Inequality, Outreach, and Impact in Public Goods Contributions

References

• Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 847–904. doi:10.1162/003355300554935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. R., Mellor, J. M., & Milyo, J. (2008). Inequality and public good provision: An experimental analysis. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(3), 1010–1028. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.073
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J. (2007). Giving gifts to groups: How altruism depends on the number of recipients. Journal of Public Economics, 91(9), 1731–1749. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcelo, H., & Capraro, V. (2015). Group size effect on cooperation in one-shot social dilemmas. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 1–8. doi:10.1038/srep07937
   Google Scholar
• Bjorvatn, K., & Coniglio, N. D. (2020). Sharing and cooperation in an experiment with heterogeneous groups. Economics Letters, 197, 109619. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal, 112(483), F419–F436. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brañas-Garza, P., Molis, E., & Neyse, L. (2021). Exposure to inequality may cause under-provision of public goods: Experimental evidence. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 92, 101679. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2021.101679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, E., & Croson, R. (2006). Income and wealth heterogeneity in the voluntary provision of linear public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 90(4–5), 935–955. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, J., & Keswell, M. (2015). Diversity and the provision of public goods: Experimental evidence from South Africa. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118, 110–122. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, J., & Visser, M. (2008). Income inequality and the provision of public goods: When the real world mimics the lab. SALDRU Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, A. W., Nielsen, U. H., Tungodden, B., Tyran, J.-R., & Wengström, E. (2016). Fairness is intuitive. Experimental Economics, 19(4), 727–740. doi:10.1007/s10683-015-9463-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. P. (2007). Punishing free-riders: How group size affects mutual monitoring and the provision of public goods. Games and Economic Behavior, 60(1), 31–51. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2006.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. S., Godby, R., Mestelman, S., & Muller, R. A. (1997). Equity theory and the voluntary provision of public goods. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 32(3), 349–364. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00025-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. S., Mestelman, S., Moir, R., & Muller, R. A. (1999). Heterogeneity and the voluntary provision of public goods. Experimental Economics, 2(1), 5–30. doi:10.1023/A:1009984414401
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, T. L., Kroll, S., & Shogren, J. F. (2005). The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on public good contributions: Evidence from the lab. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(3), 357–365. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474. doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16(2), 181–191. doi:10.1006/game.1996.0081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1, 509–519.
   Google Scholar
• Eckel, C. C., Priday, B. A., & Wilson, R. K. (2018). Charity begins at home: A lab-in-the-field experiment on charitable giving. Games, 9(4), 95–22. doi:10.3390/g9040095
   Google Scholar
• Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583–610. doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., & Gachter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994. doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, C. M., & Luttmer, E. F. (2011). Do fairness and race matter in generosity? Evidence from a nationally representative charity experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5–6), 372–394. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grether, D. M., & Plott, C. R. (1979). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. The American Economic Review, 69(4), 623–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. J., & Eckel, C. C. (2012). Giving versus taking: A “real donation” comparison of warm glow and cold prickle in a context-rich environment (pp. 1–23). Monash University, Department of Economics working paper series: Monasch.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves Heap, S. P., Ramalingam, A., & Stoddard, B. V. (2016). Endowment inequality in public goods games: A re-examination. Economics Letters, 146, 4–7. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2016.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr, A., Burns, J., & Visser, M. (2007). Income inequality, reciprocity and public good provision: an experimental analysis. The South African Journal of Economics, 75(3), 508–520. doi:10.1111/j.1813-6982.2007.00127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMF (2018). Regional economic outlook, April 2018, Sub-Saharan Africa: Domestic revenue mobilization and private investment. International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Junquera-Varela, R. F., Verhoeven, M., Shukla, G. P., Haven, B., & Moreno-Dodson, B. (2017). Strengthening domestic resource mobilization: Moving from theory to practice in low-and middle-income countries. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplanova, P. (2016). Public goods as factors of a local economic development in Slovakia. Administration & Public Management Review, 2016(26), 6–24.
   Google Scholar
• Keser, C., Markstädter, A., Schmidt, M., & Schnitzler, C. (2014). Social costs of inequality: Heterogeneous endowments in public-good experiments. Technical report, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:cegedp:217
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, K., & Porter, C. (2018). Charitable dictators? Determinants of giving to NGOs in Uganda. Journal of International Development, 30(1), 80–101. doi:10.1002/jid.3331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. X., Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J., & Brown, T. L. (2011). Giving to government: Voluntary taxation in the lab. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9–10), 1190–1201. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohse, J., Goeschl, T., & Diederich, J. H. (2017). Giving is a question of time: Response times and contributions to an environmental public good. Environmental and Resource Economics, 67(3), 455–477. doi:10.1007/s10640-016-0029-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, H. R., Cummings, R. G., Ganderton, P. T., Harrison, G. W., & McGuckin, T. (1994). Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. Land Economics, 70(2), 145–154. doi:10.2307/3146318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 404–417. doi:10.2307/1964229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereda, M., Capraro, V., & Sánchez, A. (2019). Group size effects and critical mass in public goods games. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41988-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pigou, A. (1932). The Economics of Welfare. 4th edition. Macmillan: London.
   Google Scholar
• Piovesan, M., & Wengström, E. (2009). Fast or fair? A study of response times. Economics Letters, 105(2), 193–196. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2009.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430. doi:10.1038/nature11467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, D. G., & Kraft-Todd, G. T. (2014). Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 300. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadi Sedik, T., & Xu, R. (2020). A vicious cycle: How pandemics lead to economic despair and social unrest. IMF Working Papers 20.
   Google Scholar
• Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1991). Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation. The American Economic Review, 81(4), 971–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics South Africa. (2018). Men, Women and Children: Findings of the Living Conditions Survey 2014/15. Available at: https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-10-02%20/Report-03-10-02%202015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
   Google Scholar
• Tamai, T. (2022). Economic growth, equilibrium welfare, and public goods provision with intergenerational altruism. European Journal of Political Economy, 71, 102068. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubeda, P. (2014). The consistency of fairness rules: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 41, 88–100. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2012.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umer, H. (2020). Revisiting generosity in the dictator game: Experimental evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 84, 101503. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2019.101503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank (2020). Global economic prospects. Technical report. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2021). South Africa economic update, edition 13: Building back better from covid-19 with a special focus on jobs.
   Google Scholar
• Zelmer, J. (2003). Linear public goods experiments: A meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 6(3), 299–310. doi:10.1023/A:1026277420119
   Google Scholar
• Zizzo, D. J. (2010). Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 13(1), 75–98. doi:10.1007/s10683-009-9230-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar