Ability Grouping Effects on Academic Achievement and Self-Esteem in a Southwestern School District

References

• Alexander K. L., & McDill E. L. Selection and allocation within schools: Some causes and consequences of curriculum placement. American Sociological Review, 1976, 41, 963–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 1982, 37, 122–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver S. C., & Scheier M. F. Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality, social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 92, 111–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook J. A., & Campbell D. T. Quasi-experimentation. New York: Rand-MeNally, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Coopersmith S. The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco, CA: Freeman & Co, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Coopersmith S. Selfesteem inventories. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Drews L. M. Student abilities, grouping patterns, and classroom interaction. Washington, DC: Cooperative Research Program, Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1963. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 00-2679)
   Google Scholar
• Esposito D. Homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping: Principle findings and implications of a re-research of the literature. New York :Columbia University, 1971. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service 0566150)
   Google Scholar
• Evans C. E. Elementary magnet/vanguardplan evaluation: Year II, 1975-76. Port Worth, TX: Department of Research and Evaluation, Port Worth Independent School District, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Evans E. Elementary magnet vanguard plan evaluation: Year HI. 1977-78. Port Worth, TX: Department of Research and Evaluation, Port Worth Independent School District, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Evans C. E. Middle school magnet vanguard English grammar program: Evaluation report 1979-80. Fort Worth, TX: Department of Research and Evaluation, Port Worth Independent School District, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Evans C. E. Longitudinal achievement of vanguard/magnet students, grades 4-8. Port Worth, TX: Department of Research and Evaluation, Port Worth Independent School District, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger E. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relationships, 1954, 2, 17–140.
   Google Scholar
• Findley W. G., & Bryan M. M. Ability grouping: 1970—III. Problems and utilities in the use of tests for grouping children with limited backgrounds and alternative strategies to such grouping. Washington, DC: Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1971. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 048 383)
   Google Scholar
• Findley W. G., & Bryan M. M. The pros and cons of ability grouping. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Foundation, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb R. G., Sr, & Gibb R. G., Jr. The effect of stress resulting from academic failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1967, 23, 35–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess F. C. (Ed.). Issues in education: A documented look at seven important topics. 1978. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 158 391)
   Google Scholar
• Jackson J. NT Reference group processes in a formal organization. Sociometry, 1959, 22, 307–327.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson P. Ability grouping and student educational outcomes: A contextual analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University. 1978). Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 3863 A-3864 A.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly D. H. Comparing college-bound and non-college bound students in terms of deviant behavior. College Student Journal, 1976, 10, 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison C. M. Ability grouping and mixed ability grouping in secondary schools. Educational Issues Review No. E, Scottish Council for Research in Education, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1976. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 142 535)
   Google Scholar
• National Education Association. Ability grouping. Washington, DC: Research summary 1968-3S, Research Division, National Education Association, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols N. Interclass grouping for reading instruction: W;ho makes decisions and why. Educational Leadership, 1969, 26, 588–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richer S. Reference group theory and ability grouping: A convergence of sociological theory and educational research. Sociology of Education, 1976, 49, 65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum J. E. Making unequality: The hidden curriculum of high school tracking. New York :Wiley, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum J. E. Social implications of educational grouping. In D. C. Berliner, (Ed.), Review of Research in Education vol. 8. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman B. W., & Bierman M. Beyond Pygmalion: Galatea in schools. 1975. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 047 077)
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R. M., & Ribovich J. K. Ability grouping? Stop and reconsider. Reading World, 1973, 13, 84–91.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B. J., & Schmits D. W. What’s new in ability grouping. Phi Delta Kappan, 1978, 59, 535–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar