Scalable, scaffolded writing assignments with online peer review in a large introductory economics course

References

• Abdalla, A. E. A. 1993. A country report project for an international economics class. Journal of Economic Education 24 (3): 232–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allgood, S., W. B. Walstad, and J. J. Siegfried. 2015. Research on teaching economics to undergraduates. Journal of Economic Literature 53 (2): 285–325. doi: 10.1257/jel.53.2.285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N. 2000. Alternative models of writing development. In Perspectives on writing research, theory, and practice, ed. R. Indrisano and J. R. Squire, 90–110. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Archibong, B., H. Dekker, N. D. Grawe, M.L. Olney, C. Rutz, and D. Weiman. 2017. Forging on-campus connections to enhance undergraduate student reasoning, writing, and research skills. Journal of Economic Education 48 (4): 317–26. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2017.1353466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, J. C. 2011. Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, E. O. 2017. Revision processes in first language and foreign language writing: Differences and similarities in the success of revision. Journal of Academic Writing 7 (1): 27–42. doi: 10.18552/joaw.v7i1.214.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T. 2016. Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: A research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29 (2): 365–97. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2014.960942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. H., and K. Cho. 2011. Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science 39 (5): 629–43. doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., and J. Spencer. 1993. Using writing across the curriculum in economics: Is taking the plunge worth it? Journal of Economic Education 24 (3): 219–30. doi: 10.2307/1183122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, D., and J. Youga. 1986. Using writing as a tool for learning economics. Journal of Economic Education 17 (3): 218–22. doi: 10.1080/00220485.1986.10845169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L. S., and E. C. Gumnior. 1993. Writing to learn in a business economics class. Journal of Economic Education 24 (3): 237–43. doi: 10.1080/00220485.1993.10844796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, L. 1979. Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English 41 (1): 19–37. doi: 10.2307/376357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, L. 1993. Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. 4th ed. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Gilleskie, D. L., and M. K. Salemi. 2012. The cost of economic literacy: How well does a literacy-targeted principles of economics course prepare students for intermediate theory courses? Journal of Economic Education 43 (2): 111–32. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2012.659639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlaw, S. A. 2003. Using writing to enhance student learning in undergraduate economics. International Review of Economics Education 1 (1): 61–70. doi: 10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30211-5.
   Google Scholar
• Greenlaw, S. A. 2009. Doing economics: A guide to understanding and carrying out economic research. Mason, OH: South-Western CENGAGE Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J., and M. Podemska-Mikluch. 2015. Teaching the economic way of thinking through op-eds. International Review of Economics Education 19:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.iree.2015.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. L. 1993. Teaching a writing intensive course in economics. Journal of Economic Education 24 (3): 213–18. doi: 10.1080/00220485.1993.10844793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. L., M. K. Salemi, and J. J. Siegfried. 2002. Use it or lose it: Teaching to literacy in the principles of economics course. American Economic Review 92 (2): 463–72. doi: 10.1257/000282802320191813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, J. N. 1988. Sociocognitive development and argumentative writing: Issues and implications from one research project. Journal of Basic Writing 7 (2): 42–67.
   Google Scholar
• Horning, A. S. 2007. Reading across the curriculum as the key to student success. Across the Disciplines 4:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• The International Network of WAC Programs (INWAC). (2014). Statement of WAC principles and practices. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, WAC Clearinghouse. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/principles/statement.pdf (accessed June 14, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Joordens, S., D. Paré, and L.-M. Collimore. 2014. Taking learning outcomes to the gym: An assignment-based approach to developing and assessing learning outcomes. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., X. Liu, and A. L. Steckelberg. 2010. Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology 41 (3): 525–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., and W. Baker. 2009. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (1): 30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. 2000. Economical writing. 2nd ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–22. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré, D. E., and S. Joordens. 2008. Peering into large lectures: Examining peer and expert mark agreement using peerScholar, an online peer-assessment tool. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24 (6): 526–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00290.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petr, J. L. 1998. Student writing as a guide to student thinking. In Teaching undergraduate economics: A handbook for instructors, ed. W. B. Walstad and P. Saunders, 227–43. New York, NY: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, F. 2016. The power of giving feedback: Outcomes from implementing an online peer assessment system. Issues in Accounting Education 31 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.2308/iace-50754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. 2002. Writing in the academic disciplines: A curricular history. 2nd ed. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–44. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegfried, J. R., L. Bartlett, W. L. Hansen, A. C. Kelley, D. N. McCloskey, and T. H. Tietenberg. 1991. The status and prospects of the economics major. Journal of Economic Education 22 (3): 197–224. doi: 10.1080/00220485.1991.10844710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. M., A. Broughton, and J. Copley. 2005. Evaluating the written work of others: One way economics students can learn to write. Journal of Economic Education 36 (1): 43–58. doi: 10.3200/JECE.36.1.43-58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, H., and R. A. Mulder. 2012. Collaborative learning through formative peer review: Pedagogy, programs and potential. Computer Science Education 22 (4): 343–67. doi: 10.1080/08993408.2012.728041.
   Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. 1996. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46 (2): 327–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walstad, W. B. 2001. Improving assessment in university economics. Journal of Economic Education 32 (3): 281–94. doi: 10.1080/00220480109596109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P., and J. McTighe. 2008. Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar