Policy pressure on partnerships: intentions, expectations and legitimisation of Norwegian educational reform policy

References

• Aas, M. 2013. Ledelse av skoleutvikling. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2008. The Education Debate. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., M. Maguire, and A. Braun. 2012. How Schools do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, C., and C. Kosnik. 2002. “Professors and the Practicum: Involvement of University Faculty in Preservice Practicum Supervision.” Journal of Teacher Education 53 (1): 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, G. 2000. Skolekultur: Nøkkelen til Skolens Utvikling. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J. 2010. “Why ‘What Works’ Still Won’t Work: From Evidence-based Education to Value-based Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 29 (5): 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blossing, U., A. Hagen, T. Nyen, and Å Söderström. 2010. Kunnskapsløftet – fra ord til handling”. Sluttrapport fra evalueringen av et statlig program for skoleutvikling [The Knowledge Promotion – From Word to Deed. Final Report from the Evaluation of a National Programme for School Improvement]. Oslo: Fafo.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, J. L., L. A. Cooper, M. S. Donovan, A. Huyghe, K. R. Koedinger, and E. J. Paré-Blagoev. 2015. “Design-based Research within the Constraints of Practice: AlgebraByExample.” Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 20 (1–2): 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.986674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilton, P., and C. Schäffner. 2011. “Discourse and Politics.” In Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Approach, edited by T. A. van Dijk, 303–330. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., and W. R. Penuel. 2016. “Research–Practice Partnerships in Education: Outcomes, Dynamics, and Open Questions.” Educational Researcher 45 (1): 48–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., W. R. Penuel, and K. E. Geil. 2013. Research-practice Partnerships: A Strategy for Leveraging Research for Educational Improvement in School Districts. William T. Grant Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED568396.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. 2014. “Analysing Documents.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by Uwe Flick, 367–379. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n25
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstedt, M. 2009. “Governing by Partnerships: Dilemmas in Swedish Education Policy at the Turn of the Millennium.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (6): 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903301548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. 1999. “What is Evidence-Based Education?” British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2): 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.00106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., and T. Mutton. 2007. “Looking Forward: Rethinking Professional Learning through Partnership Arrangements in Initial Teacher Education.” Oxford Review of Education 33 (4): 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701450928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, C. C., W. R. Penuel, C. E. Coburn, J. Daniel, and L. Steup. 2021. Practice Partnerships in Education: The State of the Field. William T. Grant Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED615899.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, B. J., R. W. Marx, S. Best, and T. Revital. 2003. “Linking Teacher and Student Learning to Improve Professional Development in Systemic Reform.” Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (6): 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00059-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, J., L. Vidovich, and A. Chapman. 2009. “Policy ‘Partnerships’? Power Dynamics in Curriculum Reform.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 41 (2): 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620902808277.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M. 2016. An Intellectual History of School Leadership Practice and Research. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. J., W. R. Penuel, C. M. D’Angelo, A. H. DeBarger, L. P. Gallagher, C. A. Kennedy, B. H. Cheng, and J. S. Krajcik. 2015. “Impact of Project-based Curriculum Materials on Student Learning in Science: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (10): 1362–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugen, C. R. 2010. “Equity and Life-long Learning: An Analysis of White Paper no. 16 (2006/2007) of Norway.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 54 (4): 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2010.493342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. W., and L. J. Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., R. Suddaby, and B. Leca. 2009. Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., R. Suddaby, and B. Leca. 2011. “Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization.” Journal of Management Inquiry 20 (1): 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MER. 2004. Kultur for læring (St. meld. nr. 30 (2003–2004) [White Paper No. 30. Culture for Learning]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-030-2003-2004-/id404433/.
   Google Scholar
• MER. 2007.  … og ingen sto igjen. Tidlig innsats for livslang læring. (St. meld. nr. 16 (2006–2007)) [White Paper No. 16 … and None left behind: Early Intervention for Lifelong Learning]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-16-2006-2007-/id441395/.
   Google Scholar
• MER. 2011. Motivasjon – mestring – muligheter. ungdomstrinnet. (Meld. St. 22 (2010–2011)) [White Paper No. 22. Motivation – Mastering – Possibilities. The Lower Secondary Level]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld-st-22-2010–2011/id641251/.
   Google Scholar
• MER. 2017. Lærelyst – tidlig innsats og kvalitet i skolen (Meld. St. 21 (2016–2017)) [White Paper No. 21. Eager to Learn – Early Intervention and Quality in Schools]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-21-20162017/id2544344/.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1987. “The Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy.” California Management Review 30 (1): 11–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NDET. 2015. Motivasjon og mestring for bedre læring. Felles satsing på klasseledelse, regning, lesing og skriving. Strategi for ungdomstrinnet [Motivation and Mastering for Improved Learning. A Joint Effort for Classroom Management, Calculation, Reading and Writing. A Strategy for the Lower Secondary Level]. https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kd/vedlegg/grunnskole/strategiplaner/f_4276_b_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NDET. 2021. Tilskuddsordning for lokal kompetanseutvikling i barnehage og grunnopplæring [Subvention for Local Competence Development in Kindergartens, Primary and Secondary Education]. https://www.udir.no/kvalitet-og-kompetanse/lokal-kompetanseutvikling/tilskuddsordningene-for-lokal-kompetanseutvikling-i-barnehage-og-grunnopplaring/.
   Google Scholar
• NDET. n.d. Program for skoleutvikling – Programbeskrivelse 2005–2009 [Programme for School Improvement – Programme Description 2005–2009].
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. 2001. Mening, materialitet og makt: En innføring i diskursanalyse. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B., and E. F. Øverland. 2004. “International Relations and Policy Planning: The Method of Perspectivist Scenario Building.” International Studies Perspectives 5 (3): 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3577.2004.00173.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. E. 2008. “University–School Collaboration Based on Complementary Needs.” Journal of Educational Change 9 (4): 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9082-x.
   Google Scholar
• Retningslinjer for tilskuddsordning for lokal kompetanseutvikling i barnehage og grunnopplæring [Guidelines for subvention for local competence development in kindergartens, primary and secondary education], Pub. L. No. FOR-2021-01-26-230. https://lovdata.no/dokument/INS/forskrift/2021-01-26-230.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., and B. Lingard. 2010. Globalizing Education Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sarason, S. B. 1996. Revisiting the Culture of the School and the Problem of Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, B., S. Fairbanks, A. Briesch, D. Myers, and G. Sugai. 2008. “Evidence-based Practices in Classroom Management: Considerations for Research to Practice.” Education & Treatment of Children 31 (1): 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0007.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. 2002. “Evidence-based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research.” Educational Researcher 31 (7): 15–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007015.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., and M. O’Leary. 2015. “Partnership as Cultural Practice in the Face of Neoliberal Reform.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 47 (2): 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2015.996870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G., B. Karseth, and C. Baek. 2020. “From Science to Politics: Commissioned Reports and their Political Translation into White Papers.” Journal of Education Policy 35 (1): 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1656289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M., G. Edwards, and F. Lopez-Real. 2009. Learning in School-university Partnership: Sociocultural Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. n.d. “Læreplanverket.” Utdanningsdirektoratet. Accessed July 22, 2023. https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, R. 2006. “Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research.” Organization Studies 27 (5): 613–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606064101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar