Comprehension in disciplinary learning: An examination of elementary readers' processing and recall

References

• Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers' main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 31–46. doi:10.2307/747986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almasi, J. F., & Fullerton, S. K. (2012). Teaching strategic processes in reading (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C. (2004). Role of the reader's schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 594–606). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Text genre as a factor in the formation of scientific literacy. Journal of research in science teaching, 42, 403–428. doi: 10.1002/tea.20063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2, 3–23. doi:10.1177/0741088385002001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, E. A. (1946). Foundations of reading instruction, with emphasis on differentiated guidance. New York, NY: American Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Brassart, D. G. (1996). Does a prototypical argumentative schema exist? Text recall in 8 to 13 year olds. Argumentation, 10, 163–174. doi:10.1007/BF00180723
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, K. B. (2009). The role of cognitive flexibility in reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 115–139). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1999). Qualitative assessment of text difficulty: A practical guide for teachers and writers. Brookline, MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, R. S. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambliss, M. J. (1995). Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 778–807. doi:10.2307/748198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffin, C. (1997). Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 196–230). London, UK: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., Caughlan, S., Juzwik, M. M., & Martin, N. M. (2012). Reading and writing genre with purpose in K-8 classrooms. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Carlisle, J. F. (2011). The development of comprehension. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 199–228). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Roberts, K. M. (2010). The genre-specific nature of reading comprehension. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of English language and literacy teaching (pp. 74–86). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Entwisle, D. R., & Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth's race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development, 65, 1521–1540. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00833.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., & Rakestraw, J., J. A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 311–335). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gott, R. (2005). Astronauts take flight. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40, 223–234. doi: 10.3102/0013189X11413260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., Coddington, C. S., Lutz Klauda, S., Wigfield, A., & Barbosa, P. (2009). Impacts of comprehensive reading instruction on diverse outcomes of low- and high-achieving readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 195–214. doi: 10.1177/0022219408331039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwell, M., & LeBeau, B. (2010). Student eligibility for a free lunch as an SES measure in education research. Educational Researcher, 39, 120–131. doi: 10.3102/0013189X10362578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, G. B. (1978). “Footprints in the sands of time”: Biography for children. Children's Literature in Education, 9, 85–94. doi: 10.1007/BF01139703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H. (1999). Text matters in learning to read. The Reading Teacher, 52, 552–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilden, K. (2008). Process-oriented assessment tools for studying second graders' informational comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hilden, K., & Pressley, M. (2011). Verbal protocols of reading. In N. K. Duke & M. H. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (2nd ed., pp. 427–481). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kafka, T. (2005). Charting your course. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2004). The Construction-Integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1270–1328). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kucan, L., & Beck, I. L. (1996). Four fourth graders thinking aloud: An investigation of genre effects. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 259–287. doi: 10.1080/10862969609547921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, J. A. (1986). Children reading and writing: Structures and strategies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leal, D. J., & Moss, B. (1999). Encounters with information text: Perceptions and insights from four gifted readers. Reading Horizons, 40, 81–101.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York, NY: Carnegie.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Young, K. M. (1996). Two texts, three readers: Distance and expertise in reading history. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 441–486. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1404_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maloch, B., & Bomer, R. (2013). Teaching about and with informational texts: What does research teach us? Language Arts, 90, 441–450.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F., & Rice, G. E. (1984). The structure of text. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 319–352). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Stockdill, D., Kim, K., & Kim, H. J. (2011). The role of text in disciplinary learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 453–486). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, M. E. (2001). Text forms and features: A resource for intentional teaching. Katonah, NY: Richard C. Owen.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment Governing Board. (1992). Reading framework for the National Assessment of Educational Progress: 1992–1998. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED406651
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment Governing Board. (2015). Reading framework for the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Retrieved from https://www.nagb.org/publications/frameworks/reading/2015-reading-framework.html.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). NAEP Data Explorer. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/dataset.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for the English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/ELA_Standards1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2013). The next generation science standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Presss. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/K–5DCI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Paré, A., & Smart, G. (1994). Observing genres in action: Towards a research methodology. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 146–154). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 609–640). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1971). The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY: Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N., & Martineau, J. A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 8–45. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.42.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Education.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C. (2009). Disciplinary comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 240–260). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., & Shanahan, T. (2014). Does disciplinary literacy have a place in elementary school? The Reading Teacher, 67, 636–639. doi: 10.1002/trtr.1257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, S. (2005). Save our Earth. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M. (1980). Children's memory for expository text after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 399–411. doi:10.2307/747422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, S., Wixson, K., & Pearson, P. (2014). Putting text complexity in context: Refocusing on comprehension of complex text. Elementary School Journal, 115, 270–289. doi: 10.1086/678296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wignell, P. (1994). Genre across the curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 6, 355–372. doi:10.1016/0898–5898(94)90003–5
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., Stafford, B., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., & Pollini, S. (2009). Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 1–20. doi: 10.1037/a0013152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar