Impact of sustained professional development in STEM on outcome measures in a diverse urban district

References

• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, C. M. (2010). K–12 education: Many challenges arise in educating students who change schools frequently. Report to congressional requesters. GAO-11-40. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. Q. III, Reed, P. A., Ritz, J. M., Lin, C. Y., Hsiung, S., & Frazier, W. (2004). Stimulating students to improve science and mathematics achievement. The Technology Teacher, 64, 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley-Levine, J., Berghoff, B., Seybold, J., Sever, R., Blackwell, S., & Smiley, A. (2010). What teachers and administrators “need to know” about project-based learning implementation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Denver, Colorado. April, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cockling, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, E., & Hallinger, P. (1996). Problem-based learning: A promising approach to professional development. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 145–160). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buck Institute for Education. (2003). Project based learning handbook: A guide to standards-focused project based learning for middle and high school teachers. Oakland, CA: Wilsted & Taylor.
   Google Scholar
• Buysse, V., Sparkman, K. L., & Wesley, P. W. (2003). Communities of practice: Connecting what we know with what we do. Exceptional Children, 69, 263–277.
   Google Scholar
• Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. (Eds.). (2013). Project based learning: An integrated science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd ed.). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Morgan, J., & Scheurich, J. (Eds.). (2010). A companion to interdisciplinary STEM project based learning: For teachers by teachers. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense
   Google Scholar
• Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (Eds.). (2008). Project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Chia, L. (2006). Problem-based learning: Using ill-structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 90, 44–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102, 294–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colburn, A. (1998). Constructivism and science teaching. Fastback, 435, Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., & Liou, D. D. (2007). The structure and culture of information pathways: Rethinking opportunity to learn in urban high schools during the ninth grade transition. The High School Journal, 91, 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, D. (2001). Real-world issues motivate students. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/start-pyramid
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Czerniak, C. M., Beltyukova, S., Struble, J., Haney, J. J., & Lumpe, A. T. (2005). Do you see what I see? The relationship between a professional development model and student achievement. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Exemplary science in grades 5–8: Standards-based success stories (pp. 13–43). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N. & Orphonos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Palo Alto, CA: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers' instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, J. C. (2005). The name assigned to the document by the author. This field may also contain sub-titles, series names, and report numbers. Changes in students' use of lifelong learning skills during a problem-based learning project. The entity from which ERIC acquires the content, including journal, organization, and conference names, or by means of online submission from the author. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18, 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, S. K. (Ed.). (2004). Under the microscope: A decade of gender equity projects in the sciences. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., & Tarrant, K. L. (1995). Creating collaborative cultures for educational change. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 325–336, 353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flexner, A. (1910). Medical education in the United States and Canada: A report to the Carnegie Foundation for the advancement of teaching. New York, NY: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Design- based science and real-world problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 855–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenberg, N., & Ruglis, J. (2007). Reframing school dropout as a public health issue. Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice, and Policy, 4, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 922–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, M. A., & Hidalgo, N. (2009). Bridges to success in high school for migrant youth. Teachers College Record, 111, 683–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 495–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, V., & Betts, F. (2002). Back to the future: Preparing learners for academic success in 2004. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(7), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hailey, C. E., Erekson, T., Becker, K., & Thomas, M. (2005). National center for engineering and technology education. The Technology Teacher, 64, 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J. E., & Lee, O. (2003). Teacher professional development to improve the science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 27, 475–501.
   Google Scholar
• Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (pp. 9–11). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, K. J. (2010). Bolstering a STEM pipeline in Ohio. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers, 85, 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J. (2007). Project-based learning with multimedia. Retrieved from http://pblmm.k12.ca.us/PBGuide/WhyPBL.html
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., Rannikmae, M., & Valdmann, A. (2014). Identifying teacher needs for promoting education through science as a paradigm shift in science education. Science Education International, 25(2), 4–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hollins, E. R., McIntyre, L. R., DeBose, C., Hollins, K. S., & Towner, A. (2004). Promoting a self-sustaining learning community: Investigating an internal model for teacher development. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17, 247–264.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, K. S., Scheurich, J. J., & Morgan, J. R. (2011). Professional learning communities as a leadership strategy to drive math success in an urban high school serving diverse, low-income students: A case study. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 16, 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, D., Tan, S. C., & Koh, T. S. (2006). Engaged learning: Making learning an authentic experience. In D. Hung & M. S. Kline (Eds.), Engaged learning with emerging technologies (pp. 29–48). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. C., Kahle, J. B., & Fargo, J. D. (2007). A study of the effect of sustained, whole-school professional development on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 775–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K., Hays, C., Center, H., & Daley, C. (2004). Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: A sustainability planning model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 135–149. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method. Teachers College Record, 19, 319–335.
   Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K. (2004) The science of professional development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 248–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 483–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. S. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis, S. D. Kruse, & Associates (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp. 23–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: Background, federal policy and legislative action. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006). Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 607–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. L., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N. B., Stiles, K. E., & Mundy, S. E. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Kruse, S. D., & Marks, H. M. (1996). Schoolwide professional community. In F. M. Newman & Associates (Eds.), Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179–203). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional learning community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106, 532–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell, L. B., & Salzman, H. (2007). Into the eye of the storm: Assessing the evidence on science and engineering education, quality, and workforce demand. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 341–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskit, D. (2011). Teachers' attitudes toward pedagogical changes during various stages of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 851–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: The University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, G. M., & Cosden, M. A. (1997). Risk, resilience, and adjustment of individuals with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Kitsantas, A., Bolyard, J. J., Huie, F., & Irby, N. (2009). Participation by STEM faculty in mathematics and science partnership activities for teachers. Journal of STEM Education, 10, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Museus, S. D., Palmer, R. T., Davis, R. J., & Maramba, D. (2011). Racial and ethnic minority students' success in STEM Education. ASHE Higher Education Report. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106, 157–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, By states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students' motivation to learn. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards mathematics. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Public Law No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, W. (1909). Ethical values of the manual and domestic arts. Proceedings of the Northern Illinois Teachers' Association, 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. (2003). Powerful learning: Creating learning communities in urban school reform. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18, 240–258.
   Google Scholar
• Polman, J. L. (2000) Designing project-based science inquiry connecting learners through guided inquiry. New York, NY: Teacher's College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., & Hall, M. W. (1998). Learning organizations for sustainable education reform. Daedalus, 127, 89–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, M. A. P, Cross, D. I., Gresalfi,  , Trauth-Nare, A. E., & Buck, G. A. (2011). First year implementation of a project-based learning approach: The need for addressing teachers' orientations toward learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 893–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satchwell, R. E., & Loepp, F. L. (2002). Designing and implementing an integrated mathematics, science, and technology curriculum for the middle school. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39, 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, W. M., Goldenberg, C. N., & Gallimore, R. (2009). Increasing achievement by focusing grade-level teams on improving classroom learning: A prospective quasi-experimental study of Title I schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1006–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 410–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. E. (2009). A comparative case study of the characteristics of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) focused high schools. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and science of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W., Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin
   Google Scholar
• Siverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smylie, M. A., Allensworth, E., Greenberg, R. C., Harris, R., & Luppescu, S. (2001). Teacher professional development in Chicago: Supporting effective practice. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stearns, L. M., Morgan, J., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2012). The development of a teacher observation instrument for PBL classroom instruction. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13(3), 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1046
   Google Scholar
• Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). Effects of problem-based learning and traditional instruction on self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 307–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 63–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbert, J. E., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2002). Professional communities and the artisan model of teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 325–343.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board & Texas Education Agency. (2009). Texas college and career readiness standards. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Association of School Boards and Texas Association of School Administrators. (2013). Salaries and benefits in Texas public schools teacher report. Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved from http://www.tasb.org/services/hr_services/salary_surveys/documents/tchr_highlights_landing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2013). Texas essential knowledge and skills for mathematics chapter 111. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter111/ch111c.html
   Google Scholar
• Thurston, R. H. (1891). The scientific basis of belief. The North American Review, 181–192.
   Google Scholar
• Thurston, R. H. (1892). The next great problems of science. The Forum, xiv, 42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Torp, L., & Sage, S. M. (1998). Problems as possibilities. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12, 243–270.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, C. N., & Groome, M. (2007). Building a science, technology, engineering and math agenda. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Report of the academic competitiveness council. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2010). Professional development in the United States: Trends and challenges. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J., Sherrod, S., & Walters, K. (2008). Project-based learning environments: Challenging pre-service teachers to act in the moment. The Journal of Educational Research, 101, 220–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-based learning in K–12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects? American Education Research Journal, 48, 1157–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. A. (2008). High schools: An equation that works. T.H.E. Journal, 35, 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., W.-Y., Lee, S., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/pdf/rel_2007033_sum.pdf
   Google Scholar