Evaluating a Hypothetical Learning Trajectory for nets of rectangular prisms: A teaching experiment

References

• Battista, M., & Clements, D. H. (1996). Students’ understanding of three-dimensional rectangular arrays of cubes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(3), 258–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/749365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, R. D. (1986). Third graders’ ability to associate foldout shapes with polyhedra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(3), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/749303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H. (1998). Geometric and spatial thinking in young children. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED436232.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420–464). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & McMillen, S (1996). Rethinking “concrete” manipulatives. Children Mathematics, 2(5), 270–279.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, T. (1991). On the status of visual reasoning in mathematics and mathematics education. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) (pp. 33–48).
   Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17–51). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, A. (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, A. (1996). Visualization in 3-dimensional geometry: In search of a framework. In L. Puig & A. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 3–19). PME.
   Google Scholar
• Hallowell, D. A., Okamoto, Y., Romo, L. F., & La Joy, J. R. (2015). First-graders’ spatial-mathematical reasoning about plane and solid shapes and their representations. ZDM, 47(3), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0664-9
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorn, R., & Boren, S. (1990). Experiential learning of geometry. The Arithmetic Teacher, 38(3), 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Küçükaydın, M. A., & Gökbulut, Y. (2013). Misconceptions of the prospective primary school teachers concerning the definition and the net of geometric objects. Republic International Journal of Education, 2(1), 102–117.
   Google Scholar
• Lohman, D. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 40, pp. 181–248). LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Love, E. (1995). The functions of visualization in learning geometry. In R. Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (pp. 125–141). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, H. L., Wu, D., Chen, J. W., & Hsieh, K. J. (2009). Mithelmore’s development stages of the right rectangular prisms of elementary school students in Taiwan. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 57–64). PME.
   Google Scholar
• Marchis, I. (2012). Preservice primary school teachers’ elementary geometry knowledge. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(2), 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, M. A. (1989). Mental images: Some problems related to the development of solids. Paper presented at the Actes de la 13 Conference Internationale, Psychology of Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Markopoulos, C. (2003). Teaching and learning of solids with the use of technological tools [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Patra.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Olkun, S. (1999). Stimulating children’s understanding of rectangular solids made of small cubes [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University]. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED428954.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pittalis, M., & Christou, C. (2010). Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9251-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 205–235). Sense Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A. (2000). Research on the development of mathematics teachers: The teacher development experiment. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp.335–359). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A. & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_2
   Google Scholar
• Sorby, S. A. (2009). Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802595839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education, (pp. 267-307). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P.. (1991). The Constructivist Teaching Experiment: Illustrations and Implications. In E. Von Glasersfeld (ed.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education, (pp.177-194). Dordrecht: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Klinken, E. (2010). Utilising year three NAPLAN results to improve Queensland teachers’ mathematical pedagogical content knowledge. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED520921
   Google Scholar
• Wood, T., Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1990). The contextual nature of teaching: Mathematics and reading instruction in one second-grade classroom. Elementary School Journal, 90(5), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1086/461629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, V., & Smith, K. (2017). Children’s schemes for anticipating the validity of nets for solids. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(3), 369–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0219-1
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, A. (2013). Constructing a frame of cube: Connecting 3D shapes with direction, location and movement. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (pp. 690–697). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
   Google Scholar
• Zembat, İ. Ö. (2016). Mathematics teaching cycle and hypothetical learning trajectories. In E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan, & İ. Ö. Zembat (Eds.), Theories in mathematics education (pp.509–518). Pegem Academy.
   Google Scholar