The Effects of Prior Knowledge and Audience on High School Students’ Writing

References

• Anderson, R. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise, hi R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, (pp. 415–431). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N. (1981). Writing in the secondary school. Urbana, IE: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C. (1981). Understanding a writer's awareness of audience. College Composition and Communication, 32, 388–399.
   Google Scholar
• Bracewell, R. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1978). The development of audience awareness in writing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto. ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 154 433)
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, C., Hiebert, E. H., & Chesky, J. (1983). Classroom writing practices. In J. A. Niles & E. A. Harris (Eds.), Searches for meaning in reading language processing and instruction. Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, J., Burgess, I., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities (11–18). London: Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, C. L. (1981). Constructing texts: Elements of a theory of composition and style. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press,.
   Google Scholar
• Faigley, E., Daly, J. A., & Witte, S. P. (1981). The role of writing apprehension in writing performance and competence. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 16–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. (1980a). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In I. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L., & Hayes, .]. (1980 b). Cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Golub, L. S., & Fredrick, W. W. (1971). Linguistic structures in discourse of fourth and sixth graders. (Lech. Rep. No. 166) University of Wisconsin, Research and Development C enter for Cognitive learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, J, (1981). The effects of audience considerations upon the revision of a group of basic writers and more competent junior and senior writers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Conference in College Composition and Communication, Dallas. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 204 802)
   Google Scholar
• Hilgers, T. L. (1982). Experimental control and the writing stimulus: The problem of unequal familiarity with content. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 381–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, J. A. (1984). The effects of available information on responses to school writing tasks. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effect on memory. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., & Mellon, J. C. (1980). Guidelines for describing three aspects of writing: Syntax, cohesion, and mechanics. Denver. CO: National Assessment of Educational Progress. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. E:D 145 482)
   Google Scholar
• Myers, NT (1980). A procedure for writing assessment and holistic scoring. Urbana, IE: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, G. (1984). Teaming from writing in two content areas: A case study protocol analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 265–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purves, A. C. (1983). Language and processing: Reading and writing. College English, 45, 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, H. (1969). An investigation of the effects of differentiated writing assignments on the performance in English composition of a selected group of 15/16 year old pupils. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. L., & Piche, G. L. (1979). Development in syntactic and strategic aspects of audience adaptation skills in written persuasive communication. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 293–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, W. M. A. (1982), A correlational and descriptive study of student writing in three aims of discourse. Dissertation Abstracts international, 42 4818A. (University Microfilms No. DA 8210047)
   Google Scholar