Interest-enhancing approaches to mathematics curriculum design: Illustrations and personalization

References

• Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, P., & Ross, S. (1987). Using computer-assisted instruction to personalize arithmetic materials for elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 72–78. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.1.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2010). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-35. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E. T., & Wiest, L. R. (2004). Impact of personalization of mathematical word problems on student performance. The Mathematics Educator, 14(2), 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Beitzel, B. D., & Staley, R. K. (2015). The efficacy of using diagrams when solving probability word problems in college. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(1), 130–145. doi:10.1080/00220973.2013.876232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berends, I. E., & van Lieshout, E. C. (2009). The effect of illustrations in arithmetic problem-solving: Effects of increased cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 19(4), 345–353. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernacki, M., & Walkington, C. (2018). The role of situational interest in personalized learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 864–881. doi:10.1037/edu0000250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A. (2018). Being suspicious of the sense of ease and undeterred by the sense of difficulty: Looking back at Schmidt and Bjork (1992). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 146–148. doi:10.1177/1745691617690642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonen, A. J., van Wesel, F., Jolles, J., & van der Schoot, M. (2014). The role of visual representation type, spatial ability, and reading comprehension in word problem solving: An item-level analysis in elementary school children. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 15–26. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2014.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, J. L., & Koedinger, K. R. (2012). Are diagrams always helpful tools? Developmental and individual differences in the effect of presentation format on student problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 492–511. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02041.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boriack, A. W., Stillisano, J. R., Wright, K. B., & Waxman, H. C. (2015). Independent evaluation of Reasoning Mind programing. Retrieved from https://www.reasoningmind.org/rmwp/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Texas-AM-Independent-Evaluation-of-Reasoning-Mind-Programming.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Caker, O., & Simsek, N. (2010). A comparative analysis of computer and paper-based personalization on student achievement. Computers & Education, 55, 1524–1531. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, V. (2015). Examining associations between reading motivation and inference generation beyond reading comprehension skill. Reading Psychology, 36(6), 473–498. doi:10.1080/02702711.2014.892040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, V., Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2016). Learning about posterior probability: Do diagrams and elaborative interrogations help? Journal of Experimental Education, 84, 579–599. doi:10.1080/00220973.2015.1048847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, V. & Cooper, J. L. (2015). Teacher viewpoints of instructional design principles for visuals in a middle school math curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, V. & van den Broek, P. (2012). Interest, inferences, and learning from texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 650–663. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, V., Cooper, J. L., Michaelis, J., Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2017). Revising visuals based on instructional design principles: Effects on cognitive load and learning. In C. Was, F. J. Sansosti, & B. J. Morris (Eds.) Eye-tracking technology applications in educational research, (pp. 195–218). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., & Choi, S. (2014). Effects of seductive details evidenced by gaze duration. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 109, 131–138. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2014.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice. 2015. retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, D. A. (2011). Applying Silvia's model of interest to academic text: Is there a third appraisal? Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 624–628. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. L., Sidney, P. G., & Alibali, M. W. (2018). Who Benefits from diagrams and illustrations in math problems? Ability and attitudes matter. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(1), 24–38. doi:10.1002/acp.3371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova, D., & Lepper, M. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715–730. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.88.4.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Dorsey, J., Ross, S., and Morrison, G. (1991). The role of rewording and context personalization in the solving of mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 61–68. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.83.1.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deieso, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2019). Learning environment, attitudes and anxiety across the transition from primary to secondary school mathematics. Learning Environments Research. doi:10.1007/s10984-018-9261-5.
   Google Scholar
• Dewolf, T. (2014). Get the picture? Are representational illustrations effective in helping pupils to solve mathematically word problems realistically? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Dewolf, T., van Dooren, W., Ev Cimen, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2014). The impact of illustrations and warnings on solving mathematical word problems realistically. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82, 103–120. doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.745468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durik, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 597–610. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerday, T., & Shell, D. F. (2015). Disentangling the effects of interest and choice on learning, engagement, and attitude. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 134–140. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Researchr on Adolescence, 20, 507–537. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017). Mathematics practice without feedback: A desirable difficulty in a classroom setting. Instructional Science, 45(2), 177–194. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9401-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220–227. doi:10.1177/2372732216655542
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414–434. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heddy, B. C., Sinatra, G. M., Seli, H., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2017). Making learning meaningful: facilitating interest development and transfer in at-risk college students. Educational Psychology, 37(5), 565–581. doi:10.1080/01443410.2016.1150420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. E., & Ainley, M. (2008). Interest and self-regulation: Relationships between two variables that influence learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 77–109). New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høgheim, S., & Reber, R. (2015). Supporting interest of middle school students in mathematics through context personalization and example choice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 17–25. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogland, K., Pepin, B., de Koning, J., Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. (2018). Word problems versus image-rich problems: an analysis of effects of task characteristics on students’ performance on contextual mathematics problems. Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2017.1413414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, A. J., & Wiley, J. (2014). Do illustrations help or harm metacomprehension accuracy? Learning and Instruction, 34, 58–73. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., & Star, J. R. (2012). An exploratory study contrasting high-and low-achieving students' percent word problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 151–158. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajander, A. & Lovric, M. (2009) Mathematics textbooks and their potential role in supporting misconceptions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 173–181, doi:10.1080/00207390701691558
   Google Scholar
• Khachatryan, G. A., Romashov, A. V., Khachatryan, A. R., Gaudino, S. J., Khachatryan, J. M., Guarian, K. R., & Yufa, N. V. (2014). Reasoning Mind Genie 2: An intelligent tutoring system as a vehicle for international transfer of instructional methods in mathematics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 333–382.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Jiang, Y., & Song, J. (2015). The effects of interest and utility value on mathematics engagement and achievement. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 63–78). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, H., & Sullivan, H. (2000). Personalization of mathematics word problems in Taiwan. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 49–59. doi:10.1007/bf02319857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner, M. A., Ihme, J. M., Saß, S., & Köller, O. (2016). How representational pictures enhance students’ performance and test-taking pleasure in low-stakes assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner, M. A., Ihme, J. M., Saß, S., & Köller, O. (2018). How representational pictures enhance students' performance and test-taking pleasure in low-stakes assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34(6), 376–385.
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Messersmith, E. E. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of situational interest. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 591–614. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02080.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, S., Schraw, G., McCrudden, M. T., & Hartley, K. (2007). Processing recall of seductive details in scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(4), 569–587. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, C. & Sullivan, H. (1992). Effects of personalization of instructional context on the achievement and attitudes of Hispanic students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(4), 5–13. doi:10.1007/bf02296895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magner, U. I. E., Glogger, I., & Renkl, A. (2016). Which features make illustrations in multimedia learning interesting? Educational Psychology, 36(9), 1596–1613. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.933177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magner, U. I., Schwonke, R., Aleven, V., Popescu, O., & Renkl, A. (2014). Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments. Learning and instruction, 29, 141–152. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, E. J., & Sink, H. E. (2010). Access to handouts of presentation slides during lecture: Consequences for learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 691–706. doi:10.1002/acp.1579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014a). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171–173. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014b). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed., pp. 43–71). New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139547369.005.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Sims, V., & Tajika, H. (1995). Brief note: A comparison of how textbooks teach mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 443–460. doi:10.3102/00028312032002443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy L. P. (2005). Effect of demographic and personal variables on achievement in eighth-grade algebra. Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 131–135. doi:10.3200/joer.98.3.131-135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Butler, A. C. (2010). A contextual framework for understanding when difficulties are desirable. In A. S. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 175–198). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., Uttal, D. H., Jarvin, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Should you show me the money? Concrete objects both hurt and help performance on mathematics problems. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 171–184. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miele, D. B., & Wigfield, A. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative relations between motivation and critical-analytic thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 26(4), 519–541. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9282-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulqueeny, K., Kostyuk, V., Baker, R. S., & Ocumpaugh, J. (2015). Incorporating effective e-learning principles to improve student engagement in middle-school mathematics. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 15.
   Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A. (2013). Constructing motivation through choice, interest, and interestingness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 522–534. doi:10.1037/a0030307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, D., Snijders, T. M., Hagoort, P., & Özyürek, A. (2017). Linking language to the visual world: Neural correlates of comprehending verbal reference to objects through pointing and visual cues. Neuropsychologia, 95, 21–29. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, L. A., & McNeil, N. M. (2013). Effects of perceptually rich manipulatives on preschoolers' counting performance: Established knowledge counts. Child Development, 84(3), 1020–1033. doi:10.1111/cdev.12028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, M. M., Barnes, M. A., & Barron, R. W. (2010). The role of illustrations in children’s inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(3), 243–255. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priniski, S. J., Hecht, C. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2018). Making learning personally meaningful: A new framework for relevance research. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 11–29. doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1380589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Hetland, H., Chen, W., Norman, E., & Kobbeltvedt, T. (2009). Effects of example choice on interest, control, and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 509–548. doi:10.1080/10508400903191896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, G. D. (2012). A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 216–237. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richland, L. E., Bjork, R. A., Finley, J. R., & Linn, M. C. (2005). Linking cognitive science to education: Generation and interleaving effects. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1850–1855). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 175–184. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2006). An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 344–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saß, S., Wittwer, J., Senkbeil, M., & Köller, O. (2012). Pictures in test items: Effects on response time and response correctness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 70–81. doi:10.1002/acp.1798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3(4), 207–217. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. D. (2016). Decorative pictures and emotional design in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. (2002). Commentary: Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweppe, J., & Rummer, R. (2016). Integrating written text and graphics as a desirable difficulty in long-term multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 131–137. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommet, N., & Elliot, A. J. (2017). Achievement goals, reasons for goal pursuit, and achievement goal complexes as predictors of beneficial outcomes: Is the influence of goals reducible to reasons? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(8), 1141–1162. doi:10.1037/edu0000199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. L. (2009). Contextualization in perspective. Cognition and Instruction, 27(1), 51–89. doi:10.1080/07370000802584539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkington, C. (2013). Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 932–945. doi:10.1037/a0031882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkington, C., (2017). Design research on personalized problem-posing. In Galindo, E., & Newton, J., (Eds.) Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 195–202). Indianapolis, IN: Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. (2014). Motivating students by “personalizing” learning around individual interests: A consideration of theory, design, and implementation issues. In S. Karabenick & T. Urdan (Eds.) Advances in Motivation and Achievement (Vol. 18 pp. 139–176), Emerald Group Publishing. doi:10.1108/s0749-742320140000018004.
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. (2015). Students authoring personalized “Algebra Stories”: Problem-posing in the context of out-of-school interests. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40B, 171–191. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2018). Personalization of instruction: Design dimensions and implications for cognition. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 50–68. doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1380590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. (2019). Personalizing algebra to students' individual interests in an intelligent tutoring system: Moderators of impact. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29, 58–88.
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, C., Clinton, V., Ritter, S. N., & Nathan, M. J. (2015). How readability and topic incidence relate to performance on mathematics story problems in computer-based curricula. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1051–1074. doi:10.1037/edu0000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkington, C., Cooper, J., & Howell, E. (2013). The effects of visual representations and interest-based personalization on solving percent problems. In M. Martinez & A. Castro Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 533–536). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, C., Cooper, J., Nathan, M.J., & Alibali, M.A. (2015). The effects of visual representations and interest-based personalization on solving mathematics story problems. Poster presentation at The 37th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, C. & Hayata, C. (2017). Designing learning personalized to students’ interests: Balancing rich experiences with mathematical goals. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(4), 519–530. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0842-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., Mayer, R. E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Collins, H. (2008). The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66. 98–112. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waxman, H. C. & Houston, W. R. (2012). Evaluation of the 2010–2011 Reasoning Mind Program in Beaumont ISD. Retrieved from: http://www.reasoningmind.org/pdf/Waxman-Houston_Report_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wichmann, A., & Timpe, S. (2015). Can dynamic visualizations with variable control enhance the acquisition of intuitive knowledge? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 709–720. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9554-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, J., Beckmann, S., Driscoll, M., Franke, M., Herzig, P., Jitendra, A., & Ogbuehi, P. (2012). Improving mathematical problem solving in grades 4 through 8: A practice guide (NCEE 2012–4055). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/mps_pg_052212.pdf
   Google Scholar