Developing student 21st-century skills through STEM engineering design learning cycle (STEM-EDELCY) model

References

• Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfitriyani, N., Pursitasari, I. D., & Kurniasih, S. (2021). Profile of students’ critical and creative thinking skills [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 5th Asian Education Symposium 2020 (AES 2020), 566(Aes 2020), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210715.069
   Google Scholar
• Altan, E. B., & Tan, S. (2020). Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09569-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaliyah, F., Supeno, S., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). The profile of junior high school students’ creative thinking skills about alternative energy in science learning. Unnes Science Education Journal, 12(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v12i1.65085
   Google Scholar
• Ataizi, M. (2012). Situated cognition. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6
   Google Scholar
• Aufa, M N, Hadi, S, Hasbie, M, Fitri, M, Saputra, M A, Syahmani, Isnawati, (2021). Profile of students’ critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration skills on environmental pollution material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012027
   Google Scholar
• Benek, İ., & Akçay, B. (2022). The effects of socio-scientific STEM activities on 21st century skills of middle school students. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.27.9.2
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, K., Heritage, B., & Allen, P. (2023). SPSS statistics: A practical guide. (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skill (pp. 17–66). Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Biruni, I. B., Suwono, H., & Sueb, S. (2020). Fostering student’ critical thinking skills in respiratory and excretory system classroom through 5E learning cycle in 11th grade SMAN 2 Malang [Paper presentation]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000567
   Google Scholar
• Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2015). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Creating teachable moments. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, D. F., Ro, H. K., Alcott, B., & Lattuca, L. R. (2016). Co-curricular connections: The role of undergraduate research experiences in promoting engineering students’ communication, teamwork, and leadership skills. Research in Higher Education, 57(3), 363–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9386-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty, E. A., Guzey, S. S., Roehrig, G. H., Glancy, A. W., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Moore, T. J. (2017). Approaches to integrating engineering in STEM units and student achievement gains. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1148
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2017). An applied guide to research designs : quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (Second). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Eun, B. (2018). The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1421941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facione, P., & Gittens, C. A. (2016). Think critically. (3rd ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fatihah, A. A., Yennita, Y., & Futra, D. (2022). Students’ written communication skills in science learning. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(4), 564–572. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i4.292
   Google Scholar
• Guven, G., Kozcu Cakir, N., Sulun, Y., Cetin, G., & Guven, E. (2020). Arduino-assisted robotics coding applications integrated into the 5E learning model in science teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1812136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PlS-SEM). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2019). Development of an engineering design process-based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted students at the Science Education Institute for the Gifted in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0047-6
   Google Scholar
• Hermawansyah, T., Rahman, T., & Anwar, S. (2019). Profile of science communication competence of junior high school students on science lesson [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2018), 1157(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022047
   Google Scholar
• Hidayati, Y., & Sinaga, P. (2019). The profile of critical thinking skills students on science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(4), 044075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/4/044075
   Google Scholar
• Hiğde, E., & Aktamış, H. (2022). The effects of STEM activities on students’ STEM career interests, motivation, science process skills, science achievement and views. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hixson, N. K., Ravitz, J., & Whisman, A. (2012). Extended professional development in project-based learning: Impacts on 21st century teaching and student achievement. West Virginia Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., & Rogers, C. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=ncete_publications
   Google Scholar
• Isnaini, I., Atmazaki, A., Ahda, Y., Lufri, L., Elizar, E., Amran, A., Fitri, N., Afriwes, A., & Hasan, A. (2023). Analysis of critical thinking, creativity, communication, and collaboration skills (4C) for junior high school students. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biology, Science and Education (IcoBioSE 2021), 1, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-166-1_27
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, A. (2017). STEM by design: Strategies and activities for grades 4-8. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (Ninth). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantarina, Z., Semnani, A. S., Behzadi, M. H., MalKhalifeh, M. R., Mardanbeigi, M. R., & Behzadi, M. H. (2020). The impact of Bybee and synectics models on creativity, creative problem-solving, and students’ performance in geometry. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 11(01), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2020.11.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Kanmaz, A. (2022). Middle school teacher’ critical thinking skills and awareness towards teaching critical thinking skills. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 9(4), 1648–1671. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1353469.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keane, T., Keane, W. F., & Blicblau, A. S. (2016). Beyond traditional literacy: Learning and transformative practices using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 21(4), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9353-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilbane, C. R., & Milman, N. B. (2014). Teaching models: Designing instruction for 21st century learners. Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kousloglou, M., Petridou, E., Molohidis, A., & Hatzikraniotis, E. (2023). Assessing students’ awareness of 4Cs skills after mobile-technology-supported inquiry-based learning. Sustainability, 15(8), 6725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, E., DiCerbo, K., & Foltz, P. (2017). Skills for today: What we know about teaching and assessing collaboration. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, J. S. (2009). Level inquiry and the 5 E’s learning cycle model. National Geographic Science. http://www.ngspscience.com/profdev/monographs/SCL22-0407A_SCI_AM_Lederman_FP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Liebech-Lien, B., & Sjølie, E. (2020). Teachers’ conceptions and uses of student collaboration in the classroom. Educational Research, 63(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1839354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387–2404. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01231a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mater, N. R., Haj Hussein, M. J., Salha, S. H., Draidi, F. R., Shaqour, A. Z., Qatanani, N., & Affouneh, S. (2020). The effect of the integration of STEM on critical thinking and technology acceptance model. Educational Studies, 48(5), 642–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namgyel, T., & Buaraphan, K. (2017). The development of simulation and game in 5E learning cycle to teach photoelectric effect for grade 12 students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 1. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v18_issue2_files/buaraphan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Teacher Association. (2011). Quality science education and 21st-century skill. NSTA Position Statement. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/quality-science-education-and-21st-century-skills
   Google Scholar
• Nugroho, P. S., Nasir, M., Syafi’i, M., & Erviyenni, E. (2023). Profile perception of student’s collaboration and creative thinking skills in physics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 775–779. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.3055
   Google Scholar
• Oecd, O. (2022). Thinking outside the box: The PISA 2022 creative thinking assessment. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/innovation/creative-thinking/
   Google Scholar
• Oktavia, L., Muhlisin, A., & Dewantari, N. (2022). The effect of 5E cycle learning model on critical thinking skills in natural science learning. Jurnal Biolokus, 5(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v5i1.1256
   Google Scholar
• Oktavia, R. S., Rahayu, Y. S., & Yuliani, Y. (2019). Implementation of guided inquiry-based learning model to improve students’ creativity thinking skill. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains, 9(1), 1756–1762. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpps/index
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W., Brown, A. O., Zhang, W. S., LeBrun, P., Eaton, L., & Yemen, S. (2021). Fostering creativity in science learning: The potential of open-ended student drawing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S., & Brown, A. H. (2010). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Ornstein, A. C., Levine, D. U., Gutek, G. L., & Vocke, D. E. (2017). Foundations of education. (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Orosz, G., Németh, V., Kovács, L., Somogyi, Z., & Korom, E. (2023). Guided inquiry-based learning in secondary-school chemistry classes: A case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00110A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual (6th ed.). MC Graw Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, S. M., Gu, X., Crijns, M., & Biekens, P. (2020). Fostering students’ creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program. PloS One, 15(3), e0229773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Martín, H., & Bybee, R. W. (2022). The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E model of Instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00337-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamanca, J. C. G., Agudelo, O. L., & Salinas, J. (2020). Key competences, education for sustainable development and strategies for the development of 21st century skills. A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(24), 10366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saputro, T., Herlina, K., & Distrik, I. W. (2020). Guided inquiry based students’ worksheet to grow students’ critical thinking and communication skills. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i1.5146
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. (6th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shalihin, N. A. F., Saptono, S., & Masturi, M. (2019). Implementation of guided inquiry learning to improve the critical thinking skills of junior high school students. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 8(3), 306–314. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siew, N. M., Goh, H., & Sulaiman, F. (2016). Integrating stem in an engineering design process: The learning experience of rural secondary school students in an outreach challenge program. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soh, K. (2017). Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suardana, I. N., Selamet, K., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R., Sarini, P., & Devi, N. L. P. L. (2019). Guided inquiry learning model effectiveness in improving students’ creative thinking skills in science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 012215. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012215
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K., Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2020). Developing twenty-first-century skills in out-of-school education: The Bridge21 Transition Year programme. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(4), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1835709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumarni, E., Setiandi, A. E., & Sunandar, A. (2020). Profile of conceptual photosynthesis and creative thinking: Study of 7th-grade students. Biosfer, 13(2), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v13n2.250-265
   Google Scholar
• Tandika, P. B. (2022). Instructional materials and the development of young children’s 21st century skills: Perspectives from early educators in ukerewe, Tanzania. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 36(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1834473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21St century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Turan, S. (2021). Pre-service teacher experiences of the 5E instructional model: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), em1994. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11102
   Google Scholar
• Turan, S., & Matteson, S. M. (2020). Middle school mathematics classrooms practice based on 5e instructional model. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers : A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824401990017. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varas, D., Santana, M., Nussbaum, M., Claro, S., & Imbarack, P. (2023). Teachers’ strategies and challenges in teaching 21st century skills: Little common understanding. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 101289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent-Lancrin, S., González-Sancho, C., Bouckaert, M., de Luca, F., Fernández-Barrerra, M., Jacotin, G., Urgel, J., & Vidal, Q. (2019). Fostering students’ creativity and critical thinking. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/62212c37-en
   Google Scholar
• Wells, J. G. (2016). PIRPOSAL model of integrative STEM education: Conceptual and pedagogical framework for classroom implementation. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(6), 12–19. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/96424/Wells_PIRPOSAL_March2016-TET.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Yata, C., Ohtani, T., & Isobe, M. (2020). Conceptual framework of STEM based on Japanese subject principles. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, K. C., Wu, P. H., & Fan, S. C. (2020). Structural relationships among high school students’ scientific knowledge, critical thinking, engineering design process, and design product. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(6), 1001–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanden, P. J. A. C. V D., Denessen, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Meijer, P. C. (2020). Fostering critical thinking skills in secondary education to prepare students for university: Teacher perceptions and practices. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 25(4), 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2020.1846313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, B., Liu, X., Xia, L., & Sun, W. (2022). A Proposed taxonomy of teaching models in STEM education: Robotics as an example. SAGE Open, 12(2), 215824402210995. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221099525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulfa, A. R., & Rosyidah, Z. (2020). Analysis of communication skills of junior high school students on classification of living things topic. INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 1(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v1i1.2078
   Google Scholar