The best laid plans: Educational innovation in elementary teacher generated integrated STEM lesson plans

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., … Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C., Poulsen, C., & Chambers, B. (2004). Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: Factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24, 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Belmont, J. M. (1989). Cognitive strategies and strategic learning: The socio-instructional approach. American Psychologist, 44, 142–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, T., Schaeffer, M. W., Maloney, E. A., Peterson, L., Gregor, C., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Math at home adds up to achievement in school. Science, 350, 196–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining 21st century skills. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. S. (1988). Twelve middle-school teachers' planning. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 69–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. S. (1993). Descriptions of two novice secondary teachers' planning. Curriculum Inquiry, 23, 63–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., & Melear, C. T. (2006). Investigation of secondary science teachers' beliefs and practices after authentic inquiry‐based experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 938–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, S. (2011). The age of synthesis: From cognitive science to converging technologies and hereafter. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56, 465–475.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51–76). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeJarnette, N. (2012). America's children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133, 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (1994). Family behavior and learning in informal science settings: A review of the research. Science Education, 78, 57–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farenga, S. J., & Joyce, B. A. (1999). Intentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differences. Science Education, 83, 55–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogarty, R. (1991). Ten ways to integrate curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 61–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, D. (2012). From professional development to system change: Teacher leadership and innovation. Professional Development in Education, 38, 205–227.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Guest editorial: Delivery models for elementary science instruction: a call for research. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(3).
   Google Scholar
• Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (Eds.). (2014). Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. W. (1995). The age of synthesis. New York, NY: Peter Lang
   Google Scholar
• Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S.M. (2012). Student-centered learning. In N. M. Seel, (Ed), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 3211–3214). Freiburg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2001). Emotional geographies of teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1056–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegedus, S. J., Dalton, S., Roschelle, J., Penuel, W., Dickey-Kurdziolek, M., & Tatar, D. (2014). Investigating why teachers reported continued use and sharing of an educational innovation after the research has ended. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16, 312–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiatt-Michael, D. (2001). Preparing teachers to work with parents (ED460123). Washington, DC: Eric Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM Integration in K–12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• i-STEM 2015 Lesson Plans. (2015). Welcome to the 2015 i-STEM lesson plans page. Retrieved from: https://sites.google.com/a/boisestate.edu/i-stem-2015-lesson-plans/
   Google Scholar
• Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K–12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. L., Martin, S. N., & Otieno, T. C. (2008). A science lesson plan analysis instrument for formative and summative program evaluation of a teacher education program. Science Education, 92, 1096–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. M., & Tippins, D. J. (1992). The evolution of functional lesson plans among twelve elementary and secondary student teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 477–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty‐first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30, 257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. S. and Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st century skills: Prepare students for the future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47, 121–123.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Szabo, Z. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes toward technology integration in schools: A four‐year study. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, G. (1980). How do elementary school teachers plan? The nature of planning and influences on it. The Elementary School Journal, 81, 4–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2011). Innovative work behaviour in vocational colleges: Understanding how and why innovations are developed. Vocations and Learning, 4(1), 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. A., Treahy, D., Chao, C. C., & Barab, S. A. (2000). The Internet learning forum: Designing and building an online community of practice. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2000, 2208–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S. & Seifert A. L. (2014). Integrated STEM, 21st century skills, and place-based learning: A state wide plan for the i-STEM professional development and research initiative. Washington, DC: USDOE MSP Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A. L. & Chang, C. (2013). The perceptions, engagement, and practices of teachers seeking professional development in place-based integrated STEM. Teacher Education and Practice, 26, 242–265.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A. L., Moll, A. & Coats, B. (2012). i-STEM summer institute: An integrated approach to teacher professional development in STEM. Journal of STEM Education: Innovation and Outreach, 13, 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A. L. & Hendricks, K. (2015). Are we preparing the next generation? K–12 teacher knowledge and engagement in teaching core STEM practices. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society Engineering Education, 122.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A. L., Sias, C.M. (2015). To change or not to change: Indicators of K–12 teacher engagement in innovation practices. International Journal of Innovation in Education, 3, 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2016). Putting the pieces together: A model of K–12 teachers’ innovation implementation behaviors. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 9, 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. & Seifert, A. (in press). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, D., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Building bridges: Using science as a tool to teach reading and writing. Educational Action Research, 12, 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Oleson, A., & Hora, M. T. (2014). Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in shaping faculty teaching practices. Higher Education, 68, 29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2016). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from: http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_Framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pearlman, B. (2010). Designing new learning environments to support 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp 116–147). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, D. & Nadelson, L. S. ( under review). What are you going to do with that digital camera? A snapshot of educators’ perspectives and practices with instructional technology. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, J. (2000). K‐12 collaboratories. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 26(3), 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. A. P., & Abell, S. K. (2013). Connecting with other disciplines. In D. Hanuscin & M. A. Rogers (Eds.), Perspectives: Research & tips to support science education, K-6 (pp. 39–41). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2010). “21st-Century” skills. American Educator, 34, 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-Century skills requires 21st-Century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J., & Brandwein, P. F. (1962). The teaching of science: The teaching of science as enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, K. E., & Diliberto, J. A. (2010). Guidelines for successful parent involvement working with parents of students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(6), 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, A. L., & Leong, W. F. (2014). Mapping curriculum innovation in STEM schools to assessment requirements: Tensions and dilemmas. Theory Into Practice, 53, 11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards. (2016). The Need for Standards Retrieved August 24, 2016, from http://www.nextgenscience.org/need-standards
   Google Scholar
• Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85, 430–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wysession, M. W. (2015). Next Generation Science Standards: Preparing students for careers in energy-related fields. The Leading Edge, 34, 1166–1176.
   Google Scholar
• Yinger, R. J. (1980). A study of teacher planning. The Elementary School Journal, 80, 107–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar