500
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Innovation is the Answer! But is Development the Question? Assessing Innovation Against the Capabilities Approach to Development

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 2180-2197 | Received 07 Sep 2021, Accepted 03 May 2022, Published online: 26 May 2022

References

  • Aker, J. C., & Mbiti, I. M. (2010). Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 207–232. doi:10.1257/jep.24.3.207
  • Amplify Challenges. (2021, April 8). Retrieved from IDEO.org website: https://www.ideo.org/programs/amplify
  • Andrews, B. (2014, May 14). Fighting poverty by working with those most affected—Policy Lab. Retrieved March 3, 2021, from https://openpolicy.blog.gov.uk/2014/05/14/fighting-poverty-by-working-with-those-most-affected/
  • Barton, C. J. (2020). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Promise or Peril? 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS), 302–309. doi:10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462215
  • Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., & van Praag, M. (2017). The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: A review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 61–95. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1216397
  • Bradley, S. W., McMullen, J. S., Artz, K., & Simiyu, E. M. (2012). Capital is not enough: innovation in developing economies: innovation in developing economies. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 684–717. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01043.x
  • Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29–43.
  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Clark, D. A. (2008). The capability approach: Its development, critiques and recent advances. Manchester, UK: Global Poverty Reserach Group. Retrieved from Global Poverty Research Group website: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.371.4189&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Cross, J., & Street, A. (2009). Anthropology at the bottom of the pyramid. Anthropology Today, 25(4), 4–9. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8322.2009.00675.x
  • Dey, A., Gupta, A. K., & Singh, G. (2019). Innovation, investment and enterprise: Climate resilient entrepreneurial pathways for overcoming poverty. Agricultural Systems, 172, 83–90. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.07.013
  • Dhahri, S. (2018). Entrepreneurship contribution to the three pillars of sustainable development: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 106, 64–77. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.008
  • Dolan, C., & Rajak, D. (2016). Remaking Africa’s informal economies: Youth, entrepreneurship and the promise of inclusion at the bottom of the pyramid. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(4), 514–529. doi:10.1080/00220388.2015.1126249
  • Duclos, J.-Y. (2002). Vulnerability and poverty measurement issues for public policy. The World Bank. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/748011468763520444/pdf/multi0page.pdf
  • Ely, A., Smith, A., Stirling, A., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2013). Innovation politics post-rio + 20: Hybrid pathways to sustainability? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(6), 1063–1081. doi:10.1068/c12285j
  • Escobar, A. (2012). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
  • Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: A Guide to the Literature. Retrieved from https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/43180
  • Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1132–1153. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008
  • Foster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualising inclusive innovation: Modifying systems of innovation frameworks to understand diffusion of new technology to low-income consumers. The European Journal of Development Research, 25(3), 333–355. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2013.7
  • French, E., & Williams, J. (2021). Counting for something: Valuing the Human Development Index. Handbook on Diversity and Inclusion Indices. Retrieved from https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781788975711/9781788975711.00009.xml
  • Fressoli, M., Arond, E., Abrol, D., Smith, A., Ely, A., & Dias, R. (2014). When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: Implications for models of inclusive innovation. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 277–292. doi:10.1080/2157930X.2014.921354
  • Gasper, D. (1997). Sen’s capability approach and Nussbaum’s capabilities ethic. Journal of International Development, 9(2), 281–302. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199703)9:2<281::AID-JID438>3.0.CO;2-K
  • Godin, B. (2017). Models of innovation: The history of an idea. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • Gupta, A. K. (2013). Tapping the entrepreneurial potential of grassroots innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Rev, 11(3), 18–20.
  • Gupta, J., Pouw, N. R. M., & Ros-Tonen, M. A. F. (2015). Towards an elaborated theory of inclusive development. The European Journal of Development Research, 27(4), 541–559. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2015.30
  • Hagedoorn, J. (1996). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Schumpeter revisited. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 883–896. doi:10.1093/icc/5.3.883
  • Irani, L. (2019). Chasing innovation: Making entrepreneurial citizens in modern India. Princeton, New Jersey; Oxford, United Kingdom: Princeton University Press.
  • Jiménez, A., & Zheng, Y. (2018). Tech hubs, innovation and development. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 95–118. doi:10.1080/02681102.2017.1335282
  • Khandelwal, M., Hill, M. E., Greenough, P., Anthony, J., Quill, M., Linderman, M., & Udaykumar, H. S. (2017). Why have improved cook-stove initiatives in India failed? World Development, 92, 13–27. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.006
  • Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (2009). An overview of innovation. In Studies on science and the innovation process (pp. 173–203). Singapore: WORLD SCIENTIFIC. doi:10.1142/9789814273596_0009
  • Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M., & Carlos, R. (2018). Multinationals, international business, and poverty: A cross-disciplinary research overview and conceptual framework. Journal of International Business Policy; London, 1(1–2), 92–115. doi:10.1057/s42214-018-0004-1
  • Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2014). Reviewing a decade of research on the “Base/Bottom of the Pyramid” (BOP) concept. Business & Society, 53(3), 338–377. doi:10.1177/0007650312474928
  • Krause, U. (2013). Innovation: The new big push or the post-development alternative? Development, 56(2), 223–226. doi:10.1057/dev.2013.29
  • Lam, D. P. M., Martín-López, B., Wiek, A., Bennett, E. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Horcea-Milcu, A. I., & Lang, D. J. (2020). Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives: A typology of amplification processes. Urban Transformations, 2(1), 3. doi:10.1186/s42854-020-00007-9
  • Law, J. (2015). What’s wrong with a one-world world? Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 16(1), 126–139. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2015.1020066
  • Lepore, J. (2014, June 16). What the Gospel of Innovation Gets Wrong. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from The New Yorker website: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/06/23/the-disruption-machine
  • Lundvall, B. (2007). National innovation systems—Analytical concept and development tool. Industry & Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. doi:10.1080/13662710601130863
  • Makuwira, J. (2006). Development? Freedom? Whose development and freedom? Development in Practice, 16(02), 193–200. doi:10.1080/09614520600562439
  • Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2004). Community-based and -driven development: A critical review. The World Bank Research Observer, 19(1), 1–39. doi:10.1093/wbro/lkh012
  • Marie Stopes Nepal/Sunaulo Parivar + Viamo | Project. (2021, April 9). Retrieved from IDEO.org website: https://www.ideo.org/project/marie-stopes-nepal-sunaulo-parivar-viamo
  • Martinussen, J. (1997). Society, state, and market: A guide to competing theories of development. London; Atlantic Highlands, N.J., USA: Halifax, Nova Scotia: Pretoria: Zed Books; Fernwood Pub.; HRSC/RGN.
  • Mazzucato, M. (2015). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. Private sector myths (Vol. 1). New York: PublicAffairs.
  • Mercy Corps Center for Advancement | Project. (2021, April 9). Retrieved from IDEO.org website: https://www.ideo.org/project/mercy-corps-center-for-advancement-of-adolescent-girls
  • Mitchell, T. (2005). The work of economics: How a discipline makes its world. European Journal of Sociology, 46(2), 297–320. doi:10.1017/S000397560500010X
  • Natarajan, T. (2014). Shifting economics: Fundamental questions and Amartya K. Sen’s pragmatic humanism. Journal of Philosophical Economics, VIII(1), 3–30.
  • Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press on Demand.
  • Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, 1, 3–21.
  • Niosi, J. E. (2010). Building national and regional innovation systems: Institutions for economic development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Nussbaum, M. (1999). Women and equality: The capabilities approach. International Labour Review, 138(3), 227–245. doi:10.1111/j.1564-913X.1999.tb00386.x
  • OpenIDEO—How might we provide comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services to girls and women affected by conflict or disaster? – Ideas. (2020, October 22). Retrieved April 8, 2021, from https://web.archive.org/web/20201022013933/https://challenges.openideo.com/challenge/reproductive-health/ideas
  • Page, S. E. (2006). Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1(1), 87–115. doi:10.1561/100.00000006
  • Pansera, M., & Fressoli, M. (2021). Innovation without growth: Frameworks for understanding technological change in a post-growth era. Organization, 28(3), 380–404. doi:10.1177/1350508420973631
  • Pansera, M., & Owen, R. (2018). Framing inclusive innovation within the discourse of development: Insights from case studies in India. Research Policy, 47(1), 23–34. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.007
  • Peet, R., & Hartwick, E. R. (2015). Theories of development: Contentions, arguments, alternatives (Third edition). New York; London: Guilford Press.
  • Pfotenhauer, S., & Jasanoff, S. (2017). Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the 'MIT model' in three political cultures. Social Studies of Science, 47(6), 783–810. doi:10.1177/0306312717706110
  • Pieterse, J. N. (1998). My paradigm or yours? Alternative development, post‐development, reflexive development. Development and Change, 29(2), 343–373. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00081
  • Positive Negatives | Project. (2021, April 9). Retrieved from IDEO.org website: https://www.ideo.org/project/positive-negatives
  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 10, 4–11.
  • Rajan, P. (2012). Organizing grassroots innovations: Examining knowledge creation and sharing practices for technological innovation at the grassroots (Ph.D., Purdue University). Purdue University, United States – Indiana. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1328167526/abstract/41A8D426DF684050PQ/1
  • Schwittay, A., & Braund, P. (2017). Innovation@DFID: Crowdsourcing new ideas at the UK’s department for international development. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2999652
  • Scott-Smith, T. (2016). Humanitarian neophilia: The ‘innovation turn’ and its implications. Third World Quarterly, 37(12), 2229–2251. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1176856
  • Sehat Kahani | Project. (2021, April 9). Retrieved from IDEO.org website: https://www.ideo.org/project/sehat-kahani
  • Selin, C. (2008). The sociology of the future: Tracing stories of technology and time. Sociology Compass, 2(6), 1878–1895. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00147.x
  • Sen, A. (1979). Equality of what? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, 22, 197–220.
  • Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
  • Sesan, T. (2014). Global imperatives, local contingencies: An analysis of divergent priorities and dominant perspectives in stove development from the 1970s to date. Progress in Development Studies, 14(1), 3–20. doi:10.1177/1464993413504345
  • Seth, S. (2009). Putting knowledge in its place: Science, colonialism, and the postcolonial. Postcolonial Studies, 12(4), 373–388. doi:10.1080/13688790903350633
  • Simon, H. A. (1988). The science of design: Creating the artificial. Design Issues, 4, 67–82. doi:10.2307/1511391
  • Simon, H. A. (2013). Administrative behavior. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2016). Grassroots innovation and innovation democracy (p. 36). Sussex, UK: STEPS Centre.
  • Smith, M. L., Spence, R., & Rashid, A. T. (2011). Mobile phones and expanding human capabilities. Information Technologies, 7(3), 77–88.
  • Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2020). Economic development. Pearson UK.
  • United Nations (Ed.). (1990). Human development report 1990. Published for the United Nations (New York) Development Programme. New York: Oxford Univ. Pr.
  • Vinsel, L., & Russell, A. L. (2020). The innovation delusion: How our obsession with the new has disrupted the work that matters most. New York: Currency.
  • Yadav, V., & Goyal, P. (2015). User innovation and entrepreneurship: Case studies from rural India. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 5. doi:10.1186/s13731-015-0018-4

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.