An Investigation of ‘Teaching Machine’ Variables Using Learning Programs in Symbolic Logic

References

• Briggs, L. J. “Intensive Classes for Superior Students,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XXXVIII (1947), pp. 207–15.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W. C. Self-Instructional Devices: A Review of Current Concepts (Dayton, Ohio: Wright Air Development Center, 1959).
   Google Scholar
• Copi, I. M. Symbolic Logic (New York: Macmillan Co., 1954).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. L. Experimental Design in Psychological Research (New York: Einehart, 1956).
   Google Scholar
• Estes, W. K. “Learning,” in Encylopedia of Educational Research, C. W. Harris, editor (New York: Macmillan Co., 1960), pp. 752–70.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. L., Glaser, E., and Homme, L. E. “A Preliminary Investigation of Variations in the Properties of Verbal Learning Sequences of the ‘Teaching Machine’ Type,” in Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning: A Source Book, A. A. Lumsdaine, and E. Glaser, editors (Washington, D. C.: National Education Association, 1960), pp. 446–51.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. L., Glaser, R., and Homme, L, E. “The Ruleg System for the Construction of Programmed Verbal Learning Sequences,” see this issue of The Journal of Educational Research, pp. 515–520.
   Google Scholar
• Eves, H., and Newson, C. V. An Introduction to the Foundations and Fundamental Concepts of Mathematics (New York: Rinehart, 1958).
   Google Scholar
• Ferster, C. B., and Sapon, S. M. “An Application of Recent Developments in Psychology to the Teaching of German,” Harvard Educational Review, XXVHI (1958), pp. 58–69.
   Google Scholar
• Galanter, E. “The Ideal Teacher,” in Automatic Teaching: The State of the Art, E. Galanter, editor (New York: Wiley and Sons, 1959), pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, T. F. An Early Approximation to Principles of Continuous Discourse, Self-Instructional Materials, a report—to Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, N. J., 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, R., Homme, L. E., and Evans, J. L. “An Evaluation of Textbooks in Terms of Learning Principles,” in Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning: A Source Book (Washington, D. C7: National Education Association, 1960), pp. 437–45.
   Google Scholar
• Homme, L. E., and Glaser, R. “Relationships Between the Programmed Textbook and Teaching Machines,” in Automatic Teaching: The State of the Art, E. Galanter, editor (New York: Wiley and Sons, 1959), pp. 103–7.
   Google Scholar
• Homme, L. E., and Glaser, R. “Problems in Programming Verbal Learning Sequences,” in Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning: A Source Book (Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1960), pp. 486–96.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. T. “An Independent Study Laboratory Using a Self-Scoring Test,” Journal of Educational Research, XLIII (1949), pp.134–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. S. “Integration of Instructional with Self-Scoring Measuring Procedures,” Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations, LXV (1554), pp. 157–65.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. K. “Results of Use of Machines for Testing and for Drill, Upon Learning Educational Psychology,” Journal of Experimental Education, III (1934), pp. 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Luh, C. W. “The Conditions of Retention,”Psychological Monographs, XXXI, No. 142 (1922).
   Google Scholar
• Lumsdaine, A. A. “Teaching Machines and Self-Instructional Materials,” Audiovisual Commun’ns Review, VII (1959), pp. 163–01.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, O. K., and Anderson, S. B. “Modern Logic and Tasks for Experiments in Problem- Solving Behavior,” Journal of Psychology, XXXVIII (1954), pp. 151–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, D. A. “Teaching Machines,” Harvard Graduate School of Education Association, (1958), pp, 1–5)
   Google Scholar
• Pressey, S. L. “A Simple Apparatus that Gives Tests and Scores—and Teaches,” School and Society, XXIII (1926), pp. 373–76.
   Google Scholar
• Pressey, S. L. “X Machine for Automatic Teaching of Drill Material,” School and Society, XXV (1927), pp. 549–52:
   Google Scholar
• Pressey, S. L. “Development and Appraisal of Devices Providing Immediate Scoring of Objective Tests and Concomitant Self-Instruction,” Journal of Psychology, XXIX (1950), pp. 417–47:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltzman, C. J. “Delay of Reward and Human Verbal Learning,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, XLI (1951), pp. 437–39.
   Google Scholar
• Silberman, H. E., and Coulson, J. “A Draft Summary of Findings in an Exploratory Teaching Machine Study,” Automated Teaching Bulletin, I (1959), pp. 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. “Teaching Machines,” Science, CVIII (1958), pp. 969–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. Cumulative Record (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1959).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E.P. “Speculations: Characteristics of Successful Programs and Programmers,” in Automatic Teaching: The State of the Art, E. Galanter, editor (New York: Wiley and Sons, 1959), pp. 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A, N., and Russell, B. Principia Mathematica (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1925).
   Google Scholar