Perceptions of teachers regarding the perceived implementation of creative pedagogy in “making” activities

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2012). Key factors to instructors’ satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9051-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhendal, D., Marshman, M., & Grootenboer, P. (2016). Kuwaiti science teachers’ beliefs and intentions regarding the use of inquiry-based instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(8), 1455–1473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9671-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atmatzidou, S., Demetriadis, S., & Nika, P. (2018). How does the degree of guidance support students’ metacognitive and problem solving skills in educational robotics? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9709-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bécar, J.-P., Vareille, J., Cayez, V., Notteau, Y. (2017). 3D Printing is boosting the student’s creativity. Proceedings of the International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. Seville, 1847–1823.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, B. (2017). The promise and the promises of making in science education. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1275380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors, 4, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. K., & Yan, D. W. (2019). Interrelationships between influential factors and behavioral intention with regard to autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(7), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1488021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, R. H. P. (2012). Teaching for creativity: Examining the beliefs of early childhood teachers and their influence on teaching practices. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(3), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911203700307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, Y.-H., & Chu, P.-Y. (2018). The different learning outcomes of high school and college students on a 3d-printing steam engineering design curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(6), 1047–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9832-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S. L., Deuermeyer, E., & Quek, F. (2018). Supporting scientific modeling through curriculum-based making in elementary school science classes. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S. L., Quek, F., Bhangaonkar, S., Ging, A. B., & Sridharamurthy, K. (2015). Making the Maker: A Means-to-an-Ends approach to nurturing the Maker mindset in elementary-aged children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 83–114). Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D., Honey, M., & Kanter, D. E. (2013). Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. In M. Honey & D. E. Kanter (Eds.), The maker mindset (pp. 7–11). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, R., Hattie, J., & Bowles, T. (2018). Using the theory of planned behavior to explore teachers’ intentions to engage in ongoing teacher professional learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, D. A., Kafai, Y., Nakajima, T., Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2018). Putting making into high school computer science classrooms: Promoting equity in teaching and learning with electronic textiles in exploring computer science. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(1), 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godhe, A.-L., Lilja, P., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Making sense of making: Critical issues in the integration of maker education into schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1610040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, M. (2010). A blueprint for educational development in China: A review of “The National Guidelines for Medium- and Long-Term Educational Reform and Development (2010–2020)”. Frontiers of Education in China, 5(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-010-0101-3
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, K. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Teacher use of creativity-enhancing activities in Chinese and American elementary classrooms. Creativity Research Journal, 26(4), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.961771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., vanBraak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, J. S., Hong, J. C., ChanLin, L. J., Chang, S. H., & Chu, H. C. (2005). Creative teachers and creative teaching strategies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00445.x
   Google Scholar
• Huang, T.-C., Chang, S.-H., Shu, V. Y., Hansen, P., & Lee, S.-L. (2017). Developing a curriculum of maker education in Taiwan higher education. In T.-C. Huang, R. Lau, Y.-M. Huang, M. Spaniol, & C.-H. Yuen (Eds.), Emerging technologies for education (pp. 433–437). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, T.-C., Lin, W., & Yueh, H.-P. (2019). How to cultivate an environmentally responsible maker? A CPS approach to a comprehensive maker education model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(S1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09959-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T. K. (2015). Exploring the antecedents of screenshot-based interactions in the context of advanced computer software learning. Computers & Education, 80, 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Lee, J. C.-K., & Dong, X. (2019). Mapping the factors influencing creative teaching in mainland China: An exploratory study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Lee, J. C.-K., & Yang, X. (2019). What really counts? Investigating the effects of creative role identity and self-efficacy on teachers’ attitudes towards the implementation of teaching for creativity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, P. H., Gao, Y. J., & Lin, R. (2019). The research of social-design-based maker education: Based upon “The old man and the sea” text. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1572593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, W., & Jeng, I. (2013). Factors influencing future educational technologists’ intentions to participate in online teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00597.x
   Google Scholar
• Hyeon, S. E., Lee, S., & Kim, H. J. (2016). A Study on the Development of Teacher Training Programme for Maker Education. In Z. Bekirogullari, M. Y. Minas, & R. X. Thambusamy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference on education and educational psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 624–630). Future Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Irie, N. R., Hsu, Y.-C., & Ching, Y.-H. (2019). Makerspaces in diverse places: A comparative analysis of distinctive national discourses surrounding the maker movement and education in four countries. TechTrends, 63(4), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0355-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, C., & Higgins, S. (2019). What is educational technology and how is it being used to support teaching and learning in the early years? International Journal of Early Years Education, 27(3), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1504754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E., & Lui, D. (2014). A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajamaa, A., Kumpulainen, K., & Olkinuora, H. R. (2020). Teacher interventions in students’ collaborative work in a technology‐rich educational makerspace. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, F., Clark, K. M., & Uysal, S. (2019). Architecture game-based mathematical learning by making. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(S1), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09996-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, H.-J. (2017). Examining civil servants’ decisions to use Web 2.0 tools for learning, based on the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1121879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, H.-M., & Chen, C.-P. (2011). Factors influencing secondary school teachers’ adoption of teaching blogs. Computers & Education, 56(4), 948–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambić, D. (2014). Factors influencing future teachers’ adoption of educational software use in classroom. Croatian Journal of Education, 16(3), 815–846.
   Google Scholar
• Lanci, S., Nadelson, L. S., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Villanueva, I., Youmans, K., & Lenz, A. (2018). Developing a measure of engineering students’ makerspace learning, perceptions, and interactions. In Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (Paper 22089). ASEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. R., & Kemple, K. (2014). Preservice teachers’ personality traits and engagement in creative activities as predictors of their support for children’s creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.873668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, C. P., Tondeur, J., Nastiti, H., & Pagram, J. (2014). Educational innovations and pedagogical beliefs: The case of a professional development program for Indonesian teachers. Journal of Applied Research in Education, 18, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, K.-Y., & Williams, P. J. (2016). Taiwanese preservice teachers’ science, technology, engineering, and mathematics teaching intention. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9645-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M. R. (2016). The research of maker curriculum in vocational training courses-taking mechanical classes as example. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly Journal, 5(4), 143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Lin, C.-H., & Zhang, D. (2017). Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: A survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M. Z. (2017). Maker education, operational thinking, programming curriculum- some concepts of teaching design and curriculum. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly Journal, 6(1), 138–140.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S.-H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1012–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, K., & Woolfson, L. M. (2013). Teacher attitudes and behavior toward the inclusion of children with social, emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream schools: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltese, A. V., Simpson, A., & Anderson, A. (2018). Failing to learn: The impact of failures during making activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the Maker Movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 5(1), 30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Moksness, L., & Olsen, S. O. (2017). Understanding researchers’ intention to publish in open access journals. Journal of Documentation, 73(6), 1149–1166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2017-0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., Villanueva, I., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Lanci, S., Youmans, K., Lenhart, C. A., & Van Winkle, A. K. (2019). Knowledge in the making: What engineering students are learning in makerspaces. In Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (Paper 26249). ASEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt, Germany: SmartPLS. www.smartpls.com
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Collier Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782602
   Google Scholar
• Sang, W., & Simpson, A. (2019). The Maker Movement: A global movement for educational change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, T., & Kingsley, J. (2016). Made in China: Makerspaces and the search for mass innovation. Nesta. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/made-in-china-makerspaces-and-the-search-for-mass-innovation
   Google Scholar
• Sawang, S., Sun, Y., & Salim, S. A. (2014). It’s not only what I think but what they think! The moderating effect of social norms. Computers & Education, 76, 182–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2018). Teaching and learning how to create in schools of art and design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(1), 137–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1381963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel, R. J., Chu, S. L., Chen, K., Deuermeyer, E., Christy, A. G., & Quek, F. (2019). Making in the classroom: Longitudinal evidence of increases in self-efficacy and STEM possible selves over time. Computers & Education, 142, Article 103637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, S., Ebner, M., & Kumar, S. (2014). The Maker Movement. Implications of new digital gadgets, fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching. ELearning Papers, 39, 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, L. (2011). The theory of planned behavior and the impact of past behavior. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 10(1), 91–110.
   Google Scholar
• Spektor-Levy, O., & Yifrach, M. (2019). If science teachers are positively inclined toward inclusive education, why is it so difficult? Research in Science Education, 49(3), 737–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9636-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670509353043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A. (2001). Singaporean teachers’ perception of activities useful for fostering creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., Chai, C. S., Hung, D., & Lee, C. B. (2008). Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre‐service teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660801971641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., Koh, N. K., & Lee, C. B. (2011). Teachers’ intention to teach financial literacy in Singapore: A path analysis of an extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(2), 412–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1645–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., Zhou, M., & Noyes, J. (2016). Teachers and technology: Development of an extended theory of planned behavior. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1033–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9446-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. S. H., Lim, V. K. G., & Lai, R. Y. C. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega, 27(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00028-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). The influence of teachers’ attitudes and school context on instructional practices in integrated STEM education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, R. B., & Greca, I. M. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383–1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucus, S., & Acar, I. H. (2018). Teachers’ innovativeness and teaching approach: The mediating role of creative classroom behaviors. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(10), 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigle, S. E., & Wilcox, D. J. (1996). Inclusion: Criteria for the preparation of education personnel. Remedial & Special Education, 17(5), 323–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G. K. W. (2016). The behavioral intentions of Hong Kong primary teachers in adopting educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9426-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., & Cheng, E. C. K. (2015). Primary teachers’ attitudes, intentions and practices regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., & Sin, K. (2014). Inclusive education: Teachers’ intentions and behavior analysed from the viewpoint of the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.757811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim, S. Y., & Cho, Y. H. (2016). Predicting pre-service teachers’ intention of implementing peer assessment for low-achieving students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9416-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C. X., & Subramaniam, G. (2017). A mentoring approach for developing creativity in teaching. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 14(2), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusop, F. D. (2015). A dataset of factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies in future teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 1075–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92–93, 194–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, M., Chan, K. K., & Teo, T. (2016). Modelling mathematics teachers’ intention to use the dynamic geometry environments in Macau: An SEM approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 181–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar