Applying questioning or reading strategy to review technology enhanced coedited notes of elementary school students

References

• Armbruster, B. B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 175–200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Avouris, N., Margaritis, M., Komis, V., Saez, A., & Melendez, R. (2003). Modellingspace: Interaction design and architecture of a collaborative modeling environment. In C. Constantinou (Ed.), Proceedings of 6th conference on computer based learning in science (pp. 993–1004). Nicosia, Cyprus:University of Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Brummer, T., & Clark, S. K. (2008). Writing strategies for mathematics. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Call, P. E. (2000). Reflective questioning: A strategy to review notes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43, 487–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, L., & Campbell, B. (2008). Mindful learning: 101 proven strategies for student and teacher success (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, C. A. (1983). Note taking research: Implications for the classroom. Journal of Instructional Development, 6(3), 19–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02906208
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. H., Wu, C. Y., & Cheng, H. W. (2013). Integrating reviewing strategies into shared electronic note-taking: Questioning, summarizing and note reading. Computers & Education, 67, 229–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.015
   Google Scholar
• Choi, I., Land, S. M., & Turgeon, A. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science, 33, 483–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1277-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. K. (2007). Writing strategies for social studies. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Educational Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, E., Cohn, S., & Bradley, J. Jr. (1995). Notetaking, working memory, and learning in principles of economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 26, 291–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1182993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0032243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuPlass, J. A. (2010). Teaching elementary social studies: Strategies, standards, and internet resources. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1998). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Bristol, England: Thoemmes Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faust, J. L., & Paulson, D. R. (1998). Active learning in the college classroom. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 9(2), 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note taking and review on recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 321–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51, 21–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02504515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02504836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrer, A., Irgang, T., Sattes, N., & Pfahler, K. (2012). Soccr—optimistic concurrency control for the web-based collaborative framework metafora. In V. Herskovic, H. U. Hoppe, M. Jansen, & J. Ziegler (Eds.), Collaboration and technology (vol. 7493, pp. 153–160). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., & Marshall, S. (1974). On notes and note-taking. Universities Quarterly, 28, 225–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.1974.tb00467.x
   Google Scholar
• Kam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A., Tse, E., Chiu, J., Glaser, D., … Canny, J. (2005, April 2–7). Livenotes: A system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures. Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01326640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., Kim, S.-I., Risch, N., & Christensen, M. (1995). Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 172–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1995.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., & Lewis, L. B. (1987). Qualitative aspects of notetaking and their relationship with information-processing ability and academic achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 14, 110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A., Dubois, N., Christensen, M., Kim, S.-I., & Lindberg, N. (1989). A more equitable account of the note-taking functions in learning from lecture and from text. Instructional Science, 18, 217–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00053360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 366–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-476x(89)90022-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1991a). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 307–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022–0663.83.3.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1991b). Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 331–346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1992a). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303–323. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312029002303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1992b). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 111–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory into Practice, 41, 33–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26, 459–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladas, H. S. (1980). Note taking on lectures: An information-processing approach. Educational Psychologist, 15, 44–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461528009529215
   Google Scholar
• Laidlaw, E. N., Skok, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1993). The effects of notetaking and self-questioning on quiz performance. Science Education, 77, 75–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landay, J. A. (1999). Using note-taking appliances for student to student collaboration. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE '99), San Juan, Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Macceca, S. (2008). Writing strategies for mathematics (reading and writing strategies). Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrens, W. A., & Lehmann, I. J. (1984). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Miura, M., Kunifuji, S., & Sakamoto, Y. (2007). AirTransNote: An instant note sharing and reproducing system to support students learning. Proceedings of Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007), 175–179.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, N., & Masukawa, H. (2000). Relation-making to sense-making: Supporting college students' constructive understanding with an enriched collaborative note-sharing system. In B. J. Fishman & S. F. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 41–47). Ann Arbor, MI: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Phye, G. D. (1997). Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rief, S. F., & Heimburge, J. A. (2007). How to reach and teach all children through balanced literacy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. P., Vatrapu, R., & Abraham, G. (2009). Note taking and note sharing while browsing campaign information. Proceedings of Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (CD-ROM), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, G., Denoue, L., & Das, A. (2004). Collaborative note taking. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE '04), 163–167.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, N. A., King, J. R., & Henk, W. A. (1991). Enhancing students' notetaking through training and evaluation. Journal of Reading, 34, 614–622.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strough, J., & Covatto, A. M. (2002). Context and age differences in same- and other-gender peer preferences. Social Development, 11, 346–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, D. H., & McManus, R. A. (2002). Real reading, real writing: Content-area strategies. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (2008). Intervention ideas for study skills/organization. Retrieved from http://www.jimwrightonline.com/php/interventionista/interventionista_intv_list.php?prob_type=study___skills__organization
   Google Scholar