Effects of Transferring to STEM-Focused Charter and Magnet Schools on Student Achievement

REFERENCES

• Abdulkadiroglu, A., Angrist, J., Cohodes, S., Dynarski, S., Fullerton, J., Kane, T., & Pathak, P. (2009). Informing the debate: Comparing Boston's charter, pilot and traditional schools. Cambridge, MA: The Boston Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Adcock, E.P., & Phillips, G.W. (2000, April). Accountability evaluation of magnet school programs: A value-added model approach. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• America COMPETES Act, Pub. L. No. 110-69, 121 Stat. 572–718 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bifulco, R., Cobb, C.D., & Bell, C. (2009). Can interdistrict choice boost student achievement? The case of Connecticut's interdistrict magnet school program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 323–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booker, K., Gilpatric, S.M., Gronberg, T., & Jansen, D. (2007). The impact of charter school attendance on student performance. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 849–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosetti, L. (2004). Determinants of school choice: Understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta. Journal of Education Policy, 19, 387–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, H., Jenkins, F., & Grigg, W. (2006). A closer look at charter schools using hierarchical linear modeling (NCES 2006-460). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R.W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2009). Multiple choice: Charter school performance in 16 states. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on Education Outcomes. Retrieved from http://credo.stanford.edu/reports/MULTIPLE_CHOICE_CREDO.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, J.B., Jacob, B.A., & Levitt, S.D. (2005). The impact of school choice on student outcomes: An analysis of the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 729–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, T.S., & Fu, H. (2004). Do charter schools skim students or drain resources? Economics of Education Review, 23, 259–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. (2009). Are high quality schools enough to close the achievement gap? Evidence from a social experiment in Harlem. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. . Retrieved from http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/fryer/files/hcz 4.15.2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dohrmann, K.R., Nishida, T.K., Gartner, A., Lipsky, D.K., & Grimm, K.J. (2007). High school outcomes for students in a public Montessori program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22, 205–217.
   Google Scholar
• Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002). . Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, C.L. (2010). School type and mathematics achievement: A comparison of magnet and public secondary schools using the educational longitudinal study of 2002 data set . (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/3447464.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faller, M.B. (2012Behind in science. The Arizona Republic. . Retrieved from http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2012/05/10/20120510arizona-kids-still-behind-science.html
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F., & Jarwan, F. (1995Predictors of academic success at state-supported residential schools for mathematics and science: A validity study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 505–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, N. (2012Magnets adjust to new climate of school choice. Education Week, 31(30), 1, 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, A.S. (1960). The philosophy and objectives of the national defense education act. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 327, 132–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. (1996). Student achievement in public magnet, public comprehensive, and private city high schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. (2009Charter schools: They’re growing in popularity. The Denver Post. . Retrieved from http://www. denverpost.com/ci_13310748
   Google Scholar
• Hanford, S. (1997). An examination of specialized schools as agents of educational change. New York, NY: Columbia University. . Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED411368)
   Google Scholar
• Hills, J.R. (1984). Interpreting NCE scores. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(3), 25–26, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C.M., Murarka, S., & Kang, J. (2009a). How New York City's charter schools affect achievement. Cambridge, MA: New York City Charter Schools Evaluation Project.
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C.M., Murarka, S., & Kang, J. (2009b). Technical report: How New York City charter schools affect achievement (NBER Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Jeynes, W.H. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects and contributions of public, public charter, and religious schools on student outcomes. Peabody Journal of Education, 87, 305–312.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B.M. (2009). Profiles of state-supported residential math and science schools. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 472–501.
   Google Scholar
• Kaestle, C. F., & Smith, M.S. (1982). The federal role in elementary and secondary education, 1940–1980. Harvard Educational Review, 52, 384–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C., & Lubienski, S.T. (2006). Charter schools, academic achievement and NCLB. Journal of School Choice, 1, 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S.P. (2010). Re-imagining specialized STEM academies: Igniting and nurturing decidedly different minds, by design. Roeper Review, 32, 48–60.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, C.B. (1977). Magnet education in Boston. Phi Delta Kappan, 59, 158–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, M.H. (1986). Different by design: The context and character of three magnet schools. Boston, MA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• National Education Association. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: National Commission on Excellence in Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Defense Education Act of 1958, Pub. L. No. 85-864, 72 Stat. 1580 (1958). . Retrieved from http://federaleducationpolicy.wordpress.com/2011/06/03/national-defense-education-act-of-1958-2/
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association. (2007). Innovation America: Building a science, technology, engineering and math agenda. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. . Retrieved from http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/0702INNOVATIONSTEM.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, F.H., Rosenberg, B., & Van Meter, N. (2004). Charter school achievement of the 2003 national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Penta, M.Q. (2001). Comparing student performance at program magnet, year-round magnet, and non-magnet elementary schools . (Report No. 01.27). Cary, NC: Wake County Public School System. Retrieved from http://www.wcpss.net/evaluation-research/reports/2001/0127_MSAG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) for America's future. . Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stemed-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S.F. (2009) Review of “How New York City's charter schools affect achievement.” Boulder, CO: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. . Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/thinktank/review-how-New-York-City-Charter
   Google Scholar
• Robelen, E.W. (2011Latest wave of STEM schools taps new talent. Education Week, 31(3), 1, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Rossell, C.H. (1979). Magnet schools as a desegregation tool: The importance of contextual factors in explaining their success. Urban Education, 14, 303–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel-Hawley, G., & Frankenberg, E. (2012). Reviving magnet schools: Strengthening a successful school choice option. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project. . Retrieved from http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R.F., Tai, R.H., & Almarode, J.T. (2011). Study of the impact of selective SMT high schools: Reflections on learners gifted and motivated in science and mathematics. . Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/dbasse/bose/dbasse_080128#.UgEMEFPkDDn
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R.F., Tai, R.H., Rickoff, R., & Almarode, J. (2010). Specialized public high schools of science, mathematics, and technology and the STEM pipeline: What do we know now and what will we know. Roeper Review, 32, 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, J.A., & Reynolds, A.J. (1999). School mobility and achievement: Longitudinal findings from an urban cohort. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 355–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (2000). First year findings: NCSSSMST longitudinal study. NCSSSMST Journal, 5(2), 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tuttle, C.C., Teh, B., Nichols-Barrer, I., Gill, B.P., & Gleason, P. (2010). Student characteristics and achievement in 22 KIPP middle schools. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research . Retrieved from http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/pdfs/education/KIPP_fnlrpt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.N., Li, Y.H., Tompkins, L.J., & Modarresi, S. (2005, April). Using the multiple-matched-sample and statistical controls to examine the effects of magnet school programs on the reading and mathematics performance of students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, R., Gill, B., Booker, K., Lavertu, S., Sass, T.R., & Witte, J. (2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar