Underlining Can Make a Difference—Sometimes

References

• Annis, L., and Davis, J. K. “Study Techniques and Cognitive Style: Their Effect on Recall and Recognition.” Journal of Educational Research 71 (1978): 175–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, H. F. “The Comparative Effectiveness of Certain Study Techniques in the Field of History.” Journal of Educational Psychology 33 (1942): 449–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bialick, S. M.; Bialick, D. H.;, and Wark, D. H. “The Effects of Experimenter Underlining, and Expertise on the Retention of Textual Matter.” In Reading: Theory, Research, and Practice, 26th Yearbook, edited by P. D. Pearson, and J. Hansen. Clem- son, S.C.: National Reading Conference, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., and Smiley, S. S. “Rating the Importance of Structural Units of Prose Passages: A Problem of Meta- Cognitive Development.” Child Development 48 (1977): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, W. G. “A Critical Review of Research, and Opinion on the Underlining Study Aid.” In Reflections, and Investigations on Reading, 25th Yearbook, edited by W. D. Miller, and G. H. McNinch. Clemson, S.C.: National Reading Conference, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Cashen, V. M., and Leicht, K. L. “Role of Isolation Effect in a Formal Education Setting.” Journal of Educational Psychology 61 (1970): 484–86.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., and Stordahl, K. E. “The Effects of Organisational Aids on Comprehension and Retention.” Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (1955): 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, P., and Foster, J. J. “Typographic Cueing as an Aid to Learning from Typewritten Text.” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 12 (1975): 102–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouse, J. H., and Idstein, P. “Effects of Encoding Cues on Prose Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 63 (1972): 309–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. K., and Annis, L. “The Effect of Study Techniques, Study Preferences and Familiarity on Later Recall.” Journal of Experimental Education 47 (1979): 92–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp, N. W. “The Effect of Certain Study Conditions on the Achievement of College Freshmen.” Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State College, 1959. Cited by Browning.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. L., and Barker, A. S. “Effectiveness of Highlighting for Retention of Text Material.” Journal of Applied Psychology 59 (1974): 358–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. M. “Capturing Readers’ Attention by Means of Typographic Cueing Strategies.” Educational Technology 18 (1978): 7–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberger, W. A. “Self-Evaluation Responding and Typographic Cueing: Techniques for Programming Self-Instructional Reading Materials.” Journal of Educational Psychology 55 (1964): 288–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberger, W. A., and Terry, D. F. “Typographical Cueing in Conventional and Programmed Texts.” Journal of Applied Psychology 49 (1965): 55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoon, P. W. “Efficacy of Three Common Study Methods.” Psychological Reports 35 (1974): 1057–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, I. M. L. “Memory: Theory, and Application.” In Piaget, Psychology, and Education, edited by V. P. Varma, and P. Williams. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Idstein, P., and Jenkins, J. R. “Underlining versus Repetitive Reading.” Journal of Educational Research 65 (1972): 321–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. “Memory for Prose.” In The Structure of Human Memory, edited by C. N. Cofer. San Francisco: Freeman, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Klare, G. R.; Mabry, J. E.;, and Gustafson, L. M. “The Relationship of Patterning (Underlining) to Immediate Retention and to Acceptability of Technical Material.” Journal of Applied Psychology 39 (1955): 40–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulhavy, R. W.; Dyer, J. W.;, and Silver, L. “The Effect of Note taking and Test Expectancy on the Learning of Text Material.” Journal of Educational Research 68 (1975): 363–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leicht, K. L., and Cashen, V. M. “Type of Highlighted Material and Examination Performance.” Journal of Educational Research 65 (1972): 315–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, C. O. “Comparison of Methods of Study for Immediate and Delayed Recall.” Journal of Educational Psychology 29(1938): 101–6.
   Google Scholar
• McKune, E. J. “An Investigation of the Study Procedures of College Freshmen.” Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State College, 1958. Cited by Browning.
   Google Scholar
• Proger, B. B.; Carter, C. E.; Mann, L.; Taylor, R. G.;, and Bayuk, R. J. “Advance and Concurrent Organizers for Detailed Verbal Passages Used with Elementary School Pupils.” Journal of Educational Research 66 (1973): 451–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickards, J. P., and August, G. J. “Generative Underlining Strategies in Prose Recall.” Journal of Educational Psychology 67(1975): 860–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickards, J. P., and Denner, P. R. “Depressive Effects of Underlining and Adjunct Questions on Children’s Recall of Text.” Instructional Science 8 (1979): 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocchio, D. J. “The Effect of Prior Underlining on Immediate Comprehension of Reading Passages.” Independent Project, University of Missouri at St. Louis, 1972. Cited by Browning.
   Google Scholar
• Schnell, T. R., and Rocchio, D. J. “A Comparison of Underlying Strategies for Improving Reading Comprehension and Retention.” Reading Horizons 18 (1978): 106–9.
   Google Scholar
• Stordhahl, K. E., and Christensen, C. M. “The Effects of Study Techniques on Comprehension and Retention.” Journal of Educational Research 49 (1956): 561–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenson, I., and Kulhavy, R. W. “Adjunct Questions and the Comprehension of Prose by Children.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (1974): 212–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, W. B., and Kessler, C. C. “Influence of Response Mode, Sex, Reading Ability, and Level of Difficulty on Four Measures of Recall of Meaningfully Written Material.” Journal of Educational Psychology 62 (1971): 229–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weather by, T. J., and Blount, H. P. “Effects of Underlining and Sentence Importance on Remembering Prose.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlock, R. Spiders. London: Priory Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Willmore, D. J. “A Comparison of Four Methods of Studying a College Textbook.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1966. Cited by Browning.
   Google Scholar