4
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Summary of Investigations Relating to Reading July 1, 1960 to June 30, 1961

Pages 197-220 | Published online: 23 Dec 2014

Bibliography

  • Aaron, Ira E. 44Comparisons of Good and Poor Readers in Fourth and Eighth Grades,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (September, 1960, 34–7. Comparative study of 175 fourth-grade and 155 eighth-grade pupils of white schools in a Georgia school district with respect to differ ences among good and poor readers in spelling, spelling of phonetic syllables, syllabication, and intelligence.
  • Acker, Ralphs. “Reading Improvement in Military, Government and Business Agencies,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (February, 1961), 238–40. Also in Reading Teacher, XIV (November 1960), 89-557 Questionnaire survey of status and trends in reading improvement programs in 177 adult reading improvement agencies.
  • Adams, John B. “Effects of Reference Group and Status on Opinion Change, Journalism Quarterly, XXXVII (Summer 1960), 408–12. Study of the effects of knowledge of the nationality and status of a spokesman upon an issue of disagreement (nationalism vs. inter nationalism) revealed by pre- and post-tests of opinion change with respect to the reading, by 152 unde rgraduates, of specially-written news stories.
  • Anderson, A. W. “Personality Traits in Reading Ability of Western Australian University Freshmen,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (February 1961), 234–7. Correlation study of relationships among scores on the Cooperative Reading Test and the Cattell 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire for 290 male and 125 female entering students at the University of Western Australia.
  • Anderson, A. W. “The Relationship of Age to Adult Reading Scores,” Journal of Educational Psychology, LI (December 1960), 334–7. Limited sampling study of Western Austra1ian adult reading performance to explore the relationships between age and vocabulary, speed of comprehension, and level of comprehension scores on the Cooperative Reading Test.
  • Armstrong, Robert D. “Teaching Work-Study Skills by Television,” Alberta Journal of Educational Research, VH (March 1961), 12–7. Comparative study of significance of gains in learning work-study skills in grades five and six by television and by conventional methods in six lessons during a two-week period.
  • Austin, Mary C., et al. The Torch Lighters, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961, pp. 196. Survey, based upon 540 questionnaires from 371 teacher-training institutions and 74 field interviews, of the preparation of teachers of reading in the United States.
  • Ausubel, David P. “The Use of Advance Organizers in the Learning and Retention of of Meaningful Verbal Materials,” Journal of Educational Psychology, LI (October l960) 267–72. Controlled experimental study of effect of introducing relevant general concepts prior to studying an unfamiliar technical passage upon retention among two groups of 40 university seniors.
  • Balow, Bruce. “Magazine Reading Among Teachers and Prospective Teachers,” Journal of Teacher Education, XH (March 1961), 57–9. Comparison of reported magazine reading by a population of 268 students in a mid western college of education, comprising professional Education undergraduates, professional Education graduates with teaching experience, and liberal arts graduate students in Education.
  • Barcus, Francis E. “A Content Analysis of Trends in Sunday Comics, 1900-1959),” Journalism Quarterly, XXXVIII (Spring 1961), 171–80 Content analysis of nature and trends of major themes, types, and characters in778 Sunday comic strips appearing in three Boston newspapers between 1900 and 1959.
  • Baughman, N. Dale. “Special Reading Instruction in Junior High Schools,” National Association of Secondary Schools Bulletin, XLIV (November 1960), 90–5. Also in Clearing House, XXXV (March, 1961), 394-7. Analysis of 133 questionnaires sent to 269 Illinois junior high schools concerning the number and nature of special reading instruction programs, including data on objectives, procedures, and teacher preparation.
  • Beck, Harry S. “The Relationship of Symbol Reversals to Monocular and Binocular Vision” Peabody Journal of Education, XXXVIII (November 1960), 137–42. Study of the significance of reversals of letters, numbers and words as a function of monocular or binocular presentation to 44 second-grade children with known reversal tendencies.
  • Bentley, Ralph, and Galloway, R. “A Comparison of the Readability of Vocational Agricultural Reference Books with the Reading Ability of the Students Using Them,” Journal of Experimental Education, XXIX (June 1961), 373–83. Comparisons of the readibility of the ten most frequently used vocational agricu1ture reference books in 24 Indiana high schools of moderate and small size, and the reading ability of students using these in grades nine through twelve.
  • Binney, James. “A Study of Reading for Duty,” Education, LXXXI (November 1960), 177–80. Analysis of types of magazine articles recommended by nine classes of college freshmen over a three-year period for reading by other college freshmen.
  • Bloomer, Richard H. “Concepts of Meaning and the Reading and Spelling Difficulty of Words,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (January 1961), 178–80. Correlation analysis of relationships among meaning dimensions of concrete ness, number of meanings, and frequency of 149 words taken from the New Iowa Spelling Scale.
  • Bloomer, Richard H. “Reading Methodology: Some Alternative Organizational Principles,” Reading Teacher, XIV (January 1961), 167–71. Comparison of four experimental and six control classes in a 17-week beginning reading program in which experimental materials controlling word length and the frequency of let ter occurrence and sounds were used according to a “Progressive Choice Method.”
  • Bormuth, John R., and Aker, C. “Is the Tachistoscope a Worthwhile Teaching Tool?” Reading Teacher, XIV (January 1961), 172–6 Comparison of significance of effects of a 20- week program of tachistoscopic training upon rate, vocabulary and comprehension in 39 experimentaisixth-grade pupils matched with 39 control subjects for sex, intelligence, and initial reading achievement.
  • Bottomly, Forbes. “An Experiment with the Controlled Reader,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (March 1961), 265–9. Comparative study, involving 460 pupils in grades 5 and 8 in two Spokane Public Schools, of reading progress by pupils in a three-week Controlled Reader program and those in conventional developmental reading classes.
  • Bradley, Beatrice E. “Reading With a Dash of Showmanship,” Elementary School Journal, LXI (October 1960), 28–31. Controlled comparative study of learning to read from basal materials presented conventionally versus slide projection for two groups of 21 pupils in grades 1 and 2 of a Philadelphia school.
  • Brinton, J. E., and McKown, L. N. “Effects of Newspaper Reading on Knowledge and Attitude,” Journalism Quarterly, XXXVIII (Spring 1961), 187–95. Questionnaire study, among 294 subscribers and nonsubscribers to a newspaper, of effects of newspaper information on knowledge about, attitude toward, and desire to act with respect to a health issue.
  • Cappa, Dan, and Schubert, D. G. “Are Teachers Meeting the Reading Needs of the Gifted?” California Journal of Educational Research, XII January1961), 42–44. Questionnaire survey of 83 intermediate teachers in Southern California concerning their competence in meeting the reading needs of pupils with IQ’s over 130.
  • Carlson, Earl R. “Psychological Satisfaction and Interest in News,” Journalism Quarterly, XXXVII (Autumn 1960), 547–51 Study of relationships between interest ratings on 20 news topics and 25 perceived goal-values responded to by 47 college students, as shown by a Satisfaction-Usefulness Index.
  • Carter, Roy E., Jr., and Mitofsky, W. J. “Actual and Perceived Distances in the News” Journalism Quarterly, XXXVIII (Spring 1961), 223–5. Comparison of actual and perceived distances judged by 35 students in a geography class in a Southern university as a function of regional (North-South) proximity and knowledge through visitation.
  • Cassel, Russell N., and Haddox, G. “Comparing Reading Competency With Personality and Social Insight Test Scores,” California Journal of Educational Research, XII (January 1961), 27–30. Correlations between measures of personality tension and needs, social insight, academic achievement, and reading in the social studies area for 200 ninth-grade students in Phoenix, Arizona, high schools.
  • Clark, Phipps M., and Karp, J. “A Summer Remedial Program,” Elementary School Journal, LXI (December 1960), 137–42. Progress report on reading improvement in 104 New York City children who participated in summer remedial reading programs of three weeks’ duration.
  • Cohn, R. “Delayed Acquisition of Reading and Writing Abilities in Children–A Neurological Study,” Archives of Neurology, IV (February 1961), 153–64. Two-year clinical study of 46 children with specific reading and writing difficulties who were given detailed perceptual and neurological tests to ascertain if delayed development in the use of graphic symbols for communication purposes is primarily an expression of general disturbance in neurological function.
  • Coleman, J. H., and Jungeblut, Ann. “Children’s Likes and Dislikes About What They Read,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (February 1961). 221–8. Survey of reading likes and dislikes of 750 children in grades 4-6 in three eastern states, expressed on a six-point rating scale for 81 short prose selections, each reproduced on a single page.
  • Dale, Edgar, et al. Chi1dren’s Knowledge of Words. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State Univerity Bureau of Educational Research and Service, 1960. Compilation of word lists for grades 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12, based upon familiarity scores of 50% derived by tests given to samples of 200 or more at each grade level.
  • Daly, William E., and Lee, R. H. “Reading Disabilities in a Group of Mentally Retarded Children: Incidence and Treatment,” Training School Bulletin, LVII (November 1960), 85–93. Study of incidence of reading disability, measured as a discrepancy between reading speed and mental age, and effects of homogeneous versus hetrogeneous reading instruction for a group of institutional mental retardates.
  • Davis, Norris G., and Watkins, S. “Teen-Age Newspaper Reading,” Editor and Publisher, XCIII (July 23, 1960), 13, 54. Newspaper reading survey of the newspaper reading habits of 4493 Texas teen-agers.
  • Davis, Norris G., and Watkins, S. “Teen Agers’ Image of the Press,” Editor and Publisher, XCIII (July 30, 1960), 14. Newspaper reading survey of the image of newspapers and newspapermen held by 4493 Texas teenagers.
  • Delacato, Carl H. The Treatment and Prevention of Reading Problems. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1959. Pp. 122. Presentation of case histories illustrating the treatment and progress of children with severe reading disabilities, based upon an analysis of developmental and neurological symptoms.
  • Deutschmann, Paul J., and Danielson, W. A. “Diffusion of the Major News Story,” Journalism Quarterly, XXXVII (Summer 1960) 345–55, Telephone interview study of the nature and speed of diffusion of knowledge about three major news stories, the six population samples totalling 844 adults in three communities in 1957-58.
  • Diack, Hunter. Reading and the Psychology of Perception. New York: Philosophical Library, 1960. Pp. 155. Summary and review of various researches conducted by the author and others into the comparative effectiveness of early phonic versus whole approaches in teaching reading, and the assumptions about the basic perceptual unit underlying each.
  • Diener, Thomas F., and Kaczkowski, H, R. “Readability of Occupational Information,” Vocational Guidance Quarterly, IX (Winter 1960-1961), 87-9 Appraisal of three different types of occupational literature by the Yoakam readability formula.
  • Dobrin, Ruth M. “ The Massapecqua Story,” Journal of Developmental Reading, IV (Spring 1961), 159-72. Description of reading program for college-bound high school students and its effects on College Board scores and gains on the Cooperative Test of Reading Comprehension.
  • Doehring, Donald G., and Rosenstein, J. “Visual Word Recognition by Deaf and Hearing Children,” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, III (December 1960), 320–6; Comparative study of visual recognition of letters, trigrams and words in 40 orally-trained deaf children and 40 hearing children, in age groups of nine to eleven and twelve to 16.
  • Durkin, Dolores. “Children Who Read Before Grade One,” Reading Teacher, XIV (January 1961), 163–6. Progress report on two years of a study of 49 California children who learned to read before entering school.
  • Dyer, Dorothy W., and Harcum, E. R. “Visual Perception of Binary Patterns by Pre- School Children and by School Children” Journal of Educational Psychology, LII (June 1961), 161–5. “Tachistoscopic study of significance of differences in accuracy of perception to the right and left of a fixation point for 31 pre-school and kindergarten children and 35 children in grades one and two, with implications for reading.
  • Eames, Thomas H. “Accommodation in School Children Aged Five, Six, Seven, and Eight Years,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, LI (June 1961), 1255–7. Analysis of near-point accommodation adequacy of 899 young urban and suburban children with respect to their visual maturity for school reading tasks.
  • Eickholz, G., and Barbe. R. “An Experiment in Vocabulary Development,” Educational Research Bulletin, XL (January 196l), 1–7, 28. Analysis of the effectiveness of a self-teaching and testing vocabulary device in two experimental and two control seventh-grade classes in promoting the learning and retention of word meanings.
  • Edelstein, Alex S., and Larson, O. N. “The Weekly Press’ Contribution to a Sense of Urban Community,” Journalism Quarterly, XXXVII (Autumn 1950), 489’98 Study of the role of a free urgan weekly newspaper in a large metropolitan area as a communication system and a means of community identification, based upon interviews with735adults selected by area cluster sampling techniques. See also Larson and Edelstein (90).
  • Edfeldt, A. W. Silent Speech and Silent Reading, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1560. Pp. 164. Experimental study of the relationship between reading ability and the occurrence of silent speech as shown by an analysis of electromyographic records of 84 entering students at the University of Stockholm.
  • Educational Records Bulletin No. 78, 1960 Fall Testing Programs in Independent Schools and Supplementary Studies, February 1961. New York: Educational Records Bureau. Pp. 76. Annual summary and correlation analysis of a comprehensive public and private school achievement testing program, including reading achievement, for elementary and secondary schools.
  • Ervin, Susan M., and Foster, G. “The Development of Meaning in Children’s Descriptive Terms,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LVI (September 1960), 271–5. Comparative study of ability of children of average intelligence, 32 in grade one and 36 in grade six, to identify correctly physical attributes (heavy, big, strong) of objects and personal attributes (clean, pretty, happy) of pictured faces.
  • Falconer, George A. “A Mechanical Device for Teaching Sight Vocabulary to Young Deaf Children,” American Annals of the Deaf, CVI (March 1961), 251–7. Description of effects of five minutes of practice for ten days in learning 15 nouns on a Skinner-type teaching machine for eight six- and seven-year -old deaf children.
  • Flavell, J. H., and S ted man, D. J. “A Developmental Study of Judgments of Semantic Similarity,” Journal of Genetic Psychology, XCVIII (June 1961), 279–93. A descriptive cross-sectional study of the ability of 160 children of average intelligence, ten boys and ten girls of each of grades two through nine, to rank-order word-pairs in terms of their semantic similarity according to eleven categories of logicogrammatical relationships.
  • Flores, Ivan. “Methods for Comparing the Legibility of Printed Numerals,” Journal of Psychology, L (July 1960), 3–14. Comparison of effects of rigorous control of exposure time and conditions upon readability of five type faces, including one designed to be “read” by a machine.
  • Forseth, William J. “Does the Study of Geometry Help Improve Reading Ability?” Mathematics Teacher. LIV (January 1961), 12–13. Comparative effects of course work in geometry, biology, home economics, and industrial arts upon reading achievement on the Schrammel-G ray High School and College Reading Test by tenth grade students initially matched for intelligence and reading ability.
  • Frostig, M., Lefever, D. W., and Whittlesey, J. R. B. “A Developmental Test of Visual Perception for Evaluating Normal and Neurologically Handicapped Children,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, XII (June 1961), 383–94. Development and standardization of a developmental test in “five areas of visual perception for a sample of 434 normal children, 3-1/2 to 8 years old, and 71 children diagnosed as neurologically handicapped.
  • Gaier, Eugene L., and Collier, M. J. “The Latency-Stage Story Preferences of American and Finnish Children,” Child Development, XXXI (September 1960), 431–51. Cross-cultural study of story preferences, including sex differences, of 199 American children with an average CA of 10.0 and 120 Finnish children with an average age of 11.1.
  • Gates, Arthur I. Reading Attainment in Elementary Schools: 1957 and 1937. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, 1961. Pp. 26. Comparison of reading attainment in 1937 and 1957 on the Gates Reading Tests.
  • Gates, Arthur I. “Results of Teaching a System of Phonics,” Reading Teacher, XIV (March 1961), 248–52. Analysis of reading progress in relation to accomplishment quotients, years of phonics instruction and intelligence, of 267 pupils in 12 classes taught by an isolated phonics approach in grades 3-5 in four New York schools.
  • Gates, Arthur I. “Sex Differences in Reading Ability,” Elementary School Journal, LXI (May 1961)431–4. Analysis of the significance of sex differences on the Gates Reading Survey Test for6,646 boys and 6, 468 girls in grades two through eight in twelve school systems and ten states in 1957.
  • Ghent, Lila. “Form and Its Orientation: A Child’s Eye View,” American Journal of Psychology, LXXIV (June 1961) 177–90 Two laboratory experiments, involving 118 children aged four to eight, of children’s judgment of non-realistic, geometric figures as upside down.
  • Ghent, Lila. “Recognition by Children of Realistic Figures Presented in Various Orientations,” Canadian Journal of Psychology, XIV (December 1960), 249–56. Laboratory experiment, involving 69 children aged three to seven, to test assumption that children do not have a preferred orientation for recognizing realistic figures.
  • Ghent, Lila, and Bernstein, L. “Influence of the Orientation of Geometric Forms on Their Recognition by Children,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, XII (March 1981), 95–101. Laboratory study of ability of 40 pre-school children to recognize simple geometric forms in various orientations.
  • Goetzinger, C. P., Dirks, D. D., and Baer, C. J. “Auditory Discrimination and Visual Perception in Good and Poor Readers,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, LXIX (March 1960), 121–36. Controlled study comparing auditory and visual discrimination in 15 male poor readers and 15 male good readers with a CA range of 10-7 to 12-9.
  • Goldberg, H. K., Marshall, C., and Sims, E. “The Role of Brain Damage in Congenital Dyslexia,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, L (October 1960), 586–90. Comparison of electroencephalographic records of 25 severely retarded readers and 25 normally achieving readers in Baltimore County schools with respect to possible sub-clinical brain damage.
  • Gowan, J. C., and Scheibel, R. W. “Improvement of Reading in Gifted Children,” Educational Administration and Supervision, XLVI (January 1960), 35–40. Results of intensive six-week remedial reading program with 34 experimental and 27 control tenth grade students in honors English classes in a suburban California high school.
  • Greenberg, Bradley S. “Additional data on Variables Related to Press Freedom,” Journalism Quarterly, XXXVIII (Winter 1961) 76–8 Correlation analysis of the effectiveness of four variables—literacy rate, per capita income, daily circulation per thousand, and number of daily newspapers’ in estimating press freedom in 32 non-Communist bloc nations according to degree of government restriction in 1956-58.
  • Groelle, M. C. “Some Results and Implications of Reading Survey Tests Given to Educable Mentally Retarded Children,” Exceptional Children, XXVII (April 1961), 443–8. Comparative survey of reading achievement of educable mentally retarded children, 971 in 1956 and 1,179 in 1959, of elementary and high school age in the Oakland, California schools.
  • Groff, Patrick J. “The Problem of Vocabulary Load in Individualized Reading,” Reading Teacher, XIV (January 1961), 188–90, 194. Compilation of the number of new words introduced in pre-primers and primary readers in 12 basal reading series.
  • Grogan, Agnes C. “The School Library and the Able Readers: Library Channels Reading Tastes of Upper Grade Pupils,” Chicago Schools Journal, XLII (October 1960), 30–3. Description of three projects in a school library to encourage the development of taste in reading of superior pupils in grades 6-8 who read and passed tests upon a number of a ard-winning books and classics.
  • Gunderson, Richard O., and Feidt, D. A. “The Relationship of Differences Between Verbal and Non-Verbal Intelligence Scores to Achievement,” Journal of Educational Psychology, LI (June 1960), 115–21. Analysis of variance study of achievement on the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills among four groups of 25 fourth-grade children, each having different patterns of verbal and non-verbal scores but matched total IQ scores, on the California Short-Form Test of Mental Maturity; with supplementary data from teacher observation.
  • Haag, Carl H., Sayles, D. G., and Smith, D. E. P. “Certificate Requirements for Reading Specialists,” Reading Teacher, XIV (November 1960), 98–100 Survey of certification requirements for reading specialists in 46 states of the United States.
  • Harootunian, Berj. “A Note on Reading and Closure,” Reading Teacher, XIV (May 1961), 343–4. Correlation analysis of relations hips between reading achievement and tests of speed and flexibility of closure administered to 208 students in grades 7-8.
  • Hartman, Frank R. “Recognition Learning Under Multiple Channel Presentation and Testing Conditions,” Audio-Visual Communication Review, DC (January-February 1961), 24–43. Experimental study of comparative results of presenting information by single, dual, or triple modes of presentation in 43 combinations of audio, pictorial, and print channels in three experiments with 1,184 university freshmen.
  • Haskins, Jack B. “Title Rating: A Method for Measuring Reading Interests and Predicting Readership,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, XX (Fall 1960), 551–65. Experimental study involving a national sample of 497 persons, to validate the usefulness of “thermometer” and verbal scales in predicting actual readership of magazine articles by rating titles. A1 so appeared in Journalism Quarterly, XXXVII (Spring 1960), 224-30, and re viewed in Journal of Educational Research (February 1961).
  • Haskins, Jack B. “Validation of the Abstraction Index as a Tool for Content-Effects Analysis and Content Analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology, XLIV (April 1960), 102–6. Validation study of Gillie’s Abstraction Index (AI) against behavioral criteria of reader behavior and satisfaction in reading selected portions of an issue of the Saturday Evening Post, based upon a nationwide sample of 340 persons.
  • Hemmerling, Robert L., and Hurst, H. “The Effects of Leisure Time Activities on Scholastic Achievement,” California Journal of Educational Research, XII(March 1961), 86–90. Questionnaire survey of 202 California high school sophomores reporting the extent of nine leisure-time activities, including reading, and the significance of their correlation to academic success.
  • Herculane, Sister M. “A Survey of the Flexibility of Reading Rates and Techniques According to Purpose,” Journal of Developmental Reading, IV (Spring 1961), 207–10. Investigation of extent to which 102 eighth-grade pupils varied their rate and techniques of reading according to purpose and displayed understanding of the concept of flexibility in reading rate.
  • Hermann, Knud. Reading Disability: A Medical Study of Word-Blindness and Related Handicaps, Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1960. Pp. 183. Clinical analyses of children and adults diagnosed as congenitally word-blind at the Word-Blind Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Hinze, Helen K. “The Individual’s Word Associations and His Interpretation of Prose Paragraphs,” Journal of General Psychology, LXIV (January 1961), 193–203: Chi-square analysis of nature and direction of free associative responses in the interpretation of key stimulus words in two paragraphs, among 25 freshmen English students in a California state college.
  • Hirst, Lynne S. “The Usefulness of a Two Way Analysis of WISC Sub-Tests in the Diagnosis of Remedial Reading Problems,” Journal of Experimental Education, XXIX (December I960), 153–60. Analysis of WISC sub-test profiles for 21 severely disabled and 18 mildly disabled readers of normal intelligence with CA’s between 8-0 and 13-6.
  • Hislop, George R. “A Study of Division Two Social Studies Reading Skills,” Alberta Journal of Educational Research, VII (March 196l), 28–38. Comparative study of 28 high versus 28 low achievers in experimental and control groups to examine effects of a four-month program in problemsolving techniques in social studies reading in grades four, five and six.
  • Hoar, Jere. “Book Reading in the Senior Years: The Habits and Preferences of 200 Mississippians,” Journal of Educational Sociology, XXXIV (November 1960) 137–44. Questionnaire survey of reading practices and preferences of 200 people over age 60 in a rural Mississippi town.
  • Howell, William C., and Kraft, C. L. “The Judgment of Size, Contrast, and Sharpness of Letter Forms,” Journal of Experiment a Psychology,” LXI (January 1961), 30–9. Analysis of three experimental studies to quantify and measure effects of image size, blur, and contrast upon recognition of letters of the alphabet.
  • Hvistendahl, J. K. “Headline Readability Measured in Context,” Journalism Quarterly, (Spring 1961)77 226–8. Comparison of speed of reading by 80 college undergraduates of two groups of 50 one-column, three-line headlines of the same point size placed in normal context, one group of headlines set in capital and lower case letters, and the other in lower case letters only.
  • Ingram, Vivien. “Flint Evaluates Its Primary Cycle,” Elementary School Journal, LXI (November 1960), 76–80. Uncontrolled study of reading achievement of 68 third-grade pupils in an ungraded primary in comparison with 3651 other graded pupils in a Michigan city.
  • Jones, Reginald L., Grass, F. P., and Van Why, E. L. “A Longitudinal Study of Reading Achievement in a Group of Adolescent Institutionalized Mentally Retarded Children,” Training School Bulletin, LVII (August 1960), 41–7. Growth in reading achievement shown by analysis of variance on California Reading Test, by 4 2 mental retardates, aged 16-18 years, in an Ohio institution.
  • Kallos, George L., Grabow, J. M., and Guarino, A. “The WISC Profile of Disabled Readers,” Personnel and Guidance Journal (February 1961), 476–8. Analysis of the significance of differences in WISC subtest scores of 37 boys, aged 9-14 and with IQ’s of 90-109 to determine the value of the WISC profiles in predicting reading disability.
  • Kearl, Bryant, and Powers, R. D. “Estimating Understanding of Scientific Terms,” Journalism Quarterly, XXXVIII (Spring 1961), 221–3. Comparison of difficulty ratings of a test of soils terminology or knowledge by 102 Wisconsin farmers and ratings by groups of 39 soil research specialists, 92 soils extension workers, and 108 agricultural journalists in several states.
  • Kerfoot, James F. “The Vocabulary in Primary Arithmetic Texts,” Reading Teacher, XIV (January 1961), 177–80; Compilation of a first- and second-grade arithmetic word list from six current arithmetic textbook series, coded to the Gates and the Dale primary vocabulary lists.
  • Kolson, Clifford J., and Fullmer, W. “A Beginning Reading Vocabulary,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (March 1961), 270–2. Tabulation of a basic word list of 184 words according to frequency in 11 basal readers published between 1954-59 and compared to the Dolch and International Kindergarten Union lists.
  • Koppitz, Elizabeth M., Mardis, V., and Stephens, T. “A Note on Screening School Beginners with the Bender Gestalt Test,” Journal of Educational Psychology, LII (April 1961), 80–1. Correlations at the beginning and end of first grade scores of 272 pupils of the Bender Gestalt Test with either the Lee-Clark or Metropolitan readiness test scores, to determine the predictive value of the Bender Gestalt test.
  • Kowitz, G. T., and Armstrong, C. M. “The Effects of Promotion Policy on Academic Achievement,” Elementary School Journal, LXI (May 1961), 435–43. Comparative effects upon reading and arithmetic achievement in a school with a high retention rate and one with a low retention rate as indie ated by longitudinal channels of developmental data.
  • Lachmann, Frank M. “Perceptual Motor Development in Children Retarded in Reading Ability,” Journal of Consulting Psychology, XXIV (October1960), 427–31. Comparative study controlling reading ability and intelligence of performance on the Bender Gestalt Test of 40 retarded readers, 40 normal readers, and 40 emotionally disturbed but normal readers from ages 8-12.
  • Larson, Howard L., Black, D. B., and Browne, M. P. “An Evaluation of an Experimental Method of Teaching Language to Low Ability Grade X Students,” Alberta Journal of Educational Research (September 1960), 163–75. One-year comparative study of the improvement of low language achievers in five grade ten Canadian schools organized into four experimental homogeneous groups and four heterogeneous control groups, upon the Iowa Tests of General Vocabulary, Interpretation of Literary Materials, and Correctness of Expression.
  • Larson, Otto N., and Edelstein, A. S, “Communication Consensus and the Community Involvement of Urban Husbands and Wives,” Acta Sociologica, V (1960), 15–30. Area cluster sampling study of readership orientation to a free urban weekly news paper and to its effects upon community orientation determined by independent interviews of 267 husband-wife pairs in a large metropolitan area. See also Edelstein and Larson (42).
  • Legere, John C. L., and Tracey, W. R. “Reading Improvement in an Army Service School,” Journal of Developmental Reading, IV (Autumn 1960), 4l–6. Descriptions of methods and results of a 20-hour reading improvement program at a U.S. Security Agency Training Center and School.
  • Lyle, Jack. “Semantic Differential Scales for Newspaper Research,” Journalism Quarterly, XXXVII (Autumn 1960), 559–62, 646. Description of the derivation of 20 semantic differential scales to measure attitudes toward a news paper and the face validation of the scales against the Stanford test of newspaper attitudes.
  • Lynn, Richard. 4“Individual Differences in Introversion-Extraversion, Reactive Inhibition, and Reading Attainment,” Journal of Educational Psychology, LI(December 1960), 318–21. Study involving tests of reminiscence and attention given to 82 English children aged 8-11, to determine if reading attainment is significantly correlated with introversion and the tendency to generate reactive inhibition slowly.
  • Lytton, H. “An Experiment in Selection for Remedial Education,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, XXXI (February 1961), 79-94. Predictive study of the relative merit of selecting 97 elementary pupils for remedial reading on a test-result or teacher-judgment basis as shown by average gains in three “adjustment” centers in England.
  • McConville, Carolyn B. “Handedness and Psychomotor Skills,” Journal of Developmental Reading, IV (Autumn i960), 47–52. Analysis of significance of difference in performance of 110 introductory psychology students, classified respectively as right or left handed, ambidextrous, and functionally mixed dominant, upon tests or reading rate and comprehension, adaptability and reaction time.
  • McCracken, Robert A. “Accelerating the Reading Speed of Sixth Grade Gifted Children,” Exceptional Children, XXVII (September I960), 27–8. Results of accelerated speed reading program emphasizing the “responsibility requiredof a mature reader” for eight sixth-grade girls of 120 IQ or better.
  • MacGinities, Walter H. “Contextual Constraint in English Prose Passages,” Journal of Psychology, LI (January 1961), 121–30. Effect of omission of words (singly, in pairs, and in groups of four) at different intervals in two short passages of literary prose upon the ability of 600 college students to restore the omitted words.
  • McGinnis, Dorothy J., et al. “Instructional Problems in Reading as Viewed by Teachers and Administrators,” Reading Teacher, XIV (November 1960), 75–80, 114. Analysis of inventory completed by 549 elementary teachers and 54 school administrators in Michigan concerning problems encountered in the teaching of reading and the kinds of in-service training programs provided by their schools.
  • McGuire, William J. “ Cognitive Consistency and Attitude Change,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LX (May 1960), 345-53. Study of shifts in consistency of opinions on several logically related issues by 120 college students as a result of reading persuasive statements presented by a Socratic method of argument and subsequently read on one of these issues.
  • McGuire, William J. “Direct and Indirect Effects of Dissonance-Producing Messages,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LX (May 1960), 354–8 Study of immediate and delayed retention effects among 35 college students in consistency of opinion on issues, before and after reading persuasive messages, as assessed by truth ratings upon relevant syllogisms with desirable and undesirable premises.
  • MacKinnon, A. R. How Do Children Learn to Read? Toronto: Copp Clark Press, 1959. Pp. 276. Analysis of a detailed experimental study of effectiveness of beginning reading materials designed by I. A. Richards and C. M. Gibson to control language patterns and used by a small number of five-year-old individuals and groups in Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • McRobbie, K. A. “The Toronto New Castle Textfilm Reading Experiment,” Ontario Journal of Educational Research, III (April 1961) 133-68. Comparison of effect iveness of textfilms and conventional reading materials for 352 first-grade pupils in ten classes in five Toronto schools.
  • Major, Alexander G., and Collette, A. T. “The Readability of College General Biology Textbooks,” Science Education, XLV (April 1961), 216–24. Analysis of vocabulary load, comprehension level, and readability of the ten most used college biology textbooks in 1953-54, according to the Flesch reading ease formula.
  • Manis, Melvin. “The Interpretation of Opinion Statements as a Function of Recipient Attitude,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LX (May 1960), 340–1. Investigation of the relationship between differences in reader attitude of 70 psychology students toward a topic (fraternities) and interpretation of opinions expressed in statements pro, anti and neutral to this topic.
  • Martens, Mary. “The Role of a Pacer in Improving Comprehension,” Journal of Developmental Reading, IV (Winter l96l), 135–9. Variance analysis of improvement and retention in comprehension skills in a controlled study of 24 experimental and 24 control junior high school subjects over a school year, the experimental subjects using a reading pacer twice a week for ten-minute periods.
  • Mazurkiewicz, Albert J. “Social-Cultural Influences and Reading,” Journal of Developmental Reading, HI (Summer 1960), 254–63. Study of the correspondence of classification by 157 eleventh-grade boys and their fathers of reading as “mostly masculine” or “mostly feminine” and in relation to the sons’ reading ability and eurricu-lum choice.
  • Mersand, Joseph. Attitudes Toward English Teaching, Philadelphia: Chilton Company, 1961. Pp. 363. Detailed analysis of free-response questionnaire replies from 1250 persons representing educational, business, press, legal, librarian, governmental and other attitudes toward the present status and future needs of the teaching of English. Includes some references to reading.
  • Minsel, Clara. “Audio-visual Materials and Fifth Grade Reading Achievement,” Science Education, XLV (February 1961), 86’8. Controlled nine-month study of the effects of extensive vs. no use of audio-visual aids in two fifth-grade classes of 25 pupils each, upon reading achievement on the Gates Basic Reading Tests and upon number of books read.
  • Morgan, Elmer F., Jr. and Stucker, G. R. “The Joplin Plan of Reading vs. a Traditional Method,” Journal of Educational Psychology, LI (April 1960). Comparative study of the effectiven ess of the Joplin plan in grades five and six for four experimental and four control groups matched as high achievers and low achievers in reading.
  • Meuhl, Siegmar. “The Effects of Visual Discrimination Pretraining on Learning to Read a Vocabulary List in Kindergarten Children,” Journal of Educational Psychology, LI (August 1960), 217–21. Discrimination training experiment with 37 kindergarten pupils in learning to read a vocabulary list as a result of matched pretraining in geometric forms, different words, or the same words appearing on the list.
  • Neville, Donald. “A Comparison of the WISC Patterns of Male Retarded and Non-Retarded Readers,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (January 1961), 195–7. Comparison of the significance of the differences in WISC subtest scores for 35 male retarded readers and normal readers matched by total IQ and grade level.
  • Noall, Mabel S. “Automatic Teaching of Reading Skills in High School,” Journal of Education, CXLIII (February 1961), 1–73. Two studies of significance of gains through (a) “massed differentiated,” and (b) self-directed vs. teacher-directed reading skills instruction among able high school students.
  • North, Robert D. “An Appraisal of the SRA Tests of General Ability Based on Independent School Results,” Educational Records Bulletin, No. 78 (February 1961), 68–76. Correlations between TOGA IQ’s and scores on reading tests in grades 2, 5, 7, 9, and 12.
  • Pace, Zietta S. “Flesch Formulas Applied to Current Readings,” Psychological Record, XI (April 1961). Analysis of reading difficulty and human interest factors, according to Flesch readability formulas, in samples from five current books of readings in psychology.
  • Pallone, Nathaniel J. “Effects of Short- and Long-Term Developmental Courses upon S. A. T. Verbal Scores,” Personnel and Guidance Journal, XXXIX (April 1961) 654–7. Effects of intensive six-week and six-month developmental reading programs upon the verbal part of the Scholastic Aptitude Test among twelfth-grade boys in an independent preparatory school.
  • Parsley, K. M. Jr., and Powell, M. “Relationships Between the Lee-Clark Reading Readiness Test and the 1937 Revision of the Stanford Binet Intelligence Test, Form L,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (April 1961), 304–7. Correlation analysis of the relationship between Binet IQ’s and Lee-Clark Reading Readiness Test scores for 169 entering first-grade pupils whose readiness test scores indicated that reading instruction should be delayed from 3-12 months.
  • Porterfield, O. V., and Schlichting, H. F. “Peer Status and Reading Achievement,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (April 1961), 291–7; Chi-square analysis of relations hips between peer status and reading achievement among 981 sixth grade pupils from families of high, middle, and low socio-economic status, enrolled in 15 schools.
  • Poulton, E. C. “British Courses for Adults on Effective Reading,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, XXXI (June 1961), 128–37. Survey of percent of gain in reading rate and comprehension in adult reading programs in England between 1952 and 1959, chiefly with Harvard reading materials.
  • Powell, Marvin, and Parsley, K. “The Relationship Between First Grade Reading Readiness and Second Grade Reading Achievement,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (February 1961), 229–33. Correlation between first-grade scores on the Lee-Clark Reading Readiness Test and beginning second-grade scores on the California Reading Test for 703 children in schools in an Ohio city.
  • Ravenette, A. T. “An Empirical Approach to the Assessment of Reading Retardation Vocabulary Level and Reading Attainment,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, XXXI (February 1961), 96–103. Application of the Crichton Vocabulary Scale, in which words are presented orally for definition in lieu of IQ tests, to predict reading achievement in 92 children selected randomly in grades 1, 2 and 3 in two English schools.
  • Robinson, Helen M. “Summary of Investigations Relating to Reading, July 1, 1959 to June 30, 1960,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (February l96l), 203–20. Annotated bibliography and summary of a year of research related to reading.
  • Roman, Melvin. Reaching Delinquents Through Reading, Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1957. Pp. 125. Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of three approaches’group remedial reading, tutorial group therapy, and intensive group therapy—in improving reading achievement in 21 male delinquents, aged 13-16, who were severely disabled readers.
  • Roth, Robert M. “The Role of Self-Concept in Achievement,” Journal of Experimental Education, XXVII (June 1959), 265–81. Analysis of relationships between the self-concept and achievement in a voluntary reading improvement program, using rate-training films, for 45 male and nine female university freshmen classified as Improver, Non-Improver and Attrition groups.
  • Rothrock, Dayton C. “ Heterogeneous, Homogeneous, or Individualized Approach to Reading?” Elementary English, XXXVIII (April 1961), 233–5. Analysis of co-variance study, controlling intelligence, previous reading achievement, and sex, of comparative reading gains in one year on the Iowa Every Pupil Test of Basic Skills in reading comprehension and work study skills for 186 fourth and fifth grade pupils grouped into three instructional patterns of four classes each.
  • Schramm, Wilbur, Lyle, J., and Parker, E. B. Television in the Lives of Our Children. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1961. Pp. 334. Analysis of the effects of televiewing upon children and upon certain aspects of their use of print in 1958-tO, based upon eleven research studies in ten American and Canadian communities and involving data from 5991 children, 1958 parents, and several hundred members of school staffs.
  • Seigler, Hazel G., and Gynther, M. D. “Reading Ability of Children and Family Harmony,” Journal of Developmental Reading, IV (Autumn 1960), 17–24. Chi-square analysis of ratings of self, spouse, child and ideal on the Leary Int er pe rsonal Check List by ten parents of poor readers and ten parents of good readers matched on selected socio-economic factors.
  • Shores, J. Harlan. “Are Fast Readers the Best Readers?—A Second Report,” Elementary English, XXXVIII (April 1961), 236–45. Correlation analysis, involving 46 sixth-grade pupils and 51 advanced undergraduate and graduate university students, of relationship among various tests of reading speed and comprehension, including three tests devised by the author to measure the reading of science materials.
  • Shores, J. Harlan. “Reading Science materials for Two Distinct Purposes,” Elementary English, XXXVII (December 1960), 546–52: Correlation analysis of general and specific reading abilities involved in reading science materials for two distinct purposes by 46’sixth-grade children.
  • Shores, J. Harlan. “Reading of Science for Two Separate Purposes as Perceived by Sixth Grade Students and Able Adult Readers,” Elementary English, XXXVII (November I960), 461–8. Analysis of questionnaire on reading habits used in reading science materials for two different purposes by sixth-grade pupils, and by their projected “ideal” reader, in comparison with able college readers.
  • Skapski, Mary. “ Ungraded Primary Reading Program: An Objective Evaluation,” Elementary School Journal, LXI (October 1900), 41–5. Comparison of reading achievement by intelligence levels and schools, of pupils in an ungraded primary program with arithmetic and reading achievement in graded classes at grades 2 and 3 in a Vermont school system.
  • Smilansky, Sarah. “Evaluation of Early Education, in Kindergarten and Grade I and II of Elementary School,” UNESCO Educational Studies and Documents, No. 42, Paris: UN ESCO (1961), 8–17. Comparative study of the relationship of two types of parental socio-cultural backgrounds, culturally advanced and culturally underdeveloped, upon reading and arithmetic achievement of Israeli primary children; and the adjustment of these children to success or failure.
  • Smith, Edgar A. “Devereux Readability Index,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (April 1961), 298–303. Description of the development, validation, and and computation of the Devereaux Readability Index.
  • Smith, Donald E. “Serum Correlates of Perceptual Errors in Problem Readers,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, II (December 1960), 300. Biochemical test patterns characterizing eight males, aged 14 to 18, who were severely retarded readers.
  • Smith, Lois, and Becker, J. “Self-Selection with Intermediate Children,” Reading Teacher, XIV (November 1960), 83-3. Effectiveness of a year and one-half individualized reading program for 20 children in the upper intermediate grades in a Wisconsin city.
  • Smith, May L., and Eno, I. V. “What Do They Really Want to Read?” English Journal, L (May 1961), 343–5. Analysis of response to questionnaire given to 510 Iowa students in grades 7-12 to discover what students would like to have an author put into a “story-to-order” request from them.
  • Snider, J. G. “Achievement Test Performance of Acculturated Indian Children,” Alberta Journal of Educational Research, VII (March 1961), 39–41. Comparative performance on the Coo er ative Test of Reading Comprehension and other tests of 41 ace til tu rated Nezperce and 79 white students in grades 10-12 in an Idaho school.
  • Sommers, Ronald K., et al. “Effects of Speech Therapy and Speech Improvement upon Articulation and Reading,” Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, XXVI j (February 1961), 27–38. Series of studies involving 1562 first-grade children of average range of intelligence, comparing the effects of speech therapy and speech improvement programs upon reading and articulation in speech defectives and in children with normal articulation.
  • Spache, George, Standlee, L., and Neville, D. “Results of Three College Level Remedial Reading Procedures,” Journal of Developmental Reading, IV (Autumn I960), 12–16. Co-variance analysis of effects of each of three six-week college remedial reading problems (a workbook, audio-visual or individual emphasis) upon reading rate, vocabulary, comprehension, and attitude toward reading among 98 students in a Florida university.
  • Stewart, Daniel K. “Comparison of the Results of a Logical Questionnaire with Reading Comprehension, Verbal Ability, and Grade Point Averages,” Journal of Psychology, LI (April 1961), 289–92. Analysis of significance of relationships between performance on a test of logical thinking and reading comprehension, verbal ability, and grade point average among university freshm en with high and low logical reasoning scores, respectively.
  • Strang, Ruth. “Preparation for the Teacher of Reading,” Journal of Developmental Reading, IV (Autumn 1960), 53–7. Analysis of questionnaire replies from 77 colleges and universities concerning the number and type of courses on the teaching of reading at the high school and college level.
  • Tannenbaum, Percy H., and Lynch, M. D. “Sensationalism: the Concept and its Measurement,” Journalism Quarterly, XXXVII (Summer 1960), 381–92. Controlled validation study of a Sensa ionalism Index (Sendex), using the semantic differential techniques for measuring connotative meaning, by undergraduate student ratings of three specially prepared versions of three news stories.
  • Turner, Carla S. “Improving Selection of Pupils for Remedial Reading: A Report of Research,” English Journal, L (January 1961), 23–33. Description of the grouping and progress of 73 poor readers in seven groups, primarily according to intelligence and motivation, in a year’s study in a Florida junior high school.
  • Walker, Frederic R. “Evaluation of Three Methods of Teaching Reading, Seventh Grade,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (May l96l), 356–8. Controlled comparative study among three groups of seventh grade students, 86 in all, of effects of a six-week period of highly individualized instruction, individualization through the SRA Reading Laboratory, and a non-individualized approach.
  • Webster, Jane. “Using Books to Reduce the Fears of First Grade Children,” Reading Teacher, XIV (January 1961), 159–62. Analysis of the effects of bibliotherapy in reducing fear of the dark and fear of dogs in 80 first-grade children.
  • Williams, Phillip. “The Growth of Reading Vocabulary and Some of Its Implications,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, XXXI (February 1961 104–5. Comparison of usefulness of a vocabulary scale based upon a random sampling of the dictionary versus an age scale in showing vocabulary progress in 216 students aged 6-15 years in English schools.
  • Williams, William G. “The Adequacy and Usefulness of an Objective Language Scale When Administered to Elementary Schol Children,” Journal of Educational Research, LIV (September 1960), 30–3. Very brief discussion of a newly developed language scale in relation to language achievement, including reading, and to teacher and speech clinician judgments of 140 children in grades K-6.
  • Wolf son, Bernice J. “What Do Children Say Their Reading Interests Are?” Reading Teacher, XIV (November 1960), 81–2, 111. Analysis of a 120-item reading interest inventory administered orally to 1000 girls and 942 boys in grades 3-6 in a Connecticut school system.
  • Yandell, Maurine D., and Zintz, M. V. “Some Difficulties Which Indian Children Encounter With Idioms in Reading,” Reading Teacher, XIV (March 1961), 256–9. Comparative study of significance of differences in performance on an idioms test by 516 sixth-grade children representing Anglo, Spanish-American, Zuni, and Navaho ethnic groups in a New Mexico county and a control group of 390 Anglo children.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.