Predicting high school students’ argumentation skill using information literacy and trace data

References

• Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok‐Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abi‐El‐Mona, I., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2006). Argumentative discourse in a high school chemistry classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 106(8), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb17755.x
   Google Scholar
• Abi-El-Mona, I., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2011). Perceptions of the nature and ‘goodness’ of argument among college students, science teachers, and scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 573–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003677889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 277–320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073003277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnone, M. P., Small, R. V., & Reynolds, R. (2010). Supporting inquiry by identifying gaps in student confidence: Development of a measure of perceived competence. School Libraries Worldwide, 16(1), 47.
   Google Scholar
• Artman, M., Frisicaro-Pawlowski, E., & Monge, R. (2010). Not just one shot: Extending the dialogue about information literacy in composition classes. Composition Studies, 38(2), 93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, J. A. R., Gijselaers, W. H., & Segers, M. S. R. (2002). Cognitive effects of an authentic computer-supported, problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 30(6), 465–495. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020532128625 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020532128625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelet, D., Ghysels, J., Groot, W., Haelermans, C., & Maassen van den Brink, H. (2016). The differential effect of basic mathematics skills homework via a web-based intelligent tutoring system across achievement subgroups and mathematics domains: A randomized field experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R. (2010). Portraits of middle school students constructing evidence-based arguments during problem-based learning: The impact of computer-based scaffolds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9139-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 505–518). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., & Drake, J. (2013). Toward a framework on how affordances and motives can drive different uses of computer-based scaffolds: Theory, evidence, and design implications. Educational Technology Research & Development, 61, 903–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9313-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2008). A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9074-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2011). Problem-based learning and argumentation: Testing a scaffolding framework to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments. Instructional Science, 39, 667–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9148-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Gu, J., Armbrust, S., & Cook, B. (2015). Scaffolding argumentation about water quality: A mixed method study in a rural middle school. Educational Technology Research & Development, 63(3), 325–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9373-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48, 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.838920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., & Kim, N. J. (2017). A Bayesian network meta-analysis to synthesize the influence of contexts of scaffolding use on cognitive outcomes in STEM education. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1042–1081. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317723009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Weiss, D. M., Kim, N. J., Piland, J., & Gu, J. (2019). An examination of credit recovery students’ use of computer-based scaffolding in a problem-based, scientific inquiry unit. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9872-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenstock, J. E. (2008). Size matters: Word count as a measure of quality on wikipedia. WWW ’08, 1095–1096. https://doi.org/10.1145/1367497.1367673
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2014). Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(Pt 1), 58–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Richter, T., & Rouet, J.-F. (2014). Scientific literacy: The role of goal-directed reading and evaluation in understanding scientific information. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlin, B. P., & Chib, S. (1995). Bayesian model choice via Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(3), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02042.x
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C., Buckland, L., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. E., Deuser, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The role of metacognition in problem solving. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 207–226).The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeCarlo, L. T., & Tryon, W. W. (1993). Estimating and testing autocorrelation with small samples: A comparison of the C-statistic to a modified estimator. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31(8), 781–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(93)90009-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, L. (2007). The impact of problem-based learning on the information behavior and literacy of veterinary medicine students at University College Dublin. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evensen, D. H., Salisbury-Glennon, J. D., & Glenn, J. (2001). A qualitative study of six medical students in a problem-based curriculum: Toward a situated model of self-regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. (2015). Educational implications of choosing “practice” to describe science in the Next Generation Science Standards. Science Education, 99(6), 1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forte, A. (2015). The new information literate: Open collaboration and information production in schools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9210-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijlers, H., Saab, N., Van Joolingen, W., de Jong, T., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2009). Interaction between tool and talk: How instruction and tools support consensus building in collaborative inquiry-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassner, A., Weinstock, M., & Neuman, Y. (2005). Pupils' evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(Pt 1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X22278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., Lee, C. D., Shanahan, C., & Project, R. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodnough, K., & Cashion, M. (2006). Exploring problem-based learning in the context of high school science: Design and implementation issues. School Science and Mathematics, 106(7), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb17919.x
   Google Scholar
• Grooms, J., Sampson, V., & Enderle, P. (2018). How concept familiarity and experience with scientific argumentation are related to the way groups participate in an episode of argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1264–1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, P. (2009). Designing and implementing a PBL course on educational digital video production: Lessons learned from a design-based research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9039-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open-ended learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 115–140). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Z.-R., Lin, H., Wang, H.-H., Chen, H.-T., & Yang, K.-K. (2013). Promoting and scaffolding elementary school students’ attitudes toward science and argumentation through a science and society intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1625–1648. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.734935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iiyoshi, T., Hannafin, M. J., & Wang, F. (2005). Cognitive tools and student‐centred learning: Rethinking tools, functions and applications. Educational Media International, 42(4), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980500161346
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and iII-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782391
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., & Kim, B. (2010). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaweski, D., Nickeson, M. (1997). C-SHRP Bayesian modelling: A user’s guide. Canadian Strategic Highway Research Program. https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=474116
   Google Scholar
• Kelson, A., & Distlehorst, L. (2000). Groups in problem-based learning (PBL): Essential elements in theory and practice. In D. H. Evensen & C. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 167–184). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K., & Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9049-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalik, C. L., Yutzey, S. D., & Piazza, L. M. (2012). Assessing change in high school student information literacy using the tool for real-time assessment of information literacy skills. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 5(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v5i3.7092
   Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., Codere, S., Dahsah, C., Bayer, R., & Mun, K. (2014). Planning instruction to meet the intent of the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9383-2
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The web as an information resource in K–12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 285–328. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. (2006). Calibrated Bayes: A Bayes/frequentist roadmap. The American Statistician, 60(3), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X117837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., Jennings, A., & Philippakos, Z. A. (2019). Which linguistic features predict quality of argumentative writing for college basic writers, and how do those features change with instruction? Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1553–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9853-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M., & Overturf, B. J. (2012). The Common Core: Insights into the K–5 standards. The Reading Teacher, 66(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2016). On using Bayesian methods to address small sample problems. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(5), 750–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1186549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olinghouse, N. G. (2008). Student- and instruction-level predictors of narrative writing in third-grade students. Reading and Writing, 21(1–2), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9062-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., & Hannafin, M. J. (2000). Student management of web-based hypermedia resources during open-ended problem solving. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
   Google Scholar
• Paz, S. D. L., Felton, M., Monte-Sano, C., Croninger, R., Jackson, C., Deogracias, J. S., & Hoffman, B. P. (2014). Developing historical reading and writing with adolescent readers: Effects on student learning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(2), 228–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2014.908754
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). La nouvelle rhétorique: Traité de l’argumentation [The new rhetoric: Treatise on argumentation]. Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Pluta, W., Chinn, C., & Duncan, R. (2011). Learners’ epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. (2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00075-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00075-2
   Google Scholar
• Roll, I., Baker, R. S. J. d., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2014). On the benefits of seeking (and avoiding) help in online problem-solving environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 537–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S. L., & Barton, A. C. (2012). Should great lakes city build a new power plant? How youth navigate socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem, J. A. (2014). The development and validation of all four TRAILS (tool for real-time assessment of information literacy skills) tests for K-12 students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Kent State University.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savery, J. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
   Google Scholar
• Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, C. H., & Mengersen, K. (2013). Bayesian meta-analysis. In J. Koricheva, J. Gurevitch, & K. Mengersen (Eds.), Handbook of meta-analysis in ecology and evolution (pp. 145–173). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonbroodt, A. (2004). Small sample bias using maximum likelihood versus moments: The case of a simple search model of the labor market. http://www.economics.soton.ac.uk/staff/alicesch/Research/smallsammlmomjae.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shin, N., Jonassen, D. H., & McGee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(Pt 1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X304398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2006). Scaffolding disciplined inquiry in problem-based learning environments. International Journal of Learning, 12(6), 297–305.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35(1), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D. J., Abrams, K. R., & Myles, J. P. (2004). Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sugrue, B. (1995). A theory-based framework for assessing domain-specific problem-solving ability. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(3), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00865.x
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., O’Connor, J. E., & Cooney, J. B. (1990). An information processing analysis of expert and novice teachers’ problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 533–556. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027003533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Devolder, A., Braak, J. & van, (2016). Examining scaffolding support in a computer-based learning environment for elementary school learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 2(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.78505
   Google Scholar
• Torp, L., & Sage, S. (1998). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-12 education. ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., Broere, J. J., Perryck, K. H., Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., & Loey, N. E. van. (2015). Analyzing small data sets using Bayesian estimation: The case of posttraumatic stress symptoms following mechanical ventilation in burn survivors. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 6(1), 25216. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v6.25216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vord, R. (2010). Distance students and online research: Promoting information literacy through media literacy. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A. E., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem-based learning meta-analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 12–43. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1061
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S.-L., Hsu, H.-Y., Lin, S. S., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). The role of group interaction in collective efficacy and CSCL performance. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 242–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstock, M., Neuman, Y., & Tabak, I. (2004). Missing the point or missing the norms? Epistemological norms as predictors of students’ ability to identify fallacious arguments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00024-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00024-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, J. L., Crossley, S. A., McCarthy, P. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2011, March 20). Number of words versus number ideas: Finding a better predictor of writing quality [Conference Presentation] Twenty-Fourth International FLAIRS Conference, Palm Beach, FL. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FLAIRS/FLAIRS11/paper/view/2618
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S., Rizoiu, M.-A., & Xie, L. (2018). Beyond views: Measuring and predicting engagement in online videos. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (Vol. 12) https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/15031
   Google Scholar