21
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Features and Information

The Impact of Feminism in Economics—Beyond the Pale? A Discussion and Survey Results

Pages 253-273 | Published online: 10 Jul 2014

  • Alston, R. M., J. R. Kearl, and M. B. Vaughan. 1992. Is there a consensus among economists in the 1990s? American Economic Review 82 (2): 203–9.
  • Barbezat, D. 1992. The market for new Ph.D. economists. Journal of Economic Education 23 (3): 262–76.
  • Bartlett, R. 1993. A conversation with Carolyn Shaw Bell. American Economic Review, Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession Newsletter. Fall: 7–9.
  • Blank, R. 1994. Committee on the status of women in the economics profession 1993 annual report. American Economic Review, Committee on the Status of Women in the Economic Profession Newsletter. Winter: 2–7.
  • Ferber, M., and J. Nelson, eds. 1993. Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ferber, M., and M. L. Teimani. 1981. The oldest, the most established, the most quantitative of the social sciences—and the most dominated by men: The impact of feminism on economics. In D. Spender, ed., Men's studies modified. New York: Pergamon, 125–39.
  • Folbre, N. 1993. How does she know? Feminist theories of gender bias in economics. History of Political Economy 25 (1): 167–84.
  • Gordon, N. 1989. Report of the committee on the status of women in the economics profession. American Economic Review 79 (2): 422–25.
  • Harding, S. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Hoffman, E. 1992. Report of the committee on the status of women in the economics profession. American Economic Review 82 (2): 610–14.
  • Krueger, A., 1991. Report of the commission on graduate education in economics. Journal of Economic Literature 29 (3): 1035–53.
  • McMillan, D. P., and L. D. Singell, Jr. 1992. Gender differences in first jobs for economists. Mimeo. University of Oregon (May).
  • National Research Council. 1993. Summary report 1991, doctoral recipients from U.S. universities. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • National Science Foundation. 1992. Women and minorities in science and engineering: An update. (Prepared by P. E. White.) Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
  • Nelson, J. 1993. Value-free or valueless? Notes on the pursuit of detachment in economics. History of Political Economy 25 (1): 121–45.
  • Reagan, B. 1977. Report of the committee on the status of women in the economics profession. American Economic Review 67 (1): 460–64.
  • Ryan, B. 1992. Feminism and the women's movement. New York: Routledge.
  • Sen, A. 1993. Positional objectivity. Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (2): 126–45.
  • Shackelford, J. 1992. Perspectives on diversity in economic education: The college experience. Mimeo, Bucknell College (December).
  • Strober, M. 1975. Women economists: Career aspirations, education, and training. American Economic Review 65 (2): 92–99.
  • Uchitelle, L. 1993. In economics, a subtle exclusion. New York Times (January 11): D1, D3.
  • U.S. Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce. 1992. Money income and poverty status in the United States, 1991. P-60:180, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.