Complex problem solving in L1 education: Senior high school students' knowledge of the language problem-solving process

References

• Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 77–95). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (2008). Metacognition in comprehension instruction: What we've learned since NRP. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 65–79). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40, 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 49–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts' characteristics. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, R. R. Hoffman, & P. J. Feltovich (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 21–30). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christoff, A., Prabhakaran, V., Dorfman, J., Zhao, Z., Kroger, J. K., Holyoak, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2001). Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning. NeuroImage, 14, 1136–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark-Carter, D. (2010). Quantitative psychological research: The complete student's companion. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coffin, C., North, S., & Martin, D. (2009). Exchanging and countering points of view: A linguistic perspective on school students' use of electronic conferencing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, M. W. (2008). Cognitive strategy instruction for adolescents: What we know about the promise, what we don't know about the potential. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 84–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles for designing language courses. English Language Teaching, 54, 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Cotterall, S., & Murray, G. (2009). Enhancing metacognitive knowledge: Structure, affordances and self. System, 37, 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 47–68). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, A., & Bakracevic, K. (2009). Reasoning and self-awareness from adolescence to middle age: Organization and development as a function of education. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 181–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. Baron & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L., & Papafragou, A. (2005). Language and thought. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 633–662). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. English Language Teaching Journal, 51, 361–369.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1988). Problem solving and reasoning. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Hernstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Steven's handbook of experimental psychology: Learning and cognition (pp. 589–672). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses for expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 263–272). New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G. (2010). Teaching argument for critical thinking and writing: An introduction. English Journal, 99(6), 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Problem solving. In E. E. Smith & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Invitation to cognitive science: Thinking (pp. 267–296). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulshof, H. (2011, June). Linguistics at school in the Netherlands 1971–2011: A struggle for recognition (international perspective). Paper presented at the 8th International Conference of the International Association for the Improvement of Mother Tongue Education AIMTE, Hildesheim, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Curriculum Design. (2011). Summary of the goals and final attainment levels of L1 education in the Netherlands [Leerlijnen landelijke kaders Nederlands havo/vwo]. Retrieved from http://www.slo.nl/downloads/2011/llk-nederlands-hv.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Ippolito, J., Steele, J. L., & Samson, J. F. (2008). Introduction: Why adolescent literacy matters now. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaja, P. (1995). Student beliefs (or metacognitive knowledge) about SLA reconsidered. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 191–204.
   Google Scholar
• Kieft, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., Galbraith, D., & Van den Bergh, H. (2007). The effects of adapting a writing course to students' writing strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 565–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluwe, R. H. (1982). Cognitive knowledge and executive control: Metacognition. In D. R. Griffin (Ed.), Animal mind—human mind (pp. 201–224). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, J. A. (2009). Contexts for adolescent literacy. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 49–64). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Leighton, J. P. (2004). Defining and describing reason. In J. P. Leighton & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 3–11). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–804). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. (2009). Language learner autonomy and the European language portfolio: Two L2 English examples. Language Teaching, 42, 222–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, L., & Reber, A. S. (2005). Implicit cognition and thought. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 431–453). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luzón, M. J. (2002). Internet content-based activities for English for Specific Purposes. English Teaching Forum. 40(3), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Mraz, M., Rickelman, R. J., & Vacca, R. T. (2009). Content-area reading: Past, present, and future. In K. D. Wood & W. E. Blanton (Eds.), Literacy instruction for adolescents: Research-based practice (pp. 77–91). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Moshman, D. (1998). Cognitive development beyond childhood. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn, & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol.2. Cognition, perception and language (pp. 947–978). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, M., & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navés, T. (2009). Effective content and language integrated learning (CLIL) programmes. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 22–40). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (2004). Teaching reasoning. In J. P. Leighton & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 410–442). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Bryan, A., & Hegelheimer, V. (2009). Using a mixed methods approach to explore strategies, metacognitive awareness and the effects of task design on listening development. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 9–38.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. W., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: The nature of critical and creative thought. Journal of Developmental Education. 30(2), 34–35.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rex, L. A., Thomas, E. E., & Engel, S. (2010). Applying Toulmin: Teaching logical reasoning and argumentative writing. The English Journal, 99(6), 56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. Modern Language Journal, 78, 199–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Knafl, G. (2009). On quantitizing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 208–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2, 114–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., Sá, W. C., & West, R. F. (2004). Individual differences in thinking, reasoning, and decision making. In J. P. Leighton & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 375–409). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takimoto, M. (2009). The effect of input-based tasks on the development of learners' pragmatic proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 30, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2010). The role of metacognition in reading comprehension. In H. P. Trolldenier, W. Lenhard, & P. Marx (Eds.), Focal points of the research and development of pedagogically-psychological perspectives (pp. 277–302). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Velzen, J. H. (2012). Teaching metacognitive knowledge and developing expertise. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(3), 365–380.
   Google Scholar
• Van Velzen, J. H. (in press). Measuring senior high-school students' self-induced self-reflective thinking. The Journal of Educational Research. doi:10.1080/00220671.2015.1129596.
   Google Scholar
• Van Velzen, J. H. (in preparation). Metacognitive knowledge: Development, application, and improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, L. G., Fleming, S. M., Dumontheil, I., Kilford, E. J., Weil, R. S., Rees, G., … Blakemore, S. J. (2013). The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence. Conscious cognition, 22, 264–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 515–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. L. (2001). Metacognitive knowledge in SLA: The neglected variable. In C. N. Candlin & M. P. Breen (Eds.), Applied linguistics and language study. Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 44–64). Essex, England: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, J. L. (2013). Combating the crisis in adolescent literacy: Exploring literacy in the secondary classroom. American Secondary Education, 41(2), 38–48.
   Google Scholar
• White, C. (2008). Language learning strategies in independent language learning: An overview. In T. W. Lewis & M. S. Hurd (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 3–24). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students' metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10, 268–288.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2013). Thinking metacognitively about metacognition in second and foreign language learning, teaching, and research: Toward a dynamic metacognitive systems perspective. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies. 396(12), 111–121.
   Google Scholar