References
- ACARA. 2015. “Guide to understanding ICSEA (Index of Community Socioeducational Advantage) values: fact sheet.” Accessed November 16. http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Guide_to_understanding_icsea_values.pdf.
- ACARA. 2018. “MySchool Website: Glossary.” ACARA. Accessed February 2. https://www.myschool.edu.au/glossary/#o.
- Allen, R., and A. Vignoles. 2007. “What Should an Index of School Segregation Measure?” Oxford Review of Education 33 (5): 643. doi:10.1080/03054980701366306.
- Australian Government. 1973. Schools in Australia: Report of the Interim Committee for the Australian Schools Commission. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
- Australian Government. 2018. National School Resourcing Board: Review of the Socio-Economic Status Score Methodology. Final Report June 2018. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
- Australian Government Department of Education and Training. 2017. “Independent Review into Regional, Rural and Remote Education (Quality Schools Review).” Accessed December 5. https://www.education.gov.au/independent-review-regional-rural-and-remote-education.
- Baker, J. 2019. “‘Public Shaming of Children’: Bondi Kids given Popcorn if their Parents Paid Fees.” Sydney Morning Herald. Accessed March 13. https://www.smh.com.au/education/public-shaming-of-children-bondi-kids-given-popcorn-if-their-parents-paid-fees-20190313-p513v1.html.
- Ball, S., and D. Youdell. 2007. Hidden Privatisation in Public Education. Education International 5th World Congress July 2007.
- Ball, S. J., and D. Youdell. 2008. Hidden Privatisation in Public Education. Brussels: Education International.
- Benito, R., M. À. Alegre, and I. Gonzàlez-Balletbò. 2014. “School Segregation and Its Effects on Educational Equality and Efficiency in 16 OECD Comprehensive School Systems.” Comparative Education Review 58 (1): 104–134.
- Bonnor, C., and B. Shepherd. 2016. Uneven Playing Field: The State of Australia's Schools. Centre for Policy Development. Accessed 1 March 2017. https://cpd.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/The-State-of-Australias-Schools.pdf.
- Chesters, J. 2018. “Alleviating or Exacerbating Disadvantage: Does School Attended Mediate the Association Between Family Background and Educational Attainment?” Journal of Education Policy, 1–20. doi:10.1080/02680939.2018.1488001.
- Chesters, J., and A. Daly. 2017. “Do Peer Effects Mediate the Association Between Family Socio-Economic Status and Educational Achievement?” Australian Journal of Social Issues 52 (1): 63–77.
- Chiu, M. M., and L. Khoo. 2005. “Effects of Resources, Inequality, and Privilege Bias on Achievement: Country, School, and Student Level Analyses.” American Educational Research Journal 4: 575–603.
- De Bortoli, L., and S. Thomson. 2010. Contextual Factors That Influence the Achievement of Australia’s Indigenous Students: Results From PISA 2000–2006. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.
- Forsey, M., H. Proctor, and M. Stacey. 2017. “A Most Poisonous Debate: Legitimizing Support for Australian Private Schools.” In Private Schools and School Choice in Compulsory Education: Global Change and National Challenge, edited by Thomas Koinzer, Rita Nikolai, and Florian Waldow, 49–66. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
- Fuller, K. 2019. “Voluntary School Contributions Considered ‘Exploitative’ by Parents Pushing for their Waiver.” ABC News. Accessed February 19. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02-19/parents-push-to-waive-voluntary-school-contributions/10822888.
- Gonski, D., K. Boston, K. Greiner, C. Lawrence, B. Scales, and P. Tannock. 2011. “Australian Government Review of Funding for Schooling: Final Report December 2011.” edited by Employment and Workplace Relations Department of Education. Canberra City, ACT: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
- Gorur, R. 2013. “My School, My Market.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 34 (2): 214–230. doi:10.1080/01596306.2013.770248.
- Ho, C. 2017. “Angry Anglos and Aspirational Asians: Everyday Multiculturalism in the Selective School System in Sydney.” Discourse, 1–16. doi:10.1080/01596306.2017.1396961.
- Hoxby, C. 2003. “School Choice and School Productivity: Could School Choice be a Tide That Lifts all Boats?” In The Economics of School Choice (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report), edited by C. Hoxby, 287–342. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Islam, A., and J. Parasnis. 2014. Native-immigrant Wage gap Across Occupations: Evidence From Australia. Melbourne: Monash University, Department of Economics.
- Itkonen, T., and M. Jahnukainen. 2007. “An Analysis of Accountability Policies in Finland and the United States.” International Journal of Disability, Development & Education 54 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1080/10349120601149664.
- Lamb, S. 2007. “School Reform and Inequality in Urban Australia: A Case of Residualising the Poor.” In International Studies in Educational Inequality, Theory and Policy, edited by S. Daru-Bellat, S. Lamb, and R. Teese, 672–709. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Lubienski, C. A., and S. T. Lubienski. 2013. The Public School Advantage: why Public Schools Outperform Private Schools. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Mills, C., and T. Gale. 2010. Schooling in Disadvantaged Communities: Playing the Game from the Back of the Field. London: Springer.
- NSW Department of Education. 2018. The Resource Allocation Model (RAM) in 2019: An Overview (November 2018). Sydney: NSW Department of Education.
- NSW Department of Education. 2019. “Policy Library: Finance: Voluntary School Contribution.” NSW Government. Accessed November 18 2018. https://education.nsw.gov.au/policy-library/policies/voluntary-school-contribution?refid=285867.
- OECD. 2016. Low-Performing Students: Why They Fall Behind and How To Help Them Succeed. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. 2017a. Educational Opportunity for All: Overcoming Inequality throughout the Life Course, Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. 2017b. PISA 2015 Results (Volume III). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. 2017c. PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students’ Well-Being. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. 2017d. PISA 2015 Technical Report. Paris: OECD.
- OECD. 2018. “OECD Education GPS: The World of Education at your Fingertips: Parental Involvement (September 11 2018).” OECD. Accessed November 8. http://gpseducation.oecd.org/revieweducationpolicies/#!node=41727&filter=all.
- Olmedo, A., and A. Wilkins. 2017. “Governing Through Parents: A Genealogical Enquiry of Education Policy and the Construction of Neoliberal Subjectivities in England.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38 (4): 573–589. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1130026.
- Perry, L. B., C. Lubienski, and J. Ladwig. 2016. “How do Learning Environments Vary by School Sector and Socioeconomic Composition? Evidence From Australian Students.” Australian Journal of Education 60 (3): 175–190. doi:10.1177/0004944116666519.
- Perry, L. B., and A. McConney. 2010. “School Socio-Economic Composition and Student Outcomes in Australia: Implications for Education Policy.” Australian Journal of Education 54 (1): 72–85.
- Posey-Maddox, L. 2014. When Middle-Class Parents Choose Urban Schools: Class, Race, and the Challenge of Equity in Public Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Posey-Maddox, L. 2016. “Beyond the Consumer: Parents, Privatization, and Fundraising in US Urban Public Schooling.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (2): 178–197. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1065345.
- Powers, J. M. 2004. “High-Stakes Accountability and Equity: Using Evidence From California’s Public Schools Accountability Act to Address the Issues in Williams v. State of California.” American Educational Research Journal 41 (4): 763–795. doi:10.3102/00028312041004763.
- Powers, J. M., and A. U. Potterton. 2018. “The Rich get Richer: Inequalities in Public School tax Credit Donations to Charter Schools in Arizona.” Policy Futures in Education 17 (2): 246–265. doi:10.1177/1478210318790602.
- Rowe, E. E. 2017. Middle-class School Choice in Urban Spaces: The Economics of Public Schooling and Globalized Education Reform. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Rowe, E. E., and C. Lubienski. 2017. “Shopping for Schools or Shopping for Peers: Public Schools and Catchment Area Segregation.” Journal of Education Policy 32 (3): 340–356. doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1263363.
- Rowe, E., and L. Perry. 2019. “Private Financing in Urban Public Schools: Inequalities in a Stratified Education Marketplace.” Australian Educational Researcher, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s13384-019-00328-0.
- Rumberger, R. W., and G. J. Palardy. 2005. “Does Segregation Still Matter? The Impact of Student Composition on Academic Achievement in High School.” Teachers College Record 107 (9): 1999–2045.
- Rutkowski, D., and L. Rutkowski. 2013. “Measuring Socioeconomic Background in PISA: One Size Might not Fit all.” Research in Comparative and International Education 8 (3): 259–278. doi:10.2304/rcie.2013.8.3.259.
- Schulz, W. 2005. “Measuring the Socio-economic Background of Students and its Effect on Achievement in PISA 2000 and PISA 2003.” American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 7–11 April 2005.
- Shad, S. 2019. “Opinion: A ‘Free’ Public School Education can Cost $1,300 a Year — and it's Getting Harder for Parents to say no.” ABC News. Accessed March 20. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-20/parents-pitch-in-for-the-high-cost-of-public-schooling/10917358.
- Singhal, P. 2019. “'Public Schools Should be Free': Parent Outrage at Invoices for Voluntary Fees.” Fairfax Digital. Accessed February 18. https://www.smh.com.au/education/public-schools-should-be-free-parent-outrage-at-invoices-for-voluntary-fees-20190218-p50yig.html.
- Sirin, S. R. 2005. “Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research.” Review of Educational Research 75 (3): 417–453.
- Stacey, M. 2019. “‘If You’re Wrong for the Place you Just Don’t Survive’: Examining the Work of Early Career Teachers in Context.” Teachers and Teaching 25 (4): 404–417. doi:10.1080/13540602.2019.1621828.
- Thompson, G., A. Hogan, and M. Rahimi. 2019. “Private Funding in Australian Public Schools: A Problem of Equity.” The Australian Educational Researcher. doi:10.1007/s13384-019-00319-1.
- Thomson, P. 2002. Schooling the Rustbelt Kids: Making the Difference in Changing Times. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
- Thrupp, M. 1995. “The School Mix Effect: The History of an Enduring Problem in Educational Research, Policy and Practice.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 16 (2): 183.
- Waslander, S., and M. Thrupp. 1995. “Choice, Competition and Segregation: An Empirical Analysis of a New Zealand Secondary School Market, 1990-93.” Journal of Education Policy 10 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1080/0268093950100101.
- Watson, L., and C. Ryan. 2010. “Choosers and Losers: The Impact of Government Subsidies on Australian Secondary Schools.” Australian Journal of Education 54 (1): 86–107.
- Wilkins, A. 2010. “Citizens and/or Consumers: Mutations in the Construction of Concepts and Practices of School Choice.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (2): 171–189. doi:10.1080/02680930903447671.
- Willms, J. D. 2010. “School Composition and Contextual Effects on Student Outcomes.” Teachers College Record 112 (4): 1008–1037.
- Winton, S. 2018a. “Challenging Fundraising, Challenging Inequity: Contextual Constraints on Advocacy Groups’ Policy Influence.” Critical Studies in Education 59 (1): 54–73. doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1176062.
- Winton, S. 2018b. “Coordinating Policy Layers of School Fundraising in Toronto, Ontario, Canada: An Institutional Ethnography.” Educational Policy, 1–23. doi:10.1177/0895904818807331.
- Yoon, E.-S., C. Lubienski, and J. Lee. 2018. “The Geography of School Choice in a City with Growing Inequality: The Case of Vancouver.” Journal of Education Policy 33 (2): 279–298. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1346203.