References
- Alavi, S. B., & McCormick, J. (2016). Implications of proxy efficacy for studies of team leadership in organizational settings. European Psychologist, 21(3), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000270
- Alavi, S. B., & McCormick, J. (2018). Why do I think my team is capable? A study of some antecedents of team members’ personal collective efficacy beliefs. Educational Psychology, 38(9), 1147–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1500680
- Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2(3), 202–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1993.tb00014.x
- Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Webster, R. (2015). The challenges of implementing group work in primary school classrooms and including pupils with special educational needs. Education 3-13, 43(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.961689
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
- Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064
- Bandura, A. (2001). Social-cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
- Bandura, A. (2006). Guide to constructing self efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Information Age.
- Barry, C. M., & Wentzel, K. R. (2006). Friend influence on prosocial behavior: The role of motivational factors and friendship characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.153
- Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00157
- Berndt, T. J., Perry, T. B., & Miller, K. E. (1988). Friends’ and classmates’ interactions on academic tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 506–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.506
- Burk, W. J., & Laursen, B. (2005). Adolescent perceptions of friendship and their associations with individual adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000342
- Chung, S., Lount, R. B., Park, H. M., & Park, E. S. (2018). Friends with performance benefits: A meta-analysis on the relationship between friendship and group performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217733069
- Finegold, M., & Eilam, B. (1995). Sociometric analysis: A classroom assessment tool for teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(95)00005-F
- Galton, M., & Hargreaves, L. (2009). Group work: still a neglected art? Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902726917
- Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., & Pell, T. (2009). Group work and whole-class teaching with 11- to 14-year-olds compared. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701994
- Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033003003
- Goncalo, J. A., Polman, E., & Maslach, C. (2010). Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.05.001
- Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
- Hanham, J., & McCormick, J. (2008). Relationships between self-processes and group processes with friends and acquaintances. Issues in Educational Research, 18, 118–137.
- Hanham, J., & McCormick, J. (2009). Group work in schools with close friends and acquaintances: Linking self-processes with group processes. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.002
- Hanham, J., & McCormick, J. (2018). A multilevel study of self-beliefs and student behaviors in a group problem-solving task. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1241736
- Hanham, J., Ullman, J., Orlando, J., & McCormick, J. (2014). Intentional learning with technological proxies: Goal orientations and efficacy beliefs. Australian Journal of Education, 58(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944113517831
- Hare, A. P. (1994). Types of roles in small groups: A bit of history and a current perspective. Small Group Research, 25(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496494253005
- Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131681
- Hartup, W. W. (1998). Cooperation, close relationships, and cognitive development. In W. M., Bukowski, A. F., Newcomb, & W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge studies in social and emotional development (pp. 213–237). Cambridge University Press.
- Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.355
- Hendry, A., Hays, G., Challinor, K., & Lynch, D. (2017). Undertaking educational research following the introduction, implementation, evolution, and hybridization of constructivist instructional models in an Australian PBL High School. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1688
- Henrich, C. C., Kuperminc, G. P., Sack, A., Blatt, S. J., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2000). Characteristics and homogeneity of early adolescent friendship groups: A comparison of male and female clique and non-clique members. Applied Developmental Science, 4(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0401_2
- Jehn, K., & Shah, P. P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 775–790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.775
- Khong, J. Z. N., Liem, G. A. D., & Klassen, R. M. (2017). Task performance in small group settings: the role of group members’ self-efficacy and collective efficacy and group’s characteristics. Educational Psychology, 37(9), 1082–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1342767
- Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass.
- Ladd, G. W., & Emerson, E. S. (1984). Shared knowledge in children’s friendships. Developmental Psychology, 20(5), 932–940. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.20.5.932
- McCormick, J., Alavi, S. B., & Hanham, J. (2015). The importance of context when applying social cognitive theory in organizations. In A. Ortenbald (Ed.), Handbook of research on management ideas and panaceas: Adaptation and context (pp. 110–129). Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Miell, D., & MacDonald, R. A. R. (2000). Children’s creative collaborations: The importance of friendship when working together on a musical composition. Social Development, 9(3), 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00130
- Mitchell, S. N., Reilly, R., Bramwell, F. G., Solonksy, A., & Lilly, F. (2004). Friendship and choosing groupmates: Preference for teacher-selected vs. student-selected groupings in high school science classes. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 20–32.
- Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 306–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.306
- Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
- Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3, Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp, 571–645). Wiley.
- Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
- Stajkovic, A. D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A. J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015659
- Stegmueller, D. (2013). How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 748–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12001
- Swenson, L. M., & Strough, J. (2008). Adolescents’ collaboration in the classroom: Do peer relationships orgender matter? Psychology in the Schools, 45(8), 715–728. . https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20337
- Wang, S. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2012). The role of collective efficacy, cognitive quality, and task cohesion in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 58(2), 679–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.003
- Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1-2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00074-0
- Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 841–873). Macmillan.
- Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., & Caldwell, K. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.195
- Wentzel, K. R., Jablansky, S., & Scalise, N. R. (2018). Do friendships afford academic benefits? A meta-analytic study. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 1241–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9447-5
- Zajac, R. J., & Hartup, W. W. (1997). Friends as co-workers: Research review and classroom implications. Elementary School Journal, 98(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1086/461881