416
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Middle school students’ understanding of energy in health and fitness

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 222-232 | Received 05 Aug 2020, Accepted 02 Mar 2021, Published online: 15 Mar 2021

References

  • Barner, D., & Baron, A. S. (2016). An introduction to core knowledge and conceptual change. In D. Barner & A. S. Baron (Eds.), Core knowledge and conceptual change (pp. 3–8). Oxford University Press.
  • Barnett, S., & Ceci, S. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
  • Brewer, W. F. (2008). Naïve theories of observational astronomy: Review, analysis, and theoretical implications. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 155–204). Routledge.
  • Carey, S. (1999). Sources of conceptual change. In E. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. Gelman, & P. Miller (Eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget’s legacy (pp. 293–326). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 169–200). Cambridge University Press.
  • Chen, R. F., Eisenkraft, A., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Neumann, K., Nordine, J., & Scheff, A. (Eds.). (2014). Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 Education. Springer.
  • Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Erlbaum.
  • Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Ed.). Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 3–27). Springer.
  • Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2008). Learning to use scientific models: Multiple dimensions of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 191–225). Sense.
  • Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2009). Conceptual change - Multiple routes, multiple mechanisms: A commentary on Ohlsson (2009). Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802616291
  • Crilly, N., Blackwell, A. F., & Clarkson, P. J. (2006). Graphic elicitation: Using research diagrams as interview stimuli. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106065007
  • Eisenkraft, A., Nordin, J., Chen, R. F., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Neumann, K., & Scheff, A. (2014). Introduction: Why focus on energy instruction. In R. F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J.C. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (pp. 1–14). Springer.
  • Gelman, S. A. (2011). When worlds collide – or do they? Implications of explanatory coexistence for conceptual development and change. Human Development, 54(3), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329139
  • Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. A. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051837
  • Jin, H., & Wei, X. (2014). Using ideas from the history of science and linguistics to develop a learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. In R. F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J. C. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (pp. 157–174). Springer.
  • Krajcik, J., Chen, R. F., Eisenkraft, A., Fortus, D., Neumann, K., Nordine, J., & Scheff, A. (2014). Conclusion and summary comments: Teaching energy and associated research efforts. In R. F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J. C. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (pp. 357–363). Springer.
  • Legare, C. H., Evans, E. M., Rosengren, K. S., & Harris, P. L. (2012). The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development. Child Development, 83(3), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01743.x
  • Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2
  • Liu, X., & Park, M. (2014). Contextual dimensions of the energy concept and implications for energy teaching and learning. In R. F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J. C. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (pp. 175–186). Springer.
  • Millar, R. (2014). Towards a research-informed teaching sequence for energy. In R. F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J. C. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (pp. 187–206). Springer.
  • Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4
  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
  • Potvin, P., & Cyr, G. (2017). Toward a durable prevalence of scientific conceptions: Tracking the effects of two interfering misconceptions about buoyancy from preschoolers to science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1121–1142. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21396
  • Provencher, V., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (2009). Perceived healthiness of food. If it’s healthy, you can eat more! Appetite, 52(2), 340–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.11.005
  • Quinn, H. R. (2014). A physicist’s musings on teaching about energy. In R. F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J. C. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (pp. 15–36). Springer.
  • Rencher, A. C. (2002). Methods of multivariate analysis (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 629–639.
  • Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., & Bransford, J. D. (2012). Resisting overzealous transfer: Coordinating previously successful routines with needs for new learning. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.696317
  • Seeley, L., Vokos, S., & Minstrell, J. (2014). Constructing a sustainable foundation for thinking and learning about energy in the twenty-first century. In R. F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J. C. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (pp. 337–356). Springer.
  • Shtulman, A., & Lombrozo, T. (2016). Bundles of contradiction: A coexistence view of conceptual change. In D. Barner & A. S. Baron (Eds.), Core knowledge and conceptual change (pp. 53–72). Oxford University Press.
  • Snyder, T. D., & Dillow, S. A. (2012). Digest of education statistics 2011 (NCES 2012-001). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press.
  • Törrönen, J. (2002). Semiotic theory on qualitative interviewing using stimulus texts. Qualitative Research, 2(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200304
  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 3–15). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
  • Vosniadou, S. (2012). Reframing the classical approach to conceptual change: Preconceptions, misconceptions and synthetic models. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 119–130). Springer.
  • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W
  • Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). Erlbaum.
  • Zhang, T., Chen, A., & Ennis, C. (2019). Elementary school students' naïve conceptions and misconceptions about energy in physical education context. Sport, Education and Society, 24, 25–37.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.