The performative shift: middle leadership ‘in the line of fire’

References

• Abrahamsen, H., M. Aas, and G. O. Hellekjær. 2015. “How do Principals Make Sense of School Leadership in Norwegian Reorganised Leadership Teams?” School Leadership and Management 35 (1): 62–78. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2014.992775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altrichter, H., and D. Kemethofer. 2015. “Does Accountability Pressure Through School Inspections Promote School Improvement?” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26 (1): 32–56. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2014.927369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andenæs, K., and J. Møller, eds. 2016. Retten i skolen – mellom pedagogikk, jus og politikk [Legal Issues in Schools: Between Pedagogy, Law, and Politics]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. 2005. “Education, Markets, and an Audit Culture.” Critical Quarterly 47 (1–2): 11–29. doi: 10.1111/j.0011-1562.2005.00611.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2013. Foucault, Power, and Education. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., M. Maguire, and A. Braun. 2012. How Schools do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J., S. Grek, and C. Segerholm. 2015. “Regulatory Frameworks: Shifting Frameworks, Shifting Criteria.” In Governing by Inspection. Studies in European Education, edited by S. Grek, and J. Lindgren, 27–37. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Behnke, K., and G. Steins. 2017. “Principals’ Reactions to Feedback Received by School Inspection: a Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Educational Change 18 (1): 77–106. doi: 10.1007/s10833-016-9275-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, A., and E. Arneback. 2016. “Hur villkorar juridifieringen lärarprofessionens arbete med skolans kunskaper och värden?” Utbildning och Demokrati 25 (1): 11–31.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, A., M. Maguire, and S. J. Ball. 2010. “Policy Enactments in the UK Secondary School: Examining Policy, Practice and School Positioning.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (4): 547–560. doi: 10.1080/02680931003698544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M., G. McNamara, J. O’Hara, and S. O’Brien. 2016. “Exploring the Changing Face of School Inspections.” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 16 (66): 1–35 doi: 10.14689/ejer.2016.66.1
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, S. J. 2016. “Post-panopticism and School Inspection in England.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 37 (4): 623–642. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2014.965806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedering, K., and M. G. Sowada. 2017. “Reaching a Conclusion—Procedures and Processes of Judgement Formation in School Inspection Teams.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 29 (1): 5–22. doi: 10.1007/s11092-016-9246-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., J. E. Gustafsson, H. Altrichter, G. Skedsmo, D. Kemethofer, and S. G. Huber. 2015. “Comparing Effects and Side Effects of Different School Inspection Systems Across Europe.” Comparative Education 51 (3): 375–400. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2015.1045769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., F. J. G. Janssens, M. Brown, G. McNamara, J. O’Hara, and P. Shevlin. 2017. “Evaluation and Decentralised Governance: Examples of Inspections in Polycentric Education Systems.” Journal of Educational Change 18 (3): 365–383. doi: 10.1007/s10833-017-9297-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstad, E. 2009. “Schools Which are Named, Shamed and Blamed by the Media: School Accountability in Norway.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (2): 173–189. doi: 10.1007/s11092-009-9076-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2017. Norway: Quality Assurance System [online]. Accessed 17 November 2017. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/eurydice/index.php?title=Norway:Quality_Assuranceandprintable=yes
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, and M. Orsini, eds. 2015. Handbook of Critical Policy Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. 2011. “The Shadow in Organizational Ethnography: Moving Beyond Shadowing to Spect-Acting.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 6 (2): 115–133. doi: 10.1108/17465641111159116
   Google Scholar
• Government Act. 1998. Act of 17 July 1998 no. 61 Relating to Primary and Secondary Education and Training (The Education Act) [online]. Accessed 17 November 2017. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/b3b9e92cce6742c39581b661a019e504/education-act-norway-with-amendments-entered-2014-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gunnulfsen, A. E., and J. Møller. 2017. “National Testing: Gains or Strains? School Leaders’ Responses to Policy Demands.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 16 (3): 455–474. doi: 10.1080/15700763.2016.1205200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B. 2016. “State School Inspection: The Norwegian Example.” Thesis (PhD). University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B. 2017a. “Examining School Inspectors and Educational Directors Within the Organisation of School Inspection Policy: Perceptions and Views.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 61 (1): 112–126. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2015.1120234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B. 2017b. “‘Governing by Templates’ Through new Modes of School Inspection in Norway.” Journal of Educational Change 18 (2): 161–182. doi: 10.1007/s10833-017-9295-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B. 2017c. “Statlig tilsyn av skoler i Norge: sikring av likeverdig opplæring? [State School Inspection in Norway: Ensuring Equality in Classroom Instruction?].” In Likvärdig utbildning (Vol. 3), edited by S. Scheutz, 37–56. Uppsala: Iustus.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B., and K. Sivesind. 2015. “State School Inspection Policy in Norway and Sweden (2002-2012): A Reconfiguration of Governing Modes?” Journal of Education Policy 30 (3): 429–458.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., and J. Brass. 2018. “Making Accountable Teachers: The Terrors and Pleasures of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 33 (3): 361–382. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2017.1372636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2007. “Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government After two Decades.” Governance 20 (1): 127–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00347.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. 2013. “Thriving Amid the Performative Demands of the Contemporary Audit Culture: A Matter of School Context.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (6): 750–766. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2013.768706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Knowledge Promotion. 2006. The Knowledge Promotion [online]. Oslo: The Ministry of Education. Accessed 17 November 2017. http://www.udir.no/Stottemeny/English/Curriculum-in-English/_english/Knowledge-promotion---Kunnskapsloftet/
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maroy, C. 2012. “Towards Post-Bureaucratic Modes of Governance: A European Perspective.” In World Yearbook of Education 2012, edited by G. Steiner-Khamsi, and F. Waldow, 62–79. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maroy, C. 2015. “Comparing Accountability Policy Tools and Rationales: Various Ways, Various Effects?” In Governing Educational Spaces: Knowledge, Teaching, and Learning in Transition, edited by H.-G. Kotthoff, and E. Klerides, 35–56. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. 2005. “Studying Actions in Context: A Qualitative Shadowing Method for Organizational Research.” Qualitative Research 5 (4): 455–473. doi: 10.1177/1468794105056923
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J. 2016. “Accountability Policies Across Austria, Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Norway.” In Educational Accountability: International Perspectives on Challenges and Possibilities for School Leadership, edited by J. E. Easley II , and P. Tulowitzki, 224–231. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (UDIR). 2013. Methods for Inspection – A Handbook of Inspection Methods in Compliance with the Pre-School Act and the Education Act [online]. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. Accessed 17 November 2017. https://www.udir.no/regelverk-og-tilsyn/tilsyn/Metode-for-tilsyn/
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (UDIR). 2016. UDIR Annual Report [online]. Accessed 17 November 2017. https://www.udir.no/globalassets/filer/regelverk/tilsyn/tilsynsrapport-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (UDIR). no date. Inspection of kindergartens and education in Norway [online]. Accessed 17 November 2017. http://www.sici-inspectorates.eu/getattachment/b1fe7b1a-0d84-4511-9694-31b0cef8925e
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Ministry of Education. 2017. Endringer i opplæringslova og friskolelova. Skolemiljø [online] [Amendments to the Education Act and Free School Act. School learning environment], Prop. 57L 2016-2017. Accessed 17 November 2017. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/prop.-57-l-20162017/id2539013/
   Google Scholar
• Ottesen, E., and J. Møller. 2016. “Organisational Routines – the Interplay of Legal Standards and Professional Discretion.” European Educational Research Journal 15 (4): 428–446. doi: 10.1177/1474904116638853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. 2012. “Governing Knowledge: Data, Inspection and Education Policy in Europe.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 10 (4): 439–455. doi: 10.1080/14767724.2012.735148
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. 2006. “Panoptic Performativity and School Inspection Regimes: Disciplinary Mechanisms and Life Under Special Measures.” Journal of Education Policy 21 (2): 147–161. doi: 10.1080/02680930500500138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. 2009. “Inspection and the Fabrication of Professional and Performative Processes.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (5): 611–631. doi: 10.1080/02680930903125129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, Jane, Meg Maguire, Annette Braun, and Stephen Ball. 2017. “Surveillance, Governmentality and Moving the Goalposts: The Influence of Ofsted on the Work of Schools in a Post-Panoptic Era.” British journal of educational studies [online], 1–19. Accessed 14 November 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1372560
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. 1997. The Audit Society – Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., and L. M. Amoroso. 2011. Constructing Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regulation. 2006. Forskrift til opplæringsloven FOR-2006-06-23-724 [Regulation pertaining to the Education Act, 1998]. Oslo: The Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, M. 2014. “Governing Education Without Reform: The Power of the Example.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (5): 712–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K., G. Skedsmo, and J. B. Hall. 2016. “Et felles nasjonalt tilsyn: Om rammeverk og reformbaner gjennom historien. [State School Inspection: On Frameworks and Reform Trajectories Throughout History].” In Retten i skolen: mellom pedagogikk, juss og politikk, edited by K. Andenæs, and J. Møller, 99–122. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Skedsmo, G. 2009. “School Governing in Transition. Perspectives, Purposes and Perceptions of Evaluation Policy.” Thesis (PhD). University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Skedsmo, G., J. Møller. 2016. “Governing by new Performance Expectations in Norwegian Schools.” In New Public Management and the Reform of Education: European Lessons for Policy and Practice, edited by H. Gunter, 53–66. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., and N. Mockler. 2016. “Principals of Audit: Testing, Data and ‘Implicated Advocacy’.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 48 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1080/00220620.2015.1040376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo, T., and K. R. Howe. 2015. “Weighing the Effects of Federal Educational Policy on Democracy: Reframing the Discourse on High-Stakes Accountability.” Teachers College Record 117 (6): 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White Paper no. 20. 2012–2013. On the Right Track: Quality and Diversity in Comprehensive School [online]. Oslo: The Ministry of Education and Research. Accessed 14 November 2017. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/53bb6e5685704455b06fdd289212d108/no/pdfs/stm201220130020000dddpdfs.pdf
   Google Scholar