How do school leaders respond to the growing intrusiveness of accountability policies? Evidence from Italy

References

• Barker, B. 2005. “Transforming Schools: Illusion or Reality?” School Leadership and Management 25 (2): 99–116. doi: 10.1080/13632430500036215
   Google Scholar
• Bezzina, C. 2006. “The Road Less Traveled: Professional Communities in Secondary Schools.” Theory Into Practice 45 (2): 159–167. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4502_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezzina, C., A. Paletta, and G. Alimehmeti. 2018. “What are School Leaders in Italy Doing? An Observational Study.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46 (5): 841–863. doi: 10.1177/1741143217694896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J. 2012. Reinventing Management. Smarter Choices for Getting Work Done. London: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., and T. Schillemans. 2014. “Meaningful Accountability.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by M. Bovens, T. Schillemans, and R. Goodin, 673–682. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T. 2011. Theories of Educational Leadership and Management. 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. J., and J. Harris. 2008. Why Not the Best Schools? Camberwell: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capaldo, N., and L. Rondanini. 2002. Gestire e Organizzare la Scuola Dell’autonomia [To Manage and Organize the Autonomous School]. Trento: Erickson.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, C. M. 2005. “A Historical View of Douglas McGregor’s Theory Y.” Management Decision 43 (3): 450–460. doi:10.1108/00251740510589814.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, D. T., and L. Darling-Hammond. 2013. Creating Systems of Assessment for Deeper Learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cortese, F. 2012. Il Dirigente Scolastico Nella Scuola Trentina [The School Principal in Trento]. Trento. Italy: Iprase.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., A. Harris, and M. Hadfield. 2001. “Challenging the Orthodoxy of Effective School Leadership.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 4 (1): 39–56. doi: 10.1080/13603120117505
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., and P. Sammons. 2013. Successful Leadership: A Review of the International Literature. Reading Berkshire. Oxford: CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. 2008. Management. Revised ed. New York, NY: Collins Business.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, T., H. Youngs, and P. Grootenboer. 2003. “Bureaucratic Control or Professional Autonomy? Performance Management in New Zealand Schools.” School Leadership and Management 23 (1): 91–105. doi: 10.1080/1363243032000080050
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. G., and M. Langworthy. 2014. A Rich Seam: How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., D. Kalogrides, and S. Loeb. 2015. “Using Student Test Scores to Measure Principal Performance.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 37 (1): 3–28. doi: 10.3102/0162373714523831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. 2011. “Leadership for Learning: Lessons From 40 Years of Empirical Research.” Journal of Educational Administration 49: 125–142. doi: 10.1108/09578231111116699
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., and R. H. Heck. 2010. “Leadership for Learning: Does Collaborative Leadership Make a Difference?” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 38 (6): 654–678. doi: 10.1177/1741143210379060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E., and M. Raymond. 2002. “Sorting out Accountability Systems.” In School Accountability, edited by W. Evers and H. Walberg, 75–104. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, Hoover Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., M. Jones, and J. Huffman. 2017. Teachers Leading Educational Reform: The Power of Professional Learning Communities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, D. H., and P. D. Tucker. 2016. “Systematic Review of Key Leader Practices Found to Influence Student Achievement A Unified Framework.” Review of Educational Research 86 (2): 531–569. doi: 10.3102/0034654315614911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., and D. Norton. 2006. Alignment: Using the Balanced Score-Card to Create Corporate Synergies. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J. 2004. “ Forget How the Crow Flies.” The Financial Times, Juanary 16.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid, U. A. 2015. “Leadership for Equity and Social Justice in Arab and Jewish Schools in Israel: Leadership Trajectories and Pedagogical Praxis.” International Journal of Multicultural Education 17 (1): 162–187. doi: 10.18251/ijme.v17i1.938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. S., and S. B. Feldman. 2012. “Managing the Intersection of Internal and External Accountability: Challenge for Urban School Leadership in the United States.” Journal of Educational Administration 50 (5): 666–694. doi: 10.1108/09578231211249862
   Google Scholar
• Kools, M., and L. Stoll. 2016. “ What Makes a School a Learning Organisation?”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 137. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlwm62b3bvh-en.
   Google Scholar
• Labovitz, G., and V. Rosansky. 1997. The Power of Alignment: How Great Companies Stay Centered and Accomplish Extraordinary Things. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt, H. J. 2005. Top Down: Why Hierarchies Are Here to Stay and How to Manage Them More Effectively. Harvard: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeChasseur, K., M. Donaldson, E. Fernandez, and M. Femc-Bagwell. 2017. “Brokering, Buffering, and the Rationalities of Principal Work.” Journal of Educational Administration, doi:10.1108/JEA-10-2016-0129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., A. Harris, and D. Hopkins. 2008. “Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership.” School Leadership and Management 28 (1): 27–42. doi: 10.1080/13632430701800060
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., and D. Jantzi. 2006. “Transformational School Leadership for Large-Scale Reform: Effects on Students, Teachers, and Their Classroom Practices.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 17 (2): 201–227. doi: 10.1080/09243450600565829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., K. S. Louis, S. Anderson, and K. Wahlstrom. 2004. Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., S. Kruse, and A. S. Bryk. 1995. “Professionalism and Community: What is it and why is it Important in Urban Schools?” In Professionalism and Community: Perspectives on Reforming Urban Schools, edited by K. S. Louis, S. Kruse, and Associates, 3–22. Corwin: Long Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., and S. M. Printy. 2003. “Principal Leadership and School Performance.” Educational Administration Quarterly 39: 370–397. doi: 10.1177/0013161X03253412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrop, H., and T. Trujillo. 2007. “The Practical Relevance of Accountability Systems for School Improvement: A Descriptive Analysis of California Schools.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 29 (4): 319–352. doi: 10.3102/0162373707309219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 2009. Managing. San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• MIUR. 2014. “ La Buona Scuola [The good school].” Retrieved from http://www.governo.it/backoffice/allegati/76600-9649.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J. 2009. “School Leadership in an Age of Accountability: Tensions Between Managerial and Professional Accountability.” Journal of Educational Change 10: 37–46. doi: 10.1007/s10833-008-9078-6
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., A. Harris, C. Chapman, L. Stoll, and J. Russ. 2004. “Improving Schools in Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Areas: A Review of Research Evidence.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 15 (2): 149–175. doi: 10.1076/sesi.15.2.149.30433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Day, J. A. 2002. “Complexity, Accountability, and School Improvement.” In Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education, edited by S. H. Fuhrman and R. F. Elmore, 15–43. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. School Autonomy and Accountability: Are They Related to Student Performance? Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Synergies for Better Learning: An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pajno, A. 2002. “Introduzione: Autonomia Delle Scuole e Riforme Istituzionali [Introduction: School Autonomy and Institutional Reforms].” In Osservatorio Sulla Scuola Dell’autonomia, edited by Rapporto sulla scuola dell’autonomia 2002, 14–34. Rome: Armando-Luiss University Press. Luiss Edizioni – Armando Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Paletta, A. 2011. “Managing Student Learning: Schools as Multipliers of Intangible Resources.” Educational Management Administration Leadership 39/6: 733–750. doi: 10.1177/1741143211416385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletta, A. 2014. “Improving Students’ Learning Through School Autonomy: Evidence From the International Civic and Citizenship Survey.” Journal of School Choice 8: 381–409. doi: 10.1080/15582159.2014.942173
   Google Scholar
• Paletta, A. 2015. “ Dirigenti scolastici leader per l’apprendimento: una ricerca nella Provincia di Trento, Ricercazione,” Vol. 7, n. 1, June 2015, 93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Paletta, A., F. Alivernini, and S. Manganelli. 2017. “Leadership for Learning: The Relationships Between School Context, Principal Leadership and Mediating Variables.” International Journal of Educational Management 31 (2): 98–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletta, A., E. Basyte, and G. Alimehmeti. 2019. “How Principals use a new Accountability System to Promote Change in Teacher Practices: Evidence From Italy.” Educational Administration Quarterly. doi:10.1177/0013161X19840398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paletta, A., and C. Bezzina. 2016. “Governance and Leadership in Public Schools: Opportunities and Challenges Facing School Leaders in Italy.” Leadership and Policy in Schools, doi:10.1080/15700763.2016.1181186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, Lee-Anne, and E. McWilliam. 2007. “Accountability, Responsibility and School Leadership.” Journal of Educational Emquiry 7 (1): 32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, P. 2016. “Accountability.” In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 1–6. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M., C. A. Lloyd, and K. J. Rowe. 2008. “The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types.” Educational Administration Quarterly 44 (5): 635–674. doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romzek, B., and M. Dubnick. 1998. “Accountability.” In International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration, edited by J. M. Shafritz, 6–11, Vol. 1. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scurati, C., and A. Paletta. 2009. “School Empowerment and Autonomy in the Italian School System.” In Centralization and School Empowerment: From Rhetoric to Practice, edited by A. Nir, 79–89. New York, NY: Nova Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation. New York: Currency Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Sergiovanni, T. J. 2000. The Life World of Leadership: Creating Culture, Community, and Personal Meaning in our Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, R. 2005. Levers of Organization Design. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sleegers, P., P. den Brok, E. Verbiest, N. M. Moolenaar, and A. J. Daly. 2013. “Toward Conceptual Clarity: A Multidimensional, Multilevel Model of Professional Learning Communities in Dutch Elementary Schools.” The Elementary School Journal 114 (1): 118–137. doi: 10.1086/671063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., et al. 2006. “Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Educational Change 7/4: 221–258. doi: 10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
   Google Scholar
• Taysum, A. 2012. “Standards as Rules for Compliance or as Guidelines for Critical, Reflective and Reflexive Engagement in Educational Contexts.” European Studies in Educational Management 1 (1): 78–96.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, M., M. Risku, and K. Collin. 2016. “A Meta-Analysis of Distributed Leadership from 2002 to 2013 Theory Development, Empirical Evidence and Future Research Focus.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 44 (1): 146–164. doi: 10.1177/1741143214558576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, T., M. Acker-Hocevar, J. Ballenger, and A. W. Place. 2013. “Voices From the Field: What Have We Learned About Instructional Leadership?” Leadership and Policy in Schools 12 (1): 12–40. doi: 10.1080/15700763.2013.766349
   Google Scholar
• Zayim, M., and Y. Kondakci. 2015. “An Exploration of the Relationship Between Readiness for Change and Organizational Trust in Turkish Public Schools.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 43 (4): 610–625. doi: 10.1177/1741143214523009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlatos, B. 1994. “Don’t Test, Don’t Tell.” American School Board Journal 181 (11): 24–28.
   Google Scholar