Evaluating scientific thinking among Shanghai’s students of high and low performing schools

References

• Arvidsson, T. S. (2018). Individualized scaffolding of scientific reasoning development-complementing teachers with an auto-agent. Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum. (2015). Australian senior secondary curriculum for science. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/science/curriculum/f-10?layout=1
   Google Scholar
• Bo, N., Rind, I. A., & Asad, M. (2020). Influence of teacher educators on the development of prospective teachers’ personal epistemology and tolerance. Sage Open, 10(1), 215824402091463–215824402091414. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlan, S. (2014). Shanghai teachers flown in for maths. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/education-26533428
   Google Scholar
• Dean, D., Jr., & Kuhn, D. (2007). Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. Science Education, 91(3), 384–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, S. (2010). Top test scores from Shanghai stun educators. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/education/07education.html
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, N. (2015). The maths teachers of Shanghai have the perfect formula for learning. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/26/maths-teachers-shanghai-china-uk
   Google Scholar
• Guan, Q., & Meng, W. (2007). China’s new national curriculum reform: Innovation, challenges and strategies. Frontiers of Education in China, 2(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-007-0043-6
   Google Scholar
• Hongbing, J. (2010). Using International Standards to Examine Chinese Education. 国际标准“体检”中国教育. Section 12. People’s Daily 人民日报.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Ding, L., & Hu, B. (2017). Science curriculum and implementation in senior secondary school. In Liang, Ling L., Liu, Xiufeng, Fulmer, Gavin W. (Eds) Chinese science education in the 21st century: Policy, practice, and research (pp. 101–132). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures (Vol. 22). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., & Farmer, J. (2013). School turnaround in Shanghai: The empowered-management program approach to improving school performance. Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Jewett, E., & Kuhn, D. (2016). Social science as a tool in developing scientific thinking skills in underserved, low-achieving urban students. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 143, 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.10.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiaoshou, G. L. B. (2004). China’s science curriculum reform. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Education, 5(2). https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/v5_issue2/foreword/cindex.htm
   Google Scholar
• Keil, F. C. (2006). Explanation and understanding. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D. (2002). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Koerber, S., Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., & Nett, U. (2005). Scientific reasoning in young children: Preschoolers’ ability to evaluate covariation evidence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2007). Reasoning about multiple variables: Control of variables is not the only challenge. Science Education, 91(5), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2016). What do young science students need to learn about variables? Science Education, 100(2), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2018). A role for reasoning in a dialogic approach to critical thinking. Topoi, 37(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9373-4
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Arvidsson, T. S., Lesperance, R., & Corprew, R. (2017). Can engaging in science practices promote deep understanding of them? Science Education, 101(2), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Dean Jr, D. (2004). Connecting scientific reasoning and causal inference. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0502_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Iordanou, K., Pease, M., & Wirkala, C. (2008). Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? Cognitive Development, 23(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2008). What needs to develop in the development of inquiry skills?. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 512–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802391745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Pease, M., & Wirkala, C. (2009). Coordinating the effects of multiple variables: A skill fundamental to scientific thinking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(3), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Ramsey, S., & Arvidsson, T. S. (2015). Developing multivariable thinkers. Cognitive Development, 35, 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, X., Kidwai, H., & Zhang, M. (2016). How Shanghai does it: Insights and lessons from the highest-ranking education system in the world. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P. (2016). Transforming turnaround schools in China: Strategies, achievements, and challenges. Frontiers of Education in China, 11(3), 374–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., & Xiaohu, L. (2011). How to view 2009 Shanghai PISA result? The review of the reflection on Shanghai middle school students’ first participation in the international test. 如何看待上海2009 年PISA 测评结果—中国上海中学生首次参加国际测评结果反响述评. Shanghai Research on Education 上海教育科研, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, M. (2016). The development and characteristics of elementary science curriculum in China. US-China Education Review, 6(11), 642–649.
   Google Scholar
• National Curriculum of England. (2013). National curriculum of England: Science programmes of study. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study
   Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Next generation science standards. https://www.nextgenscience.org/
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). PISA & TALIS 2008 technical report. OECD Pub.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Summary description of the seven levels of proficiency in science in PISA 2015. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/test/summary-description-seven-levels-of-proficiency-science-pisa-2015.htm
   Google Scholar
• Rind, I. A. (2014). Investigating students’ experiences in an ESL programme at the University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 44(6), 1002–1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.822244
   Google Scholar
• Rind, I. A. (2015). Gender identities and female students’ learning experiences in studying English as Second Language at a Pakistani University. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1115574. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1115574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rind, I. A. (2016). Conceptualizing students’ learning experiences in English as Second Language in higher education from structure and agency. Cogent Social Sciences, 2(1), 1191978. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1191978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rind, I. A. (In press). Developing adult students’ multivariable thinking capabilities. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Rind, I. A., & Kadiwal, L. (2016). Analysing institutional influences on teaching– learning practices of English as second language programme in a Pakistani university. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1160606. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1160606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rind, I. A., Mari, M. A., & Heidari-Shahreza, M. A. (2019). Analysing the impact of external examination on teaching and learning of English at the secondary level education. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1574947
   Google Scholar
• Rind, I. A., Shahriar, A., & Fatima, S. (2016). Rural-ethnic identities & students’ learning experiences in english as second language programme in a public sector university of pakistan. The Sindh University Journal of Education, 45(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ringmar, S. (2013). Here’s the truth about Shanghai schools: They’re terrible. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/28/shanghai-china-schools-terrible-not-ideal
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C., & Ng, C. S. L. (2018). Assessment reform in Shanghai: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Educational Reform, 27(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791802700304
   Google Scholar
• Wasis. (2014). Analyzing physics items of UN, TIMSS, and PISA based on higher-order thinking and scientific literacy. In International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (pp. 147––154). https://www.academia.edu/download/54606793/17-Wasis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. J., Lombrozo, T., & Rehder, B. (2013). The hazards of explanation: Overgeneralization in the face of exceptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1006–1014. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, X. (2010). What does Shanghai PISA test tell us? The Balanced development of education is not impossible. PISA 测试上海夺冠回答了什么—教育均衡并非可望不可. 中国青年报. China Youth.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, J.-X., & Guo, Y.-Y. (2018). Core competences and scientific literacy: The recent reform of the school science curriculum in China. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1913–1933. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1514544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., & Bray, M. (2018). Equalising schooling, unequalising private supplementary tutoring: Access and tracking through shadow education in China. Oxford Review of Education, 44(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1389710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., & Akbik, A. (2012). PISA as a legitimacy tool during China’s education reform: Case study of Shanghai. TranState Working Papers No. 166, Universität Bremen.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X. (2011). Development under stress: The culture of academic competition and adolescent friendship participation in China’s secondary school. Harvard Graduate School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20(1), 99–149. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. (1995). Reasoning about interactions between variables. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(10), 1039–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660321005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar