References
- Alexander, P. A. (2000). Research news and comment: Toward a model of academic development: schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 28–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029002028
- Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). International Reading Association.
- Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003685
- Ash, D., & Wells, G. (2006). Dialogic inquiry in classrooms and museums. In Z. Bekerman, N. C. Burbles, & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 35–54). Peter Lang.
- August, D., Artzi, L., & Barr, C. (2016). Helping ELLs meet standards in English language arts and science: An intervention focused on academic vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(4), 373–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1039738
- August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cardenas-Hagan, E., Francis, D. J., Powell, J., Moore, S., & Haynes, E. F. (2014). Helping ELLs meet the common core state standards for literacy in science: The impact of an instructional intervention focused on academic language. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(1), 54–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2013.836763
- August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cardenas-Hagan, L., & Francis, D. J. (2009). The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 345–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740903217623
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
- Baumann, J. F., & Graves, M. F. (2010). What is academic vocabulary? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.1.1
- Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2007). Increasing young low-income children’s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 107(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/511706
- Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. The Guilford Press.
- Bolger, D. J., Balass, M., Landen, E., & Perfetti, C. A. (2008). Contextual variation and definitions in learning the meanings of words. Discourse Processes, 45(2), 122–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530701792826
- Bravo, M. A., & Cervetti, G. N. (2008). Teaching vocabulary through text and experience in content areas. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about vocabulary instruction (pp. 130–149). International Reading Association.
- Bybee, R. W., & Landes, N. M. (1990). Science for life & living: An elementary school science program from the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. The American Biology Teacher, 52(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4449042
- Carlisle, J. F., Fleming, J. E., & Gudbrandsen, B. (2000). Incidental word learning in science classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(2), 184–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.1001
- Carlo, M. S., August, D., Mclaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., Lively, T. J., & White, C. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English‐language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.2.3
- Cartwright, T. J., & Smith, S. L. (2017). Tackling science instruction through “science talks” and service learning. In K. L. Heider (Ed.), Service learning as pedagogy in early childhood education (pp. 179–191). Springer.
- Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P. D., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 631–658. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21015
- Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951
- Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00043-3
- Fitzgerald, J., Elmore, J., & Relyea, J. E. (2021). Academic vocabulary networks matter for students’ disciplinary learning. The Reading Teacher, 74(5), 569–579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1976
- Fitzgerald, J., Elmore, J., Relyea, J. E., & Stenner, A. J. (2020). Domain-specific academic vocabulary network development in elementary grades core disciplinary textbooks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 855–879. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000386
- Frey, N. (2002). Literacy achievement in an urban middle-level professional development school: A learning community at work. Reading Improvement, 39(1), 3–13.
- Guthrie, J. T., Anderson, E., Alao, S., & Rinehart, J. (1999). Influences of concept-oriented reading instruction on strategy use and conceptual learning from text. The Elementary School Journal, 99(4), 343–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/461929
- Heineke, A., & Neugebauer, S. R. (2018). The complexity of language and learning: Deconstructing teachers’ conceptions of academic language. Issues in Teacher Education, 27(3), 73–89.
- Hiebert, E., & Lubliner, S. (2008). The nature, learning, and instruction of general academic vocabulary. In A. Farstrup & J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about vocabulary instruction (pp. 106–129). International Reading Association.
- Hwang, J. K., Lawrence, J. F., Mo, E., & Snow, C. E. (2015). Differential effects of a systematic vocabulary intervention on adolescent language minority students with varying levels of English proficiency. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(3), 314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006914521698
- Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Puig, B. (2010). Argumentation, evidence evaluation and critical thinking. In B. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. Springer.
- Kim, J. S., Relyea, J. E., Burkhauser, M. A., Scherer, E., & Rich, P. (2021). Improving elementary grade students’ science and social studies vocabulary knowledge depth, reading comprehension, and argumentative writing: A conceptual replication. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1935–1964. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09609-6
- Kinslow, A. T., Sadler, T. D., & Nguyen, H. T. (2019). Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field-based ecology class. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 388–410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1442418
- Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902894512
- Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. (2018). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based learning approach (5th ed.). Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
- Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Guerrero, C., Huerta, M., & Fan, Y. (2012). The effect of an instruction intervention on middle school English learner’s science and English reading achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 987–1011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21031
- Lawrence, J. F., Crosson, A. C., Paré-Blagoev, J., & Snow, C. E. (2015). Word Generation randomized trial: Discussion mediates the impact of program treatment on academic word learning. American Educational Research Journal, 52(4), 750–786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215579485
- Lee, O., Llosa, L., Grapin, S., Haas, A., & Goggins, M. (2019). Science and language integration with English learners: A conceptual framework guiding instructional materials development. Science Education, 103(2), 317–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21498
- Lesaux, N. K., Kieffer, M. J., Faller, S. E., & Kelley, J. G. (2010). The effectiveness and ease of implementation of an academic vocabulary intervention for linguistically diverse students in urban middle schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 196–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.3
- Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). Discussion of socio-scientific issues: The role of science knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1267–1287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500439348
- Lin, T.-J., Anderson, R. C., Hummel, J. E., Jadallah, M., Miller, B. W., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Morris, J. A., Kuo, L.-J., Kim, I.-H., Wu, X., & Dong, T. (2012). Children’s use of analogy during collaborative reasoning. Child Development, 83(4), 1429–1443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01784.x
- Matsumura, L. C., Slater, S. C., & Crosson, A. (2008). Classroom climate, rigorous instruction and curriculum, and students’ interactions in urban middle schools. The Elementary School Journal, 108(4), 293–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/528973
- Murphy, P., Wilkinson, I., Soter, A., Hennessey, M., & Alexander, J. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740–764. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015576
- Nagy, W. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). Guilford Press.
- Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/747823
- Nagy, W. E., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.011
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
- National Research Council. (2013). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
- Osborne, J. F. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science (New York, NY), 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
- Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring strategies. Cognition & Instruction, 1, 117–175.
- Plourde, L. A. (2002). Elementary science education: The influence of student teaching where it all begins. Education, 123(2), 253–275.
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
- Rex, L. A., & Nelson, M. C. (2004). How teachers’ professional identities position high-stakes test preparation in their classrooms. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1288–1331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00380.x
- Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L.-J., Clark, A.-M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen‐Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: a dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701952
- Sadler, T. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and research. Springer.
- Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., & Topçu, M. S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multi-level assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622–1635. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1204481
- Shefelbine, J. L. (1990). Student factors related to variability in learning word meanings from context. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(1), 71–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969009547695
- Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 328(5977), 450–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182597
- Snow, C. E., & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In D. R. Olson, & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 112–133). Cambridge University Press.
- Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.
- Snow, C. E., Lawrence, J. F., & White, C. (2009). Generating knowledge of academic language among urban middle school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 325–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740903167042.
- Stahl, S. A., & Nagy, W. E. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Erlbaum.
- StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release 15. StataCorp LLC.
- Swanborn, M. S. L., & de Glopper, K. (1999). Incidental word learning while reading: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 261–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069003261
- Townsend, D., Barber, A. T., & Carter, H. (2020). Learning academic language, comprehending text. In J. Moje, P. P. Afflerbach, P. Enciso, & N. K. Nesaux (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. V, pp. 345–364). Routledge.
- Van Orman, D. S. J., Ardasheva, Y., Carbonneau, K. J., & Firestone, J. B. (2021). Examining the impacts of extended vocabulary instruction in mixed-English-proficiency science classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1881754
- Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 952–977.
- Zeidler, D. L. (2003). The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
- Zhang, J., Wong, S., Relyea, J. E., & Wui, G. (2017). Designing a socio-scientific issue curriculum on space exploration: Dialogic inquiry approach for English learners. English in Texas, 47(2), 7–12.
- Zhang, X., Anderson, R. C., Morris, J., Miller, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Lin, T., Zhang, J., Jadallah, M., Scott, T., Sun, J., Latawiec, B., Ma, S., Kay Grabow, K., & Hsu, J. Y. (2016). Improving children’s competence in decision making: Contrasting effects of collaborative interaction and direct instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 53(1), 194–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215618663