946
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A new mode of control: an actor–network theory account of effects of power and agency in establishing education policy

ORCID Icon
Pages 54-68 | Received 19 Jan 2023, Accepted 08 Sep 2023, Published online: 19 Sep 2023

References

  • Apple, Michael W. 2006. “Understanding and Interrupting Neoliberalism and Neoconservatism in Education.” Pedagogies: An International Journal 1 (1): 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15544818ped0101_4.
  • Ball, Stephen J. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065.
  • BBC. 2016. “Pisa Tests: Singapore Top in Global Education Rankings – BBC News.” Accessed June 19, 2022. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-38212070.
  • Bloom, Benjamin S. 1973. “Recent Developments in Mastery Learning.” Educational Psychologist 10 (2): 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527309529091.
  • Boylan, M. 2018. “Where did Maths Mastery Come from?” Accessed July 13, 2021. https://schoolsweek.co.uk/where-did-maths-mastery-come-from/.
  • Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fisherman of St Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, edited by John Law, 196–232. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Callon, M., and J. Law. 2005. “On Qualculation, Agency, and Otherness.” Environment and planning D: Society and Space 23 (5): 717–733.
  • Ceulemans, Carlijne, Maarten Simons, and Elke Struyf. 2012. “Professional Standards for Teachers: How Do They ‘Work’? An Experiment in Tracing Standardisation in-the-Making in Teacher Education.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 20 (1): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.649414.
  • Department for Education and Skills (DfES). 2004. “Making Mathematics Count: The Report of Professor Adrian Smith’s Inquiry into Post-14 Mathematics Education.” Accessed June 19, 2022. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/4873/.
  • Department for Education [DfE]. 2010a. “Academies Act 2010.” https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/32/contents.
  • Department for Education [DfE]. 2010b. “The Importance of Teaching.” http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/pdfs/2010-white-paper-teaching.pdf.
  • Department for Education [DfE]. 2014. “National Curriculum in England: Primary Curriculum – GOV.UK.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-primary-curriculum.
  • Department for Education [DfE]. 2016. “Assessment and Reporting Arrangements”. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/2016-key-stage-2-assessment-and-reporting-arrangements-ara.
  • Edgerton, David. 2018. The Rise and Fall of the British Nation. London, UK: Penguin.
  • Edgington, Ursula. 2016. “Performativity and Accountability in the UK Education System: A Case for Humanness.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 24 (2): 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1105467.
  • Fenwick, Tara, and Richard Edwards. 2012. Researching Education through Actor Network Theory. Edited by Tara Fenwick and Richard Edwards. Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Fisher, Trevor. 2008. “The Era of Centralisation: The 1988 Education Reform Act and Its Consequences.” Forum 50 (2): 255–261. https://doi.org/10.2304/forum.2008.50.2.255.
  • Gewirtz, Sharon, Meg Maguire, Eszter Neumann, and Emma Towers. 2021. “What’s Wrong with ‘Deliverology’? Performance Measurement, Accountability and Quality Improvement in English Secondary Education.” Journal of Education Policy 36 (4): 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1706103.
  • Gorur, Radhika. 2011. “Policy as Assemblage.” European Educational Research Journal 10 (4), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2011.10.4.611.
  • Hamilton, Mary. 2009. “Putting Words in Their Mouths: The Alignment of Identities with System Goals through the Use of Individual Learning Plans.” British Educational Research Journal 35 (2): 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802042739.
  • Hamilton, Mary. 2011. “Unruly Practices: What a Sociology of Translations Can Offer to Educational Policy Analysis.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (sup1): 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00622.x.
  • Hargreaves, A., and I. Goodson. 1996. “Teachers’ Professional Lives: Aspirations and Actualities.” In Teachers’ Professional Lives, edited by I. Goodson and A. Hargreaves, 1–26. London: Falmer Press.
  • Hoyle, Eric. 1982. “The Professionalization of Teachers: A Paradox.” British Journal of Educational Studies 30 (2): 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.1982.9973622.
  • Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Law, John. 1994. Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Law, John. 2009. “Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics.” In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, edited by Bryan S. Turner, 141–158. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • MacBeath, J. 2008. “Stories of Compliance and Subversion in a Prescriptive Policy Environment.” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 36 (1): 123–148.
  • Menter, Ian. 2009. “Teachers for the Future.” In Changing Teacher Professionalism: International Trends, Challenges and Ways Forward, edited by Sharon Gewirtz, Pat Mahony, Ian Hextall, and Alan Cribb, 217–228. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Moore, Alex, and Matthew Clarke. 2016. “‘Cruel Optimism’: Teacher Attachment to Professionalism in an Era of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (5): 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1160293.
  • Mulcahy, Dianne, and Carol Morrison. 2017. “Re/assembling ‘Innovative’ Learning Environments: Affective Practice and Its Politics.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (8): 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1278354.
  • Mulcahy, Dianne, and Suzanne Perillo. 2011. “Thinking Management and Leadership within Colleges and Schools Somewhat Differently: A Practice-Based, Actor–Network Theory Perspective.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 39 (1): 122–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210383895.
  • Nespor, Jan. 1994. Knowledge In Motion: Space, Time And Curriculum In Undergraduate Physics And Management. New York: Routledge.
  • Oancea, Alis. 2014. “Teachers’ Professional Knowledge and State-Funded Teacher Education: A (Hi)Story of Critiques and Silences.” Oxford Review of Education 40 (4): 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.939413.
  • Parliament of the United Kingdom. 1870. An Act to Provide for Public Elementary Education in England and Wales. London: Parliament of the United Kingdom.
  • Peacock, Alison. 2017. “The Chartered College of Teaching: Professional Learning without Limits.” In Flip The System UK: A Teachers’ Manifesto, edited by Lucy Rycroft-Smith and Jean-Louis Dutaut, 94–101. London: Routledge.
  • Pink, S. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media, and Representation in Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
  • Reeves, Jenny. 2007. “Inventing the Chartered Teacher.” British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (1): 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00365.x.
  • Sockett, Hugh. 1993. The Moral Base for Teacher Professionalism. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Stronach, Ian, Brian Corbin, Olwen McNamara, Sheila Stark, and Tony Warne. 2002. “Towards an Uncertain Politics of Professionalism: Teacher and Nurse Identities in Flux.” Journal of Education Policy 17 (1): 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930110100081.
  • Tomei, Anthony, Justin Dillon, and Emily Dawson. 2014. “United Kingdom: An Example of the Impact of High Stakes Accountability Regimes on STEM Education.” In The Age of STEM: Educational Policy and Practice across the World in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, edited by Brigid Freeman, Simon Marginson, Russell Tytler, 161–177. London: Routledge.
  • Whitty, G. 2006.“Teacher Professionalism in a New Era.” Paper Presented at the First General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland Annual Lecture, Belfast. Belfast, Northern Ireland.
  • Wright, S. 2015. “Exploring Actor–Network Theory and CAQDAS : Provisional Principles and Practices for Coding, Connecting and Describing Data Using ATLAS.ti.” In ATLAS.ti User Conference 2015 – Qualitative Data Analysis and Beyond, edited by S. Friese, 1–31. Berlin: Repository of Technische Universität Berlin.
  • Yorkshire Purchasing Organisation (YPO). 2022. “Five Things You Should Know about Singapore Maths.” Accessed June 19, 2022. https://www.ypo.co.uk/news-and-events/blog/five-things-you-should-know-about-singapore-maths.