Who benefits from regular class participation?

References

• Ameriks, J., A. Caplin, J. Leahy, and T. Tyler. 2007. Measuring self-control problems. American Economic Review 97 (3): 966–72. doi: 10.1257/aer.97.3.966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrietti, V. 2014. Does lecture attendance affect academic performance? Panel data evidence for introductory macroeconomics. International Review of Economics Education 15: 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.iree.2013.10.010.
   Google Scholar
• Andrietti, V., and C. Velasco. 2015. Lecture attendance, study time, and academic performance: A panel data study. Journal of Economic Education 46 (3): 239–59. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2015.1040182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, D., and K. Wertenbroch. 2002. Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psychological Science 13 (3): 219–24. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulampalam, W., R. Naylor, and J. Smith. 2012. Am I missing something? The effects of absence from class on student performance. Economics of Education Review 31 (4): 363–75. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athey, S., and G. W. Imbens. 2017. The econometrics of randomized experiments. In Handbook of economic field experiments, vol. 1, ed. A. V. Banerjee and E. Duflo, 73–140. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., J. A. Kulik, and C. L. C. Kulik. 1991. Effects of frequent classroom testing. The Journal of Educational Research 85 (2): 89–99. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1991.10702818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, M. L. 2014. Encouraging college student active engagement in learning: The influence of response methods. Innovative Higher Education 39 (4): 307–19. doi: 10.1007/s10755-013-9276-x.
   Google Scholar
• Caviglia-Harris, J. L. 2006. Attendance and achievement in economics: Investigating the impact of attendance policies and absentee rates on student performance. Journal of Economics and Finance Education 4 (2): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. C., C. Shum, and D. J. Wright. 1997. Class attendance and student performance in principles of finance. Financial Practice and Education 7 (2): 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and T.-F. Lin. 2008. Class attendance and exam performance: A randomized experiment. Journal of Economic Education 39 (3): 213–27. doi: 10.3200/JECE.39.3.213-227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, E., and E. Johnson. 2006. Class attendance and performance in principles of economics. Education Economics 14 (2): 211–33. doi: 10.1080/09645290600622954.
   Google Scholar
• Crede, M., S. G. Roch, and U. M. Kieszczynka. 2010. Class attendance in college: A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research 80 (2): 272–95. doi: 10.3102/0034654310362998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, D. L., K. N. Meadows, and T. Haffie. 2010. The effect of performance feedback on student help-seeking and learning strategy use: Do clickers make a difference? The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 1 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2010.1.6.
   Google Scholar
• Devadoss, S., and J. Foltz. 1996. Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendance and performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (3): 499–507. doi: 10.2307/1243268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin, C., R. Gil, and J. Marion. 2010. Skipping class in college and exam performance: Evidence from a regression discontinuity classroom experiment. Economics of Education Review 29 (4): 566–75. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolton, P., O. Marcenaro, and L. Navarro. 2003. The effective use of student time: A stochastic frontier production function case study. Economics of Education Review 22 (6): 547–60. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00027-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durden, E., and L. Ellis. 1995. The effects of attendance on student learning in principles of economics. American Economic Review 85 (2): 343–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., E. O’Connor, J. W. Parks, M. Cunningham, D. Hurley, D. Haak, C. Dirks, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2007. Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sciences Education 6 (2): 132–39. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garard, D. L., S. K. Hunt, L. Lippert, and S. T. Paynton. 1998. Alternatives to traditional instruction: Using games and simulations to increase student learning and motivation. Communication Research Reports 15 (1): 36–44. doi: 10.1080/08824099809362095.
   Google Scholar
• Garside, C. 1996. Look who’s talking: A comparison of lecture and group discussion teaching strategies in developing critical thinking skills. Communication Education 45 (3): 212–27. doi: 10.1080/03634529609379050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauci, S. A., A. M. Dantas, D. A. Williams, and R. E. Kemm. 2009. Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Advances in Physiology Education 33 (1): 60–71. doi: 10.1152/advan.00109.2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godlewska, A., W. Beyer, S. Whetstone, L. Schaefli, J. Rose, B. Talan, S. Kamin-Patterson, C. Lamb, and M. Forcoine. 2019. Converting a large lecture class to an active blended learning class: Why, how, and what we learned. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 43 (1): 96–115. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2019.1570090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. 1999. A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Personality psychology in Europe, vol. 7, ed. I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, and F. Ostendorf, 7–28. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, P. 1993. A correlation between attendance and grades in a first-year psychology course. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 34 (2): 201–2. doi: 10.1037/h0078770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelsman, M. M., W. L. Briggs, N. Sullivan, and A. Towler. 2005. A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research 98 (3): 184–91. doi: 10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A., and S. K. Laury. 2002. Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 92 (5): 1644–55. doi: 10.1257/000282802762024700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junn, E. 1994. Pearls of wisdom: Enhancing student class participation with an innovative exercise. Journal of Instructional Psychology 21 (4): 385–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kassarnig, V., A. Bjerre-Nielsen, E. Mones, S. Lehmann, and D. D. Lassen. 2017. Class attendance, peer similarity, and academic performance in a large field study. PLoS One 12 (11): e0187078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, S., M. Kremer, and S. Mullainathan. 2015. Self-control at work. Journal of Political Economy 123 (6): 1227–77. doi: 10.1086/683822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. B., and S. Joshi. 2008. Gender differences in the use and effectiveness of personal response device. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17 (6): 544–52. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9121-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn, G. A., and C. M. O’Connor. 2005. Student effort and performance over the semester. Journal of Economic Education 36 (1): 3–28. doi: 10.3200/JECE.36.1.3-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lage, M. J., G. J. Platt, and M. Treglia. 2000. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education 31 (1): 30–43. doi: 10.1080/00220480009596759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T.-F., and J. Chen. 2006. Cumulative class attendance and exam performance. Applied Economics Letters 13 (14): 937–42. doi: 10.1080/13504850500425733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumbantobing, R. 2012. All in: Using poker chips to maximize class participation and facilitate discussion. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2102045 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2102045
   Google Scholar
• Marburger, D. R. 2001. Absenteeism and undergraduate exam performance. Journal of Economic Education 32 (2): 99–110. doi: 10.1080/00220480109595176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marburger, D. R. 2006. Does mandatory attendance improve student performance? Journal of Economic Education 37 (2): 148–55. doi: 10.3200/JECE.37.2.148-155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, P., and I. Walker. 2006. Student achievement and university classes: Effects of attendance, size, peers, and teachers. IZA Discussion Paper 2490. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., A. Stull, K. DeLeeuw, K. Almeroth, B. Bimber, D. Chun, M. Bulger, J. Campbell, A. Knight, and H. Zhang. 2009. Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34 (1): 51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morling, B., M. McAuliffe, L. Cohen, and T. M. DiLorenzo. 2008. Efficacy of personal response systems (‘clickers’) in large, introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology 35 (1): 45–50. doi: 10.1177/009862830803500112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, H., and M. Lang. 1997. Does classroom participating improve student learning?. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 20: 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. G. 2010. Exploration of classroom participation in the presence of a token economy. Journal of Instructional Psychology 37 (1): 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, L. C., A. Nili, T. Nguyen, M. Warschauer, and T. Domina. 2016. Clickers in the wild: A campus-wide study of student response systems. In Transforming institutions: 21st century undergraduate STEM education, ed. G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, and L. Slakey, 383–98. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rocca, K. 2003. Student attendance: A comprehensive literature review. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 14 (1): 85–107.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, D. 1993. Do students go to class? Should they? Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (3): 167–74. doi: 10.1257/jep.7.3.167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanca, L. 2006. The effects of attendance on academic performance: Panel data evidence for introductory microeconomics. Journal of Economic Education 37 (3): 251–66. doi: 10.3200/JECE.37.3.251-266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starmer, D. J., S. Duquette, and L. Howard. 2015. Participation strategies and student performance: An undergraduate health science retrospective study. Journal of Chiropractic Education 29 (2): 134–38. doi: 10.7899/JCE-14-20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowell, J. R., and J. M. Nelson. 2007. Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology 34 (4): 253–58. doi: 10.1080/00986280701700391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Blerkom, L. 1992. Class attendance in an undergraduate course. Journal of Psychology 126 (5): 487–94. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1992.10543382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, T. L., J. Christian, and C. J. Armitage. 2007. Helping students turn up for class: Does personality moderate the effectiveness of an implementation intention intervention?. Learning and Individual Differences 17 (4): 316–27. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. M., P. H. Pollock, and K. Hamann. 2007. Does active learning enhance learner outcomes? Evidence from discussion participation in online classes. Journal of Political Science Education 3 (2): 131–42. doi: 10.1080/15512160701338304.
   Google Scholar
• Yourstone, S. A., H. S. Kraye, and G. Albaum. 2008. Classroom questioning with immediate electronic response: Do clickers improve learning?. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 6 (1): 75–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00166.x.
   Google Scholar