HeadsUp! Econ: Making exam review sessions fun and effective

References

• Barnett, J. E. 2000. Self-regulated reading and test preparation among college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning 31 (1): 42–53. doi: 10.1080/10790195.2000.10850100.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, J. A. 2012. Teaching naked: How moving technology out of your classroom will improve student learning. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brauer, J., and G. Delemeester. 2001. Games economists play: A survey of non‐computerized classroom‐games for college economics. Journal of Economic Surveys 15 (2): 221–36. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekkamp, H., and B. H. Van Hout-Wolters. 2007. Students’ adaptation of study strategies when preparing for classroom tests. Educational Psychology Review 19 (4): 401–28. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9025-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Lima, G., A. Winsler, and A. Kitsantas. 2014. Ethnic and gender differences in first-year college students’ goal orientation, self-efficacy, and extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Research 107 (5): 341–56. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2013.823366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., K. A. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, and D. T. Willingham. 2013. Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14 (1): 4–58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, K. 1997. Instructional methods: Selection, use, and evaluation. In Nurse as educator: Principles of teaching and learning, ed. S. B. Bastable, 261–86. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, R. T. 2005. The effectiveness of instructional games: A literature review and discussion (No. NAWCTSD-TR-2005-004). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-L., and H.-P. Lu. 2004. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management 41 (7): 853–68. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultberg, P. T., and D. Calonge. 2017. Effective teaching of economics: A constrained optimization problem? Journal of Economic Education 48 (4): 265–75. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2017.1353458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., and J. R. Blunt. 2011. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science 331 (6018): 772–75. doi: 10.1126/science.1199327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., A. C. Butler, and H. L. Roediger III. 2009. Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory 17 (4): 471–79. doi: 10.1080/09658210802647009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. B. 2015. Study on the use of serious games in business education. PhD Diss. Baton Rouge, LA: LSU Digital Commons, Graduate School, Louisiana State University. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=3470&context=gradschool_dissertations
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, D. J. 2007. I’ve studied so hard for this course, but don’t get it! Differences between student and faculty perceptions.. College Student Journal 41 (1): 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Moryl, R. 2013. T-shirts, moonshine, and autopsies: Using podcasts to engage undergraduate microeconomic students. International Review of Economics Education 13:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.iree.2013.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, M., E. Borman-Shoap, and W. Eppich. 2015. Twelve tips for maximizing the effectiveness of game-based learning. Medical Teacher 37 (11): 1013–17. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1020289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., L. Yokoi, P. Van Meter, S. Van Etten, and G. Freebern. 1997. Some of the reasons why preparing for exams is so hard: What can be done to make it easier? Educational Psychology Review 9 (1): 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L. 2013. Applying cognitive psychology to education: Translational educational science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14 (1): 1–3. doi: 10.1177/1529100612454415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D., and H. Pashler. 2010. Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies. Educational Researcher 39 (5): 406–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X10374770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salen, K., and E. Zimmerman. 2003. Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K., and D. Rohrer. 2010. The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology 24 (6): 837–48. doi: 10.1002/acp.1598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Etten, S., G. Freebern, and M. Pressley. 1997. College students’ beliefs about exam preparation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 22 (2): 192–212. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1997.0933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Etten, S., M. Pressley, G. Freebern, and M. Echevarria. 1998. An interview of college freshmen’s beliefs about their academic motivation. European Journal of Psychology of Education 13 (1): 105–30. doi: 10.1007/BF03172816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11 (4): 342–65. doi: 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar