News. Retrieved from https://grain.org/article/entries/2165-andes-potato-Park-cip-agreement
   Google Scholar
• Tanasescu, M. (2013). The rights of nature in Ecuador: The making of an idea. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 70(6), 846–861. doi:10.1080/00207233.2013.845715
   Google Scholar
• Tatliadim, A. N. (2015). Intersections of local ontologies and the market economy through rural community tourism: A case study of Amaru village in Southern Andes, Peru. London: University College London (UCL).
   Google Scholar
• Villalba-Eguiluz, C. U., & Etxano, I. (2017). Buen Vivir vs development (II): The limits of (neo-)extractivism. Ecological Economics (138), 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalba-Eguiluz, U., Arcos-Alonso, A., Pérez de Mendiguren, J. C., & Urretabizkaia, L. (2020) Social and solidarity economy in Ecuador: Fostering an alternative development model? Sustainability, 12, 6876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalba-Eguiluz, U., & Pérez-De-Mendiguren, J. C. (2019). The social and solidarity economy as a way to buen vivir. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 8(1), 106–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (2009). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 1(1), 29–40. doi:10.1260/175722209787951224
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (2010). Development as Buen Vivir: Institutional arrangements and (de)colonial entanglements. Development, 53(1), 15–21. doi:10.1057/dev.2009.93
   Google Scholar
• Walshe, R., & Argumedo, A. (2016). Ayni, Ayllu, Yanantin and Chanincha the cultural values enabling adaptation to climate change in communities of the Potato Park, in the Peruvian Andes. GAIA, 25(3), 166–173. doi:10.14512/gaia.25.3.7
   Google Scholar
• Willis, K. (2005). Theories and practises of development (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. (2014). Indigenous mobilisation and the law of consultation in Peru: A boomerang pattern? International Indigenous Policy Journal, 5(4), 1–16. doi:10.18584/iipj.2014.5.4.4
   Google Scholar
• Ytrehus, L. A. (2019). Making sense of communitarianism: The Bolivian experience. Third World Quarterly, 40(6), 1089–1106. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1573635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yujuico, E. (2008). Connecting the dots in social entrepreneurship through the capabilities approach. Socio-Economic Review, 6, 493–513. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn003
   Google Scholar
• Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Research-Technology Management, 54(4), 38–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar