Improved Reasoning in Undergraduate Writing through Structured Workshops

REFERENCES

• Bartlett, R.L., and P.G. King. 1990. Teaching economics as a laboratory science. Journal of Economic Education 21: 181–93. doi:10.2307/1181984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A.J., and J. Spencer. 1993. Using writing across the curriculum in economics: Is taking the plunge worth it? Journal of Economic Education 24: 219–30. doi:10.2307/1183122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, D., and J. Youga. 1986. Using writing as a tool for learning economics. Journal of Economic Education 17: 218–22. doi:10.2307/1181971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L.S., and E.C. Gumnior. 1993. Writing to learn in a business economics class. Journal of Economic Education 24: 237–43. doi:10.2307/1183124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deiner, L.J., D. Newsome, and D. Samaroo. 2012. Directed self-inquiry: A scaffold for teaching laboratory report writing. Journal of Chemical Education 89(12): 1511–14. doi:10.1021/ed300169g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd, J.E., C.P. Roy, R.J. Thompson, Jr., and J.A. Reynolds. 2014. “On course” for supporting expanded participation and improving scientific reasoning in undergraduate thesis writing. Journal of Chemical Education. doi: 10.1021/ed500298r.
   Google Scholar
• Etkina, E., A. Karelina, M. Ruibal-Villasenor, D. Rosengrant, R. Jordan, and C.E. Hmelo-Silver. 2010. Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories. Journal of the Learning Sciences 19(1): 54–98. doi:10.1080/10508400903452876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, G.P., J.C. Bean, and D.J. Peterson. 2013. Deep learning in intermediate microeconomics: Using scaffolding assignments to teach theory and promote transfer. Journal of Economic Education 44: 142–57. doi:10.1080/00220485.2013.770338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak, D.C., J. Hille Ris Lambers, E. Pitre, and S. Freeman. 2011. Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science 332(6034): 1213–16. doi:10.1126/science.1204820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W.L. 1993. Teaching a writing intensive course in economics. Journal of Economic Education 24: 213–18. doi:10.2307/1183121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P.A., J. Sweller, and R.E. Clark. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41(2): 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.D., and C. Geary Schneider. 2008. High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Lopatto, D. 2004. Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education 3(4): 270–77. doi:10.1187/cbe.04-07-0045.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer, R.E. 2004. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist 59(1): 14–19. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, K. 2008a. Doing economics: Enhancing skills through a process-oriented senior research course. Journal of Economic Education 39: 342–56. doi:10.3200/JECE.39.4.342-356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, K.. 2008b. Writing requirements and economic research opportunities in the undergraduate curriculum: Results from a survey of departmental practices. Journal of Economic Education 39: 287–96. doi:10.3200/JECE.39.3.287-296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmini, D.J. 1996. Using rhetorical cases to teach writing skills and enhance economic learning. Journal of Economic Education 27: 205–16. doi:10.2307/1183291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J., R. Smith, C. Moskovitz, and A. Sayle. 2009. BioTAP: A systematic approach to teaching scientific writing and evaluating undergraduate theses. BioScience 59(10): 896–903. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.10.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J.A., and R.J. Thompson. 2011. Want to improve undergraduate thesis writing? Engage students and their faculty readers in scientific peer review. CBE-Life Sciences Education 10(2): 209–15. doi:10.1187/cbe.10-10-0127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, P.H., M.W. Lipsey, and H.E. Freeman. 2003. Evaluation: A systematic approach. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., A. Hunter, S.L. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni. 2004. Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education 88(4): 493–534. doi:10.1002/sce.10131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegfried, J.J. 2001. Principles for a successful undergraduate economics honors program. Journal of Economic Education 32: 169–77. doi:10.1080/00220480109595182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegfried, J.J., R.L. Bartlett, W.L. Hansen, A.C. Kelley, D.N. McCloskey, and T.H. Tietenberg. 1991. The status and prospects of the economics major. Journal of Economic Education 22: 197–224. doi:10.2307/1183106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, M.S., and S.E. Carroll. 1999. Assignments for a writing-intensive economics course. Journal of Economic Education 30: 402–10. doi:10.1080/00220489909596097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upcraft, M.L., and J.H. Schuh. 2002. Assessment vs. research: Why we should care about the difference. About Campus 7(1): 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bramer, S.E., and L.D. Bastin. 2013. Using a progressive paper to develop students’ writing skills. Journal of Chemical Education 90(6): 745–50. doi:10.1021/ed300312q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar