Learning to do: Facilitating practice in a large introductory macroeconomics class

References

• Aronson, E., N. Blaney, C. Stephan, J. Sikes, and M. Snapp. 1978. The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Balaban, R. A., D. B. Gilleskie, and U. Tran. 2016. A quantitative evaluation of the flipped classroom in a large lecture principles of economics course. Journal of Economic Education 47 (4): 269–87. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2016.1213679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basili, P. A., and J. P. Sanford. 1991. Conceptual change strategies and collaborative group work in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28 (4): 293–304. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, T. C. 2009. Teaching economics principles interactively: A cannibal’s dinner party. Journal of Economic Education 40 (4): 366–84. doi: 10.1080/00220480903237935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, G. J., and R. F. Darr, Jr.1993. Relative effects of CMI and non-CMI practice quizzes on subsequent test performance. Journal of Research in Computing Education 25 (4): 431–38. doi: 10.1080/08886504.1993.10782063.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., and J. A. Eison. 1991. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC higher education report, Number 1. Washington, DC: George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., R. Cohen, and J. Sampson, eds. 2014. Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. E. 2007. Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE—Life Sciences Education 6 (1): 9–20. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crede, M., S. G. Roch, and U. M. Kieszczynka. 2010. Class attendance in college: A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research 80 (2): 272–95. doi: 10.3102/0034654310362998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmslie, B. T., and E. Tebaldi. 2010. Teaching economic growth theory with data. Journal of Economic Education 41 (2): 110–24. doi: 10.1080/00220481003617244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111 (23): 8410–15. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., E. O'Connor, J. W. Parks, M. Cunningham, D. Hurley, D. Haak, C. Dirks, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2007. Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education 6 (2): 132–39. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goffe, W., and D. Kauper. 2014. A survey of principles instructors: Why lecture prevails. Journal of Economic Education 45 (4): 360–75. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2014.946547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffe, W. L., and K. Sosin. 2005. Teaching with technology: May you live in interesting times. Journal of Economic Education 36 (3): 278–91. doi: 10.3200/JECE.36.3.278-291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, O. R., and J. Lambrinos. 2012. Active-learning exercises for principles of economics course. Journal of Economic Education 43 (2): 221. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2012.660065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettler, P. L. 2015. Active learning in economics: Increasing student engagement, excitement, and success. International Advances in Economic Research 21 (4): 357. doi: 10.1007/s11294-015-9548-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imazeki, J. 2014. Bring-your-own-device: Turning cell phones into forces for good. Journal of Economic Education 45 (3): 240–50. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2014.917898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, C. G., R. H. James, J. N. Lye, and I. M. McDonald. 2000. An evaluation of collaborative problem solving for learning economics. Journal of Economic Education 31 (1): 13–29. doi: 10.1080/00220480009596758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, R. H., and A. LeSage. 2009. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education 53 (3): 819–27. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lage, M. J., G. J. Platt, and M. Treglia. 2000. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education 21 (1): 30–43. doi: 10.1080/00220480009596759.
   Google Scholar
• Lom, B. 2012. Classroom activities: Simple strategies to incorporate student-centered activities within undergraduate science lectures. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education 11 (1): 64–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lukkarinen, A., P. Koivukangas, and T. Seppala. 2016. Relationship between class attendance and student performance. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 228 (July):341–47.: doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.051.
   Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., and W. Baker. 2009. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (1): 30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnamara, B. N., D. Z. Hambrick, and F. L. Oswald. 2014. Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Science 25 (8): 1608–18. doi: 10.1177/0956797614535810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martyn, M. 2007. Clickers in the classroom: An active learning approach. Educause Quarterly 30 (2): 71–74.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. L. 1998. Teaching introductory economics with a collaborative learning lab component. Journal of Economic Education 29 (4): 321–29. doi: 10.1080/00220489809595924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevid, J. S., and K. Mahon. 2009. Mastery quizzing as a signaling device to cue attention to lecture material. Teaching of Psychology 36 (1): 29–32. doi: 10.1080/00986280802529152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, R., and S. Foster. 2013. Increasing student success using online quizzing in introductory (majors) biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education 12 (3): 509–14. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-10-0183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmini, D. J. 1996. Using rhetorical cases to teach writing skills and enhance economic learning. Journal of Economic Education 27 (3): 205–16. doi: 10.1080/00220485.1996.10844909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M. 2004. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education 93 (3): 223–31. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reece, W. A., Jr., and R. P. Robins. 2017. Performing an event study: An exercise for finance students. Journal of Economic Education 48 (3): 206–15. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2017.1320603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., III, and J. D. Karpicke. 2006. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science 17 (3): 249–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salemi, M. K. 2009. Clickenomics: Using a classroom response system to increase student engagement in a large-enrollment principles of economics course. Journal of Economic Education 40 (4): 385–404. doi: 10.1080/00220480903237950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J., and A. M. Lavin. 2004. Do as I do, not as I say: Assessing outcomes when students think like economists. Journal of Economic Education 35 (2): 148–61. doi: 10.3200/JECE.35.2.148-161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeiser, K. 2017. Teaching writing in economics. Journal of Economic Education 48 (4): 254–64. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2017.1353459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrima, A. E. 2009. Implementing a mastery model through self quizzing in an online learning environment. Dissertation. ScholarWorks at WMU. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University, Graduate College.
   Google Scholar
• Seitz, A. R. 2017. Generalizable learning: Practice makes perfect – But at what? Current Biology 27 (6): R225–R227. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. M., and L. T. Gordon. 2012. A controlled study of clicker-assisted memory enhancement in college classrooms. Applied Cognitive Psychology 26 (4): 635–43. doi: 10.1002/acp.2843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. 1987. The hidden group in the classroom: The use of group process in teaching group. Work Practice. Journal of Teaching in Social Work 1 (2): 3–31. doi: 10.1300/J067v01n02_02.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D., P. Panus, N. Hagemeier, J. Thigpen, and L. Brooks. 2014. Pharmacy student self-testing as a predictor of examination performance. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 78 (2): 32. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, M. H., H. Rustogi, and C. B. Young. 2000. Enhancing the macroeconomics course: An experiential learning approach. Journal of Economic Education 31 (1): 60–65. doi: 10.1080/00220480009596762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wyk, M. M. 2015. Using the jigsaw teaching strategy for the advance of economics teachers’ acquisition of knowledge. International Journal of Educational Sciences 10 (2): 338–46. doi: 10.1080/09751122.2015.11917621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wyk, M. M. 2016. Jigsaw pedagogy in enhancing economics teachers’ learning in Free State secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Sciences 13 (3): 349–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, M. 2008. Peer review: Benefits, perceptions, and alternatives. PRC summary papers 4. London: Publishing Research Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Yamarik, S. 2007. Does cooperative learning improve student learning outcomes? Journal of Economic Education 38 (3): 259–77. doi: 10.3200/JECE.38.3.259-277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar